SleepNCT02379728
Ghana PrenaBelt Trial: A Positional Therapy Device to Reduce Still-Birth
A study testing PrenaBelt and Body Position Sensor in people with Sleep and Pregnancy, run by Allan Kember at 1 site in Ghana.
Trial summary
Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn (SB) and 232 babies are born with low birth-weight (LBW) - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences. Sleeping on the back during pregnancy has recently emerged in scientific literature as a potential risk factor for SB and LBW. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep, Pregnancy, Stillbirth
- What is being tested?
- PrenaBelt and Body Position Sensor
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGhana
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years old
- low-risk singleton pregnancy
- entering the last trimester of pregnancy (in range 26-30 weeks of gestation)
- residing in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area or area served by the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
- fluent in either English, Twi, or Ga.
Who cannot join
- BMI ≥ 35 at booking (first antenatal appointment for current pregnancy)
- pregnancy complicated by obstetric complications (hypertension [pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension], diabetes [gestational or not], or intra-uterine growth restriction [<10th %ile for growth])
- sleep complicated by medical conditions (known to get <4 hours of sleep per night due to insomnia, or musculoskeletal disorder that prevents sleeping on a certain side [e.g., arthritic shoulder])
- multiple pregnancy
- known fetal abnormality
- maternal age >35
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Maternal Device to Reduce the Risk of Stillbirth and Low Birth-Weight
Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn (SB) and 232 babies are born with low birth-weight (LBW) - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences.
Sleeping on the back during pregnancy has recently emerged in scientific literature as a potential risk factor for SB and LBW. In fact, one of the earliest studies to demonstrate this link was conducted in Ghana by investigators on this protocol.
Read more
When a woman in mid-to-late-pregnancy lies on her back, her large uterus compresses one of the major veins that delivers blood back to her heart and may completely obstruct it. This may result in less blood being returned to her heart and less blood being pumped to her developing fetus. Such changes may negatively impact the growth of her fetus and, along with some other risk factors, may contribute to the death of her baby.
The investigators have developed a device, 'PrenaBelt', to significantly reduce the amount of time a pregnant woman spends sleeping on her back. The PrenaBelt functions via a simple, safe, effective, and well-established modality called positional therapy.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the PrenaBelt on birth-weight and assess the feasibility of introducing it to Ghanaian third-trimester pregnant women in their home setting via an antenatal care clinic and local health-care staff. Data from this study will be used in effect size calculations for the design of a large-scale, epidemiological study targeted at reducing LBW and SB in Ghana and globally.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), stillbirth (SB) is defined as fetal death at gestation ≥28 weeks or weight ≥1000g. In addition to the loss of life for the stillborn baby, parents whose baby is stillborn must cope with the psychological grief of losing their baby, which results in markedly increased mortality in bereaved parents when compared with non-bereaved parents.
Low birth-weight (LBW) is defined as a weight less than 2500g at birth. LBW is a significant contributor to SB, and infants with LBW are 20 times more likely to die in the first year than heavier babies. Although LBW babies constitute only about 15% of live births, they account for 60-80% of neonatal deaths. Neonatal deaths (death within the first year of life) account for 40% of all deaths under the age of five years. LBW also accounts for significant morbidity such as cognitive impairment, and chronic diseases later in life. LBW arises through short gestation (preterm birth) or in-utero growth restriction, or both.
Women in Ghana suffer from one of the highest perinatal mortality rates in the world. Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn and 232 babies are born with LBW - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences. As such, Ghana urgently requires inexpensive interventions to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality - assisting pregnant Ghanaian women to avoid sleeping on their back might be one such intervention.
