Gastroesophageal RefluxNCT02425553
Effects of Diet on Reflux and Dyspepsia
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Dyspepsia, run by University of Zurich.
Trial summary
Reflux and dyspeptic symptoms are common affecting 10-20% of the population on a regular basis. Reflux symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation are caused by the return of acid or non-acid gastric contents into the esophagus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Dyspepsia
- What is being tested?
- Diet
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will be all faculty and delegates attending the "Ascona II: Advances in clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function" conference that agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Who may be able to join
- Participants will be faculty and delegates attending the "Ascona II: Advances in clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function" conference.
Who cannot join
- Age < 18,
- special dietary requirements incompatible with meals served at congress hotel restaurant,
- participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study (purely diagnostic studies are acceptable),
- individuals unwilling to provide written informed consent,
- inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems (all study documents in English).
- Participants with a history of alcohol dependency or medical conditions that may be exacerbated or affected by alcohol intake are allowed to participate but are instructed not to drink the alcohol provided with the high calorie, high fat test meal on day 4.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Diet and Alcohol on Fullness, Reflux and Dyspeptic Symptoms After Meals
Reflux and dyspeptic symptoms are common affecting 10-20% of the population on a regular basis. Reflux symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation are caused by the return of acid or non-acid gastric contents into the esophagus. Dyspeptic symptoms are caused by abnormal gastric relaxation (impaired accommodation) or increased sensitivity of the stomach to distension during the meal.
The effects of diet on gastrointestinal function are debated and the efficacy of dietary management for digestive symptoms has not been established. Epidemiological studies suggest an effect; however, it is not possible to distinguish the effects of fat intake and total energy (i.e. calorie) intake in this work. This issue has been addressed by small physiological studies. The results show that esophageal acid exposure was related to total calorie intake but not to fat content. In contrast, the number of reflux symptoms was 40% higher after the high-fat than the low-fat meals. Similar findings were found for the relationship between gastric distension, fullness and dyspeptic symptoms by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Thus, it appears that fat does not cause digestive dysmotility but heightens sensitivity to visceral events and so increases the number and severity of symptoms reported by patients. As yet, these findings have not been confirmed in larger, more representative surveys.
Read more
Similar to the effects of food, there are inconsistent findings regarding the effects of alcohol on gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and gastric function. Physiological studies have noted delayed gastric emptying and an increase in reflux events when alcohol is taken with food. However, larger surveys have not confirmed that alcohol triggers reflux or dyspeptic symptoms.
The proposed observational, dietary study with cross-over design will assess the independent effects of energy intake (i.e. calorie load) and fat intake on gastric fullness, the number and severity of reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals. The effect of alcohol on symptoms after the high calorie, high fat meals will also be documented. The study population of senior academics attending a conference are likely to have a relatively high prevalence of risk factors for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) being predominantly male, with an older age and a larger waist circumference than average in the general community. This will increase study power and relevance of the findings.
The results will provide new information concerning the impact of dietary factors and alcohol on digestive symptoms after meals. This data will inform future guidelines for the dietary management of patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals which will be relevant in both primary and secondary care.
Read the detailed description
This is an observational, dietary study with cross-over design. Restaurant style meals and beverages are provided to faculty and delegates attending the Ascona II conference that agree to participate and provide written consent. Approximately 120 participants are expected to be recruited.
On four consecutive days the evening meal served will vary in calorie load and fat content using the established, partially balanced study design applied in previous studies. On the first three days fruit juice will be served, whereas, on the final day, an alcoholic beverage with the same acidity and number of calories will be served. All meals will have the same size and salt content. Controlling for all these parameters will reduce possible confounding factors in the analysis.
- High calorie (1200 kcal), High fat (50% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- High calorie (1200 kcal), Low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- Low calorie (600 kcal), Low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- High calorie (1200 kcal), High fat (50% energy), 300 ml wine (40 g alcohol, 230 kcal), 100 ml water Note: The order of meals on day 1-3 will be fixed, but not necessarily in the order above. Meal constituents will not be disguised.
Note: Testing digestive symptoms in response to diet on successive days is possible because clinical physiological studies have shown no evidence of a sequence effect in previous studies using similar test meals.
An alginate-antacid preparation will be available as required for acute relief of any reflux or dyspeptic symptoms (Gaviscon Liquid, Reckitt Benckiser (available across-the-counter for this indication in Switzerland)). No participant is required to take this preparation.
