Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy AdultsNCT02380599
A Study of the Effects of Mid-Thoracic Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization on Heart Rate Variability
A study testing Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization in people with Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy Adults, run by Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation are common techniques utilized in the field of physical therapy. Despite their common utility, little is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying the changes experienced following the interventions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy Adults
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy adults
Who cannot join
- History of back surgeries, osteopenia, osteoporosis, spinal fractures, rib fractures, chronic pain over three months, or heart conditions. Subjects will also be excluded if they are currently taking or have a significant history of taking steroid or anticoagulant medications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Mount St. Mary's College
Los Angeles, California, 90007
About this study
Official title: A Comparative Study of the Effects of Mid-Thoracic Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization on Heart Rate Variability
Spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation are common techniques utilized in the field of physical therapy. Despite their common utility, little is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying the changes experienced following the interventions. Recent research suggests that neurological mechanisms may be involved in the post interventional changes, but research supporting this view is still evolving. Therefore, this study will explore whether there is a neurophysiological difference between spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization techniques. The neurophysiological difference will be measured by monitoring heart rate variability, a cardiovagal indicator of autonomic nervous system activity. The primary hypotheses of this study are three-fold, first that spinal manipulation will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Second, spinal mobilization will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation will produce different changes in heart rate variability.
Read the detailed description
This study will utilize a crossover design to study autonomic nervous system responses in healthy subjects. Prior to commencing data collection, Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained from the Mount St. Mary's College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. Once obtained subjects will be recruited from faculty, students, and staff of the College. A snowball methodology will be used to recruit friends, family, and acquaintances of these initial connections. To be included in this study, candidates must be between the age of 18 and 55 years of age. They must not have pain in any area of their body that is chronic in nature (has been present for greater then three months). Subjects who are pregnant or have a history of spinal surgery will be excluded from participation in this study. All subjects who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be informed of the intent, methods and risks associated with the study and given an opportunity to ask questions. Following this information session, and if agreeing to participate in the study, subjects will be asked to fill out the attached informed consent form. All subjects will be notified and given the opportunity to withdrawal from the study at any time without repercussions.
Once accepted into the study, subjects will fill out a personal history questionnaire to gather demographic information such as age, medical history, gender, and current pain levels. The subject will also be asked to fill out the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale Questionnaire. Once collected, subjects will be assigned a confidential subject number and all personal identifiers will be removed from subject information. All data will be scanned and stored in a personal computer that is password protect. Also at this time, subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment group. Since this is a crossover design, all subjects will receive all interventions, but the order of these interventions will be predetermined and randomized.
At this point, subjects will be taken to a quiet room located within the Department of Physical Therapy. This room is used as a lab and data collection room and has a physical therapy treatment table. The subject will be asked to lie prone on the table and an electrocardiographic recording sensory will be placed upon each wrist (two total). This sensory will feed data regarding heart rate to a laptop computer that will be collected using the Biocomm HRV Live! Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Data Acquisition program. Once the strength and stability of the signal is verified, the subject will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to gather baseline heart rate data. Following this five-minute timeframe, the subject will receive one of three interventions based upon the previously mentioned randomization process. The three interventions utilized in the study will be a posterior to anterior spinal manipulation delivered to T4-5 spinal segment, posterior to anterior spinal mobilization applied to the T4-5 spinal segment for 30 seconds, or sham therapeutic ultrasound applied to the T4-5 spinal region bilaterally for 30 seconds (the ultrasound machines will not be turned on). Between each of these interventions, subjects will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to stabilize the body's cardiovagal responses. Following completion of these three interventions, subjects will allowed to ask additional questions and will be given the number of the principal investigator and the IRB office to contact if they have questions or concerns in the future.
