Type 2 DiabetesSWEET-BONENCT02421393
Study to Weigh the Effect of Exercise Training on BONE (SWEET-BONE) Quality and Strength in Type 2 Diabetes
A study testing supervised exercise training in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Metabolic Fitness Association, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased fracture risk despite normal to increased bone mass, thus suggesting poor bone quality. This study is aimed at weighing the effect of an exercise intervention program on parameters of bone quality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- supervised exercise training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 1 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diabetes duration >5-year
- sedentary lifestyle (i.e. more than 8 hours/day spent in any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents [METs] while in a sitting or reclining posture) from at least 6 months;
- physically inactivity (i.e. insufficient amounts of physical activity [PA] according to current guidelines) from at least 6 months;
- body mass index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m2;
- ability to walk 1.6 Km without assistance;
- a Short Battery Performance Test score ranging from 4 to 9;
- eligibility after cardiologic evaluation.
Who cannot join
- any condition limiting participation in a clinical trial, including psychiatric disorders or hospitalization for depression in the past 6 months;
- any condition limiting PA/exercise, including musculoskeletal disorders or deformities, central nervous system dysfunction such as hemiparesis, myelopathies, cerebral ataxia, vestibular dysfunction, and postural hypotension (i.e. a fall of >20 mmHg of systolic or >10 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure when changing position);
- cancer and other life-expectancy limiting conditions;
- recent major acute cardiovascular event, including heart attack, stroke/transient ischemic attack(s), revascularization procedure, or participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program within the past three months, or documented history of pulmonary embolism in the past six months;
- pre-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy;
- macroalbuminuria and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 ml/min/1.73 m2;
Show all 16Show fewer
- ankle/brachial index (ABI) <0.9;
- severe motor and sensory neuropathy;
- diabetic foot with history of ulcer;
- hemoglobin (Hb) A1c >9.0%;
- blood pressure (BP) >150/90 mmHg;
- vitamin D <10 ng/ml;
- treatment with anti-fracturative agents, estrogens, aromatase inhibitors, testosterone, corticosteroids and/or glitazon;
- previous documented non-traumatic fractures,
- total spine deformity index (SDI) >3 (and >1 in a single vertebra);
- a T score <-2.5 at spine/hip at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects with HbA1c or blood pressure above the indicated threshold will be receive appropriate treatment and will be re-evaluated after 3 months. Patients with vitamin D levels < 10 ng/dl will be treated with cholecalciferol 25.000 IU/week for 6 weeks and will be re-evaluated for eligibility 2 weeks after the last
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study to Weigh the Effect of Exercise Training on BONE Quality and Strength (SWEET-BONE) in Type 2 Diabetes: an Exercise Intervention Program for Reducing the Risk of Fractures
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased fracture risk despite normal to increased bone mass, thus suggesting poor bone quality. This study is aimed at weighing the effect of an exercise intervention program on parameters of bone quality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two hundred patients with T2DM will be randomized to supervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) versus standard care (control, CON, group; n=100) for 24 months.
Read the detailed description
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased fracture risk despite normal to increased bone mass, as assessed as bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Increased fracture risk remains after adjustment for BMD, and also falls, which are more frequent in these individuals than in their non-diabetic counterparts, due to chronic complications and treatments, and for body mass index, which seems to be protective through an increase in BMD. This suggests that patients with T2DM have poor bone quality, i.e. altered bone geometry and microarchitecture, which results in reduced strength. Based on the mechanostat therapy, physical activity (PA)/exercise would be beneficial for preventing fractures in T2DM individuals through greater mechanical loading on the skeleton, which causes favorable bone adaptations, and also by increasing muscle mass, strength, and performance, which reduces the risk of falls by improving gait and balance.
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a specific exercise training intervention program on parameters of bone quality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Two hundred patients with T2DM will be randomized to supervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) versus standard care (control, CON, group; n=100) for 24 months.
Sample size calculation is based on a recent report showing that TBS is lower in diabetic vs. control subjects (1.228 vs. 1.298) with a standard deviation of 0.140. To observe a normalization of TBS in EXE participants with a statistical power of 90% (α=0.05) by unpaired t-test, 85 patients per arm are needed (170 total). A sample size of 200 patients will allow to support a dropout rate up to 15%.
