Graft vs Host DiseasePhase 2RIGNCT02396628
Ruxolitinib In GvHD
A Phase 2 study testing Experimental intervention and Standard treatment in people with Graft vs Host Disease, run by Prof. Dr. Nikolas von Bubnoff at 11 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The preliminary data demonstrate potent activity of Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory aGvHD. In this phase 2 trial the efficacy of Ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute GvHD in approximately 12 transplantation centers in Germany will be compared. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Graft vs Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- Experimental intervention and Standard treatment
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 29 Jun 2017to 15 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute skin, intestinal (histologically confirmed) or liver GvHD > grade 1 according to standard criteria
- Age ≥18 years
- Failure of previous treatment, defined as presence of at least one of the following criteria:
- Treatment with prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone in a dose of at least 2 mg/kg and lack of response after at least 7 days treatment
- Treatment with prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone in a dose of at least 2 mg/kg and progression after at least 3 days of treatment
- Failure to taper the prednisone/prednisolone dose to <0.6 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone dose to <0.5 mg/kg/day
- Written informed consent
- Ability to understand the nature of the study and the study related procedures and to comply with them
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled underlying disease
- Active bleeding
- Absence of clinical signs of acute GvHD
- Diagnostic or distinctive clinical signs of chronic GvHD
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
- Absolute neutrophil count <0.5x103/µl
Show all 12Show fewer
- Evidence of transplant-associated micrioangiopathy (TAM) (According to Jodele et al., 2015, diagnostic criteria for TAM)
- Any previous JAK2 inhibitor treatment prior to study enrolment, except Ruxolitinib given prior to the allogeneic stem cell transplantation
- Known Hypersensitivity to Ruxolitinib or any of the excipients
- Known positivity for HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C at the time of screening.
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Concomitant use of any other investigational drug within the last thirty days before the start of this study
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Germany11 sites
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53105
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Cologne, 50937
Universitätsklinikum Dresden
Dresden, 01307
University Medical Center
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg, 66421
Universitätsklinikum Marburg
Marburg, 35043
Universitätsklinikum München TU rechts der Isar
München, 81675
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
About this study
Official title: Multicentre Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Steroid-refractory Acute Multicenter, Randomized Phase 2 Trial to Determine the Response Rate of Ruxolitinib and Best Available Treatment (BAT) Versus BAT in Steroid-refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD)
The preliminary data demonstrate potent activity of Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory aGvHD. In this phase 2 trial the efficacy of Ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute GvHD in approximately 12 transplantation centers in Germany will be compared. The response by monitoring the clinical GvHD grade, requirement of alternative GvHD active agents and serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines will be determined.
Read the detailed description
The pathophysiological hallmark of GvHD after allo-HCT is an allogeneic donor T cell re-sponse against recipient antigens. This process is aggravated by increased processing and presentation of host antigens by donor APCs following conditioning treatment. The al-logeneic T cell response leads to inflammation, tissue damage and fibrosis and is mediated by extensive production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2R, IL-6 and TNF. The signal transmission of inflammatory cytokines in effector cells requires activation of specialized kinases from the family of the Janus kinases. These kinases, JAK1, 2 and 3 are linked to cytokine receptors, and are activated upon binding of the cytokine to the receptor of the inflammatory effector. The JAK1/2 kinase inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) is approved for myelofibrosis. In advanced myelofibrosis, Ruxolitinib lead to sustained clinical remissions with regard to constitutional symptoms, weight loss and spleen size in the majority of treated patients. Of note, clinical responses correlated with a marked reduction in inflammatory plasma cytokines.
Importantly, cytokines down-regulated by Ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis correspond to inflammatory effectors that mediate tissue damage and inflammation in GvHD. These are mainly the cytokines IL- 1, IL -6, TNF and IFN-gamma. Since Ruxolitinib suppresses the JAK1 / 2 cytokine response, we hypothesized that Ruxolitinib might attenuate the cytokine mediated inflammatory tissue damage in GVHD and thus might favourably affect the severity and course of GvHD after allo-HCT.
