Metastatic Breast CancerPhase 3OVERNCT02394496
Overcoming Endocrine Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Fulvestrant, Lapatinib and Aromatase Inhibitors in people with Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Consorzio Oncotech at 69 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Based on these results it can be envisioned that the majority of endocrine-responsive post-menopausal breast cancer patients will be treated with an AI as adjuvant therapy (front-line, switching or extending) and/or as first-line management of metastatic breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Fulvestrant, Lapatinib and Aromatase Inhibitors
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 396 participants
- Where
- 69 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of written informed consent
- Histological/cytological confirmation of breast cancer
- Documented positive hormone receptor status (ER+ve and/or PgR+ve) of primary or metastaic tumor issue, according to the local laboratory parameters
- Postmenopausal women
- Confirmed progression of disease after an adjuvant therapy or a therapy for metastatic disease with an aromatase inhibitors
- Patients demonstrating prior response to AI therapy
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with measurable disease as per RECIST criteria /Patients with bone lesions, lytic or mixed (lytic + sclerotic), in the absence of measurable disease as defined by RECIST criteria.
- May have received prior radiotherapy as treatment for primary or metastatic tumour; however, is not required for study entry;
- Life expectancy of at least 8 months
- WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2
- Patients with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 5 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence.
- Are able to swallow and retain oral medication;
- Are able to complete all screening assessments as outlined in the protocol;
- Patients must have normal organ and marrow function
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within the institutional normal range
Who cannot join
- Previous therapy with Fulvestrant and/or Lapatinib;
- Patients with HER 2 overexpressing, either IHC 3+ or FISH +;
- Concurrent non study anti-cancer therapy (
- Have unresolved or unstable, serious toxicity from prior administration
- Have malabsorption syndrome,
- Have a concurrent disease or condition that would make the patient inappropriate for study participation,
Show all 13Show fewer
- Have an active or uncontrolled infection;
- Have dementia, altered mental status, or any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent;
- Have a known history of uncontrolled or symptomatic angina, arrhythmias, or CHF;
- Receive concurrent treatment with an investigational agent or participate in another clinical trial;
- Receive concurrent treatment with prohibited medications
- Used an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study medication;
- Have a known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to fulvestrant, aromatase inhibitors or lapatinib or excipients.
Trial locations and contacts
69 sites in 1 country.
Clinical Research Technology contact
69 sites in 1 country
Italy69 sites, 65 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico S.O.C. di Oncologia Medica C
Aviano, Pordenone, 33081
SIMON SPAZZAPAN, Md
- Recruiting
Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II' - IRCCS Ospedale Oncologico U.O. Oncologia Medica e Sperimentale
Bari, Bari, 70124
GIUSEPPE COLUCCI, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera G. Rummo U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Benevento, Benevento, 82100
BRUNO DANIELE, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli 'Sacro Cuore di Gesù' U.O. Oncologia
Benevento, Benevento, 82100
ANTONIO FEBBRARO, Md
- Recruiting
Presidio Ospedaliero 'Antonio Perrino' U.O.C. di Oncologia
Brindisi, Brindisi, 72100
SAVERIO CINIERI, Md
- Recruiting
dazione di Ricerca e Cura 'Giovanni Paolo II' U.O. di Ginecologia Oncologia
Campobasso, Campobasso, 86100
GABRIELLA MARIA FERRANDINA, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Civile di Campobasso - A. Cardarelli U.O.C. Oncologia Medica
Campobasso, Campobasso, 86100
FRANCESCO CARROZZA, Md
- Recruiting
Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.) Direzione di Oncologia Medica
Candiolo, Torino, 10060
Massimo Aglietta, MD
Massimo Aglietta, MD
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera 'Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano' U.O.C. di Oncologia
Caserta, Caserta, 81100
LUIGI DE LUCIA, Md
- Recruiting
Presidio Ospedaliero Garibaldi - Nesima S.C. di Oncologia Medica
Catania, Catania, 95122
ROBERTO BORDONARO, Md
- Recruiting
A.O.U. Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele e Ferrarotto U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Catania, Catania, 95124
CALOGERO BUSCARINO, Md
- Recruiting
Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia U.O. Oncologia Medica
Catania, Catania, 95126
MICHELE CARUSO, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Anna U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Como, Como, 22100
MONICA GIORDANO, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale San Sebastiano Day Hospital Oncologico - Divisione Medicina Acuti
Correggio, Reggio Emilia, 42015
ALESSANDRA ZOBOLI, Md
- Recruiting
A.S.U.R. Zona Territoriale 6 Fabriano U.O. Oncologia Medica
Fabriano, Ancona, 60044
ROSA RITA SILVA, Md
- Recruiting
Arcispedaliera S. Anna di Ferrara U.O. Oncologia Clinica
Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121
MONICA INDELLI, Md
- Active, not recruiting
Ospedale 'S. Antonio Abate' U.O. Oncologia
Gallarate, Varese, 21013
- Recruiting
I.R.C.C.S. A.O.U. San Martino - I.S.T. S.C. Oncologia Medica A
Genova, Genova, 16132
LUCIA DEL MASTRO, Md
- Recruiting
ASRM - Ospedale F. Veneziale - Zona di Isernia U.O. Oncologia
Isernia, Isernia, 86170
LIBERATO DI LULLO, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Civile Renzetti U.O. Oncologia Medica
Lanciano, Chieti, 66034
ANTONIO NUZZO, Md
- Recruiting
A.S.L. LT - Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti U.O.C. di Oncologia Medica
Latina, Latina, 04100
ENZO VELTRI, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Vito Fazzi U.O. di Oncologia
Lecce, Lecce, 73100
ROSACHIARA FORCIGNANÒ, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Unico Versilia U.O. Oncologia Medica
Lido di Camaiore, Lucca, 55041
Domenico Amoroso, Md
- Recruiting
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS) Dipartimento di Medicina - Unità Cure Mediche
Milan, Milano, 20141
FRANCO NOLÈ, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Cardarelli Divisione Di Oncologia
Naples, Napoli, 80131
GIACOMO CARTENÌ, Md
- Recruiting
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori - Fondazione G. Pascale U.O. Oncologia Medica Senologica
Naples, Napoli, 80131
MICHELINO DE LAURENTIIS, Md
- Recruiting
Università di Napoli Federico II - Facoltà di Medicina Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia - Oncologia
Naples, Napoli, 80131
SABINO DE PLACIDO, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria U.O.C. Oncologia Medica
Negrar, Verona, 37024
STEFANIA GORI, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera - Ospedale Umberto I U.O. di Medicina e Oncoematologia
Nocera Inferiore, Salerno, 84014
ALFONSO MARIA D'ARCO, Md
- Recruiting
A.O.U. 'Maggiore della Carità' S.C. Oncologia
Novara, Novara, 28100
Oscar Alabisio, MD
- Recruiting
Istituto Oncologico Veneto - I.R.C.C.S. U.O. di Oncologia Medica II
Padova, Padova, 35128
ANTONIO JIRILLO, Md
- Recruiting
A.O.U.P. 'Paolo Giaccone' U.O.C. di Oncologia Medica
Palermo, Palermo, 90127
ANTONIO RUSSO, Md
- Recruiting
A.R.N.A.S - Ospedale Civico e Benfratelli G. Di Cristina e M. Ascoli Divisione di Oncologia Medica
Palermo, Palermo, 90127
VITA LEONARDI, Md
- Active, not recruiting
Ospedale S. Francesco da Paola U.O. Oncologia Medica
Paola, Cosenza, 87027
- Recruiting
Fondazione S. Maugeri IRCCS U.O. Oncologia Medica II
Pavia, Pavia, 27100
ANTONIO BERNARDO, Md
- Active, not recruiting
IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo S.C. di Oncologia Medica
Pavia, Pavia, 27100
- Recruiting
Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia S.C. Oncologia Medica
Perugia, Perugia, 06122
CARLO BASURTO, Md
- Recruiting
AUSL di Piacenza - Ospedale U.O. Oncologia Medica
Piacenza, Piacenza, 29121
LUIGI CAVANNA, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale 'Felice Lotti' - Azienda USL 5 di Pisa U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Pontedera, Pisa, 56025
