Colitis, UlcerativePhase 3UNIFINCT02407236
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC in people with Colitis, Ulcerative and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 247 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion in induction study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and as subcutaneous (SC) administration in maintenance study in participants with moderately to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 961 participants
- Where
- 247 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2015to 30 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Has a clinical diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) at least 3 months before Screening
- Has moderately to severely active UC, defined as a Baseline (Week 0) Mayo score of 6 to 12, including a Screening endoscopy subscore of the Mayo score greater than or equal to (>=) 2 as determined by a central reading of the video endoscopy
- Have failed biologic therapy, that is, have received treatment with 1 or more tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at a dose approved for the treatment of UC, and have a documented history of failure to respond to or tolerate such treatment; OR Be naïve to biologic therapy (TNF antagonists or vedolizumab) or have received biologic therapy but have not demonstrated a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, a biologic therapy and have a prior or current UC medication history that includes at least 1 of the following: a. Inadequate response to or failure to tolerate current treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or azathioprine [AZA]) OR b. History of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral or IV corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-MP or AZA) OR c. History of corticosteroid dependence (that is, an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC)
- Before the first administration of study agent, the following conditions must be met: vedolizumab must have been discontinued for at least 4 months and anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) for at least 8 weeks
Who cannot join
- Has severe extensive colitis and is at imminent risk of colectomy
- Has UC limited to the rectum only or to < 20 centimeters (cm) of the colon
- Presence of a stoma or history of a fistula
- Participants with history of extensive colonic resection (for example, less than 30 cm of colon remaining) that would prevent adequate evaluation of the effect of study agent on clinical disease activity
- Participants with history of colonic mucosal dysplasia. Participants will not be excluded from the study because of a pathology finding of "indefinite dysplasia with reactive atypia''
Trial locations and contacts
247 sites in 23 countries.
247 sites in 23 countries
United States68 sites
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Brooklyn, New York
Study site
Chesapeake, Virginia
Study site
Chesterfield, Michigan
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Columbia, Maryland
Study site
Crestview Hills, Kentucky
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Decatur, Georgia
Study site
Doylestown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Evanston, Illinois
Study site
Fairfax, Virginia
Study site
Farmington, Connecticut
Study site
Gainesville, Florida
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Hershey, Pennsylvania
Study site
Houma, Louisiana
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Irving, Texas
Study site
Jackson, Mississippi
Study site
La Mirada, California
Study site
Largo, Florida
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Lone Tree, Colorado
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Macon, Georgia
Study site
Marlton, New Jersey
Study site
Mentor, Ohio
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Mineola, New York
Study site
Morristown, New Jersey
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Newport Beach, California
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Port Orange, Florida
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Poughkeepsie, New York
Study site
Pratt, Kansas
Study site
Roanoke, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
Sayre, Pennsylvania
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana
Study site
Southlake, Texas
Study site
Suwanee, Georgia
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
The Bronx, New York
Study site
Torrance, California
Study site
Troy, Michigan
Study site
Tyler, Texas
Study site
Urbana, Illinois
Study site
Vallejo, California
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
West Jordan, Utah
Study site
Winter Park, Florida
Study site
Ypsilanti, Michigan
Study site
Zephyrhills, Florida
Japan42 sites
Study site
Ageo-shi
Study site
Asahikawa
Study site
Bunkyō City
Study site
Chiba
Study site
Chikushinoshi
Study site
Fujiidera
Study site
Fukuoka-ken
Study site
Higashi-Ibaraki
Study site
Hirosaki
Study site
Hiroshima
Study site
Isesaki
Study site
Izumo
Study site
Kagoshima
Study site
Kahoku
