Acute Myeloid LukemiaPhase 1/2PONATINIB-AMLNCT02428543
Ponatinib for FLT3-ITD Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ponatinib and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Lukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 37 sites in France.
Trial summary
This project is part of a joint ALFA and GOELAM strategy aiming to improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 18-70 years. The basis of this strategy is to evaluate intensified conventional chemotherapy and targeted drugs in selected disease-risk subgroups of adult patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Lukemia
- What is being tested?
- Ponatinib and Cytarabine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to 3 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- a. Patients aged 18 to 55-60 years: Cohort A b. Patients aged 55-60 to 70 years: Cohort B
- Signed informed consent
- Acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission
- Platelets ≥ 100 Giga/l; Neutrophils ≥ 1 Giga/l
- Intermediate risk karyotype with FLT3-ITD activating mutant detected at diagnosis (mutant FLT3/wild-type allelic ratio higher than 10%) (appendix 16)
- Induction with intensive chemotherapy, dose dense sequential induction or 3 + 7 like regimen (daunorubicin or idarubicin) for Cohort A and inclusion in the ALFA backbone for cohort B.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Pancreatic functions within the normal range
- AST or ALT less or equal to 2.5 fold upper normal range, bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 fold upper normal range
- Serum creatinine less or equal to 1.5 fold upper normal range
- Two planned consolidation courses with high-dose cytarabine (HDAC, Cohort A) or intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC, Cohort B).
Who cannot join
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Transformation of myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndromes
- Known central nervous system involvement
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
- Other active malignancy
- Previous episode of pancreatitis
Show all 25Show fewer
- Hypertriglyceridemia > 4.5 g/L
- Lipase > 1.5 × ULN, amylase > 1.5 x ULN not related to leukemia
- QTc > 470 ms (Bazett formula, see Appendix 1)
- Patients at high or very high risk of cardiovascular disease with any of the following f) Established cardiovascular disease
- Cardiac disease:
- Congestive heart failure greater than class II NYHA or
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% or
- Unstable angina (anginal symptoms at rest) or
- New onset angina (began within the last 3 months) or
- Myocardial infarction, coronary/peripheral artery disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months or
- History of thrombolic or embolic events
- Arrhythmias
- Any history of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy.
- Diabetes Mellitus untreated or not equilibrated with therapy h) Arterial Hypertension,
- - Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure greater than 90 mmHg, despite optimal medical management and optimal measurement (http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/display.jsp?id=c_272459)
- - Any history of hypertension with
- Hypertensive encephalopathy
- Posterior leucoencephalopathy
- Aortic or artery dissection i) Familial dysplipidemia. j) Taking medications that are known to be associated with Torsades de Pointes (see Appendix 11)
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 1 country.
37 sites in 1 country
France37 sites
Dr Abdelaziz CHAIB
Aix-en-Provence, 13600
Chu Amiens
Amiens, 80054
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49033
Hôpital VICTOR DUPOUY
Argenteuil, 95107
Dr Edouard RANDIAMALALA
Bayonne, 64100
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, 25030
Dr Thorsten BRAUN
Bobigny, 93000
CHU Boulogne Sur Mer
Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62321
Chr Clemenceau
Caen, 14033
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées PERCY
Clamart, 92141
Dr Stéphanie HAÏAT
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21079
Centre hospitalier de Versailles
Le Chesnay, 78157
Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
CHRU Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Dr Regis COSTELLO
Marseille, 13000
Centre Hospitalier de Meaux
Meaux, 77104
Dr Mario OJEDA-URIBE
Mulhouse, 68000
Dr Jacques DELAUNAY
Nantes, 44000
CHU Nice, Hôpital Archet 1
Nice, 06202
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris, 75010
Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013
Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades
Paris, 75743
Hôpital Saint Antoine
Paris, 75751
Dr Laurence SANHES
Perpignan, 66000
Dr Arnaud PIGNEUX
Pessac, 33604
Centre Hospitalier René Dubos
Pontoise, 95303
Marc BERNARD
Rennes, 35000
Dr Emilie LEMASLE
Rouen, 76000
Centre Hospitalier René Huguenin
Saint-Cloud, 92210
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Dr Réda GARIDI
Saint-Quentin, 02100
Dr Christian RECHER
Toulouse, 31000
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, 59322
About this study
Official title: A Phase I - II Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Ponatinib With High or Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Cytogenetic FLT3-ITD AML iIn First Complete Remission
This project is part of a joint ALFA and GOELAM strategy aiming to improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 18-70 years. The basis of this strategy is to evaluate intensified conventional chemotherapy and targeted drugs in selected disease-risk subgroups of adult patients with non promyelocytic AML. Participation will be proposed to almost all adult patients in France aged 18-70 years and diagnosed with AML.