Giacomo Allegrini, MD
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria degli Angeli U.O. Oncolgia Medica
Pordenone, Pordenone, 33170
SILVANA SARACCHINI, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi - Melacrino - Morelli U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, 89125
MARIO NARDI, Md
- Recruiting
Arcispedale S.Maria Nuova Servizio di Oncologia
Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, 42123
CORRADO BONI, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Oncologico Regionale - Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Basilicata U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, 85028
Michele Aieta, MD
- Recruiting
Istituto Regina Elena per lo studio e la cura dei tumori S.C. Oncologia Medica A
Roma, Roma, 00144
FRANCESCO COGNETTI, mD
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo - Forlanini Day Hospital Oncologia Mammella
Roma, Roma, 00149
ANNA MARIA PARISI, Md
- Recruiting
Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' U.O.C. Ginecologia Oncologica
Roma, Roma, 00168
GIOVANNI SCAMBIA, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli San Giovanni Calibita - Isola Tiberina U.O. Oncologia
Roma, Roma, 00186
ANGELO FEDELE SCINTO, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Andrea - Università La Sapienza U.O.C. Oncologia
Roma, Roma, 00189
PAOLO MARCHETTI, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Dipartimento di Oncologia - Day Hospital Oncologico
Roma, Roma, 00189
IDA PAVESE, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale G. Da Procida - ASL SA U.O. di Oncologia
Salerno, Salerno, 84126
MARIA LUISA BARZELLONI, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera 'San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona' Struttura Complessa di Oncologia
Salerno, Salerno, 84131
CLEMENTINA SAVASTANO, Md
- Recruiting
IRCCS - 'Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza' U.O. Oncologia Medica
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013
EVARISTO MAIELLO, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Busto Arsizio - Presidio Ospedaliero Saronno S.C. Oncologia Medica
Saronno, Varese, 21047
CLAUDIO VERUSIO, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera n. 1 - Annunziata Oncologia Medica
Sassari, Sassari, 07100
ANTONIO CONTU, Md
- Recruiting
Università di Sassari U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Sassari, Sassari, 07100
MARIA GIUSEPPA SAROBBA, Md
- Recruiting
AOVV - Ospedale E. Morelli S.O.C. Medicina Interna - D.H. Oncologico-Ematologico-Internistico
Sondalo, Sondrio, 23035
GIUSEPPE VALMADRE, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Civile di Sondrio - Azienda Ospedaliera Valtellina e Valchiavenna S.C. Oncologia Medica
Sondrio, Sondrio, 23100
ALESSANDRO BERTOLINI, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale 'SS. Trinità' U.O. Oncologia Medica
Sora, Frosinone, 03039
TERESA GAMUCCI, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Civico San Vincenzo U.O. Oncologia Medica
Taormina, Messina, 98039
FRANCESCO FERRAÙ, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Evangelico Valdese - ASL TO1 U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Torino, Torino, 10125
ANNA TURLETTI, Md
- Recruiting
Presidio San Lazzaro - A.O.U. San Giovanni Battista di Torino (Molinette) S.C. Oncologia Medica II
Torino, Torino, 10126
Mario Airoldi, MD
- Recruiting
Università degli Studi di Torino - Ospedale S. Anna U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Torino, Torino, 10126
ANTONIO DURANDO, Md
- Recruiting
Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I S.C.D.U. Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Torino, Torino, 10128
NICOLETTA BIGLIA, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio-Caravaggio U.O. Oncologia Medica
Treviglio, Bergamo, 24047
Sandro Barni, Md
- Active, not recruiting
Centro Oncologico A.S.S. N°1 Triestina Centro Sociale Oncologico
Trieste, Trieste, 34147
- Recruiting
A.O.U. ´S. Maria della Misericordia´ Dipartimento di Oncologia
Udine, Udine, 33100
FABIO PUGLISI, Md
- Recruiting
Presidio Ospedaliero di Vallo della Lucania U.O. Oncologia Medica
Vallo della Lucania, Salerno, 84078
PIETRO MASULLO, Md
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera Circolo e Fondazione Macchi U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Varese, Varese, 21100
