Cervical CancerPhase 3NACOPRADNCT02422563
NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Hysterectomy (OP) Versus Primary Chemo-RADiation in Cervical Cancer FIGO Stage IB2 and IIB
A Phase 3 study testing hysterectomy, Radiation and Cisplatin in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany.
Trial summary
Randomized comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy with pelvic ± para-aortic lymphonodectomy (LNE) versus primary cisplatin-based chemo-radiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO IB2 and IIB. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- hysterectomy, Radiation and Cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 534 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years
- cervical cancer FIGO IB2, IIB,
- squamous cell, adeno or adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- informed consent
Who cannot join
- small cell/neuroendocrine component
- previous radiation, previous cancer
- pregnancy
- HIV
- severe co-morbidities
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Simone Marnitz, MD contact
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study on NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Hysterectomy (OP) Versus Primary Chemo-RADiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer FIGO Stage IB2 and IIB
Randomized comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy with pelvic ± para-aortic lymphonodectomy (LNE) versus primary cisplatin-based chemo-radiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO IB2 and IIB.
Read the detailed description
The optimal treatment for patients with cervical cancer on FIGO stage IB2 and IIB is controversial. There is no randomized comparison of a dose-dense NACT (TP or TIP-schedule) followed by hysterectomy and LNE (investigational Arm A) versus primary chemo-radiation (standard arm B). Primary endpoint is the DFS at 5 years, secondary endpoints local control at 5 years, OS at 5 years, QOL, questionnaires on sexual activity/QOL.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- hysterectomy, Radiation, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin
- Keywords
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy, FIGO IB2, FIGO IIB, chemo-radiation, dose dense chemotherapy, cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, ifosfamide
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
hysterectomyProcedure or surgery
radical hysterectomy
RadiationRadiation
CisplatinDrug
PaclitaxelDrug
CarboplatinDrug
IfosfamideDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy | Experimental | Arm A includes patients for dose dense chemotherapy using TP (paclitaxel, carboplatin) or TIP (cisplatin, paclitaxel, ifosfamide) weekly for six cycles. Radical hysterectomy is performed after the 6th week + lymphadenectomy Receives: Procedure: hysterectomy; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Ifosfamide |
| Arm B: Chemoradiation | Other | Arm B includes patients undergoing primary cisplatin based chemo-radiation Receives: Radiation: Radiation; Drug: Cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
disease free survival
DFS
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
overall survival
Measured: 5 years
local control
local control rate at 5 years
Measured: 5 years
quality of life
Qol questionnaire EORTC Qol C30 and Cervical Cancer Module EORTC QLQ-CX24
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionOct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 534 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, S. Marnitz, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02422563
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NACOPRAD_2015
- Acronym
- NACOPRAD
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sardi JE, di Paola GR, Cachau A, Ortiz OC, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Martins D, Peluffo M. A possible new trend in the management of the carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 1986 Oct;25(2):139-49. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(86)90095-8.
PubMed 2428700Benedetti-Panici P, Greggi S, Colombo A, Amoroso M, Smaniotto D, Giannarelli D, Amunni G, Raspagliesi F, Zola P, Mangioni C, Landoni F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):179-88. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.179.
PubMed 11773168Sardi J, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Maya G, di Paola G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 1990 Sep;38(3):486-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90096-4.
PubMed 1699851Souhami L, Gil RA, Allan SE, Canary PC, Araujo CM, Pinto LH, Silveira TR. A randomized trial of chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Jun;9(6):970-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.6.970.
PubMed 1709686Gadducci A, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Cosio S, Zizioli V, Lapresa M, Piovano E, Landoni F. Pathological response on surgical samples is an independent prognostic variable for patients with Stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy: an Italian multicenter retrospective study (CTF Study). Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec;131(3):640-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.029. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
PubMed 24096111Lissoni AA, Colombo N, Pellegrino A, Parma G, Zola P, Katsaros D, Chiari S, Buda A, Landoni F, Peiretti M, Dell'anna T, Fruscio R, Signorelli M, Grassi R, Floriani I, Fossati R, Torri V, Rulli E. A phase II, randomized trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy comparing a three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) versus paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the Snap-02 Italian Collaborative Study. Ann Oncol. 2009 Apr;20(4):660-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn690. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
PubMed 19181826Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, Fei F, Floriani I, Gueli Alletti D, Katsaros D, Landoni F, Lissoni A, Malzoni C, Sartori E, Scollo P, Torri V, Zola P, Mangioni C. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4137-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.172.