A sample of 100 non-diabetic subjects matched 1:2 by age, gender, and BMI will be used as controls for baseline measures.
EXE participants will attend two weekly sessions of 75 min each, supervised by an exercise specialist in a dedicated gym facility. Each session will include: 5 min of warm up; 20 min of aerobic training using treadmill; 15 min of resistance training of muscle groups of skeletal sites of fragility fractures; 15 min of "weight bearing" exercises using weighted vests; 8 min of core stability training; 8 min of balance training; and 4 min of flexibility training. Weighted vest worn also during aerobic training and any occupational, home and leisure-time PA.
CON subjects will receive advises to maintain a physically active lifestyle, according to current guidelines, by performing any type of commuting, occupational, home and leisure-time PA.
All patients will be subjected to a treatment regimen aimed at achieving optimal glycemic, lipid, BP and body weight targets, as established by current guidelines and including glucose-, lipid- and BP-lowering agents as needed. For ethical reasons, drugs will be also adjusted throughout the study to attain target levels and to account for reduced needs. Since all patients are overweight or obese, caloric intake (55% complex carbohydrates, 30% fat, and 15% protein) will be reduced to obtain a negative balance of 500 kcal/day. Requirements will be calculated by adding the estimated energy expenditure from PA to basal metabolism. Adherence to diet will be verified by the use of food diaries and dietary prescriptions will be adjusted at each intermediate visit. Patients with vitamin D levels ranging from 10 to 20 ng/dl will be treated with cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every 2 weeks for 2 months, then with cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every months, whereas those with vitamin D levels ranging from 20 to 30 ng/dl will be given cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every month. At 6 months participants, will be re-evaluated and treatment will be discontinued in case of vitamin D values >30 ng/dl or continued for additional 6 months at the doses indicated above, and so on until the end of the study.
Randomization will be stratified by gender (males versus females), age (65-70 versus 71-75) and type of diabetes treatment (non-insulin versus insulin), using a permuted-block randomization software. Physicians and patients will not be blinded to group assignment, at variance with operators executing instrumental procedures, whereas sample blinding at central laboratory will be achieved using bar codes.
The primary endpoint is the trabecular bone score (TBS), which is derived from the antero-posterior spine raw DXA image(s) from the same region of interest as the BMD measurement by the use of a specific software and correlates with three-dimensional bone micro-architecture parameters. Among the numerous potential measures of bone quality, TBS is the only one that has been consistently shown to be lower in T2DM vs. control subjects.
Secondary endpoints include:
- other potential measures of bone quality as assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS);
- bone mass (BMD as assessed by DXA);
- bone metabolism (sclerostin and other biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption);
- body composition (total body lean and fat mass by total body DXA);
- muscle strength (by dynamometer);
- muscle mass/density (by pQCT);
- balance, gait and power (by Short Battery Performance Test);
- musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms (by questionnaire);
- number of falls (by questionnaire); i. symptomatic and asymptomatic fractures (by history or medical records and vertebral morphometry, respectively).
Other measures include:
- quality of life (QoL);
- cardiorespiratory fitness;
- flexibility;
- volume of PA;
- coronary heart disease 10-year risk score.