Background - Maternal Position:
In obstetrics, it is well-known that when a pregnant woman assumes the supine position (laying on her back) during the day, maternal cardiovascular parameters and/or fetal oxygenation are altered, occasionally causing significant fetal heart rate changes, particularly during labor. However, until recently, there has been little evidence on the effect of supine position during sleep in pregnancy. Recently, three studies have suggested that maternal sleep position may be a risk factor for SB and LBW. This is significant given that the majority of third trimester pregnant women spend up to 25% of their sleep time supine. In the Auckland Stillbirth Study, the population attributable risk (PAR) for non-left sleep position to SB was found to be 37%, which is greater than the PARs of the three most important modifiable risk factors for SB (obesity, advanced maternal age, and smoking) combined. In an African population, investigators on this protocol found that supine sleep during pregnancy was an independent predictor of LBW (OR, 5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-20.2; P=0.025) and SB (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-43.2; P=0.016), when controlling for covariates maternal age, gestational age, parity, and the presence of pre-eclampsia. Notably, LBW was found to mediate the relationship between supine sleep and SB. Currently, there is much interest and follow up research occurring worldwide, with a growing body of evidence regarding the detrimental effects of supine sleep position on pregnancy outcomes.
One proposed model is that the maternal supine position during sleep is a stressor that plays a causative role in LBW and SB via compression of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava ('aortocaval compression'), resulting in negative sequelae. The investigators hypothesize that by mitigating this stressor, they may protect the fetus from LBW or SB.
Background - Maternal Device:
Given the emerging data suggesting that supine sleep may play a role in LBW and SB and the high perinatal mortality rate in Ghana, a simple intervention may allow the investigators to improve fetal outcomes.
Some pregnant women sleep with many pillows supporting their body, including a pillow behind their back to avoid the supine position. Asking women to sleep on their left increases the percentage of left sided sleep to approximately 60% of the night; however, this may come at a cost of a slightly reduced sleep duration, perhaps due to women feeling they need to make a conscious effort to maintain a certain sleep position.
Hence, a simple, low-cost, and easily-implemented device has been developed for use by pregnant women to mitigate this risk factor. The investigators anticipate that using this device will remove the need for the woman to make a conscious effort to avoid the supine sleeping position. The device name is 'PrenaBelt'. The PrenaBelt is currently at the prototype stage of development, and as such, this proposal is a proof-of-concept/feasibility project.
The PrenaBelt is a belt-like, positional therapy device designed specifically for pregnant women. While the PrenaBelt does not prevent the user from lying on her back during sleep, it is expected to significantly decrease the amount of time she spends in this position via the mechanism of positional therapy. Positional therapy is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, long-established, safe, and effective intervention for preventing people with positional-dependent snoring or mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea from sleeping on their back - a position that exacerbates their condition.
The PrenaBelt is worn at the level of the waist. By virtue of its design and position on the user's body, the PrenaBelt affects subtle pressure points on the back of the user when she lies on her back. These subtle pressure points activate her body's natural mechanism to spontaneously reposition itself to relieve discomfort, thereby reducing the amount of time she remains on her back during sleep. The PrenaBelt is also designed for adjustability and comfort.
The investigators have designed an electronic Body Position Sensor (BPS) that can be securely integrated into a pocket on the PrenaBelt. The BPS will record body position of the user (left, right, prone, supine). The BPS is for research purposes only.
Study Design:
The feasibility (technical, operational, cultural), efficacy, acceptability, and compliance of the PrenaBelt intervention in the target population during the third trimester of pregnancy in an antenatal care clinic and home settings and the effect of PrenaBelt treatment on birth weight will be evaluated via a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Preliminary data will be collected for the design of a future, large-scale, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the PrenaBelt intervention in improving pregnancy outcomes in a resource-limited setting.
A small cohort of participants from the treatment and control groups will be randomly selected to use BPS's throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. Each BPS participant in the treatment group will be matched to a BPS participant in the control group using BMI (normal, overweight, obese) and age (within 5 years; 2.5 years each side) as matching variables and BPS data will be compared. These data will serve as preliminary objective evidence of PrenaBelt usage and effect on maternal sleeping position during the third trimester of pregnancy in the target population and setting.