PubMed 15961761Landoni F, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V, Cosio S, Ferrari F, Piovano E, Gadducci A. Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
PubMed 24342439
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study on NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Hysterectomy (OP) Versus Primary Chemo-RADiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer FIGO Stage IB2 and IIB
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02422563
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NACOPRAD / NACOPRAD_2015
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy, FIGO IB2, FIGO IIB, chemo-radiation, dose dense chemotherapy, cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, ifosfamide
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 534 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Randomized comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy with pelvic ± para-aortic lymphonodectomy (LNE) versus primary cisplatin-based chemo-radiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO IB2 and IIB.
Detailed description
The optimal treatment for patients with cervical cancer on FIGO stage IB2 and IIB is controversial. There is no randomized comparison of a dose-dense NACT (TP or TIP-schedule) followed by hysterectomy and LNE (investigational Arm A) versus primary chemo-radiation (standard arm B). Primary endpoint is the DFS at 5 years, secondary endpoints local control at 5 years, OS at 5 years, QOL, questionnaires on sexual activity/QOL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy | Experimental | Procedure: hysterectomy, Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: IfosfamideArm A includes patients for dose dense chemotherapy using TP (paclitaxel, carboplatin) or TIP (cisplatin, paclitaxel, ifosfamide) weekly for six cycles. Radical hysterectomy is performed after the 6th week + lymphadenectomy |
| Arm B: Chemoradiation | Other | Radiation: Radiation, Drug: CisplatinArm B includes patients undergoing primary cisplatin based chemo-radiation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- >18 years
- cervical cancer FIGO IB2, IIB,
- squamous cell, adeno or adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- small cell/neuroendocrine component
- previous radiation, previous cancer
- pregnancy
- HIV
- severe co-morbidities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| hysterectomyradical hysterectomy | Procedure or surgery | Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy |
| Radiation | Radiation | Arm B: Chemoradiation |
| Cisplatin | Drug | Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy, Arm B: Chemoradiation |
| Paclitaxel | Drug | Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy |
| Carboplatin | Drug | Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy |
| Ifosfamide | Drug | Arm A: NACT+radical hysterectomy |
Primary outcome
disease free survival
Time frame: 5 years
DFS
3 secondary outcomes
overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
local control
Time frame: 5 years
quality of life
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 2428700Sardi JE, di Paola GR, Cachau A, Ortiz OC, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Martins D, Peluffo M. A possible new trend in the management of the carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 1986 Oct;25(2):139-49. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(86)90095-8.
- Background: PubMed 11773168Benedetti-Panici P, Greggi S, Colombo A, Amoroso M, Smaniotto D, Giannarelli D, Amunni G, Raspagliesi F, Zola P, Mangioni C, Landoni F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):179-88. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.179.
- Background: PubMed 1699851Sardi J, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Maya G, di Paola G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 1990 Sep;38(3):486-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90096-4.
- Background: PubMed 1709686Souhami L, Gil RA, Allan SE, Canary PC, Araujo CM, Pinto LH, Silveira TR. A randomized trial of chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Jun;9(6):970-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.6.970.
- Background: PubMed 24096111Gadducci A, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Cosio S, Zizioli V, Lapresa M, Piovano E, Landoni F. Pathological response on surgical samples is an independent prognostic variable for patients with Stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy: an Italian multicenter retrospective study (CTF Study). Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec;131(3):640-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.029. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 19181826Lissoni AA, Colombo N, Pellegrino A, Parma G, Zola P, Katsaros D, Chiari S, Buda A, Landoni F, Peiretti M, Dell'anna T, Fruscio R, Signorelli M, Grassi R, Floriani I, Fossati R, Torri V, Rulli E. A phase II, randomized trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy comparing a three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) versus paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the Snap-02 Italian Collaborative Study. Ann Oncol. 2009 Apr;20(4):660-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn690. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 15961761Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, Fei F, Floriani I, Gueli Alletti D, Katsaros D, Landoni F, Lissoni A, Malzoni C, Sartori E, Scollo P, Torri V, Zola P, Mangioni C. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4137-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.172.
- Background: PubMed 24342439Landoni F, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V, Cosio S, Ferrari F, Piovano E, Gadducci A. Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Simone Marnitz, MD contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing hysterectomy, Radiation and Cisplatin in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Simone Marnitz, MD (simone.marnitz@charite.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
disease free survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02422563, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2015.