Postural StabilityNCT02392962
Dynamic and Static Stretching on Postural Stability, Reaction Time and Countermovement Jump of Sprinters
A study testing Static Stretching and Dynamic Stretching in people with Postural Stability, run by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
All the athletes should perform a warm-up consisting of five minutes of jogging and static stretching (Experimental Group 1) or dynamic stretching (Experimental Group 2). Before the beginning of the study and right after performing the stretching protocol, the investigators evaluated the unipedal postural stability… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 26 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Postural Stability
- What is being tested?
- Static Stretching and Dynamic Stretching
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 26 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- National level Sprinters
- Two years or more of experience
Who cannot join
- Free of injuries in the last six months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efectos de la Fatiga en el Rendimiento físico en el Ejercicio de Sentadillas
All the athletes should perform a warm-up consisting of five minutes of jogging and static stretching (Experimental Group 1) or dynamic stretching (Experimental Group 2). Before the beginning of the study and right after performing the stretching protocol, the investigators evaluated the unipedal postural stability, the acustic reaction time, the joint position sense of the knee and the countermovement jump of the athletes.
- Conditions
- Postural Stability
- Being tested
- Static Stretching, Dynamic Stretching
- Keywords
- proprioception, countermovement jump, postural balance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Static StretchingProcedure or surgery
To analyze the immediate effects of static stretching on performance of sprinters
Dynamic StretchingProcedure or surgery
To analyze the immediate effects of dynamic stretching on performance of sprinters
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental I | Experimental | This group performed static stretching Receives: Procedure: Static Stretching |
| Experimental II | Active comparator | This group performed dynamic stretching Receives: Procedure: Dynamic Stretching |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the unipedal postural balance of athletes
Monopodal postural stability (15 seconds as still as possible on a baropodometric platform in left-leg and right-leg monopodal support)
Measured: baseline and 15 minutes
Change in counter-movement jump of athletes
A maximum vertical jump with counter-movement.
Measured: baseline and 17 minutes
Change in Joint Position Sense of the knee of athletes
Acuity of repositioining a previous position of the knee joint
Measured: baseline and 20 minutes
Change in Acustic Reaction Time of athletes
Time spent to rise the dominant leg after an acustic signal
Measured: baseline and 22 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionMar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postural StabilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Jaén
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Natalia Romero-Franco, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02392962
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEIH 201014-2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efectos de la Fatiga en el Rendimiento físico en el Ejercicio de Sentadillas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02392962
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEIH 201014-2
- Conditions
- Postural Stability
- Keywords
- proprioception, countermovement jump, postural balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Jaén
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
All the athletes should perform a warm-up consisting of five minutes of jogging and static stretching (Experimental Group 1) or dynamic stretching (Experimental Group 2). Before the beginning of the study and right after performing the stretching protocol, the investigators evaluated the unipedal postural stability, the acustic reaction time, the joint position sense of the knee and the countermovement jump of the athletes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental I | Experimental | Procedure: Static StretchingThis group performed static stretching |
| Experimental II | Active comparator | Procedure: Dynamic StretchingThis group performed dynamic stretching |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 26 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- National level Sprinters
- Two years or more of experience
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Free of injuries in the last six months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Static StretchingTo analyze the immediate effects of static stretching on performance of sprinters | Procedure or surgery | Experimental I |
| Dynamic StretchingTo analyze the immediate effects of dynamic stretching on performance of sprinters | Procedure or surgery | Experimental II |
Primary outcome
Change in the unipedal postural balance of athletes
Time frame: baseline and 15 minutes
Monopodal postural stability (15 seconds as still as possible on a baropodometric platform in left-leg and right-leg monopodal support)
Change in counter-movement jump of athletes
Time frame: baseline and 17 minutes
A maximum vertical jump with counter-movement.
Change in Joint Position Sense of the knee of athletes
Time frame: baseline and 20 minutes
Acuity of repositioining a previous position of the knee joint
Change in Acustic Reaction Time of athletes
Time frame: baseline and 22 minutes
Time spent to rise the dominant leg after an acustic signal
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2015.
Related trials for Postural Stability
Enrolling by invitation
Online-Delivered Core Stability Exercises in Postpartum Women
Postpartum, Trunk Muscle Endurance
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Visual and Vestibular Rehabilitation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Visual Rehabilitation
RecruitingObservational study
Posture, Proprioception, Core Stability, and Balance in Weightlifters
Balance Assessment, Kyphosis Postural Thoracic
Recruiting
EFFECT OF MULLIGAN CERVICAL SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDE ON POSTURAL STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NECK PAIN
Chronic Neck Pain With Mobility Deficits, Chronic Neck Pain With Mobility Deficits (> 3 Months)
Enrolling by invitation
Objective Longitudinal Monitoring of Postural Stability and Gait During Neurorehabilitation: Clinical Application of Instrumented Posturography and Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis
Stroke, PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Static Stretching and Dynamic Stretching in people with Postural Stability, run by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the unipedal postural balance of athletes (time frame: baseline and 15 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2015.