Study site
Kobe
Study site
Kochi
Study site
Kurume
Study site
Kyoto
Study site
Midori-ku
Study site
Nagasaki
Study site
Nara
Study site
Nishinomiya
Study site
Numakunai
Study site
Ōita
Study site
Osaka
Study site
Saga
Study site
Saga-ken
Study site
Saitama
Study site
Sakura
Study site
Sapporo
Study site
Sendai
Study site
Shizuoka
Study site
Sunto-gun
Study site
Takamatsu
Study site
Tokorozawa
Study site
Tokyo
Study site
Toyama
Study site
Toyota
Study site
Tsu
Study site
Tsuchiura
Study site
Wakayama
Study site
Yamanashi
Ukraine13 sites
Study site
Chernivtsi
Study site
Dnipropetrovsk
Study site
Ivano-Frankivsk
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Kiyv
Study site
Kyiv
Study site
Lviv
Study site
Odesa
Study site
Sumy
Study site
Uzhhorod
Study site
Vinnytsia
Study site
Zaporizhzhya
Study site
Zhaporozhia
France11 sites
Study site
Amiens
Study site
Bordeaux
Study site
Lille
Study site
Lyon
Study site
Marseille
Study site
Montpellier
Study site
Pierre-Bénite
Study site
Reims
Study site
Rennes
Study site
Saint-Etienne
Study site
Toulouse
Australia10 sites
Study site
Bedford
Study site
Clayton
Study site
Concord
Study site
Fitzroy
Study site
Five Dock
Study site
Garran
Study site
Heidelberg
Study site
Liverpool
Study site
Melbourne
Study site
South Brisbane
Germany10 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Essen
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau
Study site
Hanover
Study site
Kiel
Study site
Leipzig
Study site
Lüneburg
Study site
Mannheim
Study site
Minden
Study site
Münster
Hungary10 sites
Study site
Balatonfüred
Study site
Békéscsaba
Study site
Budapest
Study site
Debrecen
Study site
Miskolc
Study site
Mosonmagyaróvár
Study site
Székesfehérvár
Study site
Szekszárd
Study site
Szombathely
Study site
Vác
Russia10 sites
Study site
Irkutsk
Study site
Kazan'
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Moscva
Study site
Novosibirsk
Study site
Rostov-on-Don
Study site
Ryazan
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Stavropol
Study site
Ufa
United Kingdom10 sites
Study site
Birmingham
Study site
Cambridge
Study site
Coventry
Study site
Doncaster
Study site
Edinburgh
Study site
Liverpool
Study site
London
Study site
Salford
Study site
Southampton
Study site
Sutton in Ashfield
Israel9 sites
Study site
Beersheba
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Holon
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Kfar Saba
Study site
Nahariya
Study site
Petach Tikvah
Study site
Tel Aviv
Study site
Tel HaShomer
Poland8 sites
Study site
Gdansk
Study site
Krakow
Study site
Lodz
Study site
Puławy
Study site
Sopot
Study site
Szczecin
Study site
Warsaw
Study site
Wroclaw
Canada7 sites
Study site
Brandon, Manitoba
Study site
Greater Sudbury, Ontario
Study site
London, Ontario
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Belgium6 sites
Study site
Antwerp
Study site
Ghent
Study site
Kortrijk
Study site
Leuven
Study site
Liège
Study site
Roeselaere
Bulgaria5 sites
Study site
Pleven
Study site
Rousse
Study site
Sevlievo
Study site
Sofia
Study site
Varna
New Zealand5 sites
Study site
Auckland
Study site
Christchurch
Study site
Dunedin
Study site
Lower Hutt
Study site
Milford
Romania4 sites
Study site
Bucharest
Study site
Oradea
Study site
Romania
Study site
Timișoara
Serbia4 sites
Study site
Belgrade
Study site
Kragujevac
Study site
Niš
Study site
Vojvodina
South Korea4 sites
Study site
Daegu
Study site
Guri-si
Study site
Seoul
Study site
Suwon
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Protocol to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion in induction study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and as subcutaneous (SC) administration in maintenance study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) who have demonstrated a clinical response to Induction treatment with IV ustekinumab.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 3, randomized (assignment of study drug by chance), double-blind (neither the participant or study staff will know the identity of study drugs), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (a medical research study comparing the response in 2 or more groups of participants receiving different interventions), multi-center (more than one clinical site will work on a medical research study), protocol of ustekinumab. The protocol will consist of 2 studies: an Induction study and a Maintenance study with unique endpoints. Screening period will be up to 8 Weeks. Induction study will be at least 8 weeks duration for each participant. Participant with clinical response in the Induction study will be eligible for the Maintenance study. The Maintenance study will be 44 weeks duration. After completion of the maintenance study, a long term extension will follow eligible participants for an additional 3 years. Clinical remission will be evaluated at Week 8 in the Induction study. Clinical remission among ustekinumab Induction responders will be evaluated at week 44 in the Maintenance study. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout.
