AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular Rhythm From Artificial PacingPhase 4MS-RNCT02412176

Right Ventricular Apical Versus True Mid-septal Pacing

A Phase 4 study testing Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex and Pacing site - the implantation in the septum in people with Ventricular Rhythm From Artificial Pacing, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Right ventricular (RV) artificial apical pacing can negatively impact synchrony of left ventricular contraction. The pacing from the septum of the RV can present an advantage in terms of less expressed dyssynchrony and reduced negative impact on left ventricular (LV) function. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex and Pacing site - the implantation in the septum
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteCzechia
Study dates
Jan 2014to Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Indication for cardiac pacing.

Who cannot join

  • renal insufficiency
  • iod allergy
  • claustrophobia
  • significant valvular disease
  • recent acute coronary syndrome
  • planned cardiac surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • ejection fraction of left ventricle less than 50%
  • live expectancy less than 3 years
  • expected non-compliance of the patient

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pavel Osmancik, MD, PhD contact

00420721544447

pavel.osmancik@gmail.com

Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Charles University in Prague

    Prague

    Pavel Osmancik, 00420721544447, pavel.osmancik@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: A Comparison Between Right Ventricular Apical Pacing and True Mid-septal Pacing, Verified With Computed Tomography: a Randomized Study

Background Right ventricular (RV) artificial apical pacing can negatively impact synchrony of left ventricular contraction. The pacing from the septum of the RV can present an advantage in terms of less expressed dyssynchrony and reduced negative impact on left ventricular (LV) function. However, results of randomized studies comparing apical and septal pacing are not uniform. All these results have been affected by improper implantation of the septal lead, with many apparently septal leads being, in fact, implanted off-septum. The aim of the study is to compare true septal pacing with other RV pacing locations.

Methods/Design This is a prospective, randomized, single center study. Patients with standard indications for cardiac pacing with the expectation of high percentage RV pacing will be enrolled. They will be randomized into apical and septal pacing. The real location of leads in patients randomized to septal pacing will be confirmed using cardiac CT. After cardiac CT, three groups of patients will be created: 1) apical pacing, 2) true septal (in which the position of the lead has been verified to be in the septum), and 3) apparent septal (in which the position of the lead was found to be off-septum). Primary end-point are changes in standard echocardiographic parameters (LV ejection fraction, LV end-systolic volume, and LV end-diastolic volume) and the concentration of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 6 months, 1 year and three years. Secondary end-points are changes in echo-parameters of LV synchrony.

Discussion It is hypothesized that correct septal pacing will be associated with reduce negative impact on the function of the left ventricle (i.e. smaller decreases in LV EF and smaller increases in LVEDV, LVESV) and NT-proBNP, and less expressed LV dyssynchrony.

Read the detailed description

METHODS/DESIGN The study is planned as prospective, multicenter, randomized study. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment of patients.

Inclusion criteria will be the following:

  1. Indication for cardiac pacing based on recent guidelines of European Society of Cardiology (5)
  2. High degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block (AV block 2/1 or second degree AV block with resulting heart rate below 50), or atrial fibrillation with slow conduction to ventricles.
  3. A high probability of needing significant ventricular stimulation (more than 50%)
  4. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria will be the following:

  1. The absence of written informed consent
  2. Renal insufficiency (creatinine level more than 130 µmol/l)
  3. History of Iodine allergy
  4. Claustrophobia
  5. Significant valve disease (i.e. mitral insufficiency 75% and worse, moderate or severe aortic stenosis)
  6. Recent (within three months) acute coronary syndrome
  7. Planned cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery)
  8. Ejection fraction of left ventricle less than 50%
  9. Expected life expectancy less than 3 years
  10. Expected non-compliance.

End-points: there are three unique primary end-points: 1) changes in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) over time (from baseline to 6 months and 3 years), 2) changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) over time (from baseline to 6 months and 3 years) and 3) changes in concentration of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), from baseline to 6 months up to three years).

Secondary endpoints are changes in echocardiography parameters of left ventricular synchrony, changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) over time and changes in the quality of life, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, over time (from baseline to 6 months and 3 years).