GRAZIELLA PINOTTI, Md
- Recruiting
Presidio Ospedaliero 'Belcolle' U.O.C. Oncologia Medica
Viterbo, Viterbo, 01100
LUCA MOSCETTI, Md
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial With Factorial Design Comparing Fulvestrant ± Lapatinib ± Aromatase Inhibitor in Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Based on these results it can be envisioned that the majority of endocrine-responsive post-menopausal breast cancer patients will be treated with an AI as adjuvant therapy (front-line, switching or extending) and/or as first-line management of metastatic breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
In presence of ER hypersensitivity even a small amount of ER may be sufficient for sustained growth signalling. On the other hand, ER disruption operated by fulvestrant is not complete, particularly in the initial phase of treatment. From phase III trials, indeed, The invertigators know that with the standard 250mg monthly dose the steady state of circulating drug is reached only after 5-6 injections. This may play a role since, as long as ER downregulation is concerned, a clear dose-response relationship has been reported. In such a situation, fulvestrant efficacy may be partial, particularly because the concomitant AI discharge yields a restoration of physiologic postmenopausal levels of circulating oestrogens. New dosing schedule are currently under investigation both to accelerate the achievement of the steady state (loading dose) and to achieve higher circulating drug levels (high dose) (86).
In this trial the investigators will be using the so-called 'loading dose'.
Further potential strategies to improve fulvestrant efficacy in this setting are:
- avoid the restoration of circulating oestrogens; B) interfere with molecular mechanisms that produce ER hypersensitivity by targeting the EGFR/ERBB2/ERB3 system.
- avoid the restoration of circulating oestrogens: this should be achieved by holding the AI treatment. Because some cases of progression upon AIs may be related to an inefficient inhibition of the aromatase it is a logical step to test whether changing AI class (from type I, steroidal, to type II, non steroidal, and vice-versa) (87), may improve fulvestrant efficay. In this view, pts in this trial will be randomized to receive fulvestrant (loading dose) with or without the alternate class AI treatment. Circulating oestrogens levels will be tracked to verify inhibition of aromatase for pts assigned to concurrent AI treatment.
- Interfere with growth factors-mediated ER hypersensitivity: although fulvestrant is able to overcome the ER hypersensitivity of LTED (88) and produce a growth arrest, this activity may not be complete because of incomplete ER disruption, but also because of a direct stimulation of growth by the hyperactivated EGFR/ERBB2/ERB3 system. Laboratory evidence support this hypothesis. Indeed, breast cancer cell lines exposed to long-term treatment with fulvestrant became insensitive to the drug and restore growth (89). This growth does not appear, however, related to the development of direct resistance to the drug, since ER mediated signalling continue to be efficiently suppressed in these cells; rather it may be driven by the use of alternative growth-stimulating pathway, including the EGFR system. Indeed, it can be abrogated by the EGFR-tyrosine Kinase inhibitor Gefitinib (IRESSA™) and by an MAPK-inhibitor (90). Lapatinib (GW572016) is an orally active small molecule that reversibly inhibits ErbB1 and ErbB2 tyrosine kinases, which in turn blocks phosphorylation and activation of Erk1/2 (p-Erk1/2) and Akt (p-Akt) in ErbB1- and/ or ErbB2-expressing tumor cell lines and xenografts (91-94). Lapatinib elicits cytostatic or cytotoxic antitumor effects depending on the cell type (95;96). Because ErbB2-containing heterodimers exert potent mitogenic signals, simultaneously interrupting both ErbB1 and ErbB2 signaling is an appealing therapeutic approach. Moreover, ErbB3 signaling is also involved in lapatinib action. Indeed ErbB3 is kinase-dead and relies on ErbB2 for transactivation: ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimers are potent activators of the PI3K-Akt survival pathway (97;98), which can, in turn, inhibited by lapatinib.