FLT3 genetic alterations include FLT3 somatic point mutations within the second tyrosine kinase domain and internal duplications of the juxta-membrane domain. This alteration is refered to as FLT3-ITD. The FLT3-ITD mutation is found in around 30% of patients with cytogenetically normal AML. Patients with the FLT3-ITD genotype have been reported to have a poor outcome when treated with conventional chemotherapy with an estimated 4-year relapse-free survival of 25% (Schlenk et al. N Engl J Med 2008). More recently, the prognostic relevance of FLT3-ITD has been studied in the context of integrated genetic profiling. This confirmed the genetic complexity of AML and also that FLT3-ITD was associated with reduced overall survival in intermediate-risk AML. A multivariate analysis of several genetic alterations revealed that FLT3-ITD was the primary predictor of patient outcome. FLT3-ITD mutations were classified in 3 categories: 1) FLT3-ITD with +8, TET2, DNMT3A or MLL-PTD mutations (3-year OS 14.5%); 2) FLT3-ITD with wild type CEBPA, TET2, DNMT3 and MLL-PTD (3-year OS 35.2%) and 3) FLT3-ITD with CEBPA mutations (3-year OS 42%) (Patel JP et al. N Engl J Med 2012). However, FLT3-ITD was not a predictor of response to induction therapy, allowing the introduction of targeted therapies after the induction course.
Read more
Several FLT3 inhibitors have been evaluated or are currently being tested in the setting of relapsing AML. In most trials to date, patients were only eligible if the FLT3-ITD mutation was present. Disappointing results were reported with the first generation of FLT3 inhibitors, including lestaurtinib (CEP-701), midostaurin (PKC-412) and sorafenib. Second generation FLT3 inhibitors such as quizartinib (AC220) are currently under investigation with promising results. However, the hematologic toxicity of AC220 will likely present a major limitation in evaluating AC220 combined with standard or high-dose chemotherapy.
Ponatinib (AP24534) is a third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain. Ponatinib was rationally designed with an extensive network of optimized molecular contacts and triple bonds to accommodate the T315I mutation, a major cause of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic and advanced phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Ponatinib also inhibits SRC (IC50: 5.4 nM) and members of the VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR families of receptor tyrosine kinases (O'Hare T, Cancer Cell 2009). Despite low activity against FLT3 based on the IC50 value (FLT3 IC50: 12.6 nM compared to BCR IC50: 0.37 nM), ponatinib has recently been reported to have significant cellular activity against the MV4-11 cell line which harbors an FLT3-ITD activating mutation. Ponatinib-induced apoptosis was maximal at 10 nM in vitro and a single dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg had a strong inhibitory effect in vivo in mice bearing MV4-11 xenografts. Primary blast cells from 4 FLT3-ITD AML patients were also tested and ponatinib reduced their viability (IC50: 4 nM) whereas no activity was shown on FLT3-ITD-negative blast cells (Gozgit JM et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2011).
