TinnitusNCT02370810
A CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom
A study testing CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus in people with Tinnitus, run by Anglia Ruskin University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Tinnitus
- What is being tested?
- CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant's eligibility for the study is as follows:
- Aged 18 years and over living in the UK
- The ability to read and type in English
- No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
- Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
- Commitment to completing the programme
Show all 12Show fewer
- Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
- Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
- Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same
- Be available for 12 months after starting the study to complete a 1 year follow-up questionnaire
- Suffering with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months
- Tinnitus outcome measure scores indicating the need for tinnitus care (26 or above on the Tinnitus Functional Index)
Who cannot join
- Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
- Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
- Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
- Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Vision and hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin Univeristy
Cambridge, CB1 1PT
About this study
Official title: CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomise Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom
Read the detailed description
Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed in Europe to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK). It furthermore, aims to establish for which subgroups of tinnitus suffers this iCBT intervention would be a suitable intervention.
Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress Setting: This will be an internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the UK
Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 70 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for age and tinnitus severity.
Intervention: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life.
Hypothesis: If this intervention proves feasible it is and effective, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.
- Conditions
- Tinnitus
- Being tested
- CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
- Keywords
- tinnitus treatment, internet-intervention, CBT
- Medical subject headings
- Tinnitus, Color Vision Defects
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitusBehavioural
Also called iCBT
The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. Receives: Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus |
| weekly check-in group with delayed treatment | Other | will complete weekly measures and commence the treatment once the experimental group completes the intervention Receives: Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Tinnitus Functional Index
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (8)
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version
Measure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Insomnia Severity Index
Measure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Satisfaction With Life
Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionSep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TinnitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anglia Ruskin University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Linkoeping University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eldre Beukes, Anglia Ruskin University
- Investigators
- Peter Allen, Study chair, Anglia Ruskin University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02370810
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ARU-0115
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Beukes E, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Long-Term Outcomes of an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Tinnitus: Follow-Up Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2026 May 1;152(5):503-512. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2026.0094.
PubMed 41854598Rodrigo H, Beukes EW, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for tinnitus: secondary analysis to examine predictors of outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 20;11(8):e049384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049384.
PubMed 34417217Beukes EW, Baguley DM, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Andersson G. Audiologist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):423-433. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000505.
PubMed 29095725Beukes EW, Manchaiah V, Allen PM, Baguley DM, Andersson G. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with tinnitus in the UK: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 23;5(9):e008241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008241.
PubMed 26399571
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomise Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02370810
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARU-0115
- Conditions
- Tinnitus
- Keywords
- tinnitus treatment, internet-intervention, CBT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anglia Ruskin UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Linkoeping University
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jul 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom
Detailed description
Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed in Europe to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK). It furthermore, aims to establish for which subgroups of tinnitus suffers this iCBT intervention would be a suitable intervention.
Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress Setting: This will be an internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the UK
Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 70 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for age and tinnitus severity.
Intervention: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life.
Hypothesis: If this intervention proves feasible it is and effective, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitusCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. |
| weekly check-in group with delayed treatment | Other | Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnituswill complete weekly measures and commence the treatment once the experimental group completes the intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Aged 18 years and over living in the UK
- The ability to read and type in English
- No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
- Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
- Commitment to completing the programme
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
- Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
- Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
- Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitusAlso: iCBTThe intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. | Behavioural | experimental group, weekly check-in group with delayed treatment |
Primary outcome
The Tinnitus Functional Index
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
8 secondary outcomes
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Insomnia Severity Index
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Satisfaction With Life
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41854598Beukes E, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Long-Term Outcomes of an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Tinnitus: Follow-Up Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2026 May 1;152(5):503-512. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2026.0094.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34417217Rodrigo H, Beukes EW, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for tinnitus: secondary analysis to examine predictors of outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 20;11(8):e049384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049384.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29095725Beukes EW, Baguley DM, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Andersson G. Audiologist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):423-433. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000505.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26399571Beukes EW, Manchaiah V, Allen PM, Baguley DM, Andersson G. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with tinnitus in the UK: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 23;5(9):e008241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008241.
Related trials for Tinnitus
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of TRTL-913 in Healthy Volunteers (Part A) and in Adults With Tinnitus (Part B)
Tinnitus
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant on Tinnitus Severity in Adults With Preoperative Tinnitus
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparing an AI-driven Hearing Test With the Standard Hearing Test in Adults With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Acute Nicotine Gum and Auditory Brain Responses in Adults With Chronic Tinnitus
Tinnitus, Chronic Subjective Tinnitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Allen study chair
Anglia Ruskin University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus in people with Tinnitus, run by Anglia Ruskin University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Tinnitus Functional Index (time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02370810, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2021.