AzTrials
AzTrials

Human Immunodeficiency VirusNCT02390310

Simplifying the Shang Ring Technique for Circumcision of Men and Boys

A study testing Shang Ring, injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%) and topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream) in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by EngenderHealth at 2 sites in Kenya.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a research study in Kenya that will examine the outcomes of participants aged 10-15 and 16 and older; and provider acceptability of the Shang Ring technique for male circumcision that would simplify use. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
What is being tested?
Shang Ring, injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%) and topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
574 participants
Where
2 sitesKenya
Study dates
May 2015to Jul 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 10 years and older;
  • Uncircumcised upon clinical examination;
  • In good general health;
  • Free of genital ulcerations or other visible signs of sexually transmitted infections upon clinical examination;
  • Participant and parent or legally acceptable representative (LAR) as applicable must be able to understand study procedures and requirements of study participation;
  • Freely consents to participate in the study and signs a written informed consent form if 18 years of age or greater
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Accompanied by the parent/LAR, who freely consents and signs an informed consent form for participation of the child into the study for participants less than 18 years old;
  • Assent from participant less than 18 years old who understand study procedure;
  • Participant must agree to return to the study site for the full schedule of follow-up visits after his circumcision (or as appropriate the Parent or LAR must agree to bring the participant);
  • Participant and parent/LAR as appropriate must agree to provide the study staff with an address, phone number, or other locator information while participating in the research study.

Who cannot join

  • Has a known allergy or sensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthesia;
  • Takes a medication that would be a contraindication for elective surgery, such as an anticoagulant or steroid;
  • Has known bleeding/clotting disorder (e.g. hemophilia);
  • Has any congenital genitourinary abnormality;
  • Has an active genital infection, anatomic abnormality or other condition (e.g. diabetes or sickle cell anemia), which in the opinion of the surgeon, prevents the man from undergoing a circumcision as part of this study; or,
  • Is currently participating in another biomedical research study.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Kenya2 sites
  • Homa Bay Level IV County Hospital

    Homa Bay, Homa Bay County

  • Vipingo Health Center

    Vipingo, Kilifi County

Other trials in Kenya

About this study

This is a research study in Kenya that will examine the outcomes of participants aged 10-15 and 16 and older; and provider acceptability of the Shang Ring technique for male circumcision that would simplify use. The study will be in two phases:

Phase 1 will explore the no-flip technique that has been used in China but will be used for the first time in Africa.

Phase 2 will be a randomized trial comparing use of tropical vs. injectable anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

The study, to be conducted in two phases, will examine procedural and clinical outcomes, as well as participant and provider acceptability, of adaptations of the Shang Ring technique for male circumcision that would simplify its use and increase its acceptability.

  • Phase I will be non-comparative for exploration of the no-flip technique for Shang Ring circumcision (i.e. all participants will be circumcised using the no-flip Shang Ring technique). Historical data from standard Shang Ring circumcisions conducted in Africa (Kenya, Uganda and Zambia) will be used as the comparison group. Men will be randomized to removal at 7 days after circumcision vs. delayed removal, to assess occurrence and safety of spontaneous detachments following circumcision with the no-flip technique.
  • Phase 2 will compare the use of topical vs. injectable anesthesia for Shang Ring circumcision. Participants will be randomized to topical vs. injectable anesthesia in a 2:1 ratio. The investigators rationalize the 2:1 randomization scheme given that the investigators will have just completed Phase I in which 200 men and boys will have been circumcised using the no-flip technique with injected anesthesia. However, given the subjectivity associated with using reported pain as the primary endpoint, the investigators believe it is critical to randomize participants in this phase of the study.
Being tested
Shang Ring, injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%), topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream)
Keywords
male circumcision, Shang Ring, male circumcision device, prevention, voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC)
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Shang RingDevice

    Also called Shang Ring No Flip Technique

    Comparison of healing times at 7 day and more than 7 days after circumcision.

  • injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%)Drug

    Comparison of Anesthesia methods for Shang Ring circumcision. Comparison of pain during Shang Ring circumcision when using injectable vs. topical anesthesia.

  • topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream)Drug

    Comparison of Anesthesia methods for Shang Ring circumcision. Comparison of pain during Shang Ring circumcision when using injectable vs. topical anesthesia.