Potential Harms:
This study is minimal risk. Participants in this study are at no greater risk of harms when completing the activities of this study than those risks they encounter in their everyday life.
The PrenaBelt, sham-PrenaBelt, and Body Position Sensor devices are non-invasive medical devices of Health Canada Class I designation. Pregnant women typically sleep with many pillows supporting their body, including a pillow behind their back to avoid the supine position. The PrenaBelt is a positional therapy device that may assist pregnant women to avoid supine sleep. Positional therapy devices have been shown to be safe and approved for use by humans by the US Food and Drug Administration. In addition, maternal body pillows, regular pillows, and pelvic belts (lumbar support) have been used by pregnant women during sleep without reports of serious adverse effects for the mother or neonate [Victoria Pennick and Sarah D Liddle, "Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy (Review)," The Cochrane Collaboration, London, Review 2013].
Participants in both the intervention and control groups may experience discomfort while learning to sleep with the PrenaBelt/sham-PrenaBelt, which theoretically may lead to delayed onset of sleep, arousals from sleep, and loss of sleep. Participants will be instructed how to, and told that they can, remove the PrenaBelt/sham-PrenaBelt and discontinue use at any time without penalty if they become too uncomfortable.
- Conditions
- Sleep, Pregnancy, Stillbirth, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
- Being tested
- PrenaBelt, Body Position Sensor, sham-PrenaBelt
- Keywords
- positional therapy, tennis ball technique, sleep pregnancy, supine position, supine, sleep position, low birth weight, stillbirth, intrauterine growth restriction
- Medical subject headings
- Stillbirth, Fetal Growth Retardation, Fetal Hypoxia, Deception
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrenaBeltDevice
The PrenaBelt (PB) is a belt-like, positional therapy (PT) device designed for pregnant women. While the PB does not prevent the user from lying on her back during sleep, it is expected to significantly decrease the amount of time a user spends supine via the mechanism of PT. PT is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, long-established, safe, and effective intervention for preventing people with positional-dependent snoring or obstructive sleep apnea from sleeping on their back - a position that exacerbates their condition.
The PB is worn at the level of the waist or thorax. By design, the PB affects subtle pressure points on the user's back while supine, activating her body's natural mechanism to reposition itself to relieve discomfort, thereby reducing the amount of time spent supine.
Body Position SensorDevice
The Body Position Sensor (BPS) is for research purposes only. The BPS can be securely integrated into a pocket on the PrenaBelt (PrenaBelt with BPS Arm) or sham-PrenaBelt (Control with BPS Arm). The BPS is a small, electronic data acquisition device. The BPS uses a three axes accelerometer to detect orientation of the PrenaBelt, and thus the user (right, left, prone, supine), in three-dimensional space. The accelerometer data is collected continually with time stamping and stored on the BPS hard drive and can be accessed via connecting it to a computer. The BPS is not expected to affect the body position of the user.
sham-PrenaBeltDevice
The PrenaBelt can be easily converted into a sham-PrenaBelt for research purposes by removing the hard balls from its pockets or exchanging these hard balls for soft balls so it cannot provide pressure points, i.e., positional therapy function. The sham-PrenaBelt looks, fits, and feels like the PrenaBelt but cannot provide positional therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PrenaBelt | Experimental | Participants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care.
Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. Receives: Device: PrenaBelt |
| PrenaBelt with Body Position Sensor | Experimental | Participants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt (with integrated body position sensor (BPS)) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep.
Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. Receives: Device: PrenaBelt; Device: Body Position Sensor |
| Control | Sham comparator | Participants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care.
Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. Receives: Device: sham-PrenaBelt |
| Control with Body Position Sensor (BPS) | Sham comparator | Participants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt (with integrated BPS) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the sham-PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep.
Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. Receives: Device: Body Position Sensor; Device: sham-PrenaBelt |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Birthweight of Baby
Birthweight was measured using a Detecto newborn scale (Webb City, USA) and documented in the participant's hospital folder immediately after delivery by a midwife who was not a part of the study team and was not aware of the treatment allocation. Birthweight was subsequently abstracted by the blinded outcomes assessor.