Power calculation and statistical analysis: The sample size calculation was based on the following assumptions: the power of the test = 0.8 and a statistical significance border = 0.05. Based on information from previous trials regarding the effect of pacing on left ventricular volumes and parameters, it is assumed that there will be at least a 10% difference in the change of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV, measured from baseline to 3 years follow-up) between the group paced from apex and the group with true septal pacing. Based on previous results regarding the efficacy of true septal pacing, based on recent fluoroscopy criteria, it is assumed that approximately 40% of those randomized to the septal group will not have the lead located in the septum, but in the anterior wall. This means that 70 patients are needed in the apical group, 70 in the septal group and 70 in the apparent septal group to achieve statistical significance. Data analysis will be performed using standard tests (chi-square, Student t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test etc.) For data description, standard descriptive statistical methods will be used: absolute and relative frequencies for categorical data and the median with 5-95% percentiles for continuous data. For categorical variables, statistical analysis will be done using the χ2 or the Fisher exact test; for continuous variables, the Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test will be used. Kaplan-Meier curves will be calculated for visualizing the occurrence of end-points during follow-up. The influence of patient characteristics on the occurrence of end-points will be calculated using logistic regression and the Cox proportional risk model, when appropriate.

Data analysis In the primary analysis, three groups of patients will be analyzed: 1) patients randomized to RV apical pacing (apex group); 2) patients with true septal pacing (true septal group, i.e. those randomized to septal pacing, in whom the location of the lead was confirmed (using cardiac CT) to actually be in the septum), and 3) patients with apparent septal pacing (apparent septal group, i.e. those randomized to septal pacing, in whom the lead location will be found to off-septum, based on cardiac CT). The primary goal of the study will be to confirm that true septal pacing is associated with fewer prominent negative effects on the left ventricle. A secondary goal is to determine if off-septum placement (i.e., apparent septal group) has similar negative consequences for the left ventricle as those seen in apical pacing. In a secondary analysis, the two original groups will be compared (i.e., the groups randomized to apical vs. septal pacing).

Echocardiographic evaluation All patients will undergo echocardiography before implantation and during follow-up. Echocardiography will be done in the left lateral decubitus position. Imaging will be performed using a commercially available echocardiographic system (VIVID 7, General Electric Ultrasound, Milwaukee, USA). Images will be obtained using a 3.5 Mega Hertz transducer, at a depth of 16 cm in the parasternal (long and short axis) and apical (two- and four-chamber images) views. Standard 2D and colour Doppler data, triggered by the Q R S complex, will be saved in cine-loop format. A minimum of three consecutive beats will be recorded from each view and the images will be digitally stored for off-line analysis (EchoPac 7.0.0, General Electric Ultrasound, Milwaukee, USA). Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV EF will be measured from the apical two- and four-chamber images, using the (modified biplane) Simpson's rule. (10) Parameters of interventricular and left ventricular dyssynchrony will be measured off-line using tissue Doppler.

Conventional tissue Doppler-based dyssynchrony indices will be determined; (11) the standard deviation (SD) in time to peak velocity in 12 mid and basal segments (Ts SD12), the difference in time to peak velocity between anteroseptal and posterior wall (Ts AsP), the difference in time to peak velocity between the septal and lateral wall (Ts SL) as well as the maximal difference in time to peak velocity in 6 basal segments (Ts Diff6). Moreover, newer recently published parameters of dyssynchrony, such as apical rocking or septal flash, will also be measured. (12)

Further examinations before implantation Patients will be asked to complete the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the concentration of NT-proBNP, in peripheral blood will be measured. Afterwards patients will be randomized to RV apical or RV septal pacing. Because it can be anticipated that not all leads intended for RV septal implantation will actually end up implanted in the RV septum (some will be in the free anterior wall or in the anteroseptal groove), the ratio of randomization will be 2/1 (mid-septal vs. apical).