Study groups in NCT02390310
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phase 1 - 7 Day RemovalActive comparatorShang Ring No Flip Technique: Removal of Shang Ring and assessment of healing 7 days after circumcision with no-flip technique.
Receives: Device: Shang Ring
Phase 1 - Delayed RemovalActive comparatorShang Ring No Flip Technique: Removal of ring or assessment of spontaneous detachment at more than 7 days to assess occurrence and safety following circumcision with the no-flip technique.
Receives: Device: Shang Ring
Phase 2 - Topical AnesthesiaActive comparatorComparison of Anesthesia methods for Shang Ring circumcision: Assessment of pain during and after surgery using topical anesthesia.
Receives: Drug: topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream)
Phase 2 - Injectable AnesthesiaActive comparatorComparison of Anesthesia methods for Shang Ring circumcision: Assessment of pain during and after surgery when using injectable anesthesia.
Receives: Drug: injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase I: Combined rate of moderate and severe adverse events (AEs) as a measure of safety of the no-flip technique for Shang Ring circumcision in males aged 10 years and older

    We will evaluate the rate of moderate and severe AEs (combined) following Shang Ring MC using the no-flip technique based on clinical exam findings.

    Measured: 42 days

  2. Phase 2: Pain measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS) experienced during the Shang Ring circumcision procedure with topical (EMLA Cream; lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) vs. injectable (1% lidocaine) anesthesia.

    The outcome metric for the primary outcome will be maximum pain reported to have been experienced by participants during the Shang Ring circumcision, assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), reported immediately after completion of the Shang Ring circumcision procedure

    Measured: 42 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Phase I: Ease of use of the Shang Ring with the no-flip technique as measured by MC procedure and device removal times and problems encountered during MC and removal procedures

    To evaluate ease of use with the no-flip technique we will document MC procedure and device removal times and problems encountered during MC and removal procedures

    Measured: 42 days

  2. Phase I: Satisfaction of the no-flip Shang Ring among study participants

    we will interview participants/parents/guardians to document acceptability and satisfaction with the Shang Ring circumcision, procedure and post-procedure pain, and time to return to normal activity

    Measured: 42 days

  3. Phase I: Occurrence of spontaneous detachment among those participants wearing the Shang Ring for more than 7 days days after circumcision

    we will gather data on timing of spontaneous detachment among those participants wearing the Shang Ring for more than 7 days days after circumcision

    Measured: 42 days

  4. Phase I: Safety of spontaneous detachment as measured by AEs among those participants wearing the Shang Ring for more than 7 days after circumcision

    we will gather data to document AEs among those participants wearing the Shang Ring for more than 7 days after circumcision

    Measured: 42 days

  5. Phase 2: Safety of topical vs. injectable anesthesia for local anesthesia during Shang Ring circumcision as measured by rates of moderate and severe AEs (combined rates)

    we will document rates of moderate and severe AEs among those having a Shang Ring circumcision with topical vs. injectable anesthesia

    Measured: 42 days

  6. Phase 2: Satisfaction with topical vs. injectable anesthetic among study participants

    we will interview study participants and their parents/guardians appropriate to document acceptability and satisfaction with the circumcision, the Shang Ring procedure, post-procedure pain, and time to return to normal activity between the two techniques

    Measured: 42 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
574 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02390310
Sponsor's protocol ID
OPP1084493
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
5 Feb 2015
Last updated
3 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Al Hussein Alawamlh O, Awori QD, Barone MA, Kim SJ, Goldstein M, Li PS, Lee RK. No-flip ShangRing circumcision in 10-12 year old boys: Results from randomized clinical trials in Kenya. PLoS One. 2020 May 22;15(5):e0233150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233150. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32442198
  • Awori Q, Li PS, Lee RK, Ouma D, Oundo M, Barasa M, Obura N, Mwamkita D, Simba R, Oketch J, Nyangweso N, Maina M, Kiswi N, Kirui M, Chirchir B, Goldstein M, Barone MA. Use of topical versus injectable anaesthesia for ShangRing circumcisions in men and boys in Kenya: Results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0218066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218066. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31412032

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Shang Ring, injectable anesthesia (lidocaine 1%) and topical anesthesia (lidocaine 2.5%, prilocaine 2.5% cream) in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by EngenderHealth at 2 sites in Kenya.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase I: Combined rate of moderate and severe adverse events (AEs) as a measure of safety of the no-flip technique for Shang Ring circumcision in males aged 10 years and older (time frame: 42 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02390310, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in