In vitro, we demonstrated in an allogeneic system (major mismatch mixed-lymphocyte reactions) that co-incubation with Ruxolitinib strongly suppressed both the proliferation of alloge-neic T cells and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Using a very aggressive major mismatch mouse model of acute GvHD Ruxolitinib treatment signifi-cantly prolonged survival of animals (see Figure 1A). In addition, in these animals showed a reduced weight loss, significantly reduced histopathological GvHD severity, suppression of inflammatory cytokines in the serum and a reduction of donor T cells in GvHD target organs such as the intestines.
Sole suppression of cytokine production or cytokine receptor activity by Ruxolitinib would be very similar to already established drugs for GvHD and no major conceptual advance. However we observed that Ruxolitinib did not only suppress cytokine production but also led to increased frequencies of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. This cell type was previ-ously shown to lead to long-lasting tolerance as compared to the short-term immunosuppression achieved by conventional medication for GvHD.
- Conditions
- Graft vs Host Disease
- Being tested
- Experimental intervention, Standard treatment
- Keywords
- Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD), resistance to therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Ruxolitinib
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental interventionDrug
Treatment with Ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg BID orally addition to BAT according DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines
Treatment according to DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines for treatment of acute GvHD (as of March 2018). Optional cross over from BAT to Ruxolitinib and BAT in case of lack of response from day 28.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental intervention | Experimental | Treatment with Ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg BID orally addition to BAT according DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines. Receives: Drug: Experimental intervention |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Treatment according to DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines for treatment of acute GvHD (as of March 2018). Optional cross over from BAT to Ruxolitinib and BAT in case of lack of response from day 28. Receives: Drug: Standard treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
efficacy of Ruxolitinib and BAT as compared to BAT alone at day 28 after randomisation
To evaluate efficacy of Ruxolitinib and BAT as compared to BAT alone at day 28 after randomisation start in steroid-refractory acute GvHD, measured as response rate
Measured: at day 28 after randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study start29 Jun 2017
- Primary completion15 Nov 2019
- Study completion15 Nov 2019
Why it stopped: impossibility to recruit in the BAT arm
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Graft vs Host DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. Nikolas von Bubnoff
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Trials Unit Freiburg
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Prof. Dr. Nikolas von Bubnoff, University Hospital Freiburg
- Investigators
- Nikolas von Bubnoff, Professor, Principal investigator, Medical Center - University of Freiburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02396628
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RIG-P000814
- Other IDs
- 2014-004267-20, DRKS00007939, 2014
- Acronym
- RIG
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
von Bubnoff N, Ihorst G, Grishina O, Rothling N, Bertz H, Duyster J, Finke J, Zeiser R. Ruxolitinib in GvHD (RIG) study: a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial to determine the response rate of Ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) (NCT02396628). BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5045-7.
PubMed 30453910
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Steroid-refractory Acute Multicenter, Randomized Phase 2 Trial to Determine the Response Rate of Ruxolitinib and Best Available Treatment (BAT) Versus BAT in Steroid-refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02396628
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIG / RIG-P000814
- Conditions
- Graft vs Host Disease
- Keywords
- Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD), resistance to therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Ruxolitinib
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: impossibility to recruit in the BAT arm
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Prof. Dr. Nikolas von BubnoffUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Trials Unit Freiburg
- Study start
- 29 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The preliminary data demonstrate potent activity of Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory aGvHD. In this phase 2 trial the efficacy of Ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute GvHD in approximately 12 transplantation centers in Germany will be compared. The response by monitoring the clinical GvHD grade, requirement of alternative GvHD active agents and serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines will be determined.
Detailed description
The pathophysiological hallmark of GvHD after allo-HCT is an allogeneic donor T cell re-sponse against recipient antigens. This process is aggravated by increased processing and presentation of host antigens by donor APCs following conditioning treatment. The al-logeneic T cell response leads to inflammation, tissue damage and fibrosis and is mediated by extensive production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2R, IL-6 and TNF. The signal transmission of inflammatory cytokines in effector cells requires activation of specialized kinases from the family of the Janus kinases. These kinases, JAK1, 2 and 3 are linked to cytokine receptors, and are activated upon binding of the cytokine to the receptor of the inflammatory effector. The JAK1/2 kinase inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) is approved for myelofibrosis. In advanced myelofibrosis, Ruxolitinib lead to sustained clinical remissions with regard to constitutional symptoms, weight loss and spleen size in the majority of treated patients. Of note, clinical responses correlated with a marked reduction in inflammatory plasma cytokines.