Analysis was by original assigned groups and on a complete-case basis (drop-outs excluded). The newborns included in the final analysis were born from November 31, 2015 through May 13, 2016.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Birthweight Centile
Birthweight centile was calculated using the Gestation-Related Optimal Weight (GROW) software,(1,2) which accounts for the main non-pathological factors affecting birthweight (gestational age, maternal height, maternal weight at booking, parity, ethnicity, and sex of the neonate) and, as such, enables delineation between constitutional and pathological smallness and more accurate detection of pregnancies at increased risk for adverse outcomes.(3,4) This was an additional trial outcome specified after trial commencement.
- Gardosi J, Francis A. Customized Weight Centile Calculator. Gestation Network; 2016. Available from: www.gestation.net
- Gardosi J, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. Elsevier; 1992 Feb;339(8788):283-7.
- Gardosi J. Horm Res. 2006;65(SUPPL. 3):15-8.
- Odibo A O, et al. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar 10; 24(3):411-7.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Gestational Age at Delivery
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) will be recorded in the participant's health record as a part of routine obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Mode of Delivery
Mode of delivery (unassisted, episiotomy, amniotomy, induced, fetal monitoring, forceps delivery, vacuum extraction, Cesarean section) will be recorded in the participant's health record as a part of routine obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Sex of Newborn (Male/Female)
Sex of the newborn will be recorded in the participant's health record as a part of routine obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Stillbirth
If a stillbirth occurs, it will be recorded in the participant's health record as a part of routine obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Low Birthweight
Low birthweight is defined as a birthweight ≤ 2500 grams at birth.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Small for Gestational Age
Small for gestational age is defined as a Gestation-Related Optimal Weight (GROW) birthweight centile ≤ 10%.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Preterm Delivery
Preterm delivery was defined as a gestational age (in weeks) at birth of less than 37 weeks, 0 days.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Received ≥ 1 Obstetrical Diagnosis During Labor/Delivery
Any relevant diagnosis/diagnoses made during labor/delivery (e.g., gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, meconium aspiration) will be recorded in the participant's health record as a part of routine obstetric care at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Measured: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SleepStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allan Kember
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, Grand Challenges Canada, Innovative Canadians for Change, Global Innovations for Reproductive Health and Life, Kaishin Chu Design
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Allan Kember, IWK Health Centre
- Investigators
- Heather M Scott, MD FRCSC, Study chair, The IWK Health CentreJerry Coleman, MB ChB FWACS, Principal investigator, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02379728
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GCC-S7-0629-01-10-ACC
- Other IDs
- FDA/CT/152
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Owusu JT, Anderson FJ, Coleman J, Oppong S, Seffah JD, Aikins A, O'Brien LM. Association of maternal sleep practices with pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and stillbirth among Ghanaian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;121(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
PubMed 23507553Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, Ekeroma AJ, Zuccollo JM, McCowan LM. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ. 2011 Jun 14;342:d3403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3403.
PubMed 21673002Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, Bond D, Morris J, Rawlinson W, Jeffery H. Sleep position, fetal growth restriction, and late-pregnancy stillbirth: the Sydney stillbirth study. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):347-355. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000627.
PubMed 25568999Platts J, Mitchell EA, Stacey T, Martin BL, Roberts D, McCowan L, Heazell AE. The Midland and North of England Stillbirth Study (MiNESS). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 21;14:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-171.
PubMed 24885461Warland J, Mitchell EA. A triple risk model for unexplained late stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 14;14:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-142.
PubMed 24731396O'Brien LM, Warland J. Typical sleep positions in pregnant women. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Jun;90(6):315-7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
PubMed 24661447Coleman J, Grewal S, Warland J, Hobson S, Liu K, Kember A. Maternal positional therapy for fetal growth and customised birth weight centile benefit in a Bayesian reanalysis of a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 28;14(4):e078315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078315.
