AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Renal DiseaseIVVINCT02375711

Immunosenescence and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Vaccine Efficacy in Chronic Renal Disease Patient

A study testing Blood sample in people with Chronic Renal Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of immunosenescence in the HBV vaccination response in patients with renal insufficiency. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Renal Disease
What is being tested?
Blood sample
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Mar 2014to Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with an indication of HBV vaccination
  • Patient with renal disease, with a creatinine clearance between 15 and 60ml/min
  • Patient who have never been vaccinated against HBV
  • Patient with negative serology for HBV
  • Patient able to understand the reason of the study
  • Patient not opposed to the conservation of biological samples for scientific research

Who cannot join

  • Patient infected with Hepatitis B or with history of vaccination against HBV
  • Patient suffering from psychotic illness
  • Patient with any history of immunosuppressive therapy
  • Patient with infectious and/or cancer diseases in evolution

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service de néphrologie, CHU de Besançon

    Besançon, 25000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Immunosenescence as a Predictive Biomarker of HBV Vaccine Efficacy in Chronic Renal Disease Patient

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of immunosenescence in the HBV vaccination response in patients with renal insufficiency.

Read the detailed description

The risk of infection with hepatitis B during exposure to blood is high (30% against 1.8% for Hepatitis C Virus and HIV 1%) and dialysis patients are a population at risk. Vaccination against this virus, which is very effective in the general population (vaccine response: 90 to 95%), is highly recommended in dialysis patients. However, numerous studies have shown that HBV vaccination was less effective in patients with chronic renal disease than in the general population. The reasons for low vaccine response are poorly understood. However, recent data suggest that renal failure could induce accelerated immunosenescence.

The aging of the immune system, or immunosenescence, is a complex and profound phenomenon of the immune system during life. The gradual reduction of the generation of naive T cells in the thymus is the major cause of immunosenescence. But this process is also associated with an accumulation of lymphocytes at the end of differentiation.

In this context, the decrease in vaccine response and increased infections in renal insufficiency might be correlated, as in the elderly population, with the aging of the immune system. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of immunosenescence in the HBV vaccination response in patients with renal insufficiency.

Vaccination against HBV is not performed for the purposes of the study, but due to the existing vaccine indication for the subject. Included patients receive vaccination as routine care according to the recommendations and the vaccination schedule recommended by the Health Authority.

Being tested
Blood sample
Keywords
Chronic renal disease, Hepatitis B vaccine, Biological Aging
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Hepatitis B

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood sampleBiological

    A blood sample of 35 ml is achieved at 1 month to evaluate the anti-HBV cell response. Two other blood samples of 10 ml are scheduled 3 and 6 months after vaccination to assess humoral response to HBV vaccination.

Study groups in NCT02375711
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chronic Renal FailureExperimentalPatients with renal failure, with creatinine clearance between 60 and 15 ml/min. A blood sample is achieved at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months.
Receives: Biological: Blood sample

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+ CD 57+ CD 28- / CD 8+ T lymphocytes Ratio in Peripheral Blood

    The primary outcome is assessed 1 month after the vaccination schedule. The percentage of CD 8+ and CD 8+ CD 28- CD 57+ lymphocytes were determined by flow cytometry.

    Measured: 13 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Calculated Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation)

    Creatinine clearance calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation and adjusted for body surface area. Calculated Creatinine Clearance: method to approximate kidney function. It measures rate creatinine (substance formed from metabolism of creatine) is cleared from blood by kidneys.

    Measured: 13 months

  2. Interferon gamma and Interleukin-10 production of Peripheral blood T lymphocytes

    Analysis of cytokine production is assessed by flow cytometry after stimulation of lymphocytes T.

    Measured: 13 months

  3. Percentage of Lymphocytes subpopulations in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

    Different lymphocyte subpopulations will be quantified by flow cytometry using the following antibodies: CD 3, CD 4, CD 8, CD 19, CD 25, CD 27, CD 28, CD 31, CD 45RO, CD 45RA, CD 56, CD 62L, Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, Programmed cell death protein 1, CD 38, CD 127, Forkhead box P3.

    Measured: 13 months

  4. T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)

    TREC study used a technique of quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction performed on DNA extracted from PBMC.

    Measured: 13 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Why it stopped: Problems in including patients in the study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02375711
Sponsor's protocol ID
P/2013/173
Acronym
IVVI
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
9 Apr 2014
Last updated
5 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood sample in people with Chronic Renal Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Problems in including patients in the study). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+ CD 57+ CD 28- / CD 8+ T lymphocytes Ratio in Peripheral Blood (time frame: 13 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in