Based on its molecular mechanism of action, on its fair toxicity profile and on its promising, although preliminary, activity data, Lapatinib appears an ideal candidate to combine with Fulvestrant in the attempt to improve its efficacy in patients progressing on AIs.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Fulvestrant, Lapatinib, Aromatase Inhibitors, Placebo Lapatinib
- Keywords
- Fulvestrant, Lapatinib, Aromatase Inhibitor, metastatic breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FulvestrantDrug
Also called Faslodex
Fulvestrant 500mg (2 x 5ml) im injections as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 500mg (2x5ml) on Day 14 (+/- 3 days) , Day 28 (+/- 3 days) and every 28 Days (+/- 3 days) thereafter.
LapatinibDrug
1500mg (TBD) O.S. qd
Aromatase InhibitorsDrug
Also called Aromatase Inhibitor
as indicated in the Summary Product Characteristic
Placebo LapatinibDrug
Also called Placebo
1500mg (TBD) O.S. qd
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ARM 1 | Experimental | Fulvestrant + Placebo Lapatinib Receives: Drug: Fulvestrant; Drug: Placebo Lapatinib |
| ARM 2 | Experimental | Fulvestrant + Aromatase Inhibitors + Placebo Lapatinib Receives: Drug: Fulvestrant; Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors; Drug: Placebo Lapatinib |
| ARM 3 | Experimental | Fulvestrant + Lapatinib Receives: Drug: Fulvestrant; Drug: Lapatinib |
| ARM 4 | Experimental | Fulvestrant + Lapatinib + Aromatase Inhibitors Receives: Drug: Fulvestrant; Drug: Lapatinib; Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS): it is defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Time To Progression
Time to Progression (TTP): it is defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or cancer-related death, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Overall Survival
Overall survival. (OS): it is defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date death from any cause.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Response Rate:
Response Rate: It will be classified according to the RECIST criteria.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Clinical Benefit Rate
Clinical Benefit Rate: it is defined as the sum of rates of PR, CR and SD lasting ≥ 6 months.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 6 months
Safety as measured by expected and Non-expected toxicity events
To evaluate expected and Non-expected toxicity events that occur in more than 5% of patients in any of the study group, as reported by the CTC.
Measured: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Safety assessed by number of Participants with Adverse Events
Withdrawals from the treatment plan (causes of withdrawals will be compared per each study group).
Measured: time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (61)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 396 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Consorzio Oncotech
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sabino De Placido, MD, Principal investigator, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia Oncologia Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"Michelino De Laurentiis, MD, Study chair, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori - Fondazione G. Pascale
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02394496
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GIM8-OVER
- Other IDs
- 2007-006031-30
- Acronym
- OVER
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM. ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):624-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7261.624. No abstract available.
PubMed 10977847Fisher B, Anderson S, Tan-Chiu E, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Dimitrov NV, Atkins JN, Abramson N, Merajver S, Romond EH, Kardinal CG, Shibata HR, Margolese RG, Farrar WB. Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for axillary node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):931-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.931.
PubMed 11181655Meric F, Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK. HER2/neu in the management of invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Apr;194(4):488-501. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01121-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 11949754Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 15;344(11):783-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.
PubMed 11248153Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Sep;37 Suppl 4:S9-15. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00231-3.
PubMed 11597399Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;2(2):127-37. doi: 10.1038/35052073.
PubMed 11252954Burstein HJ. The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1652-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058197. No abstract available.
PubMed 16236735Lu Y, Zi X, Zhao Y, Mascarenhas D, Pollak M. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 19;93(24):1852-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1852.
