AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmbolismPRESERVENCT02381509

Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Carelon Research at 53 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

PRESERVE is a multi-center, prospective, open-label, non-randomized investigation of commercially available IVC filters from 6 manufacturers placed in subjects for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis
What is being tested?
IVC Filter
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,428 participants
Where
53 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2015to 20 Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects requiring the placement of one of 6 IVC filters for the prevention of PE.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female, age 18 years or older;
  • Requires IVC filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE);
  • Provide written informed consent and written HIPAA authorization prior to initiation of study procedures;
  • Willing to comply with the specified follow-up

Who cannot join

  • Subject is unable to participate in study evaluations pre- and post-treatment
  • Known sensitivity to contrast or serious contrast reaction such as anaphylaxis for which premedication is known to be unsuccessful in alleviating symptoms

Trial locations and contacts

53 sites in 1 country.

53 sites in 1 country

United States53 sites
  • Albany Medical Center

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • University of Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Boston Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02446

  • Carolinas Medical Center

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • UT Southwestern

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Miami Valley Hospital/Wright State University

    Dayton, Ohio, 45409

  • Duke Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Inova Fairfax Hospital

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

  • Holy Cross Hospital

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33301

  • Hackensack UMC

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Memorial Hermann Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Fairfield Medical Center

    Lancaster, Ohio, 43130

  • The Heart Institute Largo

    Largo, Florida, 33770

  • University of Arkansas

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90024

  • Feinstein Institute

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • University of Miami Hospital and Clinics/Jackson Memorial

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Medical College of WI/Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Yale New Haven Hospital

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06501

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10065

  • NY Presbyterian Weil Cornell Medical Ctr

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Southcoast Hospital

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747

  • Florida Hospital

    Orlando, Florida, 32803

  • Palo Alto VA

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Oregon Health & Science Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Rhode Island Hospital/Miriam Hospital

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Rochester Regional Health System

    Rochester, New York, 14621

  • William Beaumont Hospital

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073

  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94118

  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130

  • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303

  • St. Louis University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Overlook Medical Center

    Summit, New Jersey, 07901

  • University Hospital/SUNY Upstate

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Tallahasse Memorial Hospital

    Tallahassee, Florida, 32308

  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90502

  • University of Oklahoma-Tulsa

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Carle Heart & Vascular Institute

    Urbana, Illinois, 61801

  • Medstar Georgetown

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

  • St. Mary's Medical Center

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407

  • Wake Forest Baptist Health

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

PRESERVE is a multi-center, prospective, open-label, non-randomized investigation of commercially available IVC filters from 6 manufacturers placed in subjects for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study will enroll up to 1,800 IVC filter subjects (with a maximum of 300 subjects per IVC filter brand) at up to 60 sites in the US. The primary objective of this investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the commercially available IVC filters (retrievable and permanent) in subjects with clinical need for mechanical prophylaxis of PE with an IVC filter.

Read the detailed description

The overall goal is to characterize the current practice of IVC filter placement, including the indications, filter type, frequency and success of filter removal, safety of placement initially and in the long term, including filter mechanical stability and caval patency, and the frequency of subsequent episodes of PE and recurrence of DVT. The first steps are to identify the characteristics of use in a broad range of clinical practice settings in the US.

Commercially available IVC filters from 6 manufacturers in the United States will be used. The type of FDA-cleared IVC filter implanted will be left to the discretion of the Principal Investigator at the Site. The following IVC filters will be utilized in this trial:

  1. ALN Vena Cava Filter (with and without hook) (ALN Implants Chirurgicaux)
  2. Option™ Elite Retrievable Vena Cava Filter (Argon Medical Devices Inc., designed and manufactured by Rex Medical)
  3. VenaTech® LP Vena Cava Filter (B Braun Interventional Systems, Inc.) and VenaTech® Convertible™ Vena Cava Filter
  4. DENALI® Vena Cava Filter System (DL900F, DL900J) (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.)
  5. Cook Günther-Tulip™ Vena Cava Filter (Cook Incorporated)
  6. Cordis OPTEASE® Retrievable Vena Cava Filter and Cordis TRAPEASE® Permanent Vena Cava Filter (Cordis Corporation)

Subjects will be evaluated at Procedure, Discharge, 3-months, 6-months (phone), 12-months, 18-months (phone), and 24-months post-procedure. All subjects in whom the IVC filter is removed will be followed for 1-month postretrieval. Mandated follow-up imaging will be performed at 3 months (plain film) and 12 and 24 months (contrast abdominal CT). In addition, clinical visits with physical exam will be performed at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months.

