AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityPhase 2/3NCT02381184

Extended Clomiphene Citrate Regimen in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

A Phase 2/3 study testing clomiphene citrate and laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) in people with Infertility, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One hundred and thirty six anovulatory women with CC-resistant PCOS were scheduled randomly into two equal groups. Group A (n=68); received CC (100 mg/day from cycle day 3 for 10 days) for up to six cycles. Group B (n=68) underwent LOD and followed up for 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
clomiphene citrate and laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jun 2014to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: between 18-35 years
  • Period of infertility > 2 years
  • Serum level of FSH <10 U/L in the early follicular phase
  • All women were CC-resistant PCOS, as they failed to ovulate with a dose of CC of 150 mg/day for 5 days per cycle for at least three consecutive cycles
  • All women had patent Fallopian tubes proved by hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy and their partners satisfied the normal parameters of semen analysis according to the modified WHO criteria

Who cannot join

  • Infertility due to causes other than CC- resistant PCOS or due to combined factors
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥35 Kg/m²
  • The use of metformin, gonadotropins, hormonal contraception or diet regimen within the last 6 months
  • Women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, hyperprolactinaemia or abnormal thyroid function
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindications to Letrozole or clomiphene treatment
  • Previous LOD

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Benha Faculty of Medicine

    Banhā, El Qaluobia, 13518

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Extended Clomiphene Citrate Regimen Versus Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling for Ovulation Induction in Clomiphene Citrate-resistant Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

One hundred and thirty six anovulatory women with CC-resistant PCOS were scheduled randomly into two equal groups. Group A (n=68); received CC (100 mg/day from cycle day 3 for 10 days) for up to six cycles. Group B (n=68) underwent LOD and followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the ovulation rate in each group; secondary outcomes were midcycle endometrial thickness and serum estradiol, midluteal serum progesterone, and the rates of clinical pregnancy and abortion.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized trial included 136 anovulatory women with CC-resistant PCOS among those attending the Gynecology Outpatient Clinics of, Benha University Hospital, and private practice settings, Alkalubia, Egypt from August 2012 to August 2014. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee and written informed consents were obtained before the study commenced. Diagnosis of PCOS was based on the Rotterdam criteria (18), whereby diagnosis of PCOS require the presence of two of three criteria after the exclusion of other etiologies, i.e., oligomenorrhea and/or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism, and/or polycystic ovaries on ultrasound. Inclusion criteria: 1- Age: between 18-35 years. 2- Period of infertility > 2 years. 3- Serum level of FSH <10 U/L in the early follicular phase. 4- All women were CC-resistant PCOS, as they failed to ovulate with a dose of CC of 150 mg/day for 5 days per cycle for at least three consecutive cycles. 5- All women had patent Fallopian tubes proved by hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy and their partners satisfied the normal parameters of semen analysis according to the modified WHO criteria (19). Exclusion criteria: 1- Infertility due to causes other than CC- resistant PCOS or due to combined factors. 2- Body mass index (BMI) ≥35 Kg/m². 3- The use of metformin, gonadotropins, hormonal contraception or diet regimen within the last 6 months. 4- Women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, hyperprolactinaemia or abnormal thyroid function. 5- Hypersensitivity or contraindications to Letrozole or clomiphene treatment. 6- Previous LOD. The study was started two months after last CC treatment cycle to eliminate any post-treatment effect of CC.

At admission, a thorough evaluation of all participants was carried out via history taking and physical examination, which included anthropometric measurements. A baseline transvaginal ultrasound examination was done using 7-10 MHZ probe (Voluson 730 PRO V, GE Healthcare, USA) to measure endometrial thickness and exclude any pelvic pathology before treatment. Basal hormonal assays were performed on day 3 of the spontaneous or progestin induced cycle and included measurement of the serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone.

Randomization was done according to a computer generated random numerical table into two equal groups. Treatment allocation was concealed by using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Envelopes were opened consecutively by a third person (study nurse), who assigned patients to the extended Clomiphene Citrate group (Group A) or LOD group (Group B). Once allocated, the treatment was revealed to both the investigator and the patient. Group A (n =68) assigned to receive100 mg of clomiphene citrate (Clomid®; Hoechst Marion Russel, Cairo, Egypt) daily starting on day 3 of spontaneous or progestin induced cycle for 10 days. Group B (n =68) underwent LOD. Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, using three-puncture technique. Each ovary was cauterized perpendicular to its antimesenteric border at four points, each for 4 seconds at 40 W with a mixed current, using a monopolar electrosurgical needle (Karl Storz, ND, Germany). Each puncture was about 4 mm in diameter and 6-8 mm in depth. The ovary was cooled by irrigation with normal saline solution. Any, intraoperative or postoperative complication was reported. The follow-up was started from the next cycle after ovarian drilling up to 6 months.

