AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisNCT02368080

Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout in Healthy and Cystic Fibrosis Adults

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis and Healthy, run by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the lung clearance index (LCI) in cystic fibrosis and healthy adults obtained with two different multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBWN2) devices. Each participants will perform the test (LCI) in duplicate on each device. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis, Healthy
What is being tested?
Comparison of two MBWN2 devices : "EasyOne Pro Lab" versus "Exhalyzer D"
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
95 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Apr 2013to Jan 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: CF : primary care clinic HC : community sample

Who may be able to join

  • Cystic fibrosis diagnosis

Who cannot join

  • Respiratory infection within 3 weeks
  • Chronically infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Burkholderia Cepacia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

    Brussels, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout in Healthy and Cystic Fibrosis Adults: a Comparison of Two Commercially Available Devices

This study compares the lung clearance index (LCI) in cystic fibrosis and healthy adults obtained with two different multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBWN2) devices. Each participants will perform the test (LCI) in duplicate on each device.

Read the detailed description

Using nitrogen as the inert gas, there are currently two commercially available devices that offer the possibility to measure the LCI. However, comparison between them are lacking. The 2 MBWN2 devices are the "EasyOne Pro Lab" (ndd Medical Technologies, Zürich, Switzerland) and the "Exhalyzer D" (Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland).

Being tested
Comparison of two MBWN2 devices : "EasyOne Pro Lab" versus "Exhalyzer D"
Keywords
Lung Clearance Index, Cystic Fibrosis, Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Comparison of two MBWN2 devices : "EasyOne Pro Lab" versus "Exhalyzer D"Device

    Healthy and Cystic Fibrosis participants will perform the same day MBWN2 tests in duplicate with each device.

Study groups in NCT02368080
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cystic fibrosis adults (CF)No treatment, comparison of LCI values obtained with two devices
Receives: Device: Comparison of two MBWN2 devices : "EasyOne Pro Lab" versus "Exhalyzer D"
Healthy adults (HC)No treatment, comparison of LCI values obtained with two devices Free of respiratory disease or others diseases likely to disturb respiratory system.
Receives: Device: Comparison of two MBWN2 devices : "EasyOne Pro Lab" versus "Exhalyzer D"

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lung Clearance Index (LCI)

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Discriminative ability of LCI of each device (assessed by evaluating the proportion of patients with normal spirometry but high LCI with each device)

    Difference in discriminative ability between devices will be assessed by evaluating the proportion of patients with normal spirometry but high LCI with each device

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. Functional residual capacity (FRC) ( the helium rebreathing technique (FRC He) with a "Jaeger Masterscreen" (Würzburg, Germany)

    FRC will be compared with a third device in a subset of 11 healthy adults : the helium rebreathing technique (FRC He) with a "Jaeger Masterscreen" (Würzburg, Germany)

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02368080
Sponsor's protocol ID
StLuc MBWN2 01
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
14 Jan 2015
Last updated
30 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis and Healthy, run by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lung Clearance Index (LCI) (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in