Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 2NCT02411227
Neurocognitive Driving Rehabilitation in Virtual Environments (NeuroDRIVE) as an Adjunctive Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury
A Phase 2 study testing VR Driving in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Background: People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have problems with thinking and everyday activities. They may have a higher risk for car accidents. NeuroDRIVE uses a virtual reality driving simulator. Researchers think it can help test and improve how people think and drive after TBI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- VR Driving
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2015to 10 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects eligible for participation must meet the following criteria:
- Currently has a valid driver s license, or had a valid driver s license prior to injury
- 18 years of age or older
- Able to effectively manipulate the steering wheel and the gas/brake pedals without adaptive equipment
- Able to read, write, and speak in English
- History of traumatic brain injury greater than 12 weeks prior to initiation into the current study
- Able to provide informed consent
- NBSI score greater than or equal to 16 (Mild TBI sub-group only)
Who cannot join
- Subjects are not eligible for participation if any of the following conditions exist:
- Risk for injury from the MRI magnet, including:
- Pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices.
- Brain stimulators.
- Some types of dental implants.
- Aneurysm clips (metal clips on the wall of a large artery).
Show all 25Show fewer
- Metallic prostheses (including metal pins and rods, heart valves, and cochlear implants).
- Permanent eyeliner (other non-metallic tattoos are permissible).
- Implanted delivery pump.
- Shrapnel fragments.
- Welders and metal workers are also at risk for injury because of possible small metal fragments in the eye of which they may be unaware.
- Fear of confined spaces.
- Back problems that may result in back pain or discomfort from lying in the scanner.
- Weight of over 350 pounds, due to the weight limit of the MRI table.
- It is not known if MRI is completely safe for a developing fetus. Therefore, all women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test performed no more than 24 hours before each MRI scan. The scan will not be done if the pregnancy test is positive. Because neuroimaging is a key component of the current study, inability to participate in MRI scanning is a necessary exclusion criterion.
- History of penetrating brain injury
- History of serious medical condition other than TBI that could affect cognitive or motor abilities (e.g., multiple sclerosis, encephalitis, cerebrovascular disease)
- History of severe motion sickness and/or vertigo.
- Other medical or psychological instability that could create difficulty fulfilling the study requirements (e.g., untreated mental illness, auditory/visual hallucinations, narcolepsy)
- To verify this information, study coordinators will request medical records (i.e., recent medical history, medication list, any neuroimaging, and records pertinent to the participant s recent injury) to further evaluate potential participants inclusion into the study. Medical records can be obtained in three ways:
- Participants can bring the records when they come to NIH for testing; it will be made clear if they do not bring this information with them and we cannot verify that they meet inclusion criteria, potential participants will not be enrolled into the study that day.
- Alternatively, the participants can also fax their medical records to a secured fax machine at the Recreational Therapy office at the NIH where access is only permitted to study staff (i.e., scheduler, physician, and nurse psychologist).
- Participants may also fill out a medical release document and submit it to the study coordinator.
- Medical history data will be reviewed, and if it is clear that the patient does not meet the inclusion criteria, we will contact them and cancel their appointment. Data obtained in this manner may be used to evaluate participant eligibility; however, it will not be used for any research purposes. Additionally, for any patients who are deemed not eligible to participate, their medical history data will be destroyed in accordance with NIH regulations.
- As a condition of receiving funding from CNRM, de-identified imaging and phenotyping data (i.e., neurocognitive test results and behavioral questionnaires) from funded studies must be made available within a centralized repository (the CNRM Informatics Core) one year after the completion of the study. This is intended to facilitate use and analysis of this data for future research questions or projects. As such, potential subjects will be informed that they should not participate in this study if they do not want their data used for other projects.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Neurocognitive Driving Rehabilitation in Virtual Environments (NeuroDRIVE) as an Adjunctive Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury
Background:
- People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have problems with thinking and everyday activities. They may have a higher risk for car accidents. NeuroDRIVE uses a virtual reality driving simulator. Researchers think it can help test and improve how people think and drive after TBI.
Read more
Objective:
- To test how NeuroDRIVE affects brain performance and driving safety.
Eligibility:
- People at least 18 years old with a history of TBI and who had a driver s license at some point. They must speak, read, and write English and be physically able to drive.
Design:
- Participants will be asked to release their driving records, but they do not have to do this to be in the study.
- Visit 1: Screening physical exam.
- Visit 2: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Participants will lie on a table that slides into a cylinder with a strong magnetic field. A device will be placed over the head. Participants may do computer tasks during the scan.
- Participants will have tests of memory, attention, and thinking. They may be asked questions, take tests, and do simple actions.
- Visit 3: Tests of memory, attention, and thinking, plus a virtual reality driving assessment.
- Participants will be assigned to Group 1 to start NeuroDRIVE training immediately or Group 2 to start 10 weeks later.
- Visits 4 9, over 4 weeks:
- Participants will practice driving skills and mental exercises in the simulator.