PubMed 38684260Coleman J, Okere M, Seffah J, Kember A, O'Brien LM, Borazjani A, Butler M, Wells J, MacRitchie S, Isaac A, Chu K, Scott H. The Ghana PrenaBelt trial: a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of maternal positional therapy during third-trimester sleep on birth weight. BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e022981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022981.
PubMed 31048420
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Maternal Device to Reduce the Risk of Stillbirth and Low Birth-Weight
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02379728
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCC-S7-0629-01-10-ACC
- Conditions
- Sleep, Pregnancy, Stillbirth, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
- Keywords
- positional therapy, tennis ball technique, sleep pregnancy, supine position, supine, sleep position, low birth weight, stillbirth
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Allan KemberUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, Grand Challenges Canada, Innovative Canadians for Change, Global Innovations for Reproductive Health and Life, Kaishin Chu Design
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn (SB) and 232 babies are born with low birth-weight (LBW) - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences.
Sleeping on the back during pregnancy has recently emerged in scientific literature as a potential risk factor for SB and LBW. In fact, one of the earliest studies to demonstrate this link was conducted in Ghana by investigators on this protocol.
When a woman in mid-to-late-pregnancy lies on her back, her large uterus compresses one of the major veins that delivers blood back to her heart and may completely obstruct it. This may result in less blood being returned to her heart and less blood being pumped to her developing fetus. Such changes may negatively impact the growth of her fetus and, along with some other risk factors, may contribute to the death of her baby.
The investigators have developed a device, 'PrenaBelt', to significantly reduce the amount of time a pregnant woman spends sleeping on her back. The PrenaBelt functions via a simple, safe, effective, and well-established modality called positional therapy.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the PrenaBelt on birth-weight and assess the feasibility of introducing it to Ghanaian third-trimester pregnant women in their home setting via an antenatal care clinic and local health-care staff. Data from this study will be used in effect size calculations for the design of a large-scale, epidemiological study targeted at reducing LBW and SB in Ghana and globally.
Detailed description
Introduction:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), stillbirth (SB) is defined as fetal death at gestation ≥28 weeks or weight ≥1000g. In addition to the loss of life for the stillborn baby, parents whose baby is stillborn must cope with the psychological grief of losing their baby, which results in markedly increased mortality in bereaved parents when compared with non-bereaved parents.
Low birth-weight (LBW) is defined as a weight less than 2500g at birth. LBW is a significant contributor to SB, and infants with LBW are 20 times more likely to die in the first year than heavier babies. Although LBW babies constitute only about 15% of live births, they account for 60-80% of neonatal deaths. Neonatal deaths (death within the first year of life) account for 40% of all deaths under the age of five years. LBW also accounts for significant morbidity such as cognitive impairment, and chronic diseases later in life. LBW arises through short gestation (preterm birth) or in-utero growth restriction, or both.
Women in Ghana suffer from one of the highest perinatal mortality rates in the world. Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn and 232 babies are born with LBW - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences. As such, Ghana urgently requires inexpensive interventions to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality - assisting pregnant Ghanaian women to avoid sleeping on their back might be one such intervention.
Background - Maternal Position:
In obstetrics, it is well-known that when a pregnant woman assumes the supine position (laying on her back) during the day, maternal cardiovascular parameters and/or fetal oxygenation are altered, occasionally causing significant fetal heart rate changes, particularly during labor. However, until recently, there has been little evidence on the effect of supine position during sleep in pregnancy. Recently, three studies have suggested that maternal sleep position may be a risk factor for SB and LBW. This is significant given that the majority of third trimester pregnant women spend up to 25% of their sleep time supine. In the Auckland Stillbirth Study, the population attributable risk (PAR) for non-left sleep position to SB was found to be 37%, which is greater than the PARs of the three most important modifiable risk factors for SB (obesity, advanced maternal age, and smoking) combined. In an African population, investigators on this protocol found that supine sleep during pregnancy was an independent predictor of LBW (OR, 5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-20.2; P=0.025) and SB (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-43.2; P=0.016), when controlling for covariates maternal age, gestational age, parity, and the presence of pre-eclampsia. Notably, LBW was found to mediate the relationship between supine sleep and SB. Currently, there is much interest and follow up research occurring worldwide, with a growing body of evidence regarding the detrimental effects of supine sleep position on pregnancy outcomes.
