Knee ReplacementNCT02422251
Biomechanical Assessment of a High Congruency Knee Bearing
A study testing Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) in people with Knee Replacement, run by Golden Jubilee National Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The aim of the project is to compare the biomechanics of three different bearing designs used in total knee replacement (TKR) implants. The bearing is the part in the middle of the knee implant that allows the metal tray attached to the shin bone (tibia) to move in relation to the metal part attached to the thigh bone… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Replacement
- What is being tested?
- Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Primary unilateral total knee replacement
- Suitable to have any one of the three test bearings
- Over 35 years of age
- Willing to take part
- From one of the following NHS Scotland Health Boards: Ayrshire \& Arran, Forth Valley, Greater Glasgow \& Clyde, Highland, Lanarkshire or Lothian
- Able to return for follow up sessions
Who cannot join
- Previous hip or knee replacement procedure if carried out in the previous twelve months
- Unable to give written consent
- Unable to attend the movement analysis sessions
- Journey time from home to the university in excess of two hours
- Previous ankle surgery
- Any past neurologic history e.g. stroke, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire, G81 4dy
About this study
Official title: Clinical Investigation of the Functional Outcomes of High Congruency Versus Low Congruency Knee Bearings
The aim of the project is to compare the biomechanics of three different bearing designs used in total knee replacement (TKR) implants. The bearing is the part in the middle of the knee implant that allows the metal tray attached to the shin bone (tibia) to move in relation to the metal part attached to the thigh bone (femur) and is usually made of plastic (high density polyethylene). There will be three different bearing types in the study, which all give different movements. This study will see which bearing is most like a natural knee and so which design gives the best function and feeling to patients with a TKR. 90 TKR patients from the Golden Jubilee National Hospital will be recruited and randomised to receive one of the three study bearings (30 in each group). In addition, a control group of 30 healthy individuals of similar age will be recruited for comparison. Before surgery and at 4 to 8 weeks and 1 year after their operation patients will attend biomechanical assessment sessions at the University of Strathclyde. The control group will attend the assessment session only once. In each of these sessions they will carry out a number of everyday tasks such as walking, moving from sitting to standing and going up and down stairs. These tasks will be measured using motion capture techniques. Reflective markers placed on each participant will be tracked by cameras so that their movements can be recorded. Force plates in the floor will record the forces during the tasks.
Movement and force data will be analysed to see if any differences exist between the groups and show which bearing gives the most natural movement.
Read the detailed description
This is a double blind randomised controlled trial. The aim of the study is to compare the biomechanical performance of knee replacements with different bearing designs to that of a native or natural knee. The hypothesis is that a mobile bearing design with a high congruency bearing will allow the knee replacement to work more like the native knee and give more natural movement when carrying out everyday tasks.
The current evidence on whether fixed or mobile, low or high congruency bearings give the most natural movement or provide better knee function is sparse. By carrying out a randomised controlled trial including a cohort of healthy individuals and taking indepth functional assessments of a number of different common activities of daily living it should be possible to show what level of functional outcome the three bearings being used give.
Ninety patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty under the care of four consultant orthopaedic surgeons at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited and randomised into one of the three study groups (low congruency fixed bearing, high congruency fixed bearing or high congruency mobile bearing).
Invitation letters and participant information sheets will be sent out to suitable patients prior to their preoperative consultation. They will be approached at their consultation visit to seek consent to take part in the study. At this time they will be given the opportunity to ask questions about the study. Following written consent, the patient will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. A nominated person, independent of the approach and consent of the patient, will sign and open the envelope and inform the hospital research team of the randomisation. The patient and the university research team will be blinded to randomisation. For each patient arrangements will be made for their preoperative movement analysis testing session. Subsequently, they will have their surgery and rehabilitation prior to discharge according to standard hospital practice. Participants will then return to the hospital for standard follow up appointments at six weeks and one year. At the same time arrangements will be made for them to attend their follow up movement analysis sessions. Clinical data recorded at preoperative assessment and postoperative follow up appointments, such as range of movement, Oxford Knee Score, patient satisfaction, EQ5D and radiographic measurements will be collected for study patients to compare to the functional outcomes measured during the movement analysis sessions.