Dietary intake and adverse events will be also recorded. Participants from both groups will be followed for additional 5 years in order to record the number of falls and eventual fractures during this time period. PA and MS symptoms will be also monitored throughout this 5-year interval. To this end, patients will be seen yearly (or every 6 months according to the degree of glycemic control and the overall cardiovascular risk profile) in order to collect self-report data on number of falls and type and amount of PA from a daily diary, clinical documentation on eventual fractures, and MS questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- supervised exercise training
- Keywords
- Bone quality, Bone strength, Fractures, Muscle strength, Gait and balance, Musculo-skeletal symptoms, Falls
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
supervised exercise trainingOther
Two weekly sessions of 75 min each, supervised by an exercise specialist in a dedicated gym facility. Each session will include: 5 min of warm up; 20 min of aerobic training using treadmill; 15 min of resistance training of muscle groups of skeletal sites of fragility fractures; 15 min of "weight bearing" exercises using weighted vests; 8 min of core stability training; 8 min of balance training; and 4 min of flexibility training. Weighted vest worn also during aerobic training and any occupational, home and leisure-time physical activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Experimental | Supervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) Receives: Other: supervised exercise training |
| Control | No intervention | Standard care including advises to maintain a physically active lifestyle, according to current guidelines, by performing any type of commuting, occupational, home and and leisure-time physical activity (PA) (control, CON, group; n=100). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effect of intervention on bone quality (trabecular bone score)
Effect of exercise intervention training on trabecular bone score (TBS)
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (10)
Effect of intervention on other measures of bone quality (composite)
Effect of exercise intervention training on peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on bone mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry)
Effect of exercise intervention training on bone mineral density (BMD) as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on bone metabolism (composite)
Effect of exercise intervention training on biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on body composition (total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry )
Effect of exercise intervention training on total body lean and fat mass as assessed by total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on muscle strength (dynamometry)
Effect of exercise intervention training on muscle strength as assessed by dynamometer
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on muscle mass/density (pQcT)
Effect of exercise intervention training on muscle mass/density as assessed by pQCT
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on balance, gait and power (Short Battery Performance Test)
Effect of exercise intervention training on a composite score of for balance, gait and power as assessed by Short Battery Performance Test
Measured: 2 years
Effect of intervention on on musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms (questionnaire)
Effect of exercise intervention training oon musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms as assessed by the use of a questionnaire
Measured: 7 years
Effect of intervention on number of falls (self-report daily diary)
Effect of exercise intervention training on number of falls as assessed by the use of a self-report daily diary
Measured: 7 years
Effect of intervention on fracture incidence (history or medical records and vertebral morphometry)
Effect of exercise intervention training on the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic fractures as assessed by history or medical records and vertebral morphometry, respectively
Measured: 2-7 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion1 Nov 2023
- Study completion1 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Metabolic Fitness Association, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Roma La Sapienza, S. Andrea Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giuseppe Pugliese, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Roma La SapienzaFrancesco Conti, MD, PhD, Study director, University of Roma La Sapienza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02421393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MFA-04
- Acronym
- SWEET-BONE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Balducci S, Zanuso S, Cardelli P, Salvi L, Mazzitelli G, Bazuro A, Iacobini C, Nicolucci A, Pugliese G; Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators. Changes in physical fitness predict improvements in modifiable cardiovascular risk factors independently of body weight loss in subjects with type 2 diabetes participating in the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES). Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1347-54. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1859. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PubMed 22399699Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, De Feo P, Cavallo S, Cardelli P, Fallucca S, Alessi E, Fallucca F, Pugliese G; Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators. Effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial: the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES). Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 8;170(20):1794-803. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.380.
PubMed 21059972Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, Johnson KC, Margolis KL. Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;91(9):3404-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0614. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
PubMed 16804043Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S, Link TM. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Nov;95(11):5045-55. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0226. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
PubMed 20719835Carnevale V, Romagnoli E, D'Erasmo L, D'Erasmo E. Bone damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Nov;24(11):1151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
PubMed 25150773Chan MY, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Relationship between body mass index and fracture risk is mediated by bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Nov;29(11):2327-35. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2288.
PubMed 24862213Cousins JM, Petit MA, Paudel ML, Taylor BC, Hughes JM, Cauley JA, Zmuda JM, Cawthon PM, Ensrud KE; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group. Muscle power and physical activity are associated with bone strength in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study. Bone. 2010 Aug;47(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 11.
PubMed 20466088De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Kroger H, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Meunier PJ, Pols HA, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Nov;16(11):1330-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1863-y. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
PubMed 15928804de Waard EA, van Geel TA, Savelberg HH, Koster A, Geusens PP, van den Bergh JP. Increased fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an overview of the underlying mechanisms and the usefulness of imaging modalities and fracture risk assessment tools. Maturitas. 2014 Nov;79(3):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
PubMed 25192916Dobnig H, Piswanger-Solkner JC, Roth M, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Tiran A, Strele A, Maier E, Maritschnegg P, Sieberer C, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in nursing home patients: effects on bone turnover, bone mass, and fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;91(9):3355-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0460. Epub 2006 May 30.