The occurrence and severity of fullness, reflux and dyspeptic symptoms will be recorded contemporaneously by participants for three hours after each of the four test meals using a mobile application (SymTrack, Gastric Imaging \& Analysis GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland). Paper forms will be made available for those without a mobile device. Three hours is the period of time during which reflux and dyspeptic symptoms are most often reported after meals. Positive reporting bias will be minimized by automatic reminders sent to the participants by the SymTrack every 30 minutes for three hours to remind participants to document the severity of symptoms including, if appropriate, an absence of symptoms. The use of the rescue medication to treat reflux and dyspeptic symptoms during the study will also be documented on the SymTrack. Symptoms and use of the rescue medication that occur after this three hour period up to 12 hours (i.e. the following morning) will be documented as part of safety follow-up data; however these will not contribute to primary or secondary outcomes.
All faculty and delegates will be invited to participate in this observational, dietary study. The investigators expect to recruit all, or nearly all, of those attending. The fixed menu provided every night by the restaurant will be the same whether the attendee does or does not participate in the study (unless specific dietary requirements are present). Involvement of almost all attendees will reduce selection bias; however, selection bias will remain because the group of clinical academics is not wholly representative of the general population. Note that the study population is predominantly male, with an older age and a larger waist circumference than the average in the community. These are all risk factors for reflux disease. This should increase study power to show treatment effect and the clinical relevance of findings.
All those attending the Centro Stefano Franscini conference centre in Ascona take their evening meal together. The cost of these meals is included in the registration package. This is a fixed menu with non-alcoholic drinks (alcohol is available to purchase). No other food is available on site except for individuals that have registered special dietary requirements. If other food is wanted, then this is available nearby in the town of Ascona. This local organizational arrangement with the provision of fixed meals free of charge will encourage compliance with the diet.
If the participants do not adhere to the meal and beverages set out in the study protocol then this can be documented using the SymTrack. To assess compliance, the participant will respond to the questions "did the patient consume the study meal?", "did the patient take additional food?", "did the patient consume the study beverage?", and "did the patient take additional alcoholic drinks?". Failure to comply with study procedures will not preclude the individual from participating on the following days.
The primary study analysis will investigate associations between number symptoms and caloric and fat content of the meals. It will be expressed as odds ratio. There will be a qualitative description of the deviation from study protocol. For example if participants report drinking alcohol during or after the meal on days 1-3 this will be expressed as a percentage deviation.
The primary and secondary variables plus other outcomes of interest will be documented using a mobile application (SymTrack; Gastric Imaging and Analysis GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland). Paper symptom diaries will be available for those participants without access to a smartphone.
On arrival at the meeting each attendee that agrees to participate and signs Written Informed Consent will be given personal instructions as to the operation of the mobile application. Should any difficulties remain then investigators, including those involved in the development of the app, will be on hand to assist participants.
Once the Written Informed Consent is signed the participants will be given a unique username and password to allow them to log into the SymTrack and start entering screening information and symptoms. This username will allow the identification of study participant as data is entered and ensure effective monitoring of data.
The primary analysis will be performed following study completion. The primary outcome is the number of reflux or dyspeptic symptoms. Odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of the number of symptoms with the meal calorie load and fat content.
Secondary outcomes are the severity of reflux and the severity of dyspeptic symptoms as well as sensation of fullness after each test meal. Analogue to the primary outcome an odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of these outcomes with the meal calorie load and fat content.
An odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of the primary and secondary outcomes with the ingestion of alcohol after the meal.
An additional analysis will be performed to identify factors - other than composition of the test meal - that increase the likelihood of reporting reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals (e.g. age, gender, BMI and low quality of life score).
Control questions that describe the study compliance will be described using descriptive statistics.
The majority of data acquired in this study originates from electronic sources. Screening data and symptoms entered via the smartphone are immediately transferred over an encrypted channel to the server and stored in a MySQL-database. Both the server application and the database are hosted on a professional application hosting provider located in Switzerland. The server application and the database design are developed and tested by Gastric Imaging \& Analysis GmbH. The software version used during this study will be tested using semi-automated functional tests and load tests. Study principal investigator (Mark Fox) is responsible for all data stored in the database.
To ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with ethical principles, internal monitoring will be carried out regularly throughout the study. At the screening the internal monitor will review the protocol, and the database and all other aspects of the study with the investigator and other staff. Monitoring will be carried out early in the study and again after the last subject has completed the study. During monitoring, the monitor will verify compliance with the protocol and amendment(s), review the signed informed consent forms, diverse logs and all other source data. Direct access to all study-related site and source data/documents is mandatory for the monitoring review. Study team staff must be made available to answer any queries during the monitoring process.