Participants will be asked to attend movement analysis testing sessions at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow on three separate occasions; preoperatively, at 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Each of these sessions will follow the same procedure. Prior to data collection, participants will be asked to change into the tight fitting shorts and vest tops provided (male participants will be asked to forego the vest tops) in the changing rooms within the laboratory facility. Measurements of weight and body dimensions will be taken (required for processing the data) and then reflective markers will be attached to the legs, pelvis, torso and arms. These will be attached using toupee tape or elasticated straps as required. They will be asked to wear a headband (provided) with another four markers attached on their head. There will be eight activities of daily living (ADLs) in the test protocol, which will be carried out in one of two laboratories; one a standard motion capture laboratory (S) and the other in a laboratory with a CAREN system (Motek Medical, Amsterdam, Netherlands) which consists of a virtual reality screen, moving platform and treadmill (M). The ADLs will be:
- Level walking in a straight line (S)
- Level walking along a curved pathway (S)
- Sit to stand to sit (S)
- Sit to stand to walk (S)
- Ascending and descending stairs (S)
- Getting into and out of a car (S)
- Single leg balance (M)
- Walking on an incline (M)
Participants will be asked to perform each ADL in a fixed order several times until three good sets of data have been collected. Participants will be given instructions on how to perform each ADL prior to performing it and will be asked to practice them before data is collected. During the demanding tasks, participants will be supported by a harness to prevent falls and hand rails will be provided on the test staircase. Participants will be allowed rest breaks between each ADL and during tests if required. At the end of each task the participant will be asked a set of questions about how they found performing the task. On completion of the test protocol, the markers will be removed, the participant will get changed and will be free to leave. It is expected that each testing session will last up to 4 hours.
The three good data sets will be averaged to reduce variability. Statistical analysis will be carried out using an appropriate statistical package to determine if any significant differences exist in the data between the three patient groups and between the patient groups and the control group. All data will be tested for parametricity. Parametric data will be analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with post hoc Bonferroni correction. If the data is found to be nonparametric, KruskalWallis tests will be used. For data over time appropriate repeated measures analysis will be used. A 95% confidence level will be used throughout.
The study is being funded over a three year period. The first year involves the set up and development of the protocol and the recruitment of the control participants. It is hoped that the recruitment of the patients will start nine months into the study period and will take 25 months to complete the data collection and analysis. This will allow two months for the reporting of the study.
- Conditions
- Knee Replacement
- Being tested
- Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus), Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device
Columbus high congruency bearing on a rotating platform tibia.
Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device
Columbus high congruency bearing on a fixed platform tibia.
Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device
Columbus deep dish bearing on a fixed platform tibia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile high congruency bearing | Experimental | Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a rotating platform tibia and high congruency mobile bearing. Receives: Device: Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) |
| Fixed high congruency bearing | Experimental | Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and high congruency bearing. Receives: Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) |
| Fixed low congruency bearing | Experimental | Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and low congruency bearing. Receives: Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) |
| Control | No intervention | Healthy control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knee kinematics
Knee range of motion during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (10)
Hip kinematics
Hip range of motion during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
Hip kinetics
Hip loading during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
Knee kinetics
Knee loading during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
Ankle kinematics
Ankle range of motion during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
Ankle kinetics
Ankle loading during activities of daily living
Measured: 1 year
EQ-5D
EQ-5D health questionnaire score
Measured: 1 year
Oxford Knee Score
Oxford Knee Score questionnaire score
Measured: 1 year
Knee alignment
Frontal plane alignment of the knee
Measured: 1 year
Patient satisfaction
Score of patients' satisfaction with the implant
Measured: 1 year
Complications
Evidence of any complication related to the surgery
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee ReplacementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- University of Strathclyde
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Frederic Picard, MD, Principal investigator, National Waiting Times Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02422251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ortho 14-12
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Komaris DS, Tedesco S, O'Flynn B, Govind C, Clarke J, Riches P. Dynamic stability during stair negotiation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Jul;87:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105410. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
PubMed 34130036Komaris DS, Govind C, Murphy AJ, Clarke J, Ewen A, Leonard H, Riches P. Implant design affects walking and stair navigation after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 6;16(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02311-x.