Starting from cycle day 9, ultrasound scans were repeated daily to monitor follicle growth (number and mean diameter). Ultrasound examination was done by the same doctor to avoid interobserver variability and he was blinded to the treatment groups. When the optimal follicle size was reached (i.e. mean follicular diameter ≥ 18 mm), HCG 10,000 IU (Epifasi, EPICO, Egypt) was given intramuscular to trigger ovulation. No HCG was given and protected sexual intercourse was advised, if there were ≥ 3 follicles with a diameter ≥16mm to avoid the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple gestations. Intrauterine insemination was performed 36 - 40 hours after HCG injection using soft tip catheter.

Serum E2 and the endometrial thickness were measured on the day of HCG administration. The endometrial thickness was measured in a sagittal plane in the fundus of the uterus (point of maximal thickness) from the echogenic interface at the junction of the endometrium and myometrium Ovulation was confirmed when midluteal (day 21of the cycle) serum progesterone was ≥ 5 ng/mL. Serum β-hCG was determined 2 weeks after HCG injection for diagnosis of biochemical pregnancy. Sonographic evidence of an intrauterine gestational sac at 6 weeks gestation was considered an evident of a clinical pregnancy.

Treatment continued for up to six months. Patients were counseled for further lines of treatment if there was no ovulation as confirmed by midluteal serum progesterone level less than 5 ng /ml within 3 months.

The primary outcome was the ovulation rate in each group. Secondary outcomes were the endometrial thickness and serum estradiol (pg/ml), on the day of the hCG injection, midluteal serum progesterone (ng/ml) and the rates of clinical pregnancy and first trimester spontaneous abortion. The ovulation rate was calculated as the percentage of ovulatory cycles per total observed cycles. The cumulative pregnancy rate was defined as the number of pregnant patients to the total number of patients. The abortion rate was defined as the percentage of miscarriage during the first 12 weeks of gestation per total pregnancies, while the biochemical miscarriage was considered if pregnancy loss occurred in any confirmed biochemical pregnancy without ultrasound evidence of intrauterine pregnancy.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
clomiphene citrate, laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD)
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • clomiphene citrateDrug

    Also called Clomid

    receive100 mg of clomiphene citrate (Clomid®; Hoechst Marion Russel, Cairo, Egypt) daily starting on day 3 of spontaneous or progestin induced cycle for 10 days.

  • laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD)Procedure or surgery

    Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, using three-puncture technique

Study groups in NCT02381184
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clomiphene Citrate group (Group A)Active comparatorGroup A (n =68) assigned to receive100 mg of clomiphene citrate (Clomid®; Hoechst Marion Russel, Cairo, Egypt) daily starting on day 3 of spontaneous or progestin induced cycle for 10 days.
Receives: Drug: clomiphene citrate
laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) Group BActive comparatorGroup B (n =68) underwent LOD. Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, using three-puncture technique. Each ovary was cauterized perpendicular to its antimesenteric border at four points, each for 4 seconds at 40 W with a mixed current, using a monopolar electrosurgical needle (Karl Storz, ND, Germany). Each puncture was about 4 mm in diameter and 6-8 mm in depth. The ovary was cooled by irrigation with normal saline solution. Any, intraoperative or postoperative complication was reported. The follow-up was started from the next cycle after ovarian drilling up to 6 months
Receives: Procedure: laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the ovulation rate

    serum progesterone was ≥ 5 ng/mL.

    Measured: midluteal (day 21of the cycle)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. the endometrial thickness

    Sonographic of endometrial thickness

    Measured: the day of the hCG injection

  2. the rates of clinical pregnancy

    Serum β-hCG is determined Sonographic evidence of an intrauterine gestational sac at 6 weeks gestation was considered an evident of a clinical pregnancy.

    Measured: 2 weeks after HCG injection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02381184
Sponsor's protocol ID
khalid-walid
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
28 Feb 2015
Last updated
23 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing clomiphene citrate and laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) in people with Infertility, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the ovulation rate (time frame: midluteal (day 21of the cycle)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in