AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3NCT02376790

Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Etanercept and Methotrexate in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 138 sites in 18 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the role of etanercept alone or in combination with methotrexate on disease activity in adults with psoriatic arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Etanercept and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
851 participants
Where
138 sitesin 18 countries
Study dates
3 Mar 2015to 6 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject must have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria.
  • Subject has ≥ 3 tender and ≥ 3 swollen joints at screening and at baseline.
  • Subject has an active psoriatic skin lesion
  • Subject is naïve to etanercept and any other biologic for the treatment for PsA or psoriasis.
  • Subject has no prior use of methotrexate for PsA.
  • Subject has no history of tuberculosis
  • Subject has a negative test for tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C.

Who cannot join

  • Subject has known history of alcoholic hepatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or immunodeficiency syndromes, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Subject has any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of investigational product.
  • Subject has a serious infection, defined as requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 8 weeks prior to the first dose of investigational product.

Trial locations and contacts

138 sites in 18 countries.

138 sites in 18 countries

United States55 sites
  • Research Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Research Site

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28803

  • Research Site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Research Site

    Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Research Site

    Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Research Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

  • Research Site

    Clifton, New Jersey, 07012

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Research Site

    Danville, Virginia, 24541

  • Research Site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Research Site

    Escondido, California, 92025

  • Research Site

    Frederick, Maryland, 21702

  • Research Site

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

  • Research Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Research Site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Research Site

    Hemet, California, 92543

  • Research Site

    Kissimmee, Florida, 34741

  • Research Site

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • Research Site

    Lansing, Michigan, 48917

  • Research Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128

  • Research Site

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Research Site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Research Site

    Mather, California, 95655

  • Research Site

    Meridian, Idaho, 83642

  • Research Site

    Mesa, Arizona, 85202

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Research Site

    Ocoee, Florida, 34761

  • Research Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Research Site

    Paducah, Kentucky, 42003

  • Research Site

    Palm Desert, California, 92260

  • Research Site

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701

  • Research Site

    Roanoke, Virginia, 24016

  • Research Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Research Site

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • Research Site

    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081

  • Research Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78232

  • Research Site

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Research Site

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Research Site

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

  • Research Site

    Springfield, Illinois, 62703

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Research Site

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

  • Research Site

    Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406

  • Research Site

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • Research Site

    Wheaton, Maryland, 20902

  • Research Site

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605

  • Research Site

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

  • Research Site

    Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542

Other trials in United States

Russia15 sites
  • Research Site

    Chelyabinsk, 454076

  • Research Site

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • Research Site

    Kursk, 305007

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 115522

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 119992

  • Research Site

    Novosibirsk, 630005

  • Research Site

    Orenburg, 460018

  • Research Site

    Petrozavodsk, 185019

  • Research Site

    Ryazan, 390026

  • Research Site

    Saratov, 410053

  • Research Site

    Smolensk, 214025

  • Research Site

    Vladimir, 600023

  • Research Site

    Yaroslavl, 150003

  • Research Site

    Yaroslavl, 150062

  • Research Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

Other trials in Russia

Mexico8 sites
  • Research Site

    Chihuahua City, 31000

  • Research Site

    Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80000

  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44650

  • Research Site

    Mexicali, Baja California Norte, 21100

  • Research Site

    Mexicalli, Baja California Norte, 21200

  • Research Site

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64020

  • Research Site

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64718

  • Research Site

    Zapopan, Jalisco, 45190

Other trials in Mexico

Canada7 sites
  • Research Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 3H7

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7

  • Research Site

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 3H3

  • Research Site

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8

  • Research Site

    Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2

  • Research Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3N 0K6

Other trials in Canada

Czechia7 sites
  • Research Site

    Brno, 638 00

  • Research Site

    Ostrava-Trebovice, 722 00

  • Research Site

    Pardubice, 530 02

  • Research Site

    Prague, 128 08

  • Research Site

    Prague, 128 50

  • Research Site

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

  • Research Site

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

Bulgaria6 sites
  • Research Site

    Burgas, 8000

  • Research Site

    Pleven, 5800

  • Research Site

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • Research Site

    Rousse, 7002

  • Research Site

    Sofia, 1612

  • Research Site

    Sofia, 1784

Other trials in Bulgaria

Hungary5 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1036

  • Research Site

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • Research Site

    Szolnok, 5000

  • Research Site

    Szombathely, 9700

  • Research Site

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Poland5 sites
  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-402

