AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial InfarctionNCT02407002

Safety of Nitroglycerin for Field Treatment of STEMI

An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to quantify the risk of hypotension due to field treatment with nitroglycerin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, particularly right ventricular infarcts, and secondarily to evaluate the benefit to pain relief.. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myocardial Infarction
How many people
940 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2015to 30 Apr 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The subjects will be patients with STEMI identified in the field and transported to a study site.

Who may be able to join

  • Identified by paramedics as having a STEMI.
  • Transported to a study site.

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Primary complaint of trauma
  • Cardiac arrest upon EMS arrival
  • Transported to a non-study site
  • Transferred from another hospital
  • Hypotensive on EMS arrival

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90509

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Use of Nitroglycerin by Paramedics for Treatment of Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in the Field

The purpose of this study is to quantify the risk of hypotension due to field treatment with nitroglycerin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, particularly right ventricular infarcts, and secondarily to evaluate the benefit to pain relief..

Read the detailed description

Nitroglycerin is widely used for treatment of chest pain of suspected cardiac etiology in the field. While there are a few studies from the pre-reperfusion era that demonstrate some benefit of nitroglycerin administration in patients with myocardial infarction, there are no studies establishing its benefit and safety in patients with STEMI in the emergency department or prehospital settings.

It is unclear if the current practice of administration of nitroglycerin in all patients with suspected cardiac chest pain in the field is of benefit. Furthermore, the risk to the patient with STEMI has not been established. The American Heart Association 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care states that "there is insufficient evidence to determine the benefit or harm of initiating nitroglycerin treatment in the prehospital setting or ED." By quantifying the risk of nitroglycerin use for treatment of suspected STEMI in the field and the benefit to pain relief, one can determine if the continued use of this medication for cardiac chest pain in the field is appropriate.

This study will be conducted at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, and Cedar-Sinai Medical Center. Participants will be identified in the emergency department at all sites. There will be no interventions performed. The study is limited to observational data gathering only.

Los Angeles County established regionalized cardiac care in 2006 with a total of 34 designated STEMI receiving centers (SRC) throughout the county. Harbor-UCLA, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, and Cedar-Sinai Medical Center are designated SRC. As such, patients with possible STEMI, identified via ECG software interpretation of acute MI in the field, are directed to these centers by EMS.

LA County protocol requires paramedic units to contact the Base Station for all patients with suspected STEMI. There is a dedicated mobile intensive care nurse (MICN) or Base Physician 24-hours per day answering the radio, providing on-line medical direction, and maintaining a log of all patients. Outcome data is collected and available for quality improvement (QI) purposes. From the 2013 QI data, the investigators expect that approximately 70% of these patients will have a culprit lesion on catheterization, confirming a STEMI.

The MICN or research assistant will identify study subjects. A study investigator will review the log on a weekly basis to ensure no patient is missed. Patients will be eligible for enrollment in the study if they are identified by paramedics as having a STEMI and transported to a study site. The patient will be identified by the MICN or research assistant at the time of base contact or arrival to the hospital with a prehospital diagnosis of STEMI. Patients will be excluded if they are under 18 years of age, if the primary complaint is trauma, if they are in cardiac arrest at the time of paramedic arrival or if they are transported to a non-study site.

The primary outcome is frequency of hypotension (SBP<100) on initial ED vital signs after treatment with nitroglycerin for suspected STEMI in the field. The onset of action of sublingual nitroglycerin is 2-5 minutes, with a duration of 60 minutes. Average transport times in LA County are approximately 15 minutes. Therefore, the primary outcome will be measured upon ED arrival, after completion of field care and prior to any ED intervention.

Secondary outcomes will be change in chest pain score for patients treated for STEMI in the field and in-hospital mortality. Chest pain is assessed on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The initial pain score is assessed and documented by paramedics. The same NRS is used by the triage nurse upon ED arrival. A priori, a decrease of 1.39 will be considered the minimum clinically significant difference (MCSD) based on prior literature. Planned subgroup analysis for these outcomes will be patients requiring PCI for proximal right coronary artery lesion on catheterization.

After patient arrival, the MICN or research assistant will log patient and retain paramedic and base record for the study investigator. The following information will be obtained regarding patient EMS and ED phase: patient sequence number and medical record number, age, gender, race, initial prehospital vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, pain scale), treatment with nitroglycerin in the field (number of doses), initial triage vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, pain scale), ECG findings (location of ST elevations if present), disposition to the cath lab (yes/no). On follow up, a study investigator will enter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed, the location of the culprit lesion(s) for patients treated in the cath lab, and final diagnosis and disposition for all patients. This information will be obtained via chart review and discussion with the cath lab team as required. There will be no follow-up of patients beyond hospital discharge. A second investigator will review a random 10% sample of records for key data elements.

During data entry, all information will be maintained in SherlockMD, a HIPAA-complaint electronic secure database with access only to the principal investigator. At study completion, de-identified data will be exported into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond WA). Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The study outcomes will be presented as proportions with exact binomial confidence intervals. P-values for univariate associations will be calculated using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Adjusted outcome estimates will be determined using multiple logistic regression. A power analysis is not applicable to the primary outcome: proportion of hypotensive episodes related to nitroglycerin use for STEMI in the field, with no comparative group. For the secondary outcome of pain relief, the investigators determined a sample size of 73 patients per group to achieve 90% power to detect the minimum clinically significant difference of 1.39, assuming, base on prior literature, an average pain score of 6.6 and standard deviation of 2.58. Kappa statistic will be used to assess agreement between data abstractors.

Keywords
Nitroglycerin, Safety
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Infarction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hypotension

    SBP <100mmHg

    Measured: At ED arrival. This will be assessed at the end of the prehospital phase of care, taken from the first set of vital signs on arrival at the emergency department. Average transport 15 minutes.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pain Relief

    Change in NRS (1.39 considered the minimum clinically significant difference)

    Measured: At ED arrival. This will be assessed at the end of the prehospital phase of care, taken from the first set of vital signs on arrival at the emergency department. Average transport 15 minutes.

  2. Mortality

    Measured: At hospital discharge. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge, anticipated median 3 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
940 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02407002
Sponsor's protocol ID
30516-01
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
24 Mar 2015
Last updated
25 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hypotension (time frame: At ED arrival. This will be assessed at the end of the prehospital phase of care, taken from the first set of vital signs on arrival at the emergency department. Average transport 15 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in