Implantation will be done using the standard approach, i.e., using the subclavian or cephalic approach. Only active fixation leads will be used. The position of the lead in the RV apical group will be assessed by displaying the lead in the anteroposterior (AP), right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 and left anterior oblique (LAO) 40 projection and stored. For the septal pacing group, a 3D stylet with two angulations will be prepared, as proposed recently. (9) Initially, the distal end of a standard stylet will be manually shaped into a smooth large curve, in a single plane, over a length of about 20 cm using the barrel of a syringe. The lead, with this J-shape stylet, will be advanced into the RV and further to the pulmonary artery. Then the stylet will be withdrawn and an additional 90° curve angulation will be created with the distal 3 cm end of the stylet. The 3D stylet will be inserted into the lead, and by slight counterclockwise torque applied, the lead will be withdrawn from the pulmonary artery to the right ventricle. A "jump" is usually seen as the lead falls below the RV outflow tract. At that point, the lead is quickly advanced and forced against the mid-septum. This manipulation will be done using RAO 30, and the target position is in the middle of the cardiac contour. Before final lead fixation, the position of the lead will be checked in the LAO 40 (the lead should point toward the spine with an angle to the horizontal plane between 0 to 60°). Perioperative fluoroscopy images will be stored, and standard implant parameters will be measured (impedance, R wave amplitude, and threshold).

Cardiac CT will be performed 6-12 weeks after implantation to assess the true position of the RV lead in the heart. Before cardiac CT, lead dislodgement will be excluded by measuring standard lead parameters.

Image acquisition CT will be performed using a 256-detector-row CT scanner (Brilliance CT 256; Philips, Best, The Netherlands) with a tube voltage of 100 kilo Volt (kV), collimation of 2x128×0.625 mm, a pitch of 0.18, a rotation time of 0.27 s, and a slice thickness of 0.9 mm. A tri-phasic injection of 60 mL of contrast media (Ultravist 370, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, New Jersey, USA) will be used. Initially, 50 mL of contrast agent will be administered at a flow rate of 4.0 mL/s, followed by 20 mL of 50% contrast/saline. Subsequently, a saline flush of 30 mL will be administered at a flow rate of 3.0 mL/s. Bolus tracking will be used for synchronization of the contrast medium injection during scanning. The region of interest will be the descending aorta. After enhancement reaches 140 hounsfield Units (HU), there will be 3-s post-threshold delay before the scan is commenced. Prospective ECG triggered dose modulation (mode "step and shoot") will be used, scanning 70-80% of the R - R interval. After examination, the displayed dose-length product (DLP) will be recorded to evaluate radiation dose.

Image post-processing Datasets will be transferred to an external workstation (Comprehensive Cardiac Analyses, Brilliance Workspace v 4.0, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, USA) for off-line analysis. Axial slices, oblique reconstructions and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) images will be used for precise localization of the RV lead. According to the location of RV lead, septal group patients will be divided in two sub-groups: true septum group (i.e. patients randomize to septal pacing, in whom the lead is actually found to be in the septum) and apparent septum group (i.e. those randomized to the septal pacing, in whom the lead is found to be off-septum, and typically in the free anterior wall or in the anteroseptal groove). Because the apical position is easily visible with fluoroscopy, cardiac CT will be done only in the patients randomized to septal pacing.

Post-implantation follow-up and out-patient controls will be done at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. During each control, standard pacemaker parameters (impedance, threshold, and amplitude) will be measured, and the percentage of ventricular stimulation will be assessed. During each control, echocardiography will be done, NT-proBNP measured, and patients will be asked to fulfill the Minnesota questionnaire.

Being tested
Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex, Pacing site - the implantation in the septum
Keywords
pacemaker, dyssynchrony, apical pacing, mid-septum

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apexProcedure or surgery

    Also called Pacing site - RV apex

    Pacing site - RV apex. The lead will be implanted in the RV apex.

  • Pacing site - the implantation in the septumProcedure or surgery

    Also called Pacing site - MS

    Pacing site - septum. The lead will be implanted in the septum.

Study groups in NCT02412176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pacing site - right ventricular apexExperimentalThe intervention will be the implantation of the lead into the right ventricular apex
Receives: Procedure: Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex
Pacing site - septumExperimentalThe intervention will be the implantation of the lead into the septum.
Receives: Procedure: Pacing site - the implantation in the septum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in the left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months

    The changes over time in the left ventricular ejection fraction will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months

  2. Change from baseline in the left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months

    The changes over time in the left ventricular end-systolic volume will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months

  3. Change from baseline in the concentration of N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide at 6 months

    The changes over time in the concentration of the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months

  4. Change from baseline in the left ventricular ejection fraction at 3 years

    The changes over time in the left ventricular ejection fraction will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 3 years

  5. Change from baseline in the left ventricular end-systolic volume at 3 years.

    The changes over time in the left ventricular ejection fraction will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 3 years

  6. Change from baseline in the concentration of N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide at 3 years.

    The changes over time in the concentration of the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 3 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change from baseline in dyssynchrony at 6 months

    Echo parameters of dyssynchrony wil be measured.

