Fecal IncontinencePhase 3FI_TOXINNCT02414425
Effect and Tolerance of Botulinum A Toxin Rectal Injections on Fecal Incontinence
A Phase 3 study testing Rectoscopy, Anorectal manometry and Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 8 sites in France.
Trial summary
Fecal incontinence is a frequent pathology which concerns 10% of the general population and severely alters patients quality of life. The cost of urinary and faecal incontinence has been estimated to be $16 billions a year. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fecal Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Rectoscopy, Anorectal manometry and Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Nov 2015to 30 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with at least one episode of active Fecal Incontinence and /or urgency per week;
- Patients with Fecal Incontinence for at least 3 months;
- Patients with Fecal Incontinence refractory to conventional treatment (medical and biofeedback);
- Patients having read the information letter and signed informed consent;
- Patients with medical insurance.
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18 years old;
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women without effective contraception and of age to procreate;
- Exclusive passive Fecal Incontinence;
- Fecal Incontinence secondary to anorectal malformation, post-surgery, anorectal organic disease (cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, post-radiotherapy etc.), constipation, an anal sphincter lesion which could be repaired as a first step, a rectal prolapse (the inclusion in the study is possible if Fecal Incontinence persists after rectopexy, a neurological disease with rapid progress ( stable neurological status is needed for at least 6 months);
- Patients under guardianship.
- Known Hypersensibility to botulinum toxin;
Show all 16Show fewer
- Neuromuscular junction pathology (myasthenia, Lambert-Eaton syndrome);
- Anesthesia performed less than 1 month previously;
- Association with antibiotics
- Neurological pathology such as polyradiculoneuropathy;
- Dysphagia, pneumopathy secondary to dysphagia;
- Botulinum toxin injections during the 3 months before the beginning of the study;
- Known Hypersensitivity to albumin;
- History of inhalation pneumopathy.
- Rectoscopy impossible (anal stenosis for example);
- Anti-coagulant or anti-platelet drug or hemostasis disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
France8 sites
Bordeaux University Hospital
Bordeaux
Clinique des Cèdres
Cornebarrieu
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon
AP-HM Hôpital Nord
Marseille
AP-HP Hôpital Tenon
Paris
Hôpital des Diaconesses
Paris
Rennes University Hospital
Rennes
Rouen University Hospital
Rouen, 76031
About this study
Official title: Effect And Tolerance of Botulinum A Toxin Rectal Injections on Fecal Incontinence
Fecal incontinence is a frequent pathology which concerns 10% of the general population and severely alters patients quality of life. The cost of urinary and faecal incontinence has been estimated to be $16 billions a year. Several treatments exist depending on the aetiology of the faecal incontinence: medical treatments, biofeedback and sacral nerve stimulation. Nevertheless, these treatments are not always effective (50-70% of success) and are not without side effects, particularly the sacral nerve stimulation (pain, infection, electrode displacement..).
The intravesical injections of botulinum toxin have been used for several years for the treatment of urinary incontinence with overactive bladder. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these injections in patients with neurological disorders and overactive bladder, as well as in idiopathic overactive bladder. The toxin injections in the detrusor muscle increase the compliance and the bladder capacity and delay the initial appearance of detrusor uninhibited contraction. Furthermore, botulinum toxin decreases the urinary urgency. It maybe secondary to the reduction of the amplitude of the detrusor uninhibited contraction as well as to a direct effect of toxin on sensory pelvic nerve afferents.
Read more
The botulinum toxin should play a role on motor afferents as well as on the sensory function of efferent nerves.
The hypothesis is to demonstrate a decrease of active faecal incontinence and/or urgency episodes with improvement in quality of life, without any major side effects, in the patients included in this study. Nevertheless, the benefit of toxin injections are known to be temporary because of nerve re-growth. If we obtain similar results for fecal incontinence, it would be possible to schedule one to two injections a year because of the limited side-effects and invasiveness of the rectal injections.