- Conditions
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Being tested
- Placebo IV, Placebo SC, Ustekinumab IV, Ustekinumab SC
- Keywords
- Ustekinumab, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), Colitis, Ulcerative
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo IVDrug
Placebo will be administered as intravenous infusion.
Placebo SCDrug
Placebo will be administered Subcutaneously.
Ustekinumab IVDrug
Ustekinumab will be administered as intravenous infusion at Week 0 or Week 8 in Induction Study.
Ustekinumab SCDrug
Ustekinumab will be administered as subcutaneously.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Induction Study - Placebo Intravenous (IV) | Placebo comparator | Participants will be randomized to receive single dose of placebo as Intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study, but will not be randomized. Receives: Drug: Placebo IV |
| Induction Study - Ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV | Experimental | Participants will be randomized to receive single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab IV |
| Induction Study - Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV | Experimental | Participants will be randomized to receive ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg of body weight, as intravenous infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab IV |
| Induction Study- Placebo- Nonresponsders at Week 8 | Other | Participants without clinical response to placebo at Week 8 will receive a single IV infusion of ustekinumab approximating 6mg/kg along with matching subcutaneous (SC) placebo (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 will be eligible to enter Maintenance study and will be randomized. Receives: Drug: Placebo SC; Drug: Ustekinumab IV |
| Induction study-Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8 | Other | Participants without clinical response to ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 will receive a single dose of ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously along with matching placebo intravenously (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 (that is, delayed responders) will be eligible to enter Maintenance study, but will not be randomized. Receives: Drug: Placebo IV; Drug: Ustekinumab SC |
| Maintenance Study - Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) | Placebo comparator | Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Receives: Drug: Placebo SC |
| Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 12 weeks | Experimental | Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC |
| Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) | Experimental | Participants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC |
| Maintenance Study - Placebo IV - Responder - Placebo SC | Other | Participants in clinical response to Induction treatment with IV Placebo will receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized. Receives: Drug: Placebo SC |
| Maintenance Study-Delayed Responder-Ustekinumab 90mg SC q8w | Other | Participants without clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 but in clinical response at Week 16 after receiving Induction Ustekinumab at week 8 (delayed responders) will receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized. Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score less than or equal to (<=)2 points, with no individual subscore greater than (>)1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding [RB], endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment [PGA]), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant ulcerative colitis (UC) medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per US Definition)
As per US definition, clinical remission was defined as absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components pertaining to this outcome measure (OM) (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
As per global definition, clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (as Per US Definition)
Per US definition, clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of Mayo components pertaining to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Secondary outcomes (71)
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8
Clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the Mayo score by >=30 percent (%) and >= 3 points, with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore >=1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of event onward or participants who had missing IBDQ score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44
Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by >= 30% and >= 3 points, with either decrease from induction baseline in rectal bleeding subscore >=1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who lost clinical response at any time before Week 44, had prohibited change in UC medication, ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
Per global definition, clinical remission was defined as Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to have achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per US Definition)
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, rectal bleeding subscore 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal or inactive disease)/ 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at Week 44. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per Global Definition)
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Participants who were not in clinical remission at any time points when endoscopic scores were collected before Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per US Definition)
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants not in clinical remission at any time point when endoscopic scores collected before Week 44 considered not in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
Mucosal healing is defined as having both endoscopic healing (EH) and histologic healing (HH). Endoscopic healing: an endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 mild disease ([erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Histologic healing: neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions or ulcerations or granulation tissue. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or had missing endoscopy score/ were missing any component of histologic healing (that is assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 8 or who had unevaluable biopsy (that is biopsy collected, but could not be assessed due to sample preparation or technical errors) at Week 8 but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, were considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Clinical Remission With a Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0 at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had missing rectal bleeding subscores at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission with a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 8
Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 and/or both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 8
Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have normal or inactive mucosal disease. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline Mayo score carried forward to Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 [normal] to 3 [severe]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants with the partial Mayo score missing at a timepoint had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that timepoint.
