Head and Neck NeoplasmsCOOPERATIONNCT02421458
Comparing Two Palliative Schemes of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
A study testing 6 x 6 Gy and 16 x 3.125 Gy in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 11 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
RCT to compare two radiation schemes for palliative HeadNeck cancer Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- 6 x 6 Gy and 16 x 3.125 Gy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed patients with primary non-metastatic carcinoma located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except T1 glottic), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses and salivary gland and carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck region who are not suitable for radical treatment with surgery or (chemo) and, therefore, planned for treatment with radiotherapy in palliative setting.
- OR
- Newly diagnosed patients with primary head and neck carcinoma with limited metastatic disease in a good general condition and few comorbidities (ACE-25 <3) with life expectancy of at least 6 months are also eligible.
- No chemotherapy or surgery is allowed before inclusion.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- WHO performance status 0-2
- Signed written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with previously radiation treatment in the head and neck region, for any reason.
- Chemotherapy or surgery for head and neck tumor before inclusion and no other concomitant anti-cancer therapy is allowed during study treatment.
- Patients with head and neck malignancies arising from skin, nose, thyroid gland or esophagus.
- Patients with advanced stage sarcoma or lymphoma of the head and neck region.
- Expected life expectancy of less than 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Netherlands11 sites
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HZ
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, 19066CX
Radiotherapiegroep, lokatie Arnhem
Arnhem, 6815AD
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Overijssel, 7513 ER
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700 RB
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Maastro Clinic
Maastricht, NL-6229 ET
Radboud umc
Nijmegen, 6225GA
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Rotterdam, 3008EA
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
The Hague, 2260 AK
Instituut Verbeeten
Tilburg, 5042 SB
About this study
Official title: Dutch Randomized Multicenter Trial COmparing twO PalliativE RAdiaTION Schemes for Incurable Head and Neck Cancer (COOPERATION)
RCT to compare two radiation schemes for palliative HeadNeck cancer
Read the detailed description
A substantial proportion of patients with head and neck (HNC) are not suitable for curative treatment with surgery and/or (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT) because of very advanced stage, significant comorbidities, bad general condition, distant metastasis, or a combination of these factors. Although radiotherapy (RT) is a commonly used option to achieve durable disease control and to alleviate troublesome symptoms, the data about the optimal radiation scheme and the impact of these schedules on quality of life (QoL) of these vulnerable patients is extremely scarce.
Although different radiation schemes are used worldwide (in the Netherlands, at least 15 different radiation schedules are used), it is currently not possible to identify the best RT scheme, based only on retrospective studies because of the major differences between these studies with regard to patient's demographics, radiation schedules given, the radiation technique used etc. Furthermore, no any information is available on the impact of these schemes on treatment-related toxicity and QoL.
This illustrates the urgent need for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify the most optimal schemes of RT for this group of patients. Therefore, the investigators intend to initiate a prospective RCT comparing the survival, loco-regional control, toxicity, and QoL of two commonly used schemes. This study will be the first of his kind for palliative patients with HNC and will compare a short-course (6 fractions) with a long-course of radiotherapy (16 fractions). Because most of patients with incurable HNC have a poor performance status and major comorbidity and prefer limited number of visits to the hospital, it is quite reasonable to investigate whether a short scheme of radiotherapy with limited number of visits to the clinic as good as a relatively long-course of radiotherapy in terms of outcome, toxicity and QoL. This delicate balance between outcomes, possible toxicity and patient's comfort would justify the initiation of such randomized trial. The results of this study will in the nearby future enable us to indicate the radiation scheme best suits which patient category
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Being tested
- 6 x 6 Gy, 16 x 3.125 Gy
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
6 x 6 GyRadiation
radiation in 6 fraction of 6 Gy, twice a week during 3 weeks
16 x 3.125 GyRadiation
radiation in 16 fraction of 3.125 Gy, 4 times a week during 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| arm 1: 6 fractions of radiation | Active comparator | radiation in a 6 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 6 Gy Receives: Radiation: 6 x 6 Gy |
| arm 2: 16 fractrions of radiation | Active comparator | radiation in a 16 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 3.125 Gy Receives: Radiation: 16 x 3.125 Gy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
time to loco-regional progression
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
Measured: 4 months
impact of both radiation schemes on QoL
this will be measured by the EORTC questionnaires C30 and HN35; analysis will be performed by a random effects regression model
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
overall survival rates
RECIST
Measured: 4 months
loco-regional control rates
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; according to RECIST
Measured: 3 months
overall response rates
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
Measured: 2 year
compliance to the study treatments as assessed by completed treatment and follow-up visits
number of treatment fractions and follow-up visits
Measured: 4 months
the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute and late toxicity
scoring of AE according tot CTC 4.0
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionNov 2018
- Study completionNov 2018
Why it stopped: recruiting rate was to low
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Head and Neck NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Netherlands Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Abrahim Al-Mamgani, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02421458
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M15CRH
- Acronym
- COOPERATION
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Al-Mamgani A, Kessels R, Verhoef CG, Navran A, Hamming-Vrieze O, Kaanders JHAM, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tans L, Hoebers F, Ong F, van Werkhoven E, Langendijk JA. Randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal radiotherapy scheme for palliative treatment of incurable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Aug;149:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 14.