Preliminary data from the phase I clinical trial showed that 15 mg ponatinib was associated with a Cmax of 51.1 nM. Cmax was increased to 111 nM and 149 nM in the 30 mg and 45 mg cohorts respectively. The trough concentrations were 55.3 nM and 61.9 nM for the 30 mg and 45 mg doses respectively (Ariad clinical investigator's brochure, version 3). Results from the ongoing phase II trial in CML patients suggest that the hematological toxicity profile of ponatinib is comparable with that of nilotinib or dasatinib, both of which have been successfully combined with conventional chemotherapy.
Investigators thus aim to combine ponatinib with cytarabine in FLT3-ITD AML patients in first complete remission.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Lukemia
- Being tested
- Ponatinib and Cytarabine
- Keywords
- FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ponatinib and CytarabineDrug
Prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation phase I-II trial; an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression dose-escalation model incorporating escalation with overdose control will be used (Babb 1998, Tighiouart 2005). Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ponatinib arm | Experimental | dose-escalation Arm _ 15, 30, 45mg Ponatinib per day. Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients Receives: Drug: Ponatinib and Cytarabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ponatinib during consolidation 1 with HDAC or IDAC
assess the safety of increased doses of ponatinib in combination with high or intermediate -dose cytarabine in AML FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall survival
To determine disease-free survival from achievement of first complete remission
Measured: 5 years
Relapse-free survival
To determine overall survival from achievement of first complete remission
Measured: 5 years
Event-free survival
To determine overall survival from diagnosis
Measured: 5 years
Minimal residual disease based on FLT3-ITD quantification, WT1 expression and/or NPM1 mutation quantification
To study minimal residual disease after induction and consolidation courses based on the quantification of the FLT3-ITD signal and /or WT1, NPM if available
Measured: 18 months
relationship between minimal residual disease and outcome
To study the relationship between minimal residual disease and outcome
Measured: 18 months
To study ponatinib resistance mechanisms
To assess FLT3-ITD mutant before and after ponatinib treatment
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionOct 2021
- Study completion3 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Versailles Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe ROUSSELOT, Versailles Hospital
- Investigators
- Rousselot Philippe, Pr, Principal investigator, CH Versailles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02428543
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013-000268-27
- Acronym
- PONATINIB-AML
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I - II Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Ponatinib With High or Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Cytogenetic FLT3-ITD AML iIn First Complete Remission
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02428543
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PONATINIB-AML / 2013-000268-27
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Lukemia
- Keywords
- FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Versailles HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project is part of a joint ALFA and GOELAM strategy aiming to improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 18-70 years. The basis of this strategy is to evaluate intensified conventional chemotherapy and targeted drugs in selected disease-risk subgroups of adult patients with non promyelocytic AML. Participation will be proposed to almost all adult patients in France aged 18-70 years and diagnosed with AML.
FLT3 genetic alterations include FLT3 somatic point mutations within the second tyrosine kinase domain and internal duplications of the juxta-membrane domain. This alteration is refered to as FLT3-ITD. The FLT3-ITD mutation is found in around 30% of patients with cytogenetically normal AML. Patients with the FLT3-ITD genotype have been reported to have a poor outcome when treated with conventional chemotherapy with an estimated 4-year relapse-free survival of 25% (Schlenk et al. N Engl J Med 2008). More recently, the prognostic relevance of FLT3-ITD has been studied in the context of integrated genetic profiling. This confirmed the genetic complexity of AML and also that FLT3-ITD was associated with reduced overall survival in intermediate-risk AML. A multivariate analysis of several genetic alterations revealed that FLT3-ITD was the primary predictor of patient outcome. FLT3-ITD mutations were classified in 3 categories: 1) FLT3-ITD with +8, TET2, DNMT3A or MLL-PTD mutations (3-year OS 14.5%); 2) FLT3-ITD with wild type CEBPA, TET2, DNMT3 and MLL-PTD (3-year OS 35.2%) and 3) FLT3-ITD with CEBPA mutations (3-year OS 42%) (Patel JP et al. N Engl J Med 2012). However, FLT3-ITD was not a predictor of response to induction therapy, allowing the introduction of targeted therapies after the induction course.