Measured: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
The stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo stool frequency subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo rectal bleeding subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo endoscopy subscore at Week 8 had the last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo physician's global assessment subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per Global Definition)
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score<=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score = sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response or were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per US Definition)
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without PGA. Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores rated 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 8 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). BF: Participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by >=30% and >= 3 points, with either decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding subscore >=1/ rectal bleeding subscore= 0/1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores =worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8
Change from baseline in CRP concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline
Number of participants with normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized CRP.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8
Change from baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline
Number of participants with normalized fecal lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal lactoferrin (> 7.24 mcg/g) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal lactoferrin.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline
Number of participants with normalized fecal calprotectin (<=250 milligram per kilogram [mg/kg) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal calprotectin.
Measured: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With a >20-point Improvement From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing IBDQ score at either baseline or Week 8 were considered not to have achieved a greater than 20-point improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Week 8
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, physical component summary (PCS: calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and mental component summary (MCS: calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing component summary score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing individual scale at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Week 8
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 8
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy , or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Baseline and Week 44
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total Mayo score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Induction Baseline and Week 44
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44
Stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44
The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool <half time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing Mayo subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44
The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 =normal/ inactive disease, 1 =mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 =moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 =severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing endoscopy subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44
The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.
Measured: Baseline through Week 44
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44
The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 [normal] to 3 [severe]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.
Measured: Baseline through Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44
Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 44
Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission from the time of the event onward. Participants who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per Global Definition)
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per US Definition)
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore: 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore: 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1(mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0(normal) to 3(severe). BF: participants received 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treatment of UC, not responded initially/ responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medicines. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect /due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding and endoscopy) at Week 44 were not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used video of endoscopy.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Clinical response: decrease from IS baseline in Mayo score by >=30% and >=3 points, with either decrease from baseline in RB subscore >=1/ RB subscore of 0/ 1. Mayo score have 4 subscores (SF, RB, endoscopy findings, PGA), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment: 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treating UC, no respond initially/responded initially but lost response/ medication intolerant. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsen UC before Week 44, had all 4 Mayo subscores miss at Week44/ lost clinical response at any time before Week44 were not in clinical response upto Week44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status
Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 44 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in endoscopic appearance of mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response, or were intolerant of medication. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy, or used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Endoscopic Healing at Maintenance Baseline
Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 44
Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per Global Definition)
Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores, range: 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered not to achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving concomitant corticosteroids (corticosteroid-free clinical remission). Participants with all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Participants missing value in corticosteroid use had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per US Definition)
US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without PGA. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Measured: Week 44
MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline
The change from maintenance baseline in average daily prednisone-equivalent (P.Eq) corticosteroid dose through Week 44 among the participants receiving concomitant corticosteroids other than budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at maintenance baseline was reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward to that timepoint.
Measured: Baseline Through Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline
Number of participants not receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44 among participants who received concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance Baseline were reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered to be receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Who Maintained 20-point Improvement From Induction Baseline in IBDQ up to Week 44 Among Participants With a >20-point Improvement in IBDQ at Maintenance Baseline
IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as:10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had missing IBDQ score were considered not to have maintained improvement in IBDQ.