PubMed 32417345
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dutch Randomized Multicenter Trial COmparing twO PalliativE RAdiaTION Schemes for Incurable Head and Neck Cancer (COOPERATION)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02421458
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COOPERATION / M15CRH
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: recruiting rate was to low
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RCT to compare two radiation schemes for palliative HeadNeck cancer
Detailed description
A substantial proportion of patients with head and neck (HNC) are not suitable for curative treatment with surgery and/or (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT) because of very advanced stage, significant comorbidities, bad general condition, distant metastasis, or a combination of these factors. Although radiotherapy (RT) is a commonly used option to achieve durable disease control and to alleviate troublesome symptoms, the data about the optimal radiation scheme and the impact of these schedules on quality of life (QoL) of these vulnerable patients is extremely scarce.
Although different radiation schemes are used worldwide (in the Netherlands, at least 15 different radiation schedules are used), it is currently not possible to identify the best RT scheme, based only on retrospective studies because of the major differences between these studies with regard to patient's demographics, radiation schedules given, the radiation technique used etc. Furthermore, no any information is available on the impact of these schemes on treatment-related toxicity and QoL.
This illustrates the urgent need for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify the most optimal schemes of RT for this group of patients. Therefore, the investigators intend to initiate a prospective RCT comparing the survival, loco-regional control, toxicity, and QoL of two commonly used schemes. This study will be the first of his kind for palliative patients with HNC and will compare a short-course (6 fractions) with a long-course of radiotherapy (16 fractions). Because most of patients with incurable HNC have a poor performance status and major comorbidity and prefer limited number of visits to the hospital, it is quite reasonable to investigate whether a short scheme of radiotherapy with limited number of visits to the clinic as good as a relatively long-course of radiotherapy in terms of outcome, toxicity and QoL. This delicate balance between outcomes, possible toxicity and patient's comfort would justify the initiation of such randomized trial. The results of this study will in the nearby future enable us to indicate the radiation scheme best suits which patient category
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| arm 1: 6 fractions of radiation | Active comparator | Radiation: 6 x 6 Gyradiation in a 6 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 6 Gy |
| arm 2: 16 fractrions of radiation | Active comparator | Radiation: 16 x 3.125 Gyradiation in a 16 fractions scheme and a daily dose of 3.125 Gy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Newly diagnosed patients with primary non-metastatic carcinoma located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except T1 glottic), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses and salivary gland and carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck region who are not suitable for radical treatment with surgery or (chemo) and, therefore, planned for treatment with radiotherapy in palliative setting.
- OR
- Newly diagnosed patients with primary head and neck carcinoma with limited metastatic disease in a good general condition and few comorbidities (ACE-25 <3) with life expectancy of at least 6 months are also eligible.
- No chemotherapy or surgery is allowed before inclusion.
- Age ≥ 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with previously radiation treatment in the head and neck region, for any reason.
- Patients with head and neck malignancies arising from skin, nose, thyroid gland or esophagus.
- Patients with advanced stage sarcoma or lymphoma of the head and neck region.
- Expected life expectancy of less than 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 6 x 6 Gyradiation in 6 fraction of 6 Gy, twice a week during 3 weeks | Radiation | arm 1: 6 fractions of radiation |
| 16 x 3.125 Gyradiation in 16 fraction of 3.125 Gy, 4 times a week during 4 weeks | Radiation | arm 2: 16 fractrions of radiation |
Primary outcome
time to loco-regional progression
Time frame: 4 months
caculated from date of response until the date of clinical deteriotion; accoriding to RECIST
impact of both radiation schemes on QoL
Time frame: 2 years
this will be measured by the EORTC questionnaires C30 and HN35; analysis will be performed by a random effects regression model
5 secondary outcomes
overall survival rates
Time frame: 4 months
loco-regional control rates
Time frame: 3 months
overall response rates
Time frame: 2 year
compliance to the study treatments as assessed by completed treatment and follow-up visits
Time frame: 4 months
the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute and late toxicity
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: recruiting rate was to low). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32417345Al-Mamgani A, Kessels R, Verhoef CG, Navran A, Hamming-Vrieze O, Kaanders JHAM, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tans L, Hoebers F, Ong F, van Werkhoven E, Langendijk JA. Randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal radiotherapy scheme for palliative treatment of incurable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Aug;149:181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 14.
Related trials for Head and Neck Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abrahim Al-Mamgani, MD, PhD principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 6 x 6 Gy and 16 x 3.125 Gy in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 11 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: recruiting rate was to low). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
time to loco-regional progression (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02421458, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2019.