PubMed 11752009Xia W, Liu LH, Ho P, Spector NL. Truncated ErbB2 receptor (p95ErbB2) is regulated by heregulin through heterodimer formation with ErbB3 yet remains sensitive to the dual EGFR/ErbB2 kinase inhibitor GW572016. Oncogene. 2004 Jan 22;23(3):646-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207166.
PubMed 14737100Gerber HP, Malik AK, Solar GP, Sherman D, Liang XH, Meng G, Hong K, Marsters JC, Ferrara N. VEGF regulates haematopoietic stem cell survival by an internal autocrine loop mechanism. Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):954-8. doi: 10.1038/nature00821.
PubMed 12087404Albanell J, Codony-Servat J, Rojo F, Del Campo JM, Sauleda S, Anido J, Raspall G, Giralt J, Rosello J, Nicholson RI, Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases: association with epidermal growth factor receptor/transforming growth factor alpha expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma and inhibition by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments. Cancer Res. 2001 Sep 1;61(17):6500-10.
PubMed 11522647Rubin Grandis J, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, Day R, Holst VA, Wagener MM, Drenning SD, Tweardy DJ. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jun 3;90(11):824-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.11.824.
PubMed 9625170Howell GM, Humphrey LE, Awwad RA, Wang D, Koterba A, Periyasamy B, Yang J, Li W, Willson JK, Ziober BL, Coleman K, Carboni J, Lynch M, Brattain MG. Aberrant regulation of transforming growth factor-alpha during the establishment of growth arrest and quiescence of growth factor independent cells. J Biol Chem. 1998 Apr 10;273(15):9214-23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.15.9214.
PubMed 9535913Jiang D, Yang H, Willson JK, Liang J, Humphrey LE, Zborowska E, Wang D, Foster J, Fan R, Brattain MG. Autocrine transforming growth factor alpha provides a growth advantage to malignant cells by facilitating re-entry into the cell cycle from suboptimal growth states. J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 20;273(47):31471-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31471.
PubMed 9813060Rusnak DW, Affleck K, Cockerill SG, Stubberfield C, Harris R, Page M, Smith KJ, Guntrip SB, Carter MC, Shaw RJ, Jowett A, Stables J, Topley P, Wood ER, Brignola PS, Kadwell SH, Reep BR, Mullin RJ, Alligood KJ, Keith BR, Crosby RM, Murray DM, Knight WB, Gilmer TM, Lackey K. The characterization of novel, dual ErbB-2/EGFR, tyrosine kinase inhibitors: potential therapy for cancer. Cancer Res. 2001 Oct 1;61(19):7196-203.
PubMed 11585755
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial With Factorial Design Comparing Fulvestrant ± Lapatinib ± Aromatase Inhibitor in Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02394496
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OVER / GIM8-OVER
- Conditions
- Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Fulvestrant, Lapatinib, Aromatase Inhibitor, metastatic breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 396 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Consorzio OncotechUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Based on these results it can be envisioned that the majority of endocrine-responsive post-menopausal breast cancer patients will be treated with an AI as adjuvant therapy (front-line, switching or extending) and/or as first-line management of metastatic breast cancer.
Detailed description
In presence of ER hypersensitivity even a small amount of ER may be sufficient for sustained growth signalling. On the other hand, ER disruption operated by fulvestrant is not complete, particularly in the initial phase of treatment. From phase III trials, indeed, The invertigators know that with the standard 250mg monthly dose the steady state of circulating drug is reached only after 5-6 injections. This may play a role since, as long as ER downregulation is concerned, a clear dose-response relationship has been reported. In such a situation, fulvestrant efficacy may be partial, particularly because the concomitant AI discharge yields a restoration of physiologic postmenopausal levels of circulating oestrogens. New dosing schedule are currently under investigation both to accelerate the achievement of the steady state (loading dose) and to achieve higher circulating drug levels (high dose) (86).
In this trial the investigators will be using the so-called 'loading dose'.