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Dyspepsia
- Being tested
- Diet
- Keywords
- Diet, Reflux, Dyspepsia, Symptoms, Alcohol
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Dyspepsia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DietOther
Also called Dinner
High calorie (1200 kcal), high fat (50% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
DietOther
Also called Dinner
High calorie (1200 kcal), low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
DietOther
Also called Dinner
Low calorie (600 kcal), low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
DietOther
Also called Dinner
High calorie (1200 kcal), high fat (50% energy), 300 ml wine (40 g alcohol, 230 kcal), 100 ml water
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting | Not described Receives: Other: Diet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of reflux symptoms
Similar to "Pharmacokinetic outcome measures" the occurrence of reflux symptoms after each dinner will be summed up and compared between different dinners.
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of the conference, an expected average of 4 days
Number of dyspeptic symptoms
Similar to "Pharmacokinetic outcome measures" the occurrence of dyspeptic symptoms after each dinner will be summed up and compared between different dinners.
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of the conference, an expected average of 4 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
The severity of reflux symptoms measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Measured: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
The severity of dyspeptic symptoms measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Measured: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
The sensation of fullness measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Measured: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastroesophageal RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark R Fox, Prof. (UK), Principal investigator, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02425553
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KEK-Nr. 2015-0095
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005 May;54(5):710-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.051821.
PubMed 15831922Fox M, Forgacs I. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):88-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.88. No abstract available.
PubMed 16410582DeVault KR, Castell DO; American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;100(1):190-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41217.x.
PubMed 15654800Tytgat GN, McColl K, Tack J, Holtmann G, Hunt RH, Malfertheiner P, Hungin AP, Batchelor HK. New algorithm for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb 1;27(3):249-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03565.x. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
PubMed 17973975Zheng Z, Nordenstedt H, Pedersen NL, Lagergren J, Ye W. Lifestyle factors and risk for symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in monozygotic twins. Gastroenterology. 2007 Jan;132(1):87-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.019. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
PubMed 17241862Fox M, Barr C, Nolan S, Lomer M, Anggiansah A, Wong T. The effects of dietary fat and calorie density on esophageal acid exposure and reflux symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Apr;5(4):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
PubMed 17363334
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Diet and Alcohol on Fullness, Reflux and Dyspeptic Symptoms After Meals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02425553
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KEK-Nr. 2015-0095
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Dyspepsia
- Keywords
- Diet, Reflux, Dyspepsia, Symptoms, Alcohol
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Reflux and dyspeptic symptoms are common affecting 10-20% of the population on a regular basis. Reflux symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation are caused by the return of acid or non-acid gastric contents into the esophagus. Dyspeptic symptoms are caused by abnormal gastric relaxation (impaired accommodation) or increased sensitivity of the stomach to distension during the meal.
The effects of diet on gastrointestinal function are debated and the efficacy of dietary management for digestive symptoms has not been established. Epidemiological studies suggest an effect; however, it is not possible to distinguish the effects of fat intake and total energy (i.e. calorie) intake in this work. This issue has been addressed by small physiological studies. The results show that esophageal acid exposure was related to total calorie intake but not to fat content. In contrast, the number of reflux symptoms was 40% higher after the high-fat than the low-fat meals. Similar findings were found for the relationship between gastric distension, fullness and dyspeptic symptoms by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Thus, it appears that fat does not cause digestive dysmotility but heightens sensitivity to visceral events and so increases the number and severity of symptoms reported by patients. As yet, these findings have not been confirmed in larger, more representative surveys.
Similar to the effects of food, there are inconsistent findings regarding the effects of alcohol on gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and gastric function. Physiological studies have noted delayed gastric emptying and an increase in reflux events when alcohol is taken with food. However, larger surveys have not confirmed that alcohol triggers reflux or dyspeptic symptoms.
The proposed observational, dietary study with cross-over design will assess the independent effects of energy intake (i.e. calorie load) and fat intake on gastric fullness, the number and severity of reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals. The effect of alcohol on symptoms after the high calorie, high fat meals will also be documented. The study population of senior academics attending a conference are likely to have a relatively high prevalence of risk factors for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) being predominantly male, with an older age and a larger waist circumference than average in the general community. This will increase study power and relevance of the findings.
The results will provide new information concerning the impact of dietary factors and alcohol on digestive symptoms after meals. This data will inform future guidelines for the dietary management of patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals which will be relevant in both primary and secondary care.
