AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaAPTNCT02380703

Aggression Prevention Training for Caregivers of Persons With Dementia (APT)

A study testing Aggression Prevention Training (APT) and Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC) in people with Dementia and Pain, run by Baylor College of Medicine.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate whether a home-based targeted education and skill training (Aggression Prevention Training or APT) will reduce aggression in persons with dementia (PWD) and pain/pain-related features more than usual care plus supportive telephone calls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Dementia, Pain, Alzheimer's Disease
What is being tested?
Aggression Prevention Training (APT) and Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
239 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 Feb 2015to 23 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Documented diagnosis of dementia
  • Clinically significant pain, depression, or caregiver/patient relationship difficulties (either self-report or caregiver proxy-report).
  • Receives care from Baylor College of Medicine Geriatric Medicine Associates or Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders Center, or Kelsey Seybold Clinics
  • Has an informal caregiver willing to participate in the study who sees the patient at least 8 hours/week and at least twice/week
  • Speaks English
  • Lives within a 40-mile radius of the coordinating center

Who cannot join

  • Advanced dementia based on inability to complete the Mental Impairment Screen-Telephone Version or a Functional Assessment Staging Tool score > 6.
  • History of aggression during the one month prior to screening or baseline
  • Resides in a long-term care facility

About this study

This study will evaluate whether a home-based targeted education and skill training (Aggression Prevention Training or APT) will reduce aggression in persons with dementia (PWD) and pain/pain-related features more than usual care plus supportive telephone calls. Half of the participants will receive APT and half will receive supportive telephone calls.

Read the detailed description

Eighty percent of PWD have behavioral or psychological disturbances, including 40% that are aggressive behaviors. The prevalence of pain in PWD is about 60%, and it is a strong predictor of aggression. The biopsychosocial model of pain posits that pain is bidirectionally related to psychological factors (ie, depression) and social support factors (ie, quality of caregiver/PWD relationship) in addition to biological factors. Thus, depression and quality of the caregiver/PWD relationship can be seen as pain-related features. Caregivers are ideally suited to help address pain, depression, and the caregiver/PWD relationship, thus preventing the development of aggression; but they need tools to assist them in identifying and managing these symptoms.

Prior studies of aggression treatment have not examined using a preventive strategy to decrease incidence of aggression in persons with dementia (PWD). Almost all studies have examined use of pharmacologic interventions following development of aggression.This 5-year randomized controlled trial based on the Unmet Needs Model will focus on preventing aggression in PWD with pain and pain-related features by providing the caregiver with targeted education and skill training. PWD and their caregivers will be randomized to APT or to an enhanced usual primary care condition (EU-PC). APT will use active learning tools, including didactics, role-playing, and multimedia [eg, books and digital versatile discs (DVDs)] to educate and provide skill training for the caregiver. The 6-8 modules in the intervention will include 4 core modules that address 4 main aggression risk factors: a) recognizing pain, b) treating pain, c) increasing pleasant activities, and d) improving patient-caregiver communication. Caregivers can select 2 to 3 additional elective sessions; elective selection is guided by the needs of the dyad to further enhance skills related to these core topics. EU-PC provides the patient and caregiver educational materials on pain, notifies the primary care provider of the PWD's level of pain and depression, and provides 8 weekly supportive telephone calls to caregivers. PWD and caregiver outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Data analysis will include both univariate descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, including regression models, repeated measure modeling and Cox proportional hazards models.

Being tested
Aggression Prevention Training (APT), Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC)
Keywords
aggression, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, pain, depression, caregiver, behavioral health, counseling
Medical subject headings
Dementia, Pain, Alzheimer Disease, Aggression, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aggression Prevention Training (APT)Behavioural

  • Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC)Other

Study groups in NCT02380703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aggression Prevention Training (APT)ExperimentalAPT will use active learning tools, including didactics, role-playing, and multimedia (eg, books and DVDs) to educate and provide skill training for the caregiver. The 6-8 modules in the intervention will include 4 core modules that address 4 main aggression risk factors: a) recognizing pain, b) treating pain, c) increasing pleasant activities, and d) improving patient-caregiver communication. Caregivers can select 2 to 3 additional elective sessions; elective selection is guided by the needs of the dyad to further enhance skills related to these core topics. Sessions will take place in the patient's home.
Receives: Behavioral: Aggression Prevention Training (APT)
Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC)Placebo comparatorEU-PC provides the patient and caregiver educational materials on pain, notifies the primary care provider of the PWD's level of pain and depression, and provides 8 weekly supportive telephone calls to caregivers.
Receives: Other: Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Aggression as Per the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Aggression Subscale

    Aggression is measured on a 7-point Likert scale for frequency and a 5-point Likert scale for disruptiveness. Aggression is considered present if a participant scores over one on both frequency (more than never) and disruptiveness (at least a little) on any of 13 aggressive behaviors, including spitting, verbal aggression, hitting, kicking, grabbing, pushing, throwing, biting, scratching, hurting self/others, destroying property, or making inappropriate verbal or physical sexual advances.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Caregiver Burden--Zarit Burden Interview

    The Zarit Burden Interview is a 22-item instrument measuring perceived impact of caregiving on the caregiver's financial status, physical status, physical health, emotional health, and social activities. Questions are answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0=never, 4=nearly always). The total scale score ranges from 0-88.

