AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT02378506

Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of High Capacity Process Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects

A Phase 3 study testing etanercept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 31 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
etanercept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
188 participants
Where
31 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
Apr 2015to Jun 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Moderate to severe active disease with presence of at least 4 tender joints and 4 swollen joints.
  • Either the patient or a designee must be capable of administering the subcutaneous injection of study drug.

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with etanercept.
  • Presence of active infection or active or untreated tuberculosis.

Trial locations and contacts

31 sites in 9 countries.

31 sites in 9 countries

Slovakia6 sites
  • Reumatologicka ambulancia

    Bratislava, 841 04

  • AAGS, s.r.o.

    Dunajská Streda, 929 01

  • Reumatologicka ambulancia, MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.

    Poprad, 058 01

  • REUMEX s.r.o.

    Rimavská Sobota, 979 01

  • REUMA-GLOBAL s.r.o.

    Trnava, 917 01

  • Reumatologicka ambulancia

    Žilina, 010 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Germany5 sites
  • Schlosspark-Klinik, Innere Medizin II, Rheumatologie

    Berlin, 14059

  • Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60528

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, 30625

  • Rheumaforschung - Studienambulanz Dr. Wassenberg

    Ratingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40882

  • Immunologisches Zentrum Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH

    Vogelsang-Gommern, 39245

Other trials in Germany

Bulgaria4 sites
  • MHAT Plovdiv

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • DCC "Aleksandrovska" EOOD

    Sofia, 1431

  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD, Sofia

    Sofia, 1612

  • Medical Center - "New rehabilitation center" EOOD

    Stara Zagora, 6000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Poland4 sites
  • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne sp. Z.O.O

    Krakow, 31-501

  • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c.

    Nadarzyn, 05-830

  • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab.med. Pawel Hrycaj

    Poznan, 61-397

  • Reumatika-Centrum Reumatologii

    Warsaw, 02-691

Other trials in Poland

Greece3 sites
  • University Hospital of Heraklion

    Heraklion, Crete, 71110

  • Rheumatology Department

    Rion Patras, Achaia, 26500

  • Rheumatology Unit

    Thessaloniki, 56429

Other trials in Greece

Hungary3 sites
  • Qualiclinic Kft.

    Budapest, 1036

  • Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz

    Kistarcsa, 2143

  • Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg megyei

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

Other trials in Hungary

South Africa3 sites
  • St. Augustines Hospital

    Durban/Berea, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001

  • Panorama Medical Centre

    Panorama, Cape Town, 7500

  • Wits Clinical Research CMJAH Clinical Trial Site

    Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193

Other trials in South Africa

Croatia2 sites
  • Chc Rijeka

    Rijeka, 51000

  • Medicinski Centar Kuna Peric

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Serbia1 site
  • Institute of Rheumatology

    Belgrade, Beograd, 11000

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: A Single-arm, Open-label Study To Assess The Immunogenicity, Safety, And Efficacy Of Etanercept Manufactured Using The High Capacity Process Administered To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial.

Being tested
etanercept
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • etanerceptBiological

    50mg subcutaneous, once weekly, 24 weeks

Study groups in NCT02378506
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ETN 50mg QWExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: etanercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12

    Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status at Week 24

    Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.

    Measured: Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment

    Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment

    Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were summarized.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)

  3. Number of Participants With Investigator-Identified Serious Infections

    Infection was considered as serious by investigator for any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)

  4. Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

    Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, swelling, pain and warmth.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)

  5. Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

    Laboratory abnormalities(national cancer institute toxicity criteria version 4.0),Grade 3:neutrophil (greater than or equal to[>=]0.5,less than[<]1.0 10^9/L),lymphocyte (<0.5 10^9/L),hemoglobin (Hb) (<80,>=65 gram per liter [g/L]),platelet(<50.0,>=25.0 10^9/L),white blood count(WBC) (<2.0, >=1.0 10^9/L);alkaline phosphatase (AP),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT) (greater than[>]5.0*upper range [UR], <=20.0*UR unit per liter[U/L]);bilirubin(>1.5*UR, less than or equal to[<=]3.0*UR micromole per liter[mcmol/L]);creatinine(>3.0*UR, <=6.0*UR mcmol/L);albumin (<20.0 g/L),urea(>3.0*UR, <=4.0*UR g/L);potassium (K)-high,low (>6.0,<=7.0or<3.0,>=2.5 mcmol/L); sodium(Na)-high,low(>155, <=160 or <130, >=120 mcmol/L)and Grade 4: neutrophil(<0.5 10^9/L),Hb (<65 g/L);platelet (<25.0 10^9/L); WBC(<1.0 10^9/L);AP,AST,ALT(>20.0*UR U/L);bilirubin(>3.0*UR mcmol/L);creatinine (>6.0*UR mcmol/L);urea (>4.0*UR g/L);K-high,low (>7.0or<2.5 mcmol/L);Na-high, low (>160or<120 mcmol/L).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    ACR20 responder: participants with 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR20 response were reported.

    Measured: Week 4, 12, 24

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response

    ACR50 responder: participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response were reported.

    Measured: Week 4, 12, 24

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response

    ACR70 responder: participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response were reported.

    Measured: Week 4, 12, 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4, 12 and 24

    DAS28: measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC ) using the 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (millimeter per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores: 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4, 12 and 24

    DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, C-Reactive protein (milligram per liter [mg/L]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores ranging 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24

  11. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4, 12 and 24

    HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
188 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02378506
Sponsor's protocol ID
B1801359
Other IDs
2013-004569-16
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
13 Feb 2015
Last updated
15 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Polak P, Peric P, Louw I, Gaylord SM, Williams T, Becker JC, Pedersen R, Korth-Bradley J, Vlahos B. A single-arm, open-label study to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of etanercept manufactured using the serum-free, high-capacity manufacturing process administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;6(1):23-28. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.18078.

    PubMed 30451655

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing etanercept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 31 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 31 sites in Slovakia, Germany, Bulgaria, Poland, Greece and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02378506, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in