AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee ReplacementNCT02422251

Biomechanical Assessment of a High Congruency Knee Bearing

A study testing Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) in people with Knee Replacement, run by Golden Jubilee National Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the project is to compare the biomechanics of three different bearing designs used in total knee replacement (TKR) implants. The bearing is the part in the middle of the knee implant that allows the metal tray attached to the shin bone (tibia) to move in relation to the metal part attached to the thigh bone… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Knee Replacement
What is being tested?
Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Aug 2015to Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary unilateral total knee replacement
  • Suitable to have any one of the three test bearings
  • Over 35 years of age
  • Willing to take part
  • From one of the following NHS Scotland Health Boards: Ayrshire \& Arran, Forth Valley, Greater Glasgow \& Clyde, Highland, Lanarkshire or Lothian
  • Able to return for follow up sessions

Who cannot join

  • Previous hip or knee replacement procedure if carried out in the previous twelve months
  • Unable to give written consent
  • Unable to attend the movement analysis sessions
  • Journey time from home to the university in excess of two hours
  • Previous ankle surgery
  • Any past neurologic history e.g. stroke, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire, G81 4dy

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Clinical Investigation of the Functional Outcomes of High Congruency Versus Low Congruency Knee Bearings

The aim of the project is to compare the biomechanics of three different bearing designs used in total knee replacement (TKR) implants. The bearing is the part in the middle of the knee implant that allows the metal tray attached to the shin bone (tibia) to move in relation to the metal part attached to the thigh bone (femur) and is usually made of plastic (high density polyethylene). There will be three different bearing types in the study, which all give different movements. This study will see which bearing is most like a natural knee and so which design gives the best function and feeling to patients with a TKR. 90 TKR patients from the Golden Jubilee National Hospital will be recruited and randomised to receive one of the three study bearings (30 in each group). In addition, a control group of 30 healthy individuals of similar age will be recruited for comparison. Before surgery and at 4 to 8 weeks and 1 year after their operation patients will attend biomechanical assessment sessions at the University of Strathclyde. The control group will attend the assessment session only once. In each of these sessions they will carry out a number of everyday tasks such as walking, moving from sitting to standing and going up and down stairs. These tasks will be measured using motion capture techniques. Reflective markers placed on each participant will be tracked by cameras so that their movements can be recorded. Force plates in the floor will record the forces during the tasks.

Movement and force data will be analysed to see if any differences exist between the groups and show which bearing gives the most natural movement.

Read the detailed description

This is a double blind randomised controlled trial. The aim of the study is to compare the biomechanical performance of knee replacements with different bearing designs to that of a native or natural knee. The hypothesis is that a mobile bearing design with a high congruency bearing will allow the knee replacement to work more like the native knee and give more natural movement when carrying out everyday tasks.

The current evidence on whether fixed or mobile, low or high congruency bearings give the most natural movement or provide better knee function is sparse. By carrying out a randomised controlled trial including a cohort of healthy individuals and taking indepth functional assessments of a number of different common activities of daily living it should be possible to show what level of functional outcome the three bearings being used give.

Ninety patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty under the care of four consultant orthopaedic surgeons at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited and randomised into one of the three study groups (low congruency fixed bearing, high congruency fixed bearing or high congruency mobile bearing).

Invitation letters and participant information sheets will be sent out to suitable patients prior to their preoperative consultation. They will be approached at their consultation visit to seek consent to take part in the study. At this time they will be given the opportunity to ask questions about the study. Following written consent, the patient will be randomised using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. A nominated person, independent of the approach and consent of the patient, will sign and open the envelope and inform the hospital research team of the randomisation. The patient and the university research team will be blinded to randomisation. For each patient arrangements will be made for their preoperative movement analysis testing session. Subsequently, they will have their surgery and rehabilitation prior to discharge according to standard hospital practice. Participants will then return to the hospital for standard follow up appointments at six weeks and one year. At the same time arrangements will be made for them to attend their follow up movement analysis sessions. Clinical data recorded at preoperative assessment and postoperative follow up appointments, such as range of movement, Oxford Knee Score, patient satisfaction, EQ5D and radiographic measurements will be collected for study patients to compare to the functional outcomes measured during the movement analysis sessions.