- Being tested
- Spinal Manipulation, Spinal Mobilization, Sham Ultrasound
- Keywords
- Spinal Manipulation, Mobilization, Autonomic Nervous System
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal ManipulationOther
Mid-thoracic spinal manipulation to T3-5 region
Spinal MobilizationOther
Mid-thoracic spinal mobilization to T3-5 region
Sham UltrasoundOther
Sham ultrasound to T3-5 region
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Crossover assignment of mid-thoracic spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, or sham ultrasound Receives: Other: Spinal Manipulation; Other: Spinal Mobilization; Other: Sham Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Heart Rate Variability
Change in heart rate variability monitored continuously
Measured: 5 minutes pre-intervention (baseline), immediately after each intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Derrick Sueki, Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA
- Investigators
- Derrick Sueki, DPT, Principal investigator, Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02380599
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MountSMCLA 3
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparative Study of the Effects of Mid-Thoracic Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization on Heart Rate Variability
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02380599
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MountSMCLA 3
- Keywords
- Spinal Manipulation, Mobilization, Autonomic Nervous System
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CAUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation are common techniques utilized in the field of physical therapy. Despite their common utility, little is known about the physiological mechanisms underlying the changes experienced following the interventions. Recent research suggests that neurological mechanisms may be involved in the post interventional changes, but research supporting this view is still evolving. Therefore, this study will explore whether there is a neurophysiological difference between spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization techniques. The neurophysiological difference will be measured by monitoring heart rate variability, a cardiovagal indicator of autonomic nervous system activity. The primary hypotheses of this study are three-fold, first that spinal manipulation will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Second, spinal mobilization will result in a change in heart rate variability that is different then sham intervention. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation will produce different changes in heart rate variability.
Detailed description
This study will utilize a crossover design to study autonomic nervous system responses in healthy subjects. Prior to commencing data collection, Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained from the Mount St. Mary's College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. Once obtained subjects will be recruited from faculty, students, and staff of the College. A snowball methodology will be used to recruit friends, family, and acquaintances of these initial connections. To be included in this study, candidates must be between the age of 18 and 55 years of age. They must not have pain in any area of their body that is chronic in nature (has been present for greater then three months). Subjects who are pregnant or have a history of spinal surgery will be excluded from participation in this study. All subjects who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be informed of the intent, methods and risks associated with the study and given an opportunity to ask questions. Following this information session, and if agreeing to participate in the study, subjects will be asked to fill out the attached informed consent form. All subjects will be notified and given the opportunity to withdrawal from the study at any time without repercussions.
Once accepted into the study, subjects will fill out a personal history questionnaire to gather demographic information such as age, medical history, gender, and current pain levels. The subject will also be asked to fill out the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale Questionnaire. Once collected, subjects will be assigned a confidential subject number and all personal identifiers will be removed from subject information. All data will be scanned and stored in a personal computer that is password protect. Also at this time, subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment group. Since this is a crossover design, all subjects will receive all interventions, but the order of these interventions will be predetermined and randomized.
At this point, subjects will be taken to a quiet room located within the Department of Physical Therapy. This room is used as a lab and data collection room and has a physical therapy treatment table. The subject will be asked to lie prone on the table and an electrocardiographic recording sensory will be placed upon each wrist (two total). This sensory will feed data regarding heart rate to a laptop computer that will be collected using the Biocomm HRV Live! Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Data Acquisition program. Once the strength and stability of the signal is verified, the subject will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to gather baseline heart rate data. Following this five-minute timeframe, the subject will receive one of three interventions based upon the previously mentioned randomization process. The three interventions utilized in the study will be a posterior to anterior spinal manipulation delivered to T4-5 spinal segment, posterior to anterior spinal mobilization applied to the T4-5 spinal segment for 30 seconds, or sham therapeutic ultrasound applied to the T4-5 spinal region bilaterally for 30 seconds (the ultrasound machines will not be turned on). Between each of these interventions, subjects will be instructed to rest quietly for five minutes in order to stabilize the body's cardiovagal responses. Following completion of these three interventions, subjects will allowed to ask additional questions and will be given the number of the principal investigator and the IRB office to contact if they have questions or concerns in the future.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Spinal Manipulation, Other: Spinal Mobilization, Other: Sham UltrasoundCrossover assignment of mid-thoracic spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, or sham ultrasound |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy adults
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- History of back surgeries, osteopenia, osteoporosis, spinal fractures, rib fractures, chronic pain over three months, or heart conditions. Subjects will also be excluded if they are currently taking or have a significant history of taking steroid or anticoagulant medications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal ManipulationMid-thoracic spinal manipulation to T3-5 region | Other | Experimental Group |
| Spinal MobilizationMid-thoracic spinal mobilization to T3-5 region | Other | Experimental Group |
| Sham UltrasoundSham ultrasound to T3-5 region | Other | Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Heart Rate Variability
Time frame: 5 minutes pre-intervention (baseline), immediately after each intervention
Change in heart rate variability monitored continuously
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2015.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Derrick Sueki, DPT principal investigator
Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Manipulation and Spinal Mobilization in people with Physiology of Manipulation / Mobilization in Healthy Adults, run by Mount St. Mary's College, Los Angeles, CA at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Heart Rate Variability (time frame: 5 minutes pre-intervention (baseline), immediately after each intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2015.