One proposed model is that the maternal supine position during sleep is a stressor that plays a causative role in LBW and SB via compression of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava ('aortocaval compression'), resulting in negative sequelae. The investigators hypothesize that by mitigating this stressor, they may protect the fetus from LBW or SB.
Background - Maternal Device:
Given the emerging data suggesting that supine sleep may play a role in LBW and SB and the high perinatal mortality rate in Ghana, a simple intervention may allow the investigators to improve fetal outcomes.
Some pregnant women sleep with many pillows supporting their body, including a pillow behind their back to avoid the supine position. Asking women to sleep on their left increases the percentage of left sided sleep to approximately 60% of the night; however, this may come at a cost of a slightly reduced sleep duration, perhaps due to women feeling they need to make a conscious effort to maintain a certain sleep position.
Hence, a simple, low-cost, and easily-implemented device has been developed for use by pregnant women to mitigate this risk factor. The investigators anticipate that using this device will remove the need for the woman to make a conscious effort to avoid the supine sleeping position. The device name is 'PrenaBelt'. The PrenaBelt is currently at the prototype stage of development, and as such, this proposal is a proof-of-concept/feasibility project.
The PrenaBelt is a belt-like, positional therapy device designed specifically for pregnant women. While the PrenaBelt does not prevent the user from lying on her back during sleep, it is expected to significantly decrease the amount of time she spends in this position via the mechanism of positional therapy. Positional therapy is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, long-established, safe, and effective intervention for preventing people with positional-dependent snoring or mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea from sleeping on their back - a position that exacerbates their condition.
The PrenaBelt is worn at the level of the waist. By virtue of its design and position on the user's body, the PrenaBelt affects subtle pressure points on the back of the user when she lies on her back. These subtle pressure points activate her body's natural mechanism to spontaneously reposition itself to relieve discomfort, thereby reducing the amount of time she remains on her back during sleep. The PrenaBelt is also designed for adjustability and comfort.
The investigators have designed an electronic Body Position Sensor (BPS) that can be securely integrated into a pocket on the PrenaBelt. The BPS will record body position of the user (left, right, prone, supine). The BPS is for research purposes only.
Study Design:
The feasibility (technical, operational, cultural), efficacy, acceptability, and compliance of the PrenaBelt intervention in the target population during the third trimester of pregnancy in an antenatal care clinic and home settings and the effect of PrenaBelt treatment on birth weight will be evaluated via a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Preliminary data will be collected for the design of a future, large-scale, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the PrenaBelt intervention in improving pregnancy outcomes in a resource-limited setting.
A small cohort of participants from the treatment and control groups will be randomly selected to use BPS's throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. Each BPS participant in the treatment group will be matched to a BPS participant in the control group using BMI (normal, overweight, obese) and age (within 5 years; 2.5 years each side) as matching variables and BPS data will be compared. These data will serve as preliminary objective evidence of PrenaBelt usage and effect on maternal sleeping position during the third trimester of pregnancy in the target population and setting.
Potential Harms:
This study is minimal risk. Participants in this study are at no greater risk of harms when completing the activities of this study than those risks they encounter in their everyday life.