PubMed 16735485Donnelly E. Methods for assessing bone quality: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2128-38. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1702-0.
PubMed 21116752Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Nuti R. Obesity and fracture risk. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Jan;11(1):9-14. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2014.11.1.009.
PubMed 25002873Howe TE, Shea B, Dawson LJ, Downie F, Murray A, Ross C, Harbour RT, Caldwell LM, Creed G. Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD000333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000333.pub2.
PubMed 21735380Janghorbani M, Van Dam RM, Willett WC, Hu FB. Systematic review of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 1;166(5):495-505. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm106. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
PubMed 17575306Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey E, Chapurlat RD, Christiansen C, Cummings SR, Diez-Perez A, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Gluer CC, Goltzman D, Hans D, Khaw KT, Krieg MA, Kroger H, LaCroix AZ, Lau E, Leslie WD, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Neill TW, Pasco JA, Prior JC, Reid DM, Rivadeneira F, van Staa T, Yoshimura N, Zillikens MC. A meta-analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Jan;29(1):223-33. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2017.
PubMed 23775829
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study to Weigh the Effect of Exercise Training on BONE Quality and Strength (SWEET-BONE) in Type 2 Diabetes: an Exercise Intervention Program for Reducing the Risk of Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02421393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SWEET-BONE / MFA-04
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Bone quality, Bone strength, Fractures, Muscle strength, Gait and balance, Musculo-skeletal symptoms, Falls
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Metabolic Fitness Association, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Roma La Sapienza, S. Andrea Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased fracture risk despite normal to increased bone mass, thus suggesting poor bone quality. This study is aimed at weighing the effect of an exercise intervention program on parameters of bone quality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two hundred patients with T2DM will be randomized to supervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) versus standard care (control, CON, group; n=100) for 24 months.
Detailed description
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased fracture risk despite normal to increased bone mass, as assessed as bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Increased fracture risk remains after adjustment for BMD, and also falls, which are more frequent in these individuals than in their non-diabetic counterparts, due to chronic complications and treatments, and for body mass index, which seems to be protective through an increase in BMD. This suggests that patients with T2DM have poor bone quality, i.e. altered bone geometry and microarchitecture, which results in reduced strength. Based on the mechanostat therapy, physical activity (PA)/exercise would be beneficial for preventing fractures in T2DM individuals through greater mechanical loading on the skeleton, which causes favorable bone adaptations, and also by increasing muscle mass, strength, and performance, which reduces the risk of falls by improving gait and balance.
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a specific exercise training intervention program on parameters of bone quality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Two hundred patients with T2DM will be randomized to supervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) versus standard care (control, CON, group; n=100) for 24 months.
Sample size calculation is based on a recent report showing that TBS is lower in diabetic vs. control subjects (1.228 vs. 1.298) with a standard deviation of 0.140. To observe a normalization of TBS in EXE participants with a statistical power of 90% (α=0.05) by unpaired t-test, 85 patients per arm are needed (170 total). A sample size of 200 patients will allow to support a dropout rate up to 15%.
A sample of 100 non-diabetic subjects matched 1:2 by age, gender, and BMI will be used as controls for baseline measures.
EXE participants will attend two weekly sessions of 75 min each, supervised by an exercise specialist in a dedicated gym facility. Each session will include: 5 min of warm up; 20 min of aerobic training using treadmill; 15 min of resistance training of muscle groups of skeletal sites of fragility fractures; 15 min of "weight bearing" exercises using weighted vests; 8 min of core stability training; 8 min of balance training; and 4 min of flexibility training. Weighted vest worn also during aerobic training and any occupational, home and leisure-time PA.
CON subjects will receive advises to maintain a physically active lifestyle, according to current guidelines, by performing any type of commuting, occupational, home and leisure-time PA.