Importantly, cytokines down-regulated by Ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis correspond to inflammatory effectors that mediate tissue damage and inflammation in GvHD. These are mainly the cytokines IL- 1, IL -6, TNF and IFN-gamma. Since Ruxolitinib suppresses the JAK1 / 2 cytokine response, we hypothesized that Ruxolitinib might attenuate the cytokine mediated inflammatory tissue damage in GVHD and thus might favourably affect the severity and course of GvHD after allo-HCT.
In vitro, we demonstrated in an allogeneic system (major mismatch mixed-lymphocyte reactions) that co-incubation with Ruxolitinib strongly suppressed both the proliferation of alloge-neic T cells and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Using a very aggressive major mismatch mouse model of acute GvHD Ruxolitinib treatment signifi-cantly prolonged survival of animals (see Figure 1A). In addition, in these animals showed a reduced weight loss, significantly reduced histopathological GvHD severity, suppression of inflammatory cytokines in the serum and a reduction of donor T cells in GvHD target organs such as the intestines.
Sole suppression of cytokine production or cytokine receptor activity by Ruxolitinib would be very similar to already established drugs for GvHD and no major conceptual advance. However we observed that Ruxolitinib did not only suppress cytokine production but also led to increased frequencies of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. This cell type was previ-ously shown to lead to long-lasting tolerance as compared to the short-term immunosuppression achieved by conventional medication for GvHD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental intervention | Experimental | Drug: Experimental interventionTreatment with Ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg BID orally addition to BAT according DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines. |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Standard treatmentTreatment according to DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines for treatment of acute GvHD (as of March 2018). Optional cross over from BAT to Ruxolitinib and BAT in case of lack of response from day 28. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Acute skin, intestinal (histologically confirmed) or liver GvHD > grade 1 according to standard criteria
- Age ≥18 years
- Failure of previous treatment, defined as presence of at least one of the following criteria:
- Written informed consent
- Ability to understand the nature of the study and the study related procedures and to comply with them
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Uncontrolled underlying disease
- Active bleeding
- Absence of clinical signs of acute GvHD
- Diagnostic or distinctive clinical signs of chronic GvHD
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental interventionTreatment with Ruxolitinib at a dose of 10 mg BID orally addition to BAT according DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines | Drug | Experimental intervention |
| Standard treatmentTreatment according to DGHO-Onkopedia guidelines for treatment of acute GvHD (as of March 2018). Optional cross over from BAT to Ruxolitinib and BAT in case of lack of response from day 28. | Drug | Standard treatment |
Primary outcome
efficacy of Ruxolitinib and BAT as compared to BAT alone at day 28 after randomisation
Time frame: at day 28 after randomisation
To evaluate efficacy of Ruxolitinib and BAT as compared to BAT alone at day 28 after randomisation start in steroid-refractory acute GvHD, measured as response rate
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: impossibility to recruit in the BAT arm). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30453910von Bubnoff N, Ihorst G, Grishina O, Rothling N, Bertz H, Duyster J, Finke J, Zeiser R. Ruxolitinib in GvHD (RIG) study: a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial to determine the response rate of Ruxolitinib and best available treatment (BAT) versus BAT in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) (NCT02396628). BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5045-7.
- BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5045-7Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Graft vs Host Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Photobiomodulation (PBM) Therapy in People With Oral Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Stem Cell Transplant
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, GVHD
RecruitingObservational study
Long-term Evaluation and Follow-up Care of Patients Treated With Stem Cell Transplants
Graft-versus-leukemia, Graft vs Host Disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Active, not recruiting
Patient Reported Outcomes With UVA-1 Therapy for Treatment of Sclerosing Skin Diseases
Scleroderma, Systemic, Morphea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nikolas von Bubnoff, Professor principal investigator
Medical Center - University of Freiburg
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Experimental intervention and Standard treatment in people with Graft vs Host Disease, run by Prof. Dr. Nikolas von Bubnoff at 11 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: impossibility to recruit in the BAT arm). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
efficacy of Ruxolitinib and BAT as compared to BAT alone at day 28 after randomisation (time frame: at day 28 after randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02396628, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2019.