AzTrials
AzTrials

Achilles Tendon RuptureNCT02422004

Healing of Human Achilles Tendon Rupture

A study testing Range of motion and Delayed weight-bearing in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall aim of this project is to investigate the healing processes of human tendon after suturing a ruptured Achilles tendon, and more specifically to determine the optimal loading pattern of the tendon during the rehabilitation period to ensure complete and good recovery of tendon structure and function. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 67 years
Conditions the study is for
Achilles Tendon Rupture
What is being tested?
Range of motion and Delayed weight-bearing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Aug 2012to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 67 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Complete Achilles tendon rupture placed in the mid-substance of the Achilles tendon
  • Presented within 14 days from injury

Who cannot join

  • re-rupture
  • other injuries affecting their lower limb functions
  • systemic diseases influencing tendon healing
  • immunosuppressive treatment including systemic corticosteroid treatment
  • inability to follow rehabilitation or follow-ups.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pernilla Eliasson, PhD contact

+46739864982

pernilla.eliasson@gmail.com

Anne-Sofie Andersen, PT, MSc contact

+4535315059

a_sofie_a@hotmail.com

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Bispebjerg Hospital

    Copenhagen, 2400

    Anne-Sofie Andersen, PT, MSc, +4535315059, a_sofie_a@hotmail.com

    Christian Couppé, PT, MSc, PhD, +4535316091, ccouppe@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Healing of Human Achilles Tendon Rupture: Loading Pattern After Surgical Repair to Achieve Optimal Mechanical Properties and Clinical Outcome

The overall aim of this project is to investigate the healing processes of human tendon after suturing a ruptured Achilles tendon, and more specifically to determine the optimal loading pattern of the tendon during the rehabilitation period to ensure complete and good recovery of tendon structure and function. The investigators hypothesize that restricting early weight bearing and only allowing for passive stretching in the early phase of tendon healing will ensure better tissue regeneration and thereby prevent chronic tendon elongation and improve tendon tissue recovery and the clinical outcome.

Read the detailed description

Surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures is known to significantly reduce the risk of re-rupture and to accelerate the time to return to activity compared with non-surgical treatments (1, 2). Although sutured, Achilles tendon rupture requires an extended rehabilitation period following surgery to function normally again. However, the currently available information on this post-operative treatment suggest that the currently available rehabilitation guidelines, which includes early weight bearing, does not accomplish optimal recovery of muscle-tendon function. It has been demonstrated that reduced capacity to perform heel-rises, diminished range of motion of the ankle joint, and reduced calf muscle mass is correlated with a delay in return to activity, and all of these factors could be related to elongation of the healing tendon (3). Importantly, it appears that preventing tendon elongation during rehabilitation improves the clinical outcome, but the actual mechanism for the elongation and thus how to prevent it remains unknown (4). With newly developed techniques in our laboratory we will determine the mechanical properties of human whole Achilles tendon, in vivo, which makes it possible to explore how tendons respond to the regimes following a suture repair and rehabilitation regime.

In contrast to the current rehabilitation regime after tendon surgery, which includes early high loading (weight bearing) already in the first weeks after surgery, we hypothesize that avoiding early weight bearing but allowing for early passive ankle joint range of motion (tissue strain with minimal loading) will prevent chronic tendon elongation, increase tendon stiffness, increase calf strength and muscle volume/thickness, and thus improve the long-term clinical outcome after tendon rupture in humans.

Patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures will undergo a standardized suture repair (a.m. Kessler) using resorbable suture (Vicryl size 1) at Bispebjerg Hospital and be placed in a brace that inhibits ankle joint movement. During surgery, patients will get four tantalum beads with a diameter of 1.0 mm implanted with a venflon needle in the proximal and the distal stub of the tendon. Thereafter they will be randomized to three post-operative treatment regimes:

Control, range of motion or immobilized

From the currently available data (4, 5, 6) it is suggested that the brace is worn for 6 weeks after surgery in all three groups of the present experiment. The control group will be allowed partial weight-bearing from day 0 and full weight-bearing from week 4, toe rises after 16 weeks, jogging after 24 weeks and return to sports 34 weeks after. The two delayed weight-bearing groups (range motion group and immobilized group) will be restricted completely from weight-bearing initially (6 weeks), allowed partial weight-bearing after 6 weeks and full weight-bearing after 8 weeks.