    Measured: one year

  2. Positive Caregiving Attributes--Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale

    The 9-item Positive Aspects of Caregiving Scale presents statements about a caregiver's mental or affective state in the context of the caregiving experience. Responses are provided on a 5-point agree/disagree scale and designed to assess perception of benefits within the caregiving context, such as feeling useful, feeling appreciated, and finding meaning. Higher scores (range 9-45) represent more positive appraisals.

    Measured: one year

  3. Behavior Problems--Revised Memory and Behavior Checklist

    Revised Memory and Behavior Checklist (RMBCL) is a 24-item informant-based measure of observable behavior problems in PWD, including memory-related, disruptive, and depressive behaviors. Scores are computed for the presence/absence of each problem first and then for caregiver "reaction" or the extent to which caregivers were bothered or distressed by each behavior (0-4). Total score is the sum of reaction scores for all endorsed behaviors. Possible range is 0-96. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: one year

  4. Pain--Philadelphia Geriatric Pain Intensity Scale (Overall Pain as Reported by the PWD)

    The Philadelphia Geriatric Pain Intensity Scale will be administered to the PWD to measure pain. It consists of 4 items assessing the extent to which the PWD has been bothered by pain over the past several weeks--at present, when pain was at its worst, when pain was at its least, and overall. These items are rated on a 0- to 5-point Likert scale (not at all to extremely). A fifth item asks for number of days per week that pain was really bad, and a sixth asks for a rating of how much pain has interfered with day-to-day activities. We report only on the item about overall pain.

    Measured: one year

  5. Depression--Geriatric Depression Screen (GDS), Caregiver Version

    The 30-item GDS will be administered to the caregiver to measure depression. Items are answered with Yes/No. Total score ranges from 0-30. A score of 11 or greater is a possible indicator of depression.

    Measured: one year

  6. Caregiver-Patient Relationship Quality--Mutuality Scale

    The Mutuality Scale and is a 15-item instrument measuring the positive quality of the relationship between caregiver and care receiver. Questions are answered by the caregiver on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0=never, 4=a great deal). Its 4 subscales represent domains of shared values, affective closeness, shared pleasurable activities and reciprocity. The total score ranges from 0-4 and is the sum of individual items divided by the number of items answered. High scores indicate a relationship characterized by communication, shared pleasurable activities, common values, and reciprocity.

    Measured: one year

  7. Pain--Philadelphia Geriatric Pain Intensity Scale (Overall Pain as Reported by the Caregiver)

    The Philadelphia Geriatric Pain Intensity Scale will be administered to the caregiver to measure caregiver report of PWD pain. It consists of 4 items assessing the extent to which the the caregiver feels the PWD has been bothered by pain over the past several weeks--at present, when pain was at its worst, when pain was at its least, and overall. These items are rated on a 0- to 5-point Likert scale (not at all to extremely). A fifth item asks for number of days per week that pain was really bad, and a sixth asks for a rating of how much pain has interfered with day-to-day activities. We report only on the item about overall pain.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion23 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion23 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
239 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02380703
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-33720
Other IDs
R01NR014657-01A1
Acronym
APT
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
1 Mar 2015
Last updated
11 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: The information generated in this proposal aims to prevent the development of aggression in persons with dementia. Clinician and participant manuals are developed for the intervention and will be widely shared through abstracts, presentation, publication and personal communication if the intervention is efficacious. In addition, if the intervention is found to be evidence-based, we will pursue placement on the websites of: 1\) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Registry for Evidence-based Programs and 2) Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregiving (RCI) Caregiver Intervention Database. Information about the study will also be available to interested investigators through NIH CRISP, and the Baylor College of Medicine Section of Health Services Research website. Requests to use the information will be considered on a case-by-case basis, following written request to the principal investigator.

Publications

  • Sibley AA, Shrestha S, Lipovac-Dew M, Kunik ME. Examining Depression Symptoms With/Without Coexisting Anxiety Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2021 Jan-Dec;36:1533317521990267. doi: 10.1177/1533317521990267.

    PubMed 33530695

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aggression Prevention Training (APT) and Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC) in people with Dementia and Pain, run by Baylor College of Medicine.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Aggression as Per the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Aggression Subscale (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02380703, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in