AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical Therapy TechniquesNCT02391376

Heat Transfer by Three Types of Packs and Its Implication on the Flexibility of the Lower Back

A study testing moist heat pack; ;, seed pack and gel pack in people with Physical Therapy Techniques, run by Universidad Católica del Maule.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects generated by the application of three different packs on the flexibility of the lower back of sedentary students. Method: Three sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a hot pack (moist heat pack-MHP, seed pack-SP or gel pack-GP) were applied on the lower… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Therapy Techniques
What is being tested?
moist heat pack; ;, seed pack and gel pack
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2012to Mar 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • sedentary subjects (physical activity performed less than 3 times-week)

Who cannot join

  • recent scars or wounds in the lower back region,
  • history of peripheral vascular diseases,
  • impaired sensitivity,
  • body mass index above 25 kg/m2,
  • fat index above 14% according to Faulkner's formula.

About this study

Official title: Heat Transfer by Three Types of Packs and Its Implication on the Flexibility of the Lower Back: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects generated by the application of three different packs on the flexibility of the lower back of sedentary students. Method: Three sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a hot pack (moist heat pack-MHP, seed pack-SP or gel pack-GP) were applied on the lower back. Pack and lower back temperatures and erythema were registered every 5 minutes. Schober test was performed before first session and after the third session.

Read the detailed description

A different type of hot pack was applied in the lower back of each subject: moist heat pack (MHP) , seed pack (SP) or gel pack (GP) as directed by each manufacturer and in accordance with clinical practice for 15 minutes for 3 consecutive days. On day one, prior to the application of the pack, the initial evaluation of flexibility of the lumbar spine of each subject was recorded using Schober test. On day 3, after the application of each pack, the final evaluation of the flexibility of the lower back was performed using the same test. During the sessions, the temperature of the corporal area, the temperature of the pack and the pigmentation change of the corporal area were assessed every 5 minutes through a photographic record.The method used to assess the flexibility was the Schober Test. In order to perform the evaluation, the patient was placed in standing position with its bare feet slightly apart; two points were marked on the skin, one above the spinous apophysis S1 and another point, 10 cm above that mark. The patient performed a maximal trunk flexion without flexing the knees and the increase of the distance between the two marks was recorded. After this evaluation, the packs were applied on the lower back, wrapped in two layers of towels in order to avoid skin injuries by the heat. The temperature of the lower back and of each type of pack was recorded at minutes 0 (baseline measurement), 5, 10 and 15. Temperature was measured through a digital pyrometer at a set distance of 50 cm and it was held perpendicular to patient skin and the pack. The photographic record of the lower back of each subject, before and after each session of superficial thermotherapy, was recorded using a digital camera . The camera was placed perpendicular to the lower back, at a distance of 50 cm. The brightness of the photograph was taken into account so as not to affect the later analysis of the erythema. The erythema analysis of the lower back was performed with the freeware Picture Color Analyzer (Shizuoka, Japan; http://www.isao.com). The software measures the red color intensity of each pixel (attributing a value between 1 and 255) within the chosen area. The average red color value obtained in arbitrary units is the result of the following formula: Average red color = total red color value / (255 X number of pixels in the area).

Being tested
moist heat pack; ;, seed pack, gel pack
Keywords
superficial heat, hot pack, thermotherapy, physiotherapy, Schober Test
Medical subject headings
Hyperthermia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • moist heat pack; ;Other

    Three sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a moist heat pack-MHP applied on the lower back.

  • seed packOther

    Three sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a seed pack-SP applied on the lower back.

  • gel packOther

    Three sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a gel pack-GP applied on the lower back.

Study groups in NCT02391376
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
moist heat pack groupExperimentalThree sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a moist heat pack on the lower back of healthy subjects
Receives: Other: moist heat pack; ;
seed pack groupExperimentalThree sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a seed pack on the lower back of healthy subjects
Receives: Other: seed pack
gel pack groupExperimentalThree sessions of 15 minutes of superficial heat through a gel pack on the lower back of healthy subjects
Receives: Other: gel pack

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of lower back flexibility (Schober test)

    Schober test

    Measured: Before first session (day 1) and after the third session (day 3-final day).

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change of pack and lower back temperatures

    Measured: every 5 minutes during each one of the three 15 minutes sessions

  2. Change of lower back erythema

    Measured: every 5 minutes during each one of the three 15 minutes sessions

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02391376
Sponsor's protocol ID
TUCM/1261/B326e/2013
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
3 Mar 2015
Last updated
18 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing moist heat pack; ;, seed pack and gel pack in people with Physical Therapy Techniques, run by Universidad Católica del Maule.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of lower back flexibility (Schober test) (time frame: Before first session (day 1) and after the third session (day 3-final day).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in