Measured: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Score at Week 20 and 44
IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing IBDQ score at a timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Week 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44
The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Week 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, PCS (calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and MCS (calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of IS carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing component summary score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing individual scale score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Weeks 20 and 44
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing individual scale score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 20 and 44
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing VAS score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 44
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44
EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing individual scale score at timepoint had their last available value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 44
Mucosal healing included EH and HH. EH: endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). HH: neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, no erosions/ ulcerations/ granulation tissue. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44/ missing endoscopy score/ missing any component of histologic healing (i.e. assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 44 and had unevaluable biopsy (biopsy collected but could not assessed due to sample preparation/ technical errors) at Week 44, but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.
Measured: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change from Maintenance baseline in CRP concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start10 Jul 2015
- Primary completion10 Aug 2018
- Study completion30 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colitis, UlcerativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 961 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02407236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR106920
- Other IDs
- 2014-005606-38, CNTO1275UCO3001, 2014
- Acronym
- UNIFI
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Danese S, Leong RW, Sands BE, Ma T, Marano C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Clinical Trial: Association Between Early Disease Clearance and Long-Term Outcomes-4-Year Results From the Phase 3 UNIFI Study of Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;62(5):483-492. doi: 10.1111/apt.70264. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
PubMed 40668079Solitano V, Panaccione R, Sands BE, Wang Z, Hogan M, Zou G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Cornfield LJ, Feagan BG, Singh S, Jairath V, Ma C. Responsiveness of different disease activity indices in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Med. 2025 Feb 14;6(2):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
PubMed 39368474Ghosh S, Feagan BG, Ott E, Gasink C, Godwin B, Marano C, Miao Y, Ma T, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Abreu MT, Sands BE. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 6;18(7):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae013.
PubMed 38310565Afif W, Arasaradnam RP, Abreu MT, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Miao Y, Zhang H, Panaccione R, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sands BE, Marano C. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results of the UNIFI Long-Term Maintenance Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 1;119(5):910-921. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002621. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
PubMed 38095692Chen R, Li L, Tie Y, Chen M, Zhang S. Trajectory of fecal lactoferrin for predicting prognosis in ulcerative colitis. Precis Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;6(3):pbad022. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad022. eCollection 2023 Sep.
PubMed 38025971Danese S, Sands BE, Abreu MT, O'Brien CD, Bravata I, Nazar M, Miao Y, Wang Y, Rowbotham D, Leong RWL, Arasaradnam RP, Afif W, Marano C. Early Symptomatic Improvement After Ustekinumab Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: 16-Week Data From the UNIFI Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2858-2867.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.050. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
PubMed 35276329Panaccione R, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, O'Brien CD, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Adedokun OJ, Tikhonov I, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Arasaradnam RP, Sands BE, Marano C. Ustekinumab is effective and safe for ulcerative colitis through 2 years of maintenance therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;52(11-12):1658-1675. doi: 10.1111/apt.16119. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
PubMed 33086438Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Danese S, O'Brien CD, Ott E, Marano C, Baker T, Zhou Y, Volger S, Tikhonov I, Gasink C, Sands BE, Ghosh S. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jun 15;27(7):994-1007. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa236.
PubMed 32964215Li K, Marano C, Zhang H, Yang F, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Feagan BG, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Friedman JR, De Hertogh G. Relationship Between Combined Histologic and Endoscopic Endpoints and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Dec;159(6):2052-2064. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
PubMed 32853634Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, O'Brien CD, Zhang H, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Li K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Van Assche G, Danese S, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Szapary P, Marano C; UNIFI Study Group. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 26;381(13):1201-1214. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900750.