  • Research Site

    Lodz, 90-436

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 01-817

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw, 50-368

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw, 51-318

Other trials in Poland

Greece4 sites
  • Research Site

    Athens, 11521

  • Research Site

    Athens, 11527

  • Research Site

    Athens, 12462

  • Research Site

    Thessaloniki, 56429

Other trials in Greece

Spain4 sites
  • Research Site

    A Coruña, Galicia, 15006

  • Research Site

    Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004

  • Research Site

    Mérida, Extremadura, 06800

  • Research Site

    Villajoyosa, Valencia, 03570

Other trials in Spain

Argentina3 sites
  • Research Site

    Buenos Aires, 1425

  • Research Site

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1015ABO

  • Research Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL

Other trials in Argentina

Chile3 sites
  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7501126

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 7640881

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 8420383

Other trials in Chile

Latvia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Liepāja, 3401

  • Research Site

    Riga, 1003

  • Research Site

    Valmiera, 4201

Other trials in Latvia

Portugal3 sites
  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1050-034

  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1649-034

  • Research Site

    Ponte de Lima, 4990-041

Other trials in Portugal

South Africa3 sites
  • Research Site

    Panorama, Western Cape, 7500

  • Research Site

    Pinelands, Western Cape, 7405

  • Research Site

    Stellenbosch, Western Cape, 7600

Other trials in South Africa

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Research Site

    Bradford, BD5 0NA

  • Research Site

    Dudley, DY1 2HQ

  • Research Site

    Nottingham, NG7 2UH

Other trials in United Kingdom

France2 sites
  • Research Site

    Lyon Cédex 3, 69437

  • Research Site

    Poitiers, 86000

Other trials in France

Puerto Rico2 sites
  • Research Site

    Ponce, 00716

  • Research Site

    San Juan, 00918

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects With Psoriatic Arthritis

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the role of etanercept alone or in combination with methotrexate on disease activity in adults with psoriatic arthritis.

Read the detailed description

The study will consist of a 30-day screening period, a 48-week double-blind treatment period and a 30-day safety follow-up period.

At or after week 24, participants with an inadequate response could receive rescue therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate until the end of the treatment period.

Being tested
Etanercept, Methotrexate, Placebo to Etanercept, Placebo to Methotrexate
Keywords
Psoriatic Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriasis, Etanercept, Enbrel, Methotrexate, Minimal Disease Activity
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EtanerceptDrug

    Also called Enbrel

    Etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week. Dosing was initiated at 10 mg weekly and titrated up to a final dose of 20 mg weekly over a 4-week period.

  • Placebo to EtanerceptDrug

    Placebo to etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week.

  • Placebo to MethotrexateDrug

    Placebo to methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week.

Study groups in NCT02376790
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Methotrexate MonotherapyActive comparatorParticipants received oral methotrexate 20 mg weekly plus placebo to etanercept subcutaneous injection once a week for 48 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Placebo to Etanercept
Etanercept MonotherapyExperimentalParticipants received etanercept 50 mg weekly by subcutaneous injection plus oral placebo to methotrexate for 48 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Etanercept; Drug: Placebo to Methotrexate
Methotrexate + EtanerceptExperimentalParticipants received etanercept 50 mg a week by subcutaneous injection plus oral methotrexate 20 mg weekly for 48 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Etanercept; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24

    A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-reactive protein concentration.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

Secondary outcomes (36)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 24

    Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures:

    • Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1
    • Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1
    • Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3%
    • Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20
    • HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5
    • Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1

    Measured: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over Time

    A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  3. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time

    A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  4. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over Time

    A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over Time

    The tender joint count is an assessment of the pain and/or tenderness of 68 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total tender joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present tenderness.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  6. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over Time

    The swollen joint count is an assessment of the swelling of 66 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total swollen joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present swelling.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over Time

    A global assessment of the participant's arthritis assessed by the physician on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 mm = No activity at all and 100 mm = Worst activity imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over Time

    A global assessment of the participant's arthritis, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No arthritis activity at all and 100 mm = Worst arthritis activity imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over Time

    A global assessment of the severity of the participant's joint pain, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No pain at all and 100 mm = Worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  10. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over Time