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Being tested
- Rectoscopy, Anorectal manometry, Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection
- Keywords
- Fecal Incontinence, Botulinum Toxin A, Rectal injection
- Medical subject headings
- Fecal Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RectoscopyProcedure or surgery
A rectoscopy will be performed for Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection
Anorectal manometryProcedure or surgery
Anorectal manometry will be performed to evaluate efficacy of Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum rectal injection
Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injectionDrug
Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection is performed during rectoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Injection of Botulinum toxin A | Experimental | Botulinum toxin A will be injected during rectoscopy for patient with rectal incontinence.
Anorectal manometry will be performed for evaluation of efficacy of experimental drug Receives: Procedure: Rectoscopy; Procedure: Anorectal manometry; Drug: Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection |
| Rectal Injection of physiologic serum | Placebo comparator | physiologic serum will be injected during rectoscopy for patient with rectal incontinence.
Anorectal manometry will be performed for evaluation of efficacy of placebo Receives: Procedure: Rectoscopy; Procedure: Anorectal manometry; Drug: Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
The number of fecaI incontinence episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 1 Month
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
The number of urgencies episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 1 Month
Secondary outcomes (13)
Number of Adverse Events
Imputability of Adverse events is evaluated by investigator
Measured: 6 Months
Number of Adverse Events
Imputability of Adverse events is evaluated by investigator
Measured: 1 Month
Number of Adverse Events
Imputability of Adverse events is evaluated by investigator
Measured: 3 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
The severity of fecal incontinence is evaluated using Cleveland Clinic Score
Measured: 6 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
The severity of fecal incontinence is evaluated using Cleveland Clinic Score
Measured: 3 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
The severity of fecal incontinence is evaluated using Cleveland Clinic Score
Measured: 1 Month
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
postponing defecation delay is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 6 Months
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
postponing defecation delay is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 3 Months
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
postponing defecation delay is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 1 Month
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
The number of fecaI incontinence episodes and/or urgencies is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 6 months
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
The number of fecaI incontinence episodes and/or urgencies is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 3 months
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
The number of urgencies episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 6 months
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
The number of urgencies episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start25 Nov 2015
- Primary completion30 Mar 2022
- Study completion30 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fecal IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, RouenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anne-Marie LEROI, Pr, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Rouen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02414425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014/008/HP
- Other IDs
- 2014-003650-14, 2014
- Acronym
- FI_TOXIN
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Leroi AM, Queralto M, Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Vitton V, Amarenco G, Etienney I, Mion F, Bridoux V, Philip J, Brochard C, Damon H, Lacroix E, Gillibert A, Gourcerol G. Intrarectal injections of botulinum toxin versus placebo for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence in adults (FI-Toxin): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;9(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00332-1. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
PubMed 38128556
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect And Tolerance of Botulinum A Toxin Rectal Injections on Fecal Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02414425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FI_TOXIN / 2014/008/HP
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Keywords
- Fecal Incontinence, Botulinum Toxin A, Rectal injection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fecal incontinence is a frequent pathology which concerns 10% of the general population and severely alters patients quality of life. The cost of urinary and faecal incontinence has been estimated to be $16 billions a year. Several treatments exist depending on the aetiology of the faecal incontinence: medical treatments, biofeedback and sacral nerve stimulation. Nevertheless, these treatments are not always effective (50-70% of success) and are not without side effects, particularly the sacral nerve stimulation (pain, infection, electrode displacement..).
The intravesical injections of botulinum toxin have been used for several years for the treatment of urinary incontinence with overactive bladder. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these injections in patients with neurological disorders and overactive bladder, as well as in idiopathic overactive bladder. The toxin injections in the detrusor muscle increase the compliance and the bladder capacity and delay the initial appearance of detrusor uninhibited contraction. Furthermore, botulinum toxin decreases the urinary urgency. It maybe secondary to the reduction of the amplitude of the detrusor uninhibited contraction as well as to a direct effect of toxin on sensory pelvic nerve afferents.