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months

  2. Change from baseline in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume at 6 months

    The changes over time in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months

  3. Change from baseline in dyssynchrony at 3 years.

    Echo parameters of dyssynchrony wil be measured.

    Measured: from baseline to 3 years

  4. Change from baseline in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume at 3 years.

    The changes over time in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume will be determined.

    Measured: from baseline to 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
RV lead in the apex
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02412176
Sponsor's protocol ID
CharlesUCR
Acronym
MS-R
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
24 Mar 2015
Last updated
11 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Burri H, Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Ganiere V, Stettler C. Comparison of tools and techniques for implanting pacemaker leads on the ventricular mid-septum. Europace. 2012 Jun;14(6):847-52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur404. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

    PubMed 22201018
  • Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, Chung ES, Niazi I, Sherfesee L, Shinn T, Sutton MS; Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial Investigators. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1585-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356.

    PubMed 23614585
  • Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 15;29(4):744-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4.

    PubMed 9091519
  • Zhang XH, Chen H, Siu CW, Yiu KH, Chan WS, Lee KL, Chan HW, Lee SW, Fu GS, Lau CP, Tse HF. New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01014.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

    PubMed 18005026
  • Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Amit G. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Europace. 2012 Jan;14(1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur240. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

    PubMed 21798880
  • Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Fleury E, Foulkes H, Stettler C, Burri H. Pacing of the interventricular septum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Oct;23(7):621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

    PubMed 22939807
  • Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ, Daubert JC, Drexler H, Ector H, Gasparini M, Linde C, Morgado FB, Oto A, Sutton R, Trusz-Gluza M; European Society of Cardiology; European Heart Rhythm Association. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(18):2256-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm305. Epub 2007 Aug 28. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17726042
  • Burri H, Park CI, Zimmermann M, Gentil-Baron P, Stettler C, Sunthorn H, Domenichini G, Shah D. Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping. Europace. 2011 Jan;13(1):82-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq332. Epub 2010 Sep 9.

    PubMed 20829188
  • Osmancik P, Stros P, Herman D, Curila K, Petr R. The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):719-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000232. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

    PubMed 23742805
  • Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989 Sep-Oct;2(5):358-67. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(89)80014-8.

    PubMed 2698218
  • Yu CM, Zhang Q, Fung JW, Chan HC, Chan YS, Yip GW, Kong SL, Lin H, Zhang Y, Sanderson JE. A novel tool to assess systolic asynchrony and identify responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy by tissue synchronization imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 1;45(5):677-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.003.

    PubMed 15734610
  • Szulik M, Tillekaerts M, Vangeel V, Ganame J, Willems R, Lenarczyk R, Rademakers F, Kalarus Z, Kukulski T, Voigt JU. Assessment of apical rocking: a new, integrative approach for selection of candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Dec;11(10):863-9. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq081. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

    PubMed 20615904
  • Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G, Alzueta J, Fernandez-Lozano I, Cobo E, Wiegand U, Concha JF, Navarro X, Navarro-Lopez F, de Teresa E. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jun;13(6):633-41. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr041.

    PubMed 21613427
  • Padeletti L, Lieberman R, Schreuder J, Michelucci A, Collella A, Pieragnoli P, Ricciardi G, Eastman W, Valsecchi S, Hettrick DA. Acute effects of His bundle pacing versus left ventricular and right ventricular pacing on left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Nov 15;100(10):1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.055.

    PubMed 17996519
  • Peschar M, de Swart H, Michels KJ, Reneman RS, Prinzen FW. Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 2;41(7):1218-26. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00091-3.

    PubMed 12679225

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Pacing site - the implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex and Pacing site - the implantation in the septum in people with Ventricular Rhythm From Artificial Pacing, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pavel Osmancik (00420721544447, pavel.osmancik@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in the left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months (time frame: from baseline to 6 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02412176, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in