Being tested
Range of motion, Delayed weight-bearing
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Weight-bearing, Range of motion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Range of motionOther

    25 range of motion exercises of the ankle, 5 times per day.

  • Delayed weight-bearingOther

    No weight-bearing during the first six weeks, and partial weight-bearing during the two following weeks

Study groups in NCT02422004
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorThis constitutes the currently accepted regime and is therefore consider the control group (CTRL) with early range of motion and early weight bearing. The control group was allowed to have partial weight-bearing from day 0 and full weight-bearing from week 4. Furthermore, they were instructed in tendon strain exercise identical with the range of motion group.
Receives: Other: Range of motion
Range of motionExperimentalEarly range of motion and delayed weight bearing (ROM). The range of motion group was restricted completely from weight-bearing until week 6, allowed partial weight-bearing after 6 weeks and full weight-bearing after 8 weeks. In addition to this, the patients were instructed to perform tendon strain exercises, five times a day, from week 2. The exercises were performed by removing the foot from the brace and then perform light dorsal ankle movement, 25 repetitions/time, when sitting on a table.
Receives: Other: Range of motion; Other: Delayed weight-bearing
ImmobilizationExperimentalDelayed weight-bearing or range of motion (IMMOB). The immobilization group was restricted completely from weight-bearing until week 6, allowed partial weight-bearing after 6 weeks and full weight-bearing after 8 weeks.
Receives: Other: Delayed weight-bearing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Tendon elongation

    Tendon elongation will be evaluated using x-ray and measurements of the distance between tantalum beads

    Measured: 2, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Heel-rise

    The number of heel-rises and the heel-rise height will be used for

    calculation of the heel-rise work.

    Measured: 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  2. Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS)

    Patient reported outcome regarding function in their Achilles tendon

    Measured: 12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  3. Elastic modulus of the tendon

    Tendon stiffness will be evaluated during a voluntary plantar flexion contraction where force and tendon elongation is measured using a force transducer and x-ray, respectively. Tendon size will be evaluated by MRI. Elastic modulus will be calculated based on stiffness and size of the tendon.

    Measured: 6, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  4. Range of motion test

    Range of motion in the ankle will be measured.

    Measured: 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  5. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire - Achilles tendinopathy (VISA-A)

    Patient reported outcome regarding pain in their Achilles tendon.

    Measured: 12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  6. Plantar flexion muscle strength

    Plantar flexion muscle strength will be measured during a maximal voluntary isometric contraction with ankle flexion at -10, 0˚ of dorsiflexion

    Measured: 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  7. Calf muscle size

    Calf muscle size will be assessed using MRI.

    Measured: 6, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

  8. Tendon size

    Tendon size will be assessed using MRI.

    Measured: 6, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02422004
Sponsor's protocol ID
BBH100
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
16 Apr 2015
Last updated
21 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Magnusson SP, Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Kjaer M. Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo. J Physiol. 2008 Jan 1;586(1):71-81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139105. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

    PubMed 17855761
  • Maffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, Reaper J, Douglas AS. Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med. 1999 Jul;9(3):157-60. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199907000-00007.

    PubMed 10512344
  • Saxena A, Ewen B, Maffulli N. Rehabilitation of the operated achilles tendon: parameters for predicting return to activity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Jan-Feb;50(1):37-40. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

    PubMed 21106412
  • Andersson T, Eliasson P, Aspenberg P. Tissue memory in healing tendons: short loading episodes stimulate healing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Aug;107(2):417-21. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00414.2009. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

    PubMed 19541735
  • Mortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE. Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jul;81(7):983-90. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00011.

    PubMed 10428130
  • Kangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):59-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546506293255. Epub 2006 Sep 14.

    PubMed 16973901
  • Eliasson P, Agergaard AS, Couppe C, Svensson R, Hoeffner R, Warming S, Warming N, Holm C, Jensen MH, Krogsgaard M, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. The Ruptured Achilles Tendon Elongates for 6 Months After Surgical Repair Regardless of Early or Late Weightbearing in Combination With Ankle Mobilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2492-2502. doi: 10.1177/0363546518781826. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

    PubMed 29965789

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Range of motion and Delayed weight-bearing in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pernilla Eliasson, PhD (+46739864982, pernilla.eliasson@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Tendon elongation (time frame: 2, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after rupture). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02422004, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in