MyelofibrosisPhase 2NCT02426086
Study to Evaluate Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Participants With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Previously Treated With Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
A Phase 2 study testing Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg and Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg in people with Myelofibrosis, run by Geron Corporation at 72 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelofibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg and Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 72 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2015to 7 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria.
- Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF.
- Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms.
- Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
Who cannot join
- Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%.
- Prior treatment with imetelstat.
- Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis.
- Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Trial locations and contacts
72 sites in 11 countries.
72 sites in 11 countries
United States29 sites
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Duarte, California
Study site
Durham, North Carolina
Study site
Greenville, South Carolina
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
Lake Success, New York
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Stanford, California
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
The Bronx, New York
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
Watertown, South Dakota
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Germany10 sites
Study site
Aachen
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Dresden
Study site
Düsseldorf
Study site
Frankfurt
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Heidelberg
Study site
Leipzig
Study site
Mannheim
Study site
Rostock
France6 sites
Study site
Angers
Study site
Lille
Study site
Marseille
Study site
Paris
Study site
Pierre-Bénite
Study site
Toulouse
Israel6 sites
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Kfar Saba
Study site
Nahariya
Study site
Ramat Gan
Study site
Tel Aviv
Spain5 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Salamanca
Study site
Valencia
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Antwerp
Study site
Bruges
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Leuven
United Kingdom4 sites
Study site
Birmingham
Study site
Glasgow
Study site
London
Study site
Oxford
Canada3 sites
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Subjects With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), multicenter (more than one hospital, medical school team or medical clinic work on a medical research study) study of 2 dosing regimens (treatment arms) of single-agent imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. The main study consists of 3 parts: Screening Phase (21 days before randomization); Treatment Phase (from randomization until study drug discontinuation); and Follow up Phase (until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent or study end, whichever occurs first). Participants received imetelstat 9.4 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously (IV) for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end OR imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg IV for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Initially, all participants were blinded to the treatment. After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion. The percentage of spleen response and symptom response were evaluated as co-primary endpoints. Following completion of the primary analysis, participants benefiting from study treatment could continue to receive imetelstat in Extension phase for up to 2 years or until loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who had already stopped study treatment could enter the Extension phase to continue follow up for safety via serious adverse event collection and for survival status.
- Conditions
- Myelofibrosis
- Being tested
- Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg, Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
- Keywords
- Myelofibrosis, Imetelstat, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to JAKi, IMbark
- Medical subject headings
- Primary Myelofibrosis, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgDrug
Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgDrug
Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg |
| Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response
Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response
Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria
Overall Response Rate: % of participants with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) per modified IWG-MRT.CR: bone marrow: normocellular <5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in peripheral blood (PB):<2%;hemoglobin (Hb):10 g/dL-upper limit of normal (ULN); neutrophils:1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen:not palpable and ≤350ml volume; extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH): no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH;symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. All response categories, benefit must last >12 weeks to qualify as response.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
CI per the modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia (Increase in severity of anemia constitutes the occurrence of new transfusion dependency or a ≥ 2.0 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin level from pretreatment baseline that lasts for at least 12 weeks. Increase in severity of thrombocytopenia or neutropenia is defined as a 2-grade decline, from pretreatment baseline, in platelet count or ANC, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. In addition, assignment to CI requires a minimum platelet count of ≥ 25,000*10^9/L and ANC of ≥ 0.5*10^9/L.) For all response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT
Clinical response rate (CRR) was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, or CI per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. CR: bone marrow: normocellular <5% blasts, ≤Grade 1 fibrosis; immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: not palpable and ≤350ml volume; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >70% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. PR: bone marrow: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤ Grade 1 fibrosis or not meeting bone marrow remission criteria; Immature myeloid cells in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL-ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI or not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score per modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Spleen response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen response: a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the left costal margin (LCM), becomes not palpable or a baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at >10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%; A spleen response requires confirmation by MRI showing >35% spleen volume reduction (SVR). For response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for spleen response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Symptoms response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Symptoms Response: a ≥50% reduction in the modified MFSAF v2.0 TSS. For response category, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for symptom response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Anemia response per modified 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. Anemia response is defined as participants with baseline Hb <10 g/dL but not meeting strict criteria for transfusion dependency: a ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hb; Transfusion dependent participants at baseline: becoming transfusion independent. Transfusion independence is defined as absence of any pRBC transfusions for at least 12 "rolling" weeks. For response categories, benefit must last for >12 weeks to qualify as a response. Participants who achieved CI per modified IWG-MRT criteria considered as response with clinical improvement. Participants who met criteria for anemia response but had worsening cytopenias (and therefore did not meet criteria for clinical improvement) were considered to have a response without clinical improvement. The clinical improvement in IWG-MRT is defined as the achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without progressive disease or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia.
Measured: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria
Duration of response (PR/CI/RWCI) is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response to date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first. PR: BM: normocellular: <5% blasts ≤Grade 1 fibrosis/not meeting BM remission criteria; IMC in PB: <2%; Hb: 8.5 -<10 g/dL-ULN or 10 g/dL- ULN; neutrophils: 1*10^9/L-ULN; platelets: 50 -<100*10^9/L-ULN; spleen: ≥35% splenic volumetric reduction by MRI/not palpable; EMH: no non-hepato-splenic EMH; symptoms: >50% improvement in symptom score. CI: achievement of anemia, spleen or symptoms response without PD or increase in severity of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia. RWCI: Participants who met criteria for response but had worsening cytopenias. PD: Splenomegaly requires MRI showing ≥25% increase in spleen volume.