The PrenaBelt, sham-PrenaBelt, and Body Position Sensor devices are non-invasive medical devices of Health Canada Class I designation. Pregnant women typically sleep with many pillows supporting their body, including a pillow behind their back to avoid the supine position. The PrenaBelt is a positional therapy device that may assist pregnant women to avoid supine sleep. Positional therapy devices have been shown to be safe and approved for use by humans by the US Food and Drug Administration. In addition, maternal body pillows, regular pillows, and pelvic belts (lumbar support) have been used by pregnant women during sleep without reports of serious adverse effects for the mother or neonate [Victoria Pennick and Sarah D Liddle, "Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy (Review)," The Cochrane Collaboration, London, Review 2013].
Participants in both the intervention and control groups may experience discomfort while learning to sleep with the PrenaBelt/sham-PrenaBelt, which theoretically may lead to delayed onset of sleep, arousals from sleep, and loss of sleep. Participants will be instructed how to, and told that they can, remove the PrenaBelt/sham-PrenaBelt and discontinue use at any time without penalty if they become too uncomfortable.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PrenaBelt | Experimental | Device: PrenaBeltParticipants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. |
| PrenaBelt with Body Position Sensor | Experimental | Device: PrenaBelt, Device: Body Position SensorParticipants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt (with integrated body position sensor (BPS)) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. |
| Control | Sham comparator | Device: sham-PrenaBeltParticipants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. |
| Control with Body Position Sensor (BPS) | Sham comparator | Device: Body Position Sensor, Device: sham-PrenaBeltParticipants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt (with integrated BPS) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the sham-PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ≥18 years old
- low-risk singleton pregnancy
- entering the last trimester of pregnancy (in range 26-30 weeks of gestation)
- residing in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area or area served by the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
- fluent in either English, Twi, or Ga.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- BMI ≥ 35 at booking (first antenatal appointment for current pregnancy)
- pregnancy complicated by obstetric complications (hypertension [pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension], diabetes [gestational or not], or intra-uterine growth restriction [<10th %ile for growth])
- sleep complicated by medical conditions (known to get <4 hours of sleep per night due to insomnia, or musculoskeletal disorder that prevents sleeping on a certain side [e.g., arthritic shoulder])
- multiple pregnancy
- known fetal abnormality
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PrenaBeltThe PrenaBelt (PB) is a belt-like, positional therapy (PT) device designed for pregnant women. While the PB does not prevent the user from lying on her back during sleep, it is expected to significantly decrease the amount of time a user spends supine via the mechanism of PT. PT is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, long-established, safe, and effective intervention for preventing people with positional-dependent snoring or obstructive sleep apnea from sleeping on their back - a position that exacerbates their condition. The PB is worn at the level of the waist or thorax. By design, the PB affects subtle pressure points on the user's back while supine, activating her body's natural mechanism to reposition itself to relieve discomfort, thereby reducing the amount of time spent supine. | Device | PrenaBelt, PrenaBelt with Body Position Sensor |
| Body Position SensorThe Body Position Sensor (BPS) is for research purposes only. The BPS can be securely integrated into a pocket on the PrenaBelt (PrenaBelt with BPS Arm) or sham-PrenaBelt (Control with BPS Arm). The BPS is a small, electronic data acquisition device. The BPS uses a three axes accelerometer to detect orientation of the PrenaBelt, and thus the user (right, left, prone, supine), in three-dimensional space. The accelerometer data is collected continually with time stamping and stored on the BPS hard drive and can be accessed via connecting it to a computer. The BPS is not expected to affect the body position of the user. | Device | Control with Body Position Sensor (BPS), PrenaBelt with Body Position Sensor |
| sham-PrenaBeltThe PrenaBelt can be easily converted into a sham-PrenaBelt for research purposes by removing the hard balls from its pockets or exchanging these hard balls for soft balls so it cannot provide pressure points, i.e., positional therapy function. The sham-PrenaBelt looks, fits, and feels like the PrenaBelt but cannot provide positional therapy. | Device | Control, Control with Body Position Sensor (BPS) |
Primary outcome
Birthweight of Baby
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Birthweight was measured using a Detecto newborn scale (Webb City, USA) and documented in the participant's hospital folder immediately after delivery by a midwife who was not a part of the study team and was not aware of the treatment allocation. Birthweight was subsequently abstracted by the blinded outcomes assessor. Analysis was by original assigned groups and on a complete-case basis (drop-outs excluded). The newborns included in the final analysis were born from November 31, 2015 through May 13, 2016.