PubMed 31553833
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Protocol to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02407236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UNIFI / CR106920
- Conditions
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Keywords
- Ustekinumab, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), Colitis, Ulcerative
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 961 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion in induction study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and as subcutaneous (SC) administration in maintenance study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) who have demonstrated a clinical response to Induction treatment with IV ustekinumab.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, randomized (assignment of study drug by chance), double-blind (neither the participant or study staff will know the identity of study drugs), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (a medical research study comparing the response in 2 or more groups of participants receiving different interventions), multi-center (more than one clinical site will work on a medical research study), protocol of ustekinumab. The protocol will consist of 2 studies: an Induction study and a Maintenance study with unique endpoints. Screening period will be up to 8 Weeks. Induction study will be at least 8 weeks duration for each participant. Participant with clinical response in the Induction study will be eligible for the Maintenance study. The Maintenance study will be 44 weeks duration. After completion of the maintenance study, a long term extension will follow eligible participants for an additional 3 years. Clinical remission will be evaluated at Week 8 in the Induction study. Clinical remission among ustekinumab Induction responders will be evaluated at week 44 in the Maintenance study. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 10
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Induction Study - Placebo Intravenous (IV) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo IVParticipants will be randomized to receive single dose of placebo as Intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study, but will not be randomized. |
| Induction Study - Ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV | Experimental | Drug: Ustekinumab IVParticipants will be randomized to receive single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized. |
| Induction Study - Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV | Experimental | Drug: Ustekinumab IVParticipants will be randomized to receive ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg of body weight, as intravenous infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized. |
| Induction Study- Placebo- Nonresponsders at Week 8 | Other | Drug: Placebo SC, Drug: Ustekinumab IVParticipants without clinical response to placebo at Week 8 will receive a single IV infusion of ustekinumab approximating 6mg/kg along with matching subcutaneous (SC) placebo (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 will be eligible to enter Maintenance study and will be randomized. |
| Induction study-Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8 | Other | Drug: Placebo IV, Drug: Ustekinumab SCParticipants without clinical response to ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 will receive a single dose of ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously along with matching placebo intravenously (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 (that is, delayed responders) will be eligible to enter Maintenance study, but will not be randomized. |
| Maintenance Study - Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo SCParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. |
| Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 12 weeks | Experimental | Drug: Ustekinumab SCParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. |
| Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) | Experimental | Drug: Ustekinumab SCParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. |
| Maintenance Study - Placebo IV - Responder - Placebo SC | Other | Drug: Placebo SCParticipants in clinical response to Induction treatment with IV Placebo will receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized. |
| Maintenance Study-Delayed Responder-Ustekinumab 90mg SC q8w | Other | Drug: Ustekinumab SCParticipants without clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 but in clinical response at Week 16 after receiving Induction Ustekinumab at week 8 (delayed responders) will receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Has a clinical diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) at least 3 months before Screening
- Has moderately to severely active UC, defined as a Baseline (Week 0) Mayo score of 6 to 12, including a Screening endoscopy subscore of the Mayo score greater than or equal to (>=) 2 as determined by a central reading of the video endoscopy
- Have failed biologic therapy, that is, have received treatment with 1 or more tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at a dose approved for the treatment of UC, and have a documented history of failure to respond to or tolerate such treatment; OR Be naïve to biologic therapy (TNF antagonists or vedolizumab) or have received biologic therapy but have not demonstrated a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, a biologic therapy and have a prior or current UC medication history that includes at least 1 of the following: a. Inadequate response to or failure to tolerate current treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or azathioprine [AZA]) OR b. History of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral or IV corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-MP or AZA) OR c. History of corticosteroid dependence (that is, an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC)
- Before the first administration of study agent, the following conditions must be met: vedolizumab must have been discontinued for at least 4 months and anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) for at least 8 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Has severe extensive colitis and is at imminent risk of colectomy
- Has UC limited to the rectum only or to < 20 centimeters (cm) of the colon
- Presence of a stoma or history of a fistula
- Participants with history of extensive colonic resection (for example, less than 30 cm of colon remaining) that would prevent adequate evaluation of the effect of study agent on clinical disease activity
- Participants with history of colonic mucosal dysplasia. Participants will not be excluded from the study because of a pathology finding of "indefinite dysplasia with reactive atypia''
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo IVPlacebo will be administered as intravenous infusion. | Drug | Induction Study - Placebo Intravenous (IV), Induction study-Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8 |
| Placebo SCPlacebo will be administered Subcutaneously. | Drug | Induction Study- Placebo- Nonresponsders at Week 8, Maintenance Study - Placebo IV - Responder - Placebo SC, Maintenance Study - Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) |
| Ustekinumab IVUstekinumab will be administered as intravenous infusion at Week 0 or Week 8 in Induction Study. | Drug | Induction Study - Ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV, Induction Study - Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV, Induction Study- Placebo- Nonresponsders at Week 8 |
| Ustekinumab SCUstekinumab will be administered as subcutaneously. | Drug | Induction study-Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8, Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 12 weeks, Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w), Maintenance Study-Delayed Responder-Ustekinumab 90mg SC q8w |
Primary outcome
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Week 8
As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score less than or equal to (<=)2 points, with no individual subscore greater than (>)1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding [RB], endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment [PGA]), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant ulcerative colitis (UC) medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per US Definition)
Time frame: Week 8
As per US definition, clinical remission was defined as absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components pertaining to this outcome measure (OM) (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Week 44
As per global definition, clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (as Per US Definition)
Time frame: Week 44
Per US definition, clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of Mayo components pertaining to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.