PubMed 33676526
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Investigation of the Functional Outcomes of High Congruency Versus Low Congruency Knee Bearings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02422251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ortho 14-12
- Conditions
- Knee Replacement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Golden Jubilee National HospitalOther government
- Collaborators
- University of Strathclyde
- Study start
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the project is to compare the biomechanics of three different bearing designs used in total knee replacement (TKR) implants. The bearing is the part in the middle of the knee implant that allows the metal tray attached to the shin bone (tibia) to move in relation to the metal part attached to the thigh bone (femur) and is usually made of plastic (high density polyethylene). There will be three different bearing types in the study, which all give different movements. This study will see which bearing is most like a natural knee and so which design gives the best function and feeling to patients with a TKR. 90 TKR patients from the Golden Jubilee National Hospital will be recruited and randomised to receive one of the three study bearings (30 in each group). In addition, a control group of 30 healthy individuals of similar age will be recruited for comparison. Before surgery and at 4 to 8 weeks and 1 year after their operation patients will attend biomechanical assessment sessions at the University of Strathclyde. The control group will attend the assessment session only once. In each of these sessions they will carry out a number of everyday tasks such as walking, moving from sitting to standing and going up and down stairs. These tasks will be measured using motion capture techniques. Reflective markers placed on each participant will be tracked by cameras so that their movements can be recorded. Force plates in the floor will record the forces during the tasks.
Movement and force data will be analysed to see if any differences exist between the groups and show which bearing gives the most natural movement.
Detailed description
This is a double blind randomised controlled trial. The aim of the study is to compare the biomechanical performance of knee replacements with different bearing designs to that of a native or natural knee. The hypothesis is that a mobile bearing design with a high congruency bearing will allow the knee replacement to work more like the native knee and give more natural movement when carrying out everyday tasks.
The current evidence on whether fixed or mobile, low or high congruency bearings give the most natural movement or provide better knee function is sparse. By carrying out a randomised controlled trial including a cohort of healthy individuals and taking indepth functional assessments of a number of different common activities of daily living it should be possible to show what level of functional outcome the three bearings being used give.
Ninety patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty under the care of four consultant orthopaedic surgeons at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited and randomised into one of the three study groups (low congruency fixed bearing, high congruency fixed bearing or high congruency mobile bearing).
Invitation letters and participant information sheets will be sent out to suitable patients prior to their preoperative consultation. They will be approached at their consultation visit to seek consent to take part in the study. At this time they will be given the opportunity to ask questions about the study. Following written consent, the patient will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. A nominated person, independent of the approach and consent of the patient, will sign and open the envelope and inform the hospital research team of the randomisation. The patient and the university research team will be blinded to randomisation. For each patient arrangements will be made for their preoperative movement analysis testing session. Subsequently, they will have their surgery and rehabilitation prior to discharge according to standard hospital practice. Participants will then return to the hospital for standard follow up appointments at six weeks and one year. At the same time arrangements will be made for them to attend their follow up movement analysis sessions. Clinical data recorded at preoperative assessment and postoperative follow up appointments, such as range of movement, Oxford Knee Score, patient satisfaction, EQ5D and radiographic measurements will be collected for study patients to compare to the functional outcomes measured during the movement analysis sessions.