Detailed description
This is an observational, dietary study with cross-over design. Restaurant style meals and beverages are provided to faculty and delegates attending the Ascona II conference that agree to participate and provide written consent. Approximately 120 participants are expected to be recruited.
On four consecutive days the evening meal served will vary in calorie load and fat content using the established, partially balanced study design applied in previous studies. On the first three days fruit juice will be served, whereas, on the final day, an alcoholic beverage with the same acidity and number of calories will be served. All meals will have the same size and salt content. Controlling for all these parameters will reduce possible confounding factors in the analysis.
- High calorie (1200 kcal), High fat (50% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- High calorie (1200 kcal), Low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- Low calorie (600 kcal), Low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal)
- High calorie (1200 kcal), High fat (50% energy), 300 ml wine (40 g alcohol, 230 kcal), 100 ml water Note: The order of meals on day 1-3 will be fixed, but not necessarily in the order above. Meal constituents will not be disguised.
Note: Testing digestive symptoms in response to diet on successive days is possible because clinical physiological studies have shown no evidence of a sequence effect in previous studies using similar test meals.
An alginate-antacid preparation will be available as required for acute relief of any reflux or dyspeptic symptoms (Gaviscon Liquid, Reckitt Benckiser (available across-the-counter for this indication in Switzerland)). No participant is required to take this preparation.
The occurrence and severity of fullness, reflux and dyspeptic symptoms will be recorded contemporaneously by participants for three hours after each of the four test meals using a mobile application (SymTrack, Gastric Imaging \& Analysis GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland). Paper forms will be made available for those without a mobile device. Three hours is the period of time during which reflux and dyspeptic symptoms are most often reported after meals. Positive reporting bias will be minimized by automatic reminders sent to the participants by the SymTrack every 30 minutes for three hours to remind participants to document the severity of symptoms including, if appropriate, an absence of symptoms. The use of the rescue medication to treat reflux and dyspeptic symptoms during the study will also be documented on the SymTrack. Symptoms and use of the rescue medication that occur after this three hour period up to 12 hours (i.e. the following morning) will be documented as part of safety follow-up data; however these will not contribute to primary or secondary outcomes.
All faculty and delegates will be invited to participate in this observational, dietary study. The investigators expect to recruit all, or nearly all, of those attending. The fixed menu provided every night by the restaurant will be the same whether the attendee does or does not participate in the study (unless specific dietary requirements are present). Involvement of almost all attendees will reduce selection bias; however, selection bias will remain because the group of clinical academics is not wholly representative of the general population. Note that the study population is predominantly male, with an older age and a larger waist circumference than the average in the community. These are all risk factors for reflux disease. This should increase study power to show treatment effect and the clinical relevance of findings.
All those attending the Centro Stefano Franscini conference centre in Ascona take their evening meal together. The cost of these meals is included in the registration package. This is a fixed menu with non-alcoholic drinks (alcohol is available to purchase). No other food is available on site except for individuals that have registered special dietary requirements. If other food is wanted, then this is available nearby in the town of Ascona. This local organizational arrangement with the provision of fixed meals free of charge will encourage compliance with the diet.
If the participants do not adhere to the meal and beverages set out in the study protocol then this can be documented using the SymTrack. To assess compliance, the participant will respond to the questions "did the patient consume the study meal?", "did the patient take additional food?", "did the patient consume the study beverage?", and "did the patient take additional alcoholic drinks?". Failure to comply with study procedures will not preclude the individual from participating on the following days.
The primary study analysis will investigate associations between number symptoms and caloric and fat content of the meals. It will be expressed as odds ratio. There will be a qualitative description of the deviation from study protocol. For example if participants report drinking alcohol during or after the meal on days 1-3 this will be expressed as a percentage deviation.
The primary and secondary variables plus other outcomes of interest will be documented using a mobile application (SymTrack; Gastric Imaging and Analysis GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland). Paper symptom diaries will be available for those participants without access to a smartphone.
On arrival at the meeting each attendee that agrees to participate and signs Written Informed Consent will be given personal instructions as to the operation of the mobile application. Should any difficulties remain then investigators, including those involved in the development of the app, will be on hand to assist participants.
Once the Written Informed Consent is signed the participants will be given a unique username and password to allow them to log into the SymTrack and start entering screening information and symptoms. This username will allow the identification of study participant as data is entered and ensure effective monitoring of data.
