Cystic Renal DiseasesNCT02371551
Evaluation of Complex Renal Cyst With CEUS/Functional MRI Versus CT
An observational study of Cystic Renal Diseases and Kidney Neoplasms, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The primary concern in complex renal cysts (CRC) with malignant potential is the accurate diagnosis and characterization. Patients with CRC have to undergo frequent imaging surveillance (every 6-12 Mo), in which the progression suggests a neoplastic process. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cystic Renal Diseases, Kidney Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Blood/urine sampling, Conventional routine CT examination and Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS)
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 19 Aug 2014to 30 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who were referred to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Nephrology or to the Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital for the clarification of a complex renal cyst/lesion and already underwent or will undergo a standard CT examination or patient who where accidentally diagnosed with a complicated renal cyst/lesion from the Department of Nephrology, Urology or Radiology (with CT imaging)
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years old
- Written informed consent
- A complicated renal cyst (Bosniak category > II cyst or hemorrhagic cyst) or lesion > 1 cm im max. transverse diameter who will undergo standard renal CT imaging
- Stable renal function (GFR> 30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- History of allergic reaction to contrast agents
- Refusal to adhere to follow-up
- Recent pyelonephritis
- Acute kidney injury (AKI stage ≥ 1)
- Other individuals especially in need of protection (according to the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Dep. of Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Bern University Hospital
Bern, CH-3010
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Complex Renal Cystic Lesions With Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Functional MRI Versus the Gold Standard: Computer Tomography (CT)
The primary concern in complex renal cysts (CRC) with malignant potential is the accurate diagnosis and characterization. Patients with CRC have to undergo frequent imaging surveillance (every 6-12 Mo), in which the progression suggests a neoplastic process. The gold standard for establishing diagnosis and necessity for surgical intervention (i.e. partial nephrectomy) is conventional computer tomography (CT) imaging. Its main drawback is the radiation dose to the body and intravenous contrast media administration, which has a risk of nephrotoxicity.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with special functional sequences (fMRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) allow measuring tissue blood flow and perfusion characteristics without ionizing radiation or nephrotoxic contrast media. To compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CEUS/functional MRI versus the gold standard CT, 60 patients with CRC will be evaluated using all these 3 modalities. The main hypothesis is that fMRI and CEUS have equal accuracy with CT regarding diagnosis and classification of CRC lesions.
Read the detailed description
Background
Renal cysts occur in a variety of diseases but also in normal kidneys (i.e. simple cysts). Diagnostic imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of renal cysts and lesions. Most patients are diagnosed after undergoing imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]) for an unrelated reason and their increasing incidental finding during the last decade parallels the growing use of imaging procedures.
Simple renal cysts are commonly observed in normal kidneys and are of limited clinical relevance. The primary clinical concern is the accurate evaluation of complex renal cysts (CRC) that have a malignant potential. Based upon the initial radiographic evaluation, further studies may be required, and some complex lesions may require surgical excision for exact diagnosis, based on growth during follow up.
The gold standard for the diagnosis of CRC is conventional CT imaging. Its main drawback is the radiation dose to the body and intravenous contrast media administration, which has a risk of nephrotoxicity. In order to accurate classify and manage these lesions, the Bosniak renal cyst classification system was created. Based upon morphologic and enhancement characteristics of the CT scan, cystic renal masses are placed in one of five categories (I, II, IIF, III, IV).
Although not yet validated for reader agreement or generalizability, the Bosniak renal cyst classification system has been widely accepted by urologists and radiologists as the best way to assess and follow these CRC lesions. While the Bosniak classification is based on CT findings, the same approach is applicable as a useful predefined framework for the evaluation of CRC with other radiographic modalities i.e. with MRI and conventional or contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The ability to differentiate between those that are benign versus malignant (surgical versus nonsurgical masses) still represents a major challenge.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained immense popularity over the last decades as it allows generation of very high-resolution images, including 3D reconstructions, without ionizing radiation. Functional MRI can be performed with or without injection of contrast, thus avoiding the risk of nephrogenic systemic sclerosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Diffusion weighted imaging (DW-MRI), blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI and arterial spin labeling (ASL) sequences are functional sequences which can be performed without injection of contrast.
The recent development and availability of a contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using microbubbles has further improved sensitivity and diagnostic confidence with respect to conventional and colour-Doppler US. They allow vascular bed opacification and have opened the way to detecting the microcirculation. CEUS was able to detect changes in human renal cortical microcirculation. Thus it seems to be a feasible technique to evaluate (i.e. perfusion pattern of the cyst wall or perfusion of the septa) CRC using the Bosniak classification system.
Ideally, the method for the evaluation of CRC should be safe, non-invasive, and accurate. Abdominal CT scanning delivers significant ionizing radiation, which may be a consideration for younger patients (age <35 years), utilizes contrast media with a considerable nephrotoxicity and risk of an allergic reaction. No prospective study comparing CT with CEUS or functional MRI for the evaluation of CRC has been conducted.