Participants will be asked to attend movement analysis testing sessions at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow on three separate occasions; preoperatively, at 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Each of these sessions will follow the same procedure. Prior to data collection, participants will be asked to change into the tight fitting shorts and vest tops provided (male participants will be asked to forego the vest tops) in the changing rooms within the laboratory facility. Measurements of weight and body dimensions will be taken (required for processing the data) and then reflective markers will be attached to the legs, pelvis, torso and arms. These will be attached using toupee tape or elasticated straps as required. They will be asked to wear a headband (provided) with another four markers attached on their head. There will be eight activities of daily living (ADLs) in the test protocol, which will be carried out in one of two laboratories; one a standard motion capture laboratory (S) and the other in a laboratory with a CAREN system (Motek Medical, Amsterdam, Netherlands) which consists of a virtual reality screen, moving platform and treadmill (M). The ADLs will be:
- Level walking in a straight line (S)
- Level walking along a curved pathway (S)
- Sit to stand to sit (S)
- Sit to stand to walk (S)
- Ascending and descending stairs (S)
- Getting into and out of a car (S)
- Single leg balance (M)
- Walking on an incline (M)
Participants will be asked to perform each ADL in a fixed order several times until three good sets of data have been collected. Participants will be given instructions on how to perform each ADL prior to performing it and will be asked to practice them before data is collected. During the demanding tasks, participants will be supported by a harness to prevent falls and hand rails will be provided on the test staircase. Participants will be allowed rest breaks between each ADL and during tests if required. At the end of each task the participant will be asked a set of questions about how they found performing the task. On completion of the test protocol, the markers will be removed, the participant will get changed and will be free to leave. It is expected that each testing session will last up to 4 hours.
The three good data sets will be averaged to reduce variability. Statistical analysis will be carried out using an appropriate statistical package to determine if any significant differences exist in the data between the three patient groups and between the patient groups and the control group. All data will be tested for parametricity. Parametric data will be analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with post hoc Bonferroni correction. If the data is found to be nonparametric, KruskalWallis tests will be used. For data over time appropriate repeated measures analysis will be used. A 95% confidence level will be used throughout.
The study is being funded over a three year period. The first year involves the set up and development of the protocol and the recruitment of the control participants. It is hoped that the recruitment of the patients will start nine months into the study period and will take 25 months to complete the data collection and analysis. This will allow two months for the reporting of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile high congruency bearing | Experimental | Device: Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a rotating platform tibia and high congruency mobile bearing. |
| Fixed high congruency bearing | Experimental | Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and high congruency bearing. |
| Fixed low congruency bearing | Experimental | Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and low congruency bearing. |
| Control | No intervention | –Healthy control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Primary unilateral total knee replacement
- Suitable to have any one of the three test bearings
- Over 35 years of age
- Willing to take part
- From one of the following NHS Scotland Health Boards: Ayrshire \& Arran, Forth Valley, Greater Glasgow \& Clyde, Highland, Lanarkshire or Lothian
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous hip or knee replacement procedure if carried out in the previous twelve months
- Unable to give written consent
- Unable to attend the movement analysis sessions
- Journey time from home to the university in excess of two hours
- Previous ankle surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus)Columbus high congruency bearing on a rotating platform tibia. | Device | Mobile high congruency bearing |
| Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Columbus high congruency bearing on a fixed platform tibia. | Device | Fixed high congruency bearing |
| Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Columbus deep dish bearing on a fixed platform tibia. | Device | Fixed low congruency bearing |
Primary outcome
Knee kinematics
Time frame: 1 year
Knee range of motion during activities of daily living
10 secondary outcomes
Hip kinematics
Time frame: 1 year
Hip kinetics
Time frame: 1 year
Knee kinetics
Time frame: 1 year
Ankle kinematics
Time frame: 1 year
Ankle kinetics
Time frame: 1 year
EQ-5D
Time frame: 1 year
Oxford Knee Score
Time frame: 1 year
Knee alignment
Time frame: 1 year
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
Complications
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34130036Komaris DS, Tedesco S, O'Flynn B, Govind C, Clarke J, Riches P. Dynamic stability during stair negotiation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Jul;87:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105410. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33676526Komaris DS, Govind C, Murphy AJ, Clarke J, Ewen A, Leonard H, Riches P. Implant design affects walking and stair navigation after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 6;16(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02311-x.
Related trials for Knee Replacement
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
SII Levels Following iPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block in Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frederic Picard, MD principal investigator
National Waiting Times Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) in people with Knee Replacement, run by Golden Jubilee National Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knee kinematics (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02422251, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2019.