The botulinum toxin should play a role on motor afferents as well as on the sensory function of efferent nerves.
The hypothesis is to demonstrate a decrease of active faecal incontinence and/or urgency episodes with improvement in quality of life, without any major side effects, in the patients included in this study. Nevertheless, the benefit of toxin injections are known to be temporary because of nerve re-growth. If we obtain similar results for fecal incontinence, it would be possible to schedule one to two injections a year because of the limited side-effects and invasiveness of the rectal injections.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Injection of Botulinum toxin A | Experimental | Procedure: Rectoscopy, Procedure: Anorectal manometry, Drug: Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injectionBotulinum toxin A will be injected during rectoscopy for patient with rectal incontinence. Anorectal manometry will be performed for evaluation of efficacy of experimental drug |
| Rectal Injection of physiologic serum | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Rectoscopy, Procedure: Anorectal manometry, Drug: Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injectionphysiologic serum will be injected during rectoscopy for patient with rectal incontinence. Anorectal manometry will be performed for evaluation of efficacy of placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with at least one episode of active Fecal Incontinence and /or urgency per week;
- Patients with Fecal Incontinence for at least 3 months;
- Patients with Fecal Incontinence refractory to conventional treatment (medical and biofeedback);
- Patients having read the information letter and signed informed consent;
- Patients with medical insurance.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients younger than 18 years old;
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women without effective contraception and of age to procreate;
- Exclusive passive Fecal Incontinence;
- Fecal Incontinence secondary to anorectal malformation, post-surgery, anorectal organic disease (cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, post-radiotherapy etc.), constipation, an anal sphincter lesion which could be repaired as a first step, a rectal prolapse (the inclusion in the study is possible if Fecal Incontinence persists after rectopexy, a neurological disease with rapid progress ( stable neurological status is needed for at least 6 months);
- Patients under guardianship.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RectoscopyA rectoscopy will be performed for Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection | Procedure or surgery | Rectal Injection of Botulinum toxin A, Rectal Injection of physiologic serum |
| Anorectal manometryAnorectal manometry will be performed to evaluate efficacy of Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum rectal injection | Procedure or surgery | Rectal Injection of Botulinum toxin A, Rectal Injection of physiologic serum |
| Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injectionBotulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection is performed during rectoscopy | Drug | Rectal Injection of Botulinum toxin A, Rectal Injection of physiologic serum |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
Time frame: 1 Month
The number of fecaI incontinence episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
Time frame: 1 Month
The number of urgencies episodes is evaluated using a bowel diary
13 secondary outcomes
Number of Adverse Events
Time frame: 6 Months
Number of Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 Month
Number of Adverse Events
Time frame: 3 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
Time frame: 6 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
Time frame: 3 Months
Change from baseline in the severity of fecal incontinence
Time frame: 1 Month
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
Time frame: 6 Months
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
Time frame: 3 Months
Change from baseline on delay in postponing defecation
Time frame: 1 Month
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
Time frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week
Time frame: 3 months
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
Time frame: 6 months
Change from baseline in the Number of urgencies episodes per week
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38128556Leroi AM, Queralto M, Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Vitton V, Amarenco G, Etienney I, Mion F, Bridoux V, Philip J, Brochard C, Damon H, Lacroix E, Gillibert A, Gourcerol G. Intrarectal injections of botulinum toxin versus placebo for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence in adults (FI-Toxin): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;9(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00332-1. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
Related trials for Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
At-Home Genital Nerve Stimulation for SCI Bowel
Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Postpartum Health Trajectories the First Year After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and the Impact of a Group-Based Intervention
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
Recruiting
Outcome Research in Bowel Irrigation Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation and/or Faecal Incontinence
Faecal Incontinence, Chronic Constipation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne-Marie LEROI, Pr principal investigator
University Hospital, Rouen
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rectoscopy, Anorectal manometry and Botulinum toxin A or physiologic serum injection in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 8 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in the Number of active fecaI incontinence episodes per week (time frame: 1 Month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02414425, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.