- They will complete a driving questionnaire online each week.
- Visit 10: Repeat of Visit 3, with some small changes.
- Visits 11-12: Very similar to Visits 1-2. Includes MRI scan; physical exam; questionnaires; and tests of thinking, memory, and attention..
- After Visit 12: Participants will fill out a weekly driving survey online for 4 weeks.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVE:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the NeuroDRIVE behavioral intervention for enhancement of driving abilities, cognitive abilities, and neurobehavioral symptoms after traumatic brain injury (TBI). For the purposes of this protocol, NeuroDRIVE refers to the novel combined approach of driving training and cognitive rehabilitation in a virtual reality environment. While NeuroDRIVE utilizes the VR system as the method through which the intervention is administered, NeuroDRIVE is not the VR system itself.
STUDY POPULATION:
30 adult patients with a history of mild TBI and 30 adult patients with a history of moderate-to-severe TBI. Participants will be recruited from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), WRNMMC, and the broader community.
DESIGN:
The current study is a Clinical Trial Phase II interventional research study. The primary purpose of the study is for treatment, and it will employ a parallel intervention model. There will be no masking (i.e., open label). Participants will be classified into two groups by TBI severity: those with history of mild TBI and those with history of moderate-tosevere TBI. These different severities are known to have distinct cognitive sequelae. Within each severity group, participants will be in a 2 (pre-post) x 2 (treatment vs. wait list) experimental design.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome measures will include:
- Results from the Virtual Reality Driving Assessment (baseline and postintervention Tactical scenario composite scores)
- Total scores on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
- Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):
WAIS-IV or WMS-IV Digit Span subtest
WAIS-IV Digit-Symbol Coding subtest
Secondary outcome measures will include:
-Neuroimaging results:
Regions of Interest for FMRI: Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Regions of Interest for DTI: Corpus callosum, bilateral frontal white matter horns, and bilateral longitudinal fasciculi
-Total scores on the following symptom questionnaires:
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E)
Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Brief Symptom Inventory- 18
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C)
SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2)
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Combat Exposure Scale (CES)
Dual Dangerous Driving Index (DDDI)
-Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive phenotyping assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):
California Verbal Learning Test- Second Edition (CVLT-II)
WAIS-IV Symbol Search subtest
Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT)
-Standard and scaled scores from the following additional cognitive phenotyping assessments:
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Test of Premorbid Functioning (ToPF)
Grooved Pegboard
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Bethesda Eye and Attention Measure (BEAM)
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- VR Driving
- Keywords
- Neuropsychologic Testing, Neurocognitive, Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Driving
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VR DrivingBehavioural
Baseline: Tactical A3 scenario, composite score Post-Assessment: Tactical A4 scenario composite score
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Immediate Intervention Receives: Behavioral: VR Driving |
| 2 | No intervention | Wait list |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VR Driving, Cognitive test, and Symptoms
-Results from the Virtual Reality Driving Assessment (baseline and post- intervention Tactical scenario composite scores)-Total scores on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory-Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):--WAIS-IV Digit Span subtest--WAIS-IV Digit-Symbol--Coding subtest
Measured: pre/post after 16 weeks of intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
MRI, Phenotyping, & Driving evals
Measured: Ongoing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start7 Apr 2015
- Primary completion20 Jul 2017
- Study completion10 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Leighton Chan, M.D., Principal investigator, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02411227
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 150103
- Other IDs
- 15-CC-0103
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ortoleva C, Brugger C, Van der Linden M, Walder B. Prediction of driving capacity after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):302-13. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182236299.
PubMed 21897289Cox DJ, Davis M, Singh H, Barbour B, Nidiffer FD, Trudel T, Mourant R, Moncrief R. Driving rehabilitation for military personnel recovering from traumatic brain injury using virtual reality driving simulation: a feasibility study. Mil Med. 2010 Jun;175(6):411-6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00081.
PubMed 20572473
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Neurocognitive Driving Rehabilitation in Virtual Environments (NeuroDRIVE) as an Adjunctive Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02411227
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 150103
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- Neuropsychologic Testing, Neurocognitive, Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Driving
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
- People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have problems with thinking and everyday activities. They may have a higher risk for car accidents. NeuroDRIVE uses a virtual reality driving simulator. Researchers think it can help test and improve how people think and drive after TBI.
Objective:
- To test how NeuroDRIVE affects brain performance and driving safety.
Eligibility:
- People at least 18 years old with a history of TBI and who had a driver s license at some point. They must speak, read, and write English and be physically able to drive.
Design:
- Participants will be asked to release their driving records, but they do not have to do this to be in the study.
- Visit 1: Screening physical exam.
- Visit 2: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Participants will lie on a table that slides into a cylinder with a strong magnetic field. A device will be placed over the head. Participants may do computer tasks during the scan.
- Participants will have tests of memory, attention, and thinking. They may be asked questions, take tests, and do simple actions.