All patients will be subjected to a treatment regimen aimed at achieving optimal glycemic, lipid, BP and body weight targets, as established by current guidelines and including glucose-, lipid- and BP-lowering agents as needed. For ethical reasons, drugs will be also adjusted throughout the study to attain target levels and to account for reduced needs. Since all patients are overweight or obese, caloric intake (55% complex carbohydrates, 30% fat, and 15% protein) will be reduced to obtain a negative balance of 500 kcal/day. Requirements will be calculated by adding the estimated energy expenditure from PA to basal metabolism. Adherence to diet will be verified by the use of food diaries and dietary prescriptions will be adjusted at each intermediate visit. Patients with vitamin D levels ranging from 10 to 20 ng/dl will be treated with cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every 2 weeks for 2 months, then with cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every months, whereas those with vitamin D levels ranging from 20 to 30 ng/dl will be given cholecalciferol 25.000 IU every month. At 6 months participants, will be re-evaluated and treatment will be discontinued in case of vitamin D values >30 ng/dl or continued for additional 6 months at the doses indicated above, and so on until the end of the study.
Randomization will be stratified by gender (males versus females), age (65-70 versus 71-75) and type of diabetes treatment (non-insulin versus insulin), using a permuted-block randomization software. Physicians and patients will not be blinded to group assignment, at variance with operators executing instrumental procedures, whereas sample blinding at central laboratory will be achieved using bar codes.
The primary endpoint is the trabecular bone score (TBS), which is derived from the antero-posterior spine raw DXA image(s) from the same region of interest as the BMD measurement by the use of a specific software and correlates with three-dimensional bone micro-architecture parameters. Among the numerous potential measures of bone quality, TBS is the only one that has been consistently shown to be lower in T2DM vs. control subjects.
Secondary endpoints include:
- other potential measures of bone quality as assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS);
- bone mass (BMD as assessed by DXA);
- bone metabolism (sclerostin and other biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption);
- body composition (total body lean and fat mass by total body DXA);
- muscle strength (by dynamometer);
- muscle mass/density (by pQCT);
- balance, gait and power (by Short Battery Performance Test);
- musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms (by questionnaire);
- number of falls (by questionnaire); i. symptomatic and asymptomatic fractures (by history or medical records and vertebral morphometry, respectively).
Other measures include:
- quality of life (QoL);
- cardiorespiratory fitness;
- flexibility;
- volume of PA;
- coronary heart disease 10-year risk score.
Dietary intake and adverse events will be also recorded. Participants from both groups will be followed for additional 5 years in order to record the number of falls and eventual fractures during this time period. PA and MS symptoms will be also monitored throughout this 5-year interval. To this end, patients will be seen yearly (or every 6 months according to the degree of glycemic control and the overall cardiovascular risk profile) in order to collect self-report data on number of falls and type and amount of PA from a daily diary, clinical documentation on eventual fractures, and MS questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Experimental | Other: supervised exercise trainingSupervised exercise training on top of standard care (exercise, EXE, group; n=100) |
| Control | No intervention | –Standard care including advises to maintain a physically active lifestyle, according to current guidelines, by performing any type of commuting, occupational, home and and leisure-time physical activity (PA) (control, CON, group; n=100). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- diabetes duration >5-year
- sedentary lifestyle (i.e. more than 8 hours/day spent in any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents [METs] while in a sitting or reclining posture) from at least 6 months;
- physically inactivity (i.e. insufficient amounts of physical activity [PA] according to current guidelines) from at least 6 months;
- body mass index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m2;
- ability to walk 1.6 Km without assistance;
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- any condition limiting participation in a clinical trial, including psychiatric disorders or hospitalization for depression in the past 6 months;
- any condition limiting PA/exercise, including musculoskeletal disorders or deformities, central nervous system dysfunction such as hemiparesis, myelopathies, cerebral ataxia, vestibular dysfunction, and postural hypotension (i.e. a fall of >20 mmHg of systolic or >10 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure when changing position);
- cancer and other life-expectancy limiting conditions;
- recent major acute cardiovascular event, including heart attack, stroke/transient ischemic attack(s), revascularization procedure, or participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program within the past three months, or documented history of pulmonary embolism in the past six months;
- pre-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| supervised exercise trainingTwo weekly sessions of 75 min each, supervised by an exercise specialist in a dedicated gym facility. Each session will include: 5 min of warm up; 20 min of aerobic training using treadmill; 15 min of resistance training of muscle groups of skeletal sites of fragility fractures; 15 min of "weight bearing" exercises using weighted vests; 8 min of core stability training; 8 min of balance training; and 4 min of flexibility training. Weighted vest worn also during aerobic training and any occupational, home and leisure-time physical activity. | Other | Exercise |
Primary outcome
Effect of intervention on bone quality (trabecular bone score)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of exercise intervention training on trabecular bone score (TBS)
10 secondary outcomes