Participants will be asked to attend movement analysis testing sessions at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow on three separate occasions; preoperatively, at 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Each of these sessions will follow the same procedure. Prior to data collection, participants will be asked to change into the tight fitting shorts and vest tops provided (male participants will be asked to forego the vest tops) in the changing rooms within the laboratory facility. Measurements of weight and body dimensions will be taken (required for processing the data) and then reflective markers will be attached to the legs, pelvis, torso and arms. These will be attached using toupee tape or elasticated straps as required. They will be asked to wear a headband (provided) with another four markers attached on their head. There will be eight activities of daily living (ADLs) in the test protocol, which will be carried out in one of two laboratories; one a standard motion capture laboratory (S) and the other in a laboratory with a CAREN system (Motek Medical, Amsterdam, Netherlands) which consists of a virtual reality screen, moving platform and treadmill (M). The ADLs will be:

  1. Level walking in a straight line (S)
  2. Level walking along a curved pathway (S)
  3. Sit to stand to sit (S)
  4. Sit to stand to walk (S)
  5. Ascending and descending stairs (S)
  6. Getting into and out of a car (S)
  7. Single leg balance (M)
  8. Walking on an incline (M)

Participants will be asked to perform each ADL in a fixed order several times until three good sets of data have been collected. Participants will be given instructions on how to perform each ADL prior to performing it and will be asked to practice them before data is collected. During the demanding tasks, participants will be supported by a harness to prevent falls and hand rails will be provided on the test staircase. Participants will be allowed rest breaks between each ADL and during tests if required. At the end of each task the participant will be asked a set of questions about how they found performing the task. On completion of the test protocol, the markers will be removed, the participant will get changed and will be free to leave. It is expected that each testing session will last up to 4 hours.

The three good data sets will be averaged to reduce variability. Statistical analysis will be carried out using an appropriate statistical package to determine if any significant differences exist in the data between the three patient groups and between the patient groups and the control group. All data will be tested for parametricity. Parametric data will be analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with post hoc Bonferroni correction. If the data is found to be nonparametric, KruskalWallis tests will be used. For data over time appropriate repeated measures analysis will be used. A 95% confidence level will be used throughout.

The study is being funded over a three year period. The first year involves the set up and development of the protocol and the recruitment of the control participants. It is hoped that the recruitment of the patients will start nine months into the study period and will take 25 months to complete the data collection and analysis. This will allow two months for the reporting of the study.

Being tested
Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus), Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device

    Columbus high congruency bearing on a rotating platform tibia.

  • Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device

    Columbus high congruency bearing on a fixed platform tibia.

  • Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)Device

    Columbus deep dish bearing on a fixed platform tibia.

Study groups in NCT02422251
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mobile high congruency bearingExperimentalDevice B Braun Columbus total knee system using a rotating platform tibia and high congruency mobile bearing.
Receives: Device: Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus)
Fixed high congruency bearingExperimentalDevice B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and high congruency bearing.
Receives: Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)
Fixed low congruency bearingExperimentalDevice B Braun Columbus total knee system using a fixed tibial platform and low congruency bearing.
Receives: Device: Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus)
ControlNo interventionHealthy control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Knee kinematics

    Knee range of motion during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Hip kinematics

    Hip range of motion during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Hip kinetics

    Hip loading during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Knee kinetics

    Knee loading during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Ankle kinematics

    Ankle range of motion during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Ankle kinetics

    Ankle loading during activities of daily living

    Measured: 1 year

  6. EQ-5D

    EQ-5D health questionnaire score

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Oxford Knee Score

    Oxford Knee Score questionnaire score

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Knee alignment

    Frontal plane alignment of the knee

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Patient satisfaction

    Score of patients' satisfaction with the implant

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Complications

    Evidence of any complication related to the surgery

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02422251
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ortho 14-12
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
13 Apr 2015
Last updated
18 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Komaris DS, Tedesco S, O'Flynn B, Govind C, Clarke J, Riches P. Dynamic stability during stair negotiation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Jul;87:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105410. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

    PubMed 34130036
  • Komaris DS, Govind C, Murphy AJ, Clarke J, Ewen A, Leonard H, Riches P. Implant design affects walking and stair navigation after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 6;16(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02311-x.

    PubMed 33676526

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mobile high congruency bearing (Columbus) and Fixed high congruency bearing (Columbus) in people with Knee Replacement, run by Golden Jubilee National Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Knee kinematics (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02422251, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in