Further potential strategies to improve fulvestrant efficacy in this setting are:
- avoid the restoration of circulating oestrogens; B) interfere with molecular mechanisms that produce ER hypersensitivity by targeting the EGFR/ERBB2/ERB3 system.
- avoid the restoration of circulating oestrogens: this should be achieved by holding the AI treatment. Because some cases of progression upon AIs may be related to an inefficient inhibition of the aromatase it is a logical step to test whether changing AI class (from type I, steroidal, to type II, non steroidal, and vice-versa) (87), may improve fulvestrant efficay. In this view, pts in this trial will be randomized to receive fulvestrant (loading dose) with or without the alternate class AI treatment. Circulating oestrogens levels will be tracked to verify inhibition of aromatase for pts assigned to concurrent AI treatment.
- Interfere with growth factors-mediated ER hypersensitivity: although fulvestrant is able to overcome the ER hypersensitivity of LTED (88) and produce a growth arrest, this activity may not be complete because of incomplete ER disruption, but also because of a direct stimulation of growth by the hyperactivated EGFR/ERBB2/ERB3 system. Laboratory evidence support this hypothesis. Indeed, breast cancer cell lines exposed to long-term treatment with fulvestrant became insensitive to the drug and restore growth (89). This growth does not appear, however, related to the development of direct resistance to the drug, since ER mediated signalling continue to be efficiently suppressed in these cells; rather it may be driven by the use of alternative growth-stimulating pathway, including the EGFR system. Indeed, it can be abrogated by the EGFR-tyrosine Kinase inhibitor Gefitinib (IRESSA™) and by an MAPK-inhibitor (90). Lapatinib (GW572016) is an orally active small molecule that reversibly inhibits ErbB1 and ErbB2 tyrosine kinases, which in turn blocks phosphorylation and activation of Erk1/2 (p-Erk1/2) and Akt (p-Akt) in ErbB1- and/ or ErbB2-expressing tumor cell lines and xenografts (91-94). Lapatinib elicits cytostatic or cytotoxic antitumor effects depending on the cell type (95;96). Because ErbB2-containing heterodimers exert potent mitogenic signals, simultaneously interrupting both ErbB1 and ErbB2 signaling is an appealing therapeutic approach. Moreover, ErbB3 signaling is also involved in lapatinib action. Indeed ErbB3 is kinase-dead and relies on ErbB2 for transactivation: ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimers are potent activators of the PI3K-Akt survival pathway (97;98), which can, in turn, inhibited by lapatinib.
Based on its molecular mechanism of action, on its fair toxicity profile and on its promising, although preliminary, activity data, Lapatinib appears an ideal candidate to combine with Fulvestrant in the attempt to improve its efficacy in patients progressing on AIs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ARM 1 | Experimental | Drug: Fulvestrant, Drug: Placebo LapatinibFulvestrant + Placebo Lapatinib |
| ARM 2 | Experimental | Drug: Fulvestrant, Drug: Aromatase Inhibitors, Drug: Placebo LapatinibFulvestrant + Aromatase Inhibitors + Placebo Lapatinib |
| ARM 3 | Experimental | Drug: Fulvestrant, Drug: LapatinibFulvestrant + Lapatinib |
| ARM 4 | Experimental | Drug: Fulvestrant, Drug: Lapatinib, Drug: Aromatase InhibitorsFulvestrant + Lapatinib + Aromatase Inhibitors |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Provision of written informed consent
- Histological/cytological confirmation of breast cancer
- Documented positive hormone receptor status (ER+ve and/or PgR+ve) of primary or metastaic tumor issue, according to the local laboratory parameters
- Postmenopausal women
- Confirmed progression of disease after an adjuvant therapy or a therapy for metastatic disease with an aromatase inhibitors
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Previous therapy with Fulvestrant and/or Lapatinib;
- Patients with HER 2 overexpressing, either IHC 3+ or FISH +;
- Concurrent non study anti-cancer therapy (
- Have unresolved or unstable, serious toxicity from prior administration
- Have malabsorption syndrome,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FulvestrantAlso: FaslodexFulvestrant 500mg (2 x 5ml) im injections as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 500mg (2x5ml) on Day 14 (+/- 3 days) , Day 28 (+/- 3 days) and every 28 Days (+/- 3 days) thereafter. | Drug | ARM 1, ARM 2, ARM 3, ARM 4 |
| Lapatinib1500mg (TBD) O.S. qd | Drug | ARM 3, ARM 4 |
| Aromatase InhibitorsAlso: Aromatase Inhibitoras indicated in the Summary Product Characteristic | Drug | ARM 2, ARM 4 |
| Placebo LapatinibAlso: Placebo1500mg (TBD) O.S. qd | Drug | ARM 1, ARM 2 |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Progression free survival (PFS): it is defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
6 secondary outcomes
Time To Progression
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Overall Survival
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Response Rate:
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Clinical Benefit Rate
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 6 months
Safety as measured by expected and Non-expected toxicity events
Time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Safety assessed by number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time frame: time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2016.