Objective
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CEUS/fMRI and compare it with abdominal CT the current gold standard diagnostic modality.
Methods
Prospective, single center, observational setting. Patients with CRC who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be further evaluated after written informed consent. Kidney function and the CRC progression will be followed according to the current medical standards. If a significant change in cystic lesions is observed, further evaluation and surgical intervention, if indicated, will be initiated by the primary physician in charge. Testing will be performed upon study entry and after 12 months according to the following schedule:
- Blood-sampling
- CT
- fMRI
- renal CEUS
- chart review Two study physicians independently will review the CEUS and functional MRI images of the patients. The reviewers will be aware of study design but will be blinded to the clinical information of the CT findings. The scoring system for image interpretation will be based on the Bosniak cyst classification.
- Conditions
- Cystic Renal Diseases, Kidney Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Blood/urine sampling, Conventional routine CT examination, Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS), Functional MRI
- Keywords
- Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Sonography, Computed Tomography, X-Ray
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Diseases, Cystic, Kidney Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood/urine samplingOther
Routine chemistry profile
Conventional routine CT examinationOther
Standard diagnostic examination
Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS)Other
Study-specific diagnostic examination
Functional MRIOther
Study-specific diagnostic examination
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | All patients Receives: Other: Blood/urine sampling; Other: Conventional routine CT examination; Other: Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS); Other: Functional MRI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CRC classification according to CT-finding based on Bosniak criteria or until surgical intervention
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS and fMRI based on the progression of CRC according to CT-finding and Bosniak classification throughout visit 1-2
Measured: 1 year
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS and fMRI based on surgical extraction and histopathological evaluation of the resected mass
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study start19 Aug 2014
- Primary completion20 Oct 2017
- Study completion30 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cystic Renal DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Spyridon Arampatzis, MD, Principal investigator, Dep. of Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Bern University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02371551
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 84/14
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Sep;169(3):819-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275903. No abstract available.
PubMed 9275903Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):339-42. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750339.
PubMed 10915671Balci NC, Semelka RC, Patt RH, Dubois D, Freeman JA, Gomez-Caminero A, Woosley JT. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jun;172(6):1495-500. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350279.
PubMed 10350279Nicolau C, Bunesch L, Sebastia C. Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2011 Dec;36(6):742-52. doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9727-8.
PubMed 21461960Schneider AG, Hofmann L, Wuerzner G, Glatz N, Maillard M, Meuwly JY, Eggimann P, Burnier M, Vogt B. Renal perfusion evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Feb;27(2):674-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr345. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
PubMed 21690200
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Complex Renal Cystic Lesions With Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Functional MRI Versus the Gold Standard: Computer Tomography (CT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02371551
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 84/14
- Conditions
- Cystic Renal Diseases, Kidney Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Sonography, Computed Tomography, X-Ray
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary concern in complex renal cysts (CRC) with malignant potential is the accurate diagnosis and characterization. Patients with CRC have to undergo frequent imaging surveillance (every 6-12 Mo), in which the progression suggests a neoplastic process. The gold standard for establishing diagnosis and necessity for surgical intervention (i.e. partial nephrectomy) is conventional computer tomography (CT) imaging. Its main drawback is the radiation dose to the body and intravenous contrast media administration, which has a risk of nephrotoxicity.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with special functional sequences (fMRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) allow measuring tissue blood flow and perfusion characteristics without ionizing radiation or nephrotoxic contrast media. To compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CEUS/functional MRI versus the gold standard CT, 60 patients with CRC will be evaluated using all these 3 modalities. The main hypothesis is that fMRI and CEUS have equal accuracy with CT regarding diagnosis and classification of CRC lesions.
Detailed description
Background
Renal cysts occur in a variety of diseases but also in normal kidneys (i.e. simple cysts). Diagnostic imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of renal cysts and lesions. Most patients are diagnosed after undergoing imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]) for an unrelated reason and their increasing incidental finding during the last decade parallels the growing use of imaging procedures.
Simple renal cysts are commonly observed in normal kidneys and are of limited clinical relevance. The primary clinical concern is the accurate evaluation of complex renal cysts (CRC) that have a malignant potential. Based upon the initial radiographic evaluation, further studies may be required, and some complex lesions may require surgical excision for exact diagnosis, based on growth during follow up.
The gold standard for the diagnosis of CRC is conventional CT imaging. Its main drawback is the radiation dose to the body and intravenous contrast media administration, which has a risk of nephrotoxicity. In order to accurate classify and manage these lesions, the Bosniak renal cyst classification system was created. Based upon morphologic and enhancement characteristics of the CT scan, cystic renal masses are placed in one of five categories (I, II, IIF, III, IV).