Several FLT3 inhibitors have been evaluated or are currently being tested in the setting of relapsing AML. In most trials to date, patients were only eligible if the FLT3-ITD mutation was present. Disappointing results were reported with the first generation of FLT3 inhibitors, including lestaurtinib (CEP-701), midostaurin (PKC-412) and sorafenib. Second generation FLT3 inhibitors such as quizartinib (AC220) are currently under investigation with promising results. However, the hematologic toxicity of AC220 will likely present a major limitation in evaluating AC220 combined with standard or high-dose chemotherapy.
Ponatinib (AP24534) is a third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain. Ponatinib was rationally designed with an extensive network of optimized molecular contacts and triple bonds to accommodate the T315I mutation, a major cause of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic and advanced phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Ponatinib also inhibits SRC (IC50: 5.4 nM) and members of the VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR families of receptor tyrosine kinases (O'Hare T, Cancer Cell 2009). Despite low activity against FLT3 based on the IC50 value (FLT3 IC50: 12.6 nM compared to BCR IC50: 0.37 nM), ponatinib has recently been reported to have significant cellular activity against the MV4-11 cell line which harbors an FLT3-ITD activating mutation. Ponatinib-induced apoptosis was maximal at 10 nM in vitro and a single dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg had a strong inhibitory effect in vivo in mice bearing MV4-11 xenografts. Primary blast cells from 4 FLT3-ITD AML patients were also tested and ponatinib reduced their viability (IC50: 4 nM) whereas no activity was shown on FLT3-ITD-negative blast cells (Gozgit JM et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2011).
Preliminary data from the phase I clinical trial showed that 15 mg ponatinib was associated with a Cmax of 51.1 nM. Cmax was increased to 111 nM and 149 nM in the 30 mg and 45 mg cohorts respectively. The trough concentrations were 55.3 nM and 61.9 nM for the 30 mg and 45 mg doses respectively (Ariad clinical investigator's brochure, version 3). Results from the ongoing phase II trial in CML patients suggest that the hematological toxicity profile of ponatinib is comparable with that of nilotinib or dasatinib, both of which have been successfully combined with conventional chemotherapy.
Investigators thus aim to combine ponatinib with cytarabine in FLT3-ITD AML patients in first complete remission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ponatinib arm | Experimental | Drug: Ponatinib and Cytarabinedose-escalation Arm _ 15, 30, 45mg Ponatinib per day. Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- a. Patients aged 18 to 55-60 years: Cohort A b. Patients aged 55-60 to 70 years: Cohort B
- Signed informed consent
- Acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission
- Platelets ≥ 100 Giga/l; Neutrophils ≥ 1 Giga/l
- Intermediate risk karyotype with FLT3-ITD activating mutant detected at diagnosis (mutant FLT3/wild-type allelic ratio higher than 10%) (appendix 16)
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Transformation of myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndromes
- Known central nervous system involvement
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
- Other active malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ponatinib and CytarabineProspective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation phase I-II trial; an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression dose-escalation model incorporating escalation with overdose control will be used (Babb 1998, Tighiouart 2005). Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients | Drug | Ponatinib arm |
Primary outcome
dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ponatinib during consolidation 1 with HDAC or IDAC
Time frame: 12 months
assess the safety of increased doses of ponatinib in combination with high or intermediate -dose cytarabine in AML FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission
6 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Relapse-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Event-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Minimal residual disease based on FLT3-ITD quantification, WT1 expression and/or NPM1 mutation quantification
Time frame: 18 months
relationship between minimal residual disease and outcome
Time frame: 18 months
To study ponatinib resistance mechanisms
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rousselot Philippe, Pr principal investigator
CH Versailles
37 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ponatinib and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Lukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 37 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ponatinib during consolidation 1 with HDAC or IDAC (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.