Effect of intervention on other measures of bone quality (composite)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on bone mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on bone metabolism (composite)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on body composition (total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry )
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on muscle strength (dynamometry)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on muscle mass/density (pQcT)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on balance, gait and power (Short Battery Performance Test)
Time frame: 2 years
Effect of intervention on on musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms (questionnaire)
Time frame: 7 years
Effect of intervention on number of falls (self-report daily diary)
Time frame: 7 years
Effect of intervention on fracture incidence (history or medical records and vertebral morphometry)
Time frame: 2-7 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 22399699Balducci S, Zanuso S, Cardelli P, Salvi L, Mazzitelli G, Bazuro A, Iacobini C, Nicolucci A, Pugliese G; Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators. Changes in physical fitness predict improvements in modifiable cardiovascular risk factors independently of body weight loss in subjects with type 2 diabetes participating in the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES). Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1347-54. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1859. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 21059972Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, De Feo P, Cavallo S, Cardelli P, Fallucca S, Alessi E, Fallucca F, Pugliese G; Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators. Effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial: the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES). Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 8;170(20):1794-803. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.380.
- Background: PubMed 16804043Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, Johnson KC, Margolis KL. Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;91(9):3404-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0614. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 20719835Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S, Link TM. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Nov;95(11):5045-55. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0226. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 25150773Carnevale V, Romagnoli E, D'Erasmo L, D'Erasmo E. Bone damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Nov;24(11):1151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 24862213Chan MY, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Relationship between body mass index and fracture risk is mediated by bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Nov;29(11):2327-35. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2288.
- Background: PubMed 20466088Cousins JM, Petit MA, Paudel ML, Taylor BC, Hughes JM, Cauley JA, Zmuda JM, Cawthon PM, Ensrud KE; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group. Muscle power and physical activity are associated with bone strength in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study. Bone. 2010 Aug;47(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 15928804De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Kroger H, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Meunier PJ, Pols HA, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Nov;16(11):1330-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1863-y. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 25192916de Waard EA, van Geel TA, Savelberg HH, Koster A, Geusens PP, van den Bergh JP. Increased fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an overview of the underlying mechanisms and the usefulness of imaging modalities and fracture risk assessment tools. Maturitas. 2014 Nov;79(3):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 16735485Dobnig H, Piswanger-Solkner JC, Roth M, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Tiran A, Strele A, Maier E, Maritschnegg P, Sieberer C, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in nursing home patients: effects on bone turnover, bone mass, and fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;91(9):3355-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0460. Epub 2006 May 30.
- Background: PubMed 21116752Donnelly E. Methods for assessing bone quality: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2128-38. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1702-0.
- Background: PubMed 25002873Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Nuti R. Obesity and fracture risk. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Jan;11(1):9-14. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2014.11.1.009.
- Web site of the Metabolic Fitness AssociationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Satisfaction of Once-Weekly Tirzepatide in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Helping Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Use Their Health Data for Healthy Diabetes Self-Management
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Not yet recruiting
Care COMPASS Study
Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2), Hypertension
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Personalizing A1c Using Hematologic Indices and CGM for Accurate Diabetes Diagnosis
Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating the Link Between Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) and Muscle Wasting in Sarcobesity
Sarcopenia, Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giuseppe Pugliese, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Roma La Sapienza
Francesco Conti, MD, PhD study director
University of Roma La Sapienza
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing supervised exercise training in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Metabolic Fitness Association, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effect of intervention on bone quality (trabecular bone score) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02421393, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2024.