Although not yet validated for reader agreement or generalizability, the Bosniak renal cyst classification system has been widely accepted by urologists and radiologists as the best way to assess and follow these CRC lesions. While the Bosniak classification is based on CT findings, the same approach is applicable as a useful predefined framework for the evaluation of CRC with other radiographic modalities i.e. with MRI and conventional or contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The ability to differentiate between those that are benign versus malignant (surgical versus nonsurgical masses) still represents a major challenge.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained immense popularity over the last decades as it allows generation of very high-resolution images, including 3D reconstructions, without ionizing radiation. Functional MRI can be performed with or without injection of contrast, thus avoiding the risk of nephrogenic systemic sclerosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Diffusion weighted imaging (DW-MRI), blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI and arterial spin labeling (ASL) sequences are functional sequences which can be performed without injection of contrast.
The recent development and availability of a contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using microbubbles has further improved sensitivity and diagnostic confidence with respect to conventional and colour-Doppler US. They allow vascular bed opacification and have opened the way to detecting the microcirculation. CEUS was able to detect changes in human renal cortical microcirculation. Thus it seems to be a feasible technique to evaluate (i.e. perfusion pattern of the cyst wall or perfusion of the septa) CRC using the Bosniak classification system.
Ideally, the method for the evaluation of CRC should be safe, non-invasive, and accurate. Abdominal CT scanning delivers significant ionizing radiation, which may be a consideration for younger patients (age <35 years), utilizes contrast media with a considerable nephrotoxicity and risk of an allergic reaction. No prospective study comparing CT with CEUS or functional MRI for the evaluation of CRC has been conducted.
Objective
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CEUS/fMRI and compare it with abdominal CT the current gold standard diagnostic modality.
Methods
Prospective, single center, observational setting. Patients with CRC who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be further evaluated after written informed consent. Kidney function and the CRC progression will be followed according to the current medical standards. If a significant change in cystic lesions is observed, further evaluation and surgical intervention, if indicated, will be initiated by the primary physician in charge. Testing will be performed upon study entry and after 12 months according to the following schedule:
- Blood-sampling
- CT
- fMRI
- renal CEUS
- chart review Two study physicians independently will review the CEUS and functional MRI images of the patients. The reviewers will be aware of study design but will be blinded to the clinical information of the CT findings. The scoring system for image interpretation will be based on the Bosniak cyst classification.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Other: Blood/urine sampling, Other: Conventional routine CT examination, Other: Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS), Other: Functional MRIAll patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who were referred to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Nephrology or to the Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital for the clarification of a complex renal cyst/lesion and already underwent or will undergo a standard CT examination or patient who where accidentally diagnosed with a complicated renal cyst/lesion from the Department of Nephrology, Urology or Radiology (with CT imaging)
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age > 18 years old
- Written informed consent
- A complicated renal cyst (Bosniak category > II cyst or hemorrhagic cyst) or lesion > 1 cm im max. transverse diameter who will undergo standard renal CT imaging
- Stable renal function (GFR> 30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnancy
- History of allergic reaction to contrast agents
- Refusal to adhere to follow-up
- Recent pyelonephritis
- Acute kidney injury (AKI stage ≥ 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood/urine samplingRoutine chemistry profile | Other | 1 |
| Conventional routine CT examinationStandard diagnostic examination | Other | 1 |
| Contrast-enhanced renal ultrasonography (CEUS)Study-specific diagnostic examination | Other | 1 |
| Functional MRIStudy-specific diagnostic examination | Other | 1 |
Primary outcome
CRC classification according to CT-finding based on Bosniak criteria or until surgical intervention
Time frame: 1 year
2 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS and fMRI based on the progression of CRC according to CT-finding and Bosniak classification throughout visit 1-2
Time frame: 1 year
Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS and fMRI based on surgical extraction and histopathological evaluation of the resected mass
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 9275903Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Sep;169(3):819-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275903. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10915671Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):339-42. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750339.
- Background: PubMed 10350279Balci NC, Semelka RC, Patt RH, Dubois D, Freeman JA, Gomez-Caminero A, Woosley JT. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jun;172(6):1495-500. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350279.
- Background: PubMed 21461960Nicolau C, Bunesch L, Sebastia C. Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2011 Dec;36(6):742-52. doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9727-8.
- Background: PubMed 21690200Schneider AG, Hofmann L, Wuerzner G, Glatz N, Maillard M, Meuwly JY, Eggimann P, Burnier M, Vogt B. Renal perfusion evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Feb;27(2):674-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr345. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
Related trials for Cystic Renal Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Hypertension in Children and Young People at Risk of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD
Recruiting
Well-Formulated Ketogenic Diet Polycystic Kidney Disease
Polycystic Kidney Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Role of ROS and cAMP-PKA Biomarkers in ADPKD
Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of JMKX003142 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Hepatic Impairment
ADPKD (Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease), Renal Edema
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Antigen-specific T Cells Against Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Spyridon Arampatzis, MD principal investigator
Dep. of Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Bern University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cystic Renal Diseases and Kidney Neoplasms, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CRC classification according to CT-finding based on Bosniak criteria or until surgical intervention (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02371551, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019.