Birthweight Centile
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Birthweight centile was calculated using the Gestation-Related Optimal Weight (GROW) software,(1,2) which accounts for the main non-pathological factors affecting birthweight (gestational age, maternal height, maternal weight at booking, parity, ethnicity, and sex of the neonate) and, as such, enables delineation between constitutional and pathological smallness and more accurate detection of pregnancies at increased risk for adverse outcomes.(3,4) This was an additional trial outcome specified after trial commencement. 1. Gardosi J, Francis A. Customized Weight Centile Calculator. Gestation Network; 2016. Available from: www.gestation.net 2. Gardosi J, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. Elsevier; 1992 Feb;339(8788):283-7. 3. Gardosi J. Horm Res. 2006;65(SUPPL. 3):15-8. 4. Odibo A O, et al. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar 10; 24(3):411-7.
8 secondary outcomes
Gestational Age at Delivery
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Mode of Delivery
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Sex of Newborn (Male/Female)
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Stillbirth
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Low Birthweight
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Small for Gestational Age
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Preterm Delivery
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Received ≥ 1 Obstetrical Diagnosis During Labor/Delivery
Time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23507553Owusu JT, Anderson FJ, Coleman J, Oppong S, Seffah JD, Aikins A, O'Brien LM. Association of maternal sleep practices with pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and stillbirth among Ghanaian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;121(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 21673002Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, Ekeroma AJ, Zuccollo JM, McCowan LM. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ. 2011 Jun 14;342:d3403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3403.
- Background: PubMed 25568999Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, Bond D, Morris J, Rawlinson W, Jeffery H. Sleep position, fetal growth restriction, and late-pregnancy stillbirth: the Sydney stillbirth study. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):347-355. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000627.
- Background: PubMed 24885461Platts J, Mitchell EA, Stacey T, Martin BL, Roberts D, McCowan L, Heazell AE. The Midland and North of England Stillbirth Study (MiNESS). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 21;14:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-171.
- Background: PubMed 24731396Warland J, Mitchell EA. A triple risk model for unexplained late stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 14;14:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-142.
- Background: PubMed 24661447O'Brien LM, Warland J. Typical sleep positions in pregnant women. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Jun;90(6):315-7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38684260Coleman J, Grewal S, Warland J, Hobson S, Liu K, Kember A. Maternal positional therapy for fetal growth and customised birth weight centile benefit in a Bayesian reanalysis of a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 28;14(4):e078315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078315.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31048420Coleman J, Okere M, Seffah J, Kember A, O'Brien LM, Borazjani A, Butler M, Wells J, MacRitchie S, Isaac A, Chu K, Scott H. The Ghana PrenaBelt trial: a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of maternal positional therapy during third-trimester sleep on birth weight. BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e022981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022981.
- Allan Kember's (Project Lead, Project Principal Investigator) blog - Project UpdatesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Grand Challenges Canada - News ReleaseLink provided by the sponsor.
- Global Innovations for Reproductive Health and Life - Project PageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Sleep
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Recruiting
Addressing Nocturia in Older Women Utilizing Behavioral Sleep Intervention and Brief Mindfulness
Nocturia, Insomnia
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Recruiting
Investigation of the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Itch and Pain Sensitivity
Histamine, Cowhage
Not yet recruiting
REM Enhancement Sleep Technology for Well-being, Emotion, and Life Lift
Healthy Adult Participants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heather M Scott, MD FRCSC study chair
The IWK Health Centre
Jerry Coleman, MB ChB FWACS principal investigator
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PrenaBelt and Body Position Sensor in people with Sleep and Pregnancy, run by Allan Kember at 1 site in Ghana.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Birthweight of Baby (time frame: At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02379728, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2020.