The primary analysis will be performed following study completion. The primary outcome is the number of reflux or dyspeptic symptoms. Odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of the number of symptoms with the meal calorie load and fat content.
Secondary outcomes are the severity of reflux and the severity of dyspeptic symptoms as well as sensation of fullness after each test meal. Analogue to the primary outcome an odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of these outcomes with the meal calorie load and fat content.
An odds ratio will be computed to describe the association of the primary and secondary outcomes with the ingestion of alcohol after the meal.
An additional analysis will be performed to identify factors - other than composition of the test meal - that increase the likelihood of reporting reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after meals (e.g. age, gender, BMI and low quality of life score).
Control questions that describe the study compliance will be described using descriptive statistics.
The majority of data acquired in this study originates from electronic sources. Screening data and symptoms entered via the smartphone are immediately transferred over an encrypted channel to the server and stored in a MySQL-database. Both the server application and the database are hosted on a professional application hosting provider located in Switzerland. The server application and the database design are developed and tested by Gastric Imaging \& Analysis GmbH. The software version used during this study will be tested using semi-automated functional tests and load tests. Study principal investigator (Mark Fox) is responsible for all data stored in the database.
To ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with ethical principles, internal monitoring will be carried out regularly throughout the study. At the screening the internal monitor will review the protocol, and the database and all other aspects of the study with the investigator and other staff. Monitoring will be carried out early in the study and again after the last subject has completed the study. During monitoring, the monitor will verify compliance with the protocol and amendment(s), review the signed informed consent forms, diverse logs and all other source data. Direct access to all study-related site and source data/documents is mandatory for the monitoring review. Study team staff must be made available to answer any queries during the monitoring process.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting | – | Other: Diet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will be all faculty and delegates attending the "Ascona II: Advances in clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function" conference that agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants will be faculty and delegates attending the "Ascona II: Advances in clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function" conference.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age < 18,
- special dietary requirements incompatible with meals served at congress hotel restaurant,
- participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study (purely diagnostic studies are acceptable),
- individuals unwilling to provide written informed consent,
- inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems (all study documents in English).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DietAlso: DinnerHigh calorie (1200 kcal), high fat (50% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal) | Other | Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting |
| DietAlso: DinnerHigh calorie (1200 kcal), low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal) | Other | Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting |
| DietAlso: DinnerLow calorie (600 kcal), low fat (20% energy), 400 ml juice (230 kcal) | Other | Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting |
| DietAlso: DinnerHigh calorie (1200 kcal), high fat (50% energy), 300 ml wine (40 g alcohol, 230 kcal), 100 ml water | Other | Faculty and Delegates of Ascona II Meeting |
Primary outcome
Number of reflux symptoms
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the conference, an expected average of 4 days
Similar to "Pharmacokinetic outcome measures" the occurrence of reflux symptoms after each dinner will be summed up and compared between different dinners.
Number of dyspeptic symptoms
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the conference, an expected average of 4 days
Similar to "Pharmacokinetic outcome measures" the occurrence of dyspeptic symptoms after each dinner will be summed up and compared between different dinners.
3 secondary outcomes
The severity of reflux symptoms measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Time frame: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
The severity of dyspeptic symptoms measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Time frame: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
The sensation of fullness measured by a visual-to-analogue scale from 0 to 100
Time frame: Participants will be followed at time points -30 min (before dinner) and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 min (after dinner) for 4 consecutive days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2015.
- Background: PubMed 15831922Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005 May;54(5):710-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.051821.
- Background: PubMed 16410582Fox M, Forgacs I. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):88-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.88. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15654800DeVault KR, Castell DO; American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;100(1):190-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41217.x.
- Background: PubMed 17973975Tytgat GN, McColl K, Tack J, Holtmann G, Hunt RH, Malfertheiner P, Hungin AP, Batchelor HK. New algorithm for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb 1;27(3):249-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03565.x. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 17241862Zheng Z, Nordenstedt H, Pedersen NL, Lagergren J, Ye W. Lifestyle factors and risk for symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in monozygotic twins. Gastroenterology. 2007 Jan;132(1):87-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.019. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 17363334Fox M, Barr C, Nolan S, Lomer M, Anggiansah A, Wong T. The effects of dietary fat and calorie density on esophageal acid exposure and reflux symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Apr;5(4):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
Related trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark R Fox, Prof. (UK) principal investigator
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Dyspepsia, run by University of Zurich.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of reflux symptoms (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the conference, an expected average of 4 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02425553, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2015.