- Background: PubMed 10977847McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM. ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):624-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7261.624. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11181655Fisher B, Anderson S, Tan-Chiu E, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Dimitrov NV, Atkins JN, Abramson N, Merajver S, Romond EH, Kardinal CG, Shibata HR, Margolese RG, Farrar WB. Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for axillary node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):931-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.931.
- Background: PubMed 11949754Meric F, Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK. HER2/neu in the management of invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Apr;194(4):488-501. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01121-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11248153Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 15;344(11):783-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.
- Background: PubMed 11597399Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Sep;37 Suppl 4:S9-15. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00231-3.
- Background: PubMed 11252954Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;2(2):127-37. doi: 10.1038/35052073.
- Background: PubMed 16236735Burstein HJ. The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1652-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058197. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11752009Lu Y, Zi X, Zhao Y, Mascarenhas D, Pollak M. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Dec 19;93(24):1852-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1852.
- Background: PubMed 14737100Xia W, Liu LH, Ho P, Spector NL. Truncated ErbB2 receptor (p95ErbB2) is regulated by heregulin through heterodimer formation with ErbB3 yet remains sensitive to the dual EGFR/ErbB2 kinase inhibitor GW572016. Oncogene. 2004 Jan 22;23(3):646-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207166.
- Background: PubMed 12087404Gerber HP, Malik AK, Solar GP, Sherman D, Liang XH, Meng G, Hong K, Marsters JC, Ferrara N. VEGF regulates haematopoietic stem cell survival by an internal autocrine loop mechanism. Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):954-8. doi: 10.1038/nature00821.
- Background: PubMed 11522647Albanell J, Codony-Servat J, Rojo F, Del Campo JM, Sauleda S, Anido J, Raspall G, Giralt J, Rosello J, Nicholson RI, Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases: association with epidermal growth factor receptor/transforming growth factor alpha expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma and inhibition by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments. Cancer Res. 2001 Sep 1;61(17):6500-10.
- Background: PubMed 9625170Rubin Grandis J, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, Day R, Holst VA, Wagener MM, Drenning SD, Tweardy DJ. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jun 3;90(11):824-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.11.824.
Related trials for Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Augmented-Reality ICG Fluorescence Second-Look for Residual Nodal Disease After Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
BrAin Metastasis in tripLe Negateive Breast Cancer: IvoneScimab and Trop2 ADC
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Brain Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Research Technology contact
Sabino De Placido, MD principal investigator
Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia Oncologia Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Michelino De Laurentiis, MD study chair
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori - Fondazione G. Pascale
69 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fulvestrant, Lapatinib and Aromatase Inhibitors in people with Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Consorzio Oncotech at 69 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 69 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Clinical Research Technology (0039089301545), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (time frame: Defined as the time between the first study dose administration and the date of progression of the disease or death from any cause, whichever occurs first assessed up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02394496, which also lists 61 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2016.