Being tested
IVC Filter
Keywords
inferior vena cava filters
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IVC FilterDevice

Study groups in NCT02381509
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVC FilterIVC filter for the prevention of PE
Receives: Device: IVC Filter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite safety endpoint of freedom from clinically significant perforation after successful filter placement, filter embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, deep vein thrombosis, and perioperative serious adverse event

    Clinically significant perforation is defined as protrusion of filter legs through the wall of the IVC causing hemorrhage or hematoma or touching, impressing, or perforating another organ or that triggers the decision to remove the filter; resulting in an attempt to remove the IVC filter or requiring other intervention. Filter embolization is defined as movement of the filter or its components to a distant anatomic site completely out of the target zone after successful filter placement, confirmed by imaging. Caval thrombotic occlusion is defined as presence of an occluding thrombus in the IVC after filter insertion and documented by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, venography, or autopsy; this may be symptomatic or asymptomatic after successful filter placement. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is defined as new symptomatic DVT post-deployment, as determined by standard of care imaging. Serious adverse event is defined by ISO 14155.

    Measured: Within first 365 days (± 30 days)

  2. Composite effectiveness endpoint of procedural and technical success without occurrence of clinically significant pulmonary embolism

    New symptomatic PE confirmed by appropriate imaging

    Measured: At 12-months in-situ or 1-month post-retrieval (whichever comes first)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Mechanical Stability

    Defined by absence of: 1) Migration: cephalad movement of the filter >20mm relative to fixed anatomic landmarks compared to the time of placement, 2) Migration: caudal migration of the filter >20mm relative to fixed anatomic landmarks compared to the time of placement, 3) Perforation: >5mm outside apparent cava wall as determined by CT or perforation of adjacent viscera or major vessel, 4) Filter fracture: any loss of a filter's structural integrity (i.e. breakage or separation) documented by imaging or autopsy, 5) Filter embolization: post-deployment movement of the filter or its components to a distant anatomic site completely out of the target zone

    Measured: At 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months or at the time of filter retrieval

  2. Procedure-related complications

    In the judgment of the Principal Investigator

    Measured: At 3-months

  3. Major adverse events (composite and individual components)

    Defined as death, PE, caval thrombotic occlusion, DVT, clinically significant perforation, retroperitoneal hematoma, or adjacent organ penetration

    Measured: At 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, and 24-months

  4. Filter tilting >15°

    As determined by appropriate imaging

    Measured: At 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months or at the time of filter retrieval

  5. Filter retrieval

    Includes: Attempted retrieval, Successful retrieval, Failed retrieval, Percentage of retrieval success, Complications associated with filter retrieval, Reasons for failed retrieval

    Measured: Up to 24-months

  6. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint for each IVC filter brand tested only if the study is a success (i.e., both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints have been met)

    PE rate

    Measured: At 12-months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2015
  3. Primary completion17 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,428 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02381509
Sponsor's protocol ID
M01482
Acronym
PRESERVE
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
2 Mar 2015
Last updated
4 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No

Publications

  • Johnson MS, Spies JB, Scott KT, Kato BS, Mu X, Rectenwald JE, White RA, Lewandowski RJ, Khaja MS, Zuckerman DA, Casciani T, Gillespie DL. Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 May;11(3):573-585.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.11.002. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

    PubMed 36872169
  • Johnson MS, Spies JB, Scott KT, Kato BS, Mu X, Rectenwald JE, White RA, Lewandowski RJ, Khaja MS, Zuckerman DA, Casciani T, Gillespie DL. Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):517-528.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

    PubMed 36841633

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Carelon Research at 53 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 53 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite safety endpoint of freedom from clinically significant perforation after successful filter placement, filter embolization, caval thrombotic occlusion, deep vein thrombosis, and perioperative serious adverse event (time frame: Within first 365 days (± 30 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02381509, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in