Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT02378506
Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of High Capacity Process Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects
A Phase 3 study testing etanercept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 31 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- etanercept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate to severe active disease with presence of at least 4 tender joints and 4 swollen joints.
- Either the patient or a designee must be capable of administering the subcutaneous injection of study drug.
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with etanercept.
- Presence of active infection or active or untreated tuberculosis.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 9 countries.
31 sites in 9 countries
Slovakia6 sites
Reumatologicka ambulancia
Bratislava, 841 04
AAGS, s.r.o.
Dunajská Streda, 929 01
Reumatologicka ambulancia, MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.
Poprad, 058 01
REUMEX s.r.o.
Rimavská Sobota, 979 01
REUMA-GLOBAL s.r.o.
Trnava, 917 01
Reumatologicka ambulancia
Žilina, 010 01
Germany5 sites
Schlosspark-Klinik, Innere Medizin II, Rheumatologie
Berlin, 14059
Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60528
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Rheumaforschung - Studienambulanz Dr. Wassenberg
Ratingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40882
Immunologisches Zentrum Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH
Vogelsang-Gommern, 39245
Bulgaria4 sites
MHAT Plovdiv
Plovdiv, 4000
DCC "Aleksandrovska" EOOD
Sofia, 1431
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD, Sofia
Sofia, 1612
Medical Center - "New rehabilitation center" EOOD
Stara Zagora, 6000
Poland4 sites
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne sp. Z.O.O
Krakow, 31-501
NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c.
Nadarzyn, 05-830
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab.med. Pawel Hrycaj
Poznan, 61-397
Reumatika-Centrum Reumatologii
Warsaw, 02-691
Greece3 sites
University Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion, Crete, 71110
Rheumatology Department
Rion Patras, Achaia, 26500
Rheumatology Unit
Thessaloniki, 56429
Hungary3 sites
Qualiclinic Kft.
Budapest, 1036
Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
Kistarcsa, 2143
Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg megyei
Nyíregyháza, 4400
South Africa3 sites
St. Augustines Hospital
Durban/Berea, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Panorama Medical Centre
Panorama, Cape Town, 7500
Wits Clinical Research CMJAH Clinical Trial Site
Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193
Croatia2 sites
Chc Rijeka
Rijeka, 51000
Medicinski Centar Kuna Peric
Zagreb, 10000
About this study
Official title: A Single-arm, Open-label Study To Assess The Immunogenicity, Safety, And Efficacy Of Etanercept Manufactured Using The High Capacity Process Administered To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
etanerceptBiological
50mg subcutaneous, once weekly, 24 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ETN 50mg QW | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: etanercept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status at Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (11)
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Investigator-Identified Serious Infections
Infection was considered as serious by investigator for any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, swelling, pain and warmth.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory abnormalities(national cancer institute toxicity criteria version 4.0),Grade 3:neutrophil (greater than or equal to[>=]0.5,less than[<]1.0 10^9/L),lymphocyte (<0.5 10^9/L),hemoglobin (Hb) (<80,>=65 gram per liter [g/L]),platelet(<50.0,>=25.0 10^9/L),white blood count(WBC) (<2.0, >=1.0 10^9/L);alkaline phosphatase (AP),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT) (greater than[>]5.0*upper range [UR], <=20.0*UR unit per liter[U/L]);bilirubin(>1.5*UR, less than or equal to[<=]3.0*UR micromole per liter[mcmol/L]);creatinine(>3.0*UR, <=6.0*UR mcmol/L);albumin (<20.0 g/L),urea(>3.0*UR, <=4.0*UR g/L);potassium (K)-high,low (>6.0,<=7.0or<3.0,>=2.5 mcmol/L); sodium(Na)-high,low(>155, <=160 or <130, >=120 mcmol/L)and Grade 4: neutrophil(<0.5 10^9/L),Hb (<65 g/L);platelet (<25.0 10^9/L); WBC(<1.0 10^9/L);AP,AST,ALT(>20.0*UR U/L);bilirubin(>3.0*UR mcmol/L);creatinine (>6.0*UR mcmol/L);urea (>4.0*UR g/L);K-high,low (>7.0or<2.5 mcmol/L);Na-high, low (>160or<120 mcmol/L).
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
ACR20 responder: participants with 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR20 response were reported.
Measured: Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
ACR50 responder: participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response were reported.
Measured: Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
ACR70 responder: participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response were reported.
Measured: Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
DAS28: measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC ) using the 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (millimeter per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores: 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, C-Reactive protein (milligram per liter [mg/L]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores ranging 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4, 12 and 24
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02378506
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1801359
- Other IDs
- 2013-004569-16
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 15 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Polak P, Peric P, Louw I, Gaylord SM, Williams T, Becker JC, Pedersen R, Korth-Bradley J, Vlahos B. A single-arm, open-label study to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing process administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;6(1):23-28. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.18078.
PubMed 30451655
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-arm, Open-label Study To Assess The Immunogenicity, Safety, And Efficacy Of Etanercept Manufactured Using The High Capacity Process Administered To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02378506
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B1801359
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ETN 50mg QW | Experimental | Biological: etanercept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Moderate to severe active disease with presence of at least 4 tender joints and 4 swollen joints.
- Either the patient or a designee must be capable of administering the subcutaneous injection of study drug.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Prior treatment with etanercept.
- Presence of active infection or active or untreated tuberculosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| etanercept50mg subcutaneous, once weekly, 24 weeks | Biological | ETN 50mg QW |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
11 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Investigator-Identified Serious Infections
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30451655Polak P, Peric P, Louw I, Gaylord SM, Williams T, Becker JC, Pedersen R, Korth-Bradley J, Vlahos B. A single-arm, open-label study to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing process administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;6(1):23-28. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.18078.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
31 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing etanercept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 31 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in Slovakia, Germany, Bulgaria, Poland, Greece and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02378506, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2017.