Measured: From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Overall Survival
Overall Survival is measured from the date of Cycle 1, Day 1 to the date of the participants death. If the participant's was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the participant is last known to be alive.
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1= Not at all to 4= Very much); and 1 global health status scale based on 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7= Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning. Clinically meaningful improvement defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status.
Measured: Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-5L- VAS is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Measured: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (right now, worst, least, and average), and the interference in 7 areas (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes. Clinically meaningful improvement in BPI defined as change greater than half of the standard deviation at baseline.
Measured: Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC was used to capture the participant's perspective of improvement or decline in MF symptoms over time. The PGIC had a 7-point response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where, (1=very much improved, 2= somewhat improved, 3= a little improved, 4=no change, 5= a little worse, 6= somewhat worse, 7=very much worse).
Measured: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were AEs with onset during or after the first dose of study drug, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat
Elimination half-life (t 1/2) is associated with the terminal slope (lambda [z]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat
Measured: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Aug 2015
- Primary completion26 Apr 2018
- Study completion7 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MyelofibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Geron Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Clinical Team, Study director, Geron Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02426086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR107170
- Other IDs
- 63935937MYF2001, 2015-000946-41, 2015
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
Publications
Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Palandri F, Martino B, Niederwieser D, Reiter A, Scott BL, Baer MR, Hoffman R, Odenike O, Vannucchi AM, Bussolari J, Zhu E, Rose E, Sherman L, Dougherty S, Sun L, Huang F, Wan Y, Feller FM, Rizo A, Kiladjian JJ. Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase II Study of Two Doses of Imetelstat in Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;39(26):2881-2892. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02864. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PubMed 34138638
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Subjects With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02426086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR107170
- Conditions
- Myelofibrosis
- Keywords
- Myelofibrosis, Imetelstat, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to JAKi, IMbark
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Geron CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.
Detailed description
This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), multicenter (more than one hospital, medical school team or medical clinic work on a medical research study) study of 2 dosing regimens (treatment arms) of single-agent imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. The main study consists of 3 parts: Screening Phase (21 days before randomization); Treatment Phase (from randomization until study drug discontinuation); and Follow up Phase (until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent or study end, whichever occurs first). Participants received imetelstat 9.4 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously (IV) for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end OR imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg IV for every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Initially, all participants were blinded to the treatment. After the first interim analysis, treatment for all participants was unblinded and participants assigned to the imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg arm could continue with their same imetelstat dose or have it increased to 9.4 mg/kg at the investigator's discretion. The percentage of spleen response and symptom response were evaluated as co-primary endpoints. Following completion of the primary analysis, participants benefiting from study treatment could continue to receive imetelstat in Extension phase for up to 2 years or until loss of benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Participants who had already stopped study treatment could enter the Extension phase to continue follow up for safety via serious adverse event collection and for survival status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg |
| Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria.
- Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF.
- Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms.
- Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%.
- Prior treatment with imetelstat.
- Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kgParticipants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. | Drug | Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg |
| Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kgParticipants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. | Drug | Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response
Time frame: Week 24
Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response
Time frame: Week 24
Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.
20 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Anemia Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Time frame: Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Duration of Response (PR/CI/RWCI) as Per IWG-MRT Criteria
Time frame: From date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of PD or death, whichever occurs first (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Overall Survival
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days), up to the date of the participant's death (approximately up to 4.1 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-C30): Global Health Status
Time frame: Up to end of the treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Utility Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: Up to end of treatment (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: At the end of treatment, up to approximately 2.3 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Up to end of extension phase (approximately up to 4.2 years)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC 0-24) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Imetelstat
Time frame: 0 (before start of infusion), 1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 12-16 and 18-24 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34138638Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Palandri F, Martino B, Niederwieser D, Reiter A, Scott BL, Baer MR, Hoffman R, Odenike O, Vannucchi AM, Bussolari J, Zhu E, Rose E, Sherman L, Dougherty S, Sun L, Huang F, Wan Y, Feller FM, Rizo A, Kiladjian JJ. Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase II Study of Two Doses of Imetelstat in Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;39(26):2881-2892. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02864. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Related trials for Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Elritercept to Placebo in Adults With Myelofibrosis and Anemia Who Are Taking Ruxolitinib
Myelofibrosis, Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
Motor Development and Early Predictors of Psychomotor Outcomes in Preterm and Term Infants Assessed by MOS-R and Caregiver Questionnaire at 18 and 36 Months
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Motor Skills Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study of Selinexor in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis
Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Momelotinib in Combination With Luspatercept in Participants With Transfusion Dependent Myelofibrosis
Primary Myelofibrosis, Myelofibrosis; Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Clinical Team study director
Geron Corporation
72 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg and Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg in people with Myelofibrosis, run by Geron Corporation at 72 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 72 sites in United States, Germany, France, Israel, Spain and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response (time frame: Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02426086, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2021.