- Visit 3: Tests of memory, attention, and thinking, plus a virtual reality driving assessment.
- Participants will be assigned to Group 1 to start NeuroDRIVE training immediately or Group 2 to start 10 weeks later.
- Visits 4 9, over 4 weeks:
- Participants will practice driving skills and mental exercises in the simulator.
- They will complete a driving questionnaire online each week.
- Visit 10: Repeat of Visit 3, with some small changes.
- Visits 11-12: Very similar to Visits 1-2. Includes MRI scan; physical exam; questionnaires; and tests of thinking, memory, and attention..
- After Visit 12: Participants will fill out a weekly driving survey online for 4 weeks.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVE:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the NeuroDRIVE behavioral intervention for enhancement of driving abilities, cognitive abilities, and neurobehavioral symptoms after traumatic brain injury (TBI). For the purposes of this protocol, NeuroDRIVE refers to the novel combined approach of driving training and cognitive rehabilitation in a virtual reality environment. While NeuroDRIVE utilizes the VR system as the method through which the intervention is administered, NeuroDRIVE is not the VR system itself.
STUDY POPULATION:
30 adult patients with a history of mild TBI and 30 adult patients with a history of moderate-to-severe TBI. Participants will be recruited from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), WRNMMC, and the broader community.
DESIGN:
The current study is a Clinical Trial Phase II interventional research study. The primary purpose of the study is for treatment, and it will employ a parallel intervention model. There will be no masking (i.e., open label). Participants will be classified into two groups by TBI severity: those with history of mild TBI and those with history of moderate-tosevere TBI. These different severities are known to have distinct cognitive sequelae. Within each severity group, participants will be in a 2 (pre-post) x 2 (treatment vs. wait list) experimental design.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome measures will include:
- Results from the Virtual Reality Driving Assessment (baseline and postintervention Tactical scenario composite scores)
- Total scores on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
- Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):
WAIS-IV or WMS-IV Digit Span subtest
WAIS-IV Digit-Symbol Coding subtest
Secondary outcome measures will include:
-Neuroimaging results:
Regions of Interest for FMRI: Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Regions of Interest for DTI: Corpus callosum, bilateral frontal white matter horns, and bilateral longitudinal fasciculi
-Total scores on the following symptom questionnaires:
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E)
Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Brief Symptom Inventory- 18
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C)
SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2)
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Combat Exposure Scale (CES)
Dual Dangerous Driving Index (DDDI)
-Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive phenotyping assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):
California Verbal Learning Test- Second Edition (CVLT-II)
WAIS-IV Symbol Search subtest
Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT)
-Standard and scaled scores from the following additional cognitive phenotyping assessments:
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Test of Premorbid Functioning (ToPF)
Grooved Pegboard
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)
Bethesda Eye and Attention Measure (BEAM)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: VR DrivingImmediate Intervention |
| 2 | No intervention | –Wait list |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Currently has a valid driver s license, or had a valid driver s license prior to injury
- 18 years of age or older
- Able to effectively manipulate the steering wheel and the gas/brake pedals without adaptive equipment
- Able to read, write, and speak in English
- History of traumatic brain injury greater than 12 weeks prior to initiation into the current study
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Risk for injury from the MRI magnet, including:
- History of penetrating brain injury
- History of serious medical condition other than TBI that could affect cognitive or motor abilities (e.g., multiple sclerosis, encephalitis, cerebrovascular disease)
- History of severe motion sickness and/or vertigo.
- Other medical or psychological instability that could create difficulty fulfilling the study requirements (e.g., untreated mental illness, auditory/visual hallucinations, narcolepsy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VR DrivingBaseline: Tactical A3 scenario, composite score Post-Assessment: Tactical A4 scenario composite score | Behavioural | 1 |
Primary outcome
VR Driving, Cognitive test, and Symptoms
Time frame: pre/post after 16 weeks of intervention
-Results from the Virtual Reality Driving Assessment (baseline and post- intervention Tactical scenario composite scores)-Total scores on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory-Standard and scaled scores from the following cognitive assessments (from the TBI Common Data Elements identified by NINDS):--WAIS-IV Digit Span subtest--WAIS-IV Digit-Symbol--Coding subtest
1 secondary outcome
MRI, Phenotyping, & Driving evals
Time frame: Ongoing
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21897289Ortoleva C, Brugger C, Van der Linden M, Walder B. Prediction of driving capacity after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):302-13. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182236299.
- Background: PubMed 20572473Cox DJ, Davis M, Singh H, Barbour B, Nidiffer FD, Trudel T, Mourant R, Moncrief R. Driving rehabilitation for military personnel recovering from traumatic brain injury using virtual reality driving simulation: a feasibility study. Mil Med. 2010 Jun;175(6):411-6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00081.
- NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web PageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leighton Chan, M.D. principal investigator
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing VR Driving in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VR Driving, Cognitive test, and Symptoms (time frame: pre/post after 16 weeks of intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02411227, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2020.