71 secondary outcomes
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44
Time frame: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44
Time frame: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per US Definition)
Time frame: Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Up to Week 44
Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per US Definition)
Time frame: Up to Week 44
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Clinical Remission With a Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0 at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants in With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per Global Definition)
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per US Definition)
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline
Time frame: Up to Week 8
Induction Study - Number of Participants With a >20-point Improvement From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
Time frame: Baseline and Week 44
Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44
Time frame: Induction Baseline and Week 44
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40668079Danese S, Leong RW, Sands BE, Ma T, Marano C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Clinical Trial: Association Between Early Disease Clearance and Long-Term Outcomes-4-Year Results From the Phase 3 UNIFI Study of Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;62(5):483-492. doi: 10.1111/apt.70264. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39368474Solitano V, Panaccione R, Sands BE, Wang Z, Hogan M, Zou G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Cornfield LJ, Feagan BG, Singh S, Jairath V, Ma C. Responsiveness of different disease activity indices in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Med. 2025 Feb 14;6(2):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38310565Ghosh S, Feagan BG, Ott E, Gasink C, Godwin B, Marano C, Miao Y, Ma T, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Abreu MT, Sands BE. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 6;18(7):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38095692Afif W, Arasaradnam RP, Abreu MT, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Miao Y, Zhang H, Panaccione R, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sands BE, Marano C. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results of the UNIFI Long-Term Maintenance Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 1;119(5):910-921. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002621. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38025971Chen R, Li L, Tie Y, Chen M, Zhang S. Trajectory of fecal lactoferrin for predicting prognosis in ulcerative colitis. Precis Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;6(3):pbad022. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad022. eCollection 2023 Sep.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35276329Danese S, Sands BE, Abreu MT, O'Brien CD, Bravata I, Nazar M, Miao Y, Wang Y, Rowbotham D, Leong RWL, Arasaradnam RP, Afif W, Marano C. Early Symptomatic Improvement After Ustekinumab Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: 16-Week Data From the UNIFI Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2858-2867.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.050. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33086438Panaccione R, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, O'Brien CD, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Adedokun OJ, Tikhonov I, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Arasaradnam RP, Sands BE, Marano C. Ustekinumab is effective and safe for ulcerative colitis through 2 years of maintenance therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;52(11-12):1658-1675. doi: 10.1111/apt.16119. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32964215Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Danese S, O'Brien CD, Ott E, Marano C, Baker T, Zhou Y, Volger S, Tikhonov I, Gasink C, Sands BE, Ghosh S. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jun 15;27(7):994-1007. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa236.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32853634Li K, Marano C, Zhang H, Yang F, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Feagan BG, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Friedman JR, De Hertogh G. Relationship Between Combined Histologic and Endoscopic Endpoints and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Dec;159(6):2052-2064. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31553833Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, O'Brien CD, Zhang H, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Li K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Van Assche G, Danese S, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Szapary P, Marano C; UNIFI Study Group. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 26;381(13):1201-1214. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900750.
Related trials for Colitis, Ulcerative
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
247 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC in people with Colitis, Ulcerative and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 247 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 247 sites in United States, Japan, Ukraine, France, Australia and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition) (time frame: Week 8). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02407236, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.