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  11. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over Time

    C-reactive protein (CRP) is a specific measure of inflammatory activity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  12. Percentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over Time

    Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures:

    • Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1
    • Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1
    • Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3%
    • Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20
    • HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5
    • Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48

  13. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over Time

    PASDAS is a measure of disease activity derived from the following variables:

    • Physician and patient global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a 0-100 VAS)
    • 68 tender joint count
    • 66 swollen joint count
    • Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (general health status on a scale from 0-100)
    • Tender dactylitis count (each digit assessed for tender dactylitis; total score 0-20)
    • Leeds enthesitis index (enthesitis assessed at 6 sites; total score of 0-6)
    • CRP level (mg/L)

    The composite score is a weighted index where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

  14. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over Time

    The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items:

    • 28 tender joint count,
    • 28 swollen joint count,
    • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest;
    • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest.

    The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  15. Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over Time

    The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items:

    • 28 tender joint count,
    • 28 swollen joint count,
    • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest;
    • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest.
    • CRP

    The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 with higher scores representing worse disease.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  16. Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over Time

    The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint count
    • 28 swollen joint count
    • C-reactive protein (CRP)
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest.

    DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

  17. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring in 8 functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  18. Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24

    The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains. Two summary component scores are calculated: mental component summary score (MCS) and physical component summary score (PCS). The MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales and the PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  19. Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24

    The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features:

    • pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits)
    • nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement)
    • onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement)
    • leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present)

    In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study.

    mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  20. Percentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 24

    The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features:

    • pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits)
    • nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement)
    • onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement)
    • leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present)
    • splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present)

    In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study.

    mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease. Clear mNAPSI is defined as a score = 0.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  21. Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24

    The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  22. Percentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 24

    The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.

    Clear LDI is defined as a score = 0.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  23. Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24

    The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  24. Percentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 24

    The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.

    Clear SPARCC enthesitis is defined as a score = 0.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  25. Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 24

    The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis.

    Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline * 100

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  26. Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis.

    Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline * 100

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  27. Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  28. Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  29. Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  30. Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  31. Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  32. Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Week 24

  33. Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  34. Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  35. Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  36. Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

    The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:

    0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)

    1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
    2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration)
    3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration)
    4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration)
    5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Mar 2015
  3. Primary completion9 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion6 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
851 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02376790
Sponsor's protocol ID
20130207
Other IDs
2014-004869-24, 2014
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
28 Jan 2015
Last updated
21 Sep 2022
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Samad AS, Coates LC, Liu LXH, Aras GA, Collier DH, Chung JB. Design and rationale of the Study of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects with Psoriatic Arthritis (SEAM-PsA). RMD Open. 2018 Feb 3;4(1):e000606. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000606. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29531787
  • Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Collier DH, Ritchlin CT, Helliwell PS, Liu L, Kricorian G, Chung JB. Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination for Psoriatic Arthritis: Primary Results From a Randomized, Controlled Phase III Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;71(7):1112-1124. doi: 10.1002/art.40851. Epub 2019 May 28.

    PubMed 30747501
  • Strand V, Mease PJ, Maksabedian Hernandez EJ, Stolshek BS, Liu LXH, Collier DH, Kricorian G, Merola JF. Patient-reported outcomes data in patients with psoriatic arthritis from a randomised trial of etanercept and methotrexate as monotherapy or in combination. RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):e001484. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001484.

    PubMed 33452180
  • Coates LC, Merola JF, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gladman DD, Strand V, van Mens LJJ, Liu L, Yen PK, Collier DH, Kricorian G, Chung JB, Helliwell PS. Performance of composite measures used in a trial of etanercept and methotrexate as monotherapy or in combination in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 2;60(3):1137-1147. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa271.

    PubMed 32864685
  • Helliwell PS, Mease PJ, Kavanaugh A, Coates LC, Ogdie A, Deodhar A, Strand V, Kricorian G, Liu LXH, Collier D, Gladman DD. Impact of clinical domains other than arthritis on composite outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: comparison of treatment effects in the SEAM-PsA trial. RMD Open. 2022 Jul;8(2):e002366. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002366.

    PubMed 35863864

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Etanercept and Methotrexate in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 138 sites in 18 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 138 sites in United States, Russia, Mexico, Canada, Czechia and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02376790, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in