AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LukemiaPhase 1/2PONATINIB-AMLNCT02428543

Ponatinib for FLT3-ITD Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ponatinib and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Lukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 37 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project is part of a joint ALFA and GOELAM strategy aiming to improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 18-70 years. The basis of this strategy is to evaluate intensified conventional chemotherapy and targeted drugs in selected disease-risk subgroups of adult patients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myeloid Lukemia
What is being tested?
Ponatinib and Cytarabine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
37 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2013to 3 Oct 2023
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • a. Patients aged 18 to 55-60 years: Cohort A b. Patients aged 55-60 to 70 years: Cohort B
  • Signed informed consent
  • Acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission
  • Platelets ≥ 100 Giga/l; Neutrophils ≥ 1 Giga/l
  • Intermediate risk karyotype with FLT3-ITD activating mutant detected at diagnosis (mutant FLT3/wild-type allelic ratio higher than 10%) (appendix 16)
  • Induction with intensive chemotherapy, dose dense sequential induction or 3 + 7 like regimen (daunorubicin or idarubicin) for Cohort A and inclusion in the ALFA backbone for cohort B.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Pancreatic functions within the normal range
  • AST or ALT less or equal to 2.5 fold upper normal range, bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 fold upper normal range
  • Serum creatinine less or equal to 1.5 fold upper normal range
  • Two planned consolidation courses with high-dose cytarabine (HDAC, Cohort A) or intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC, Cohort B).

Who cannot join

  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Transformation of myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Known central nervous system involvement
  • Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  • Other active malignancy
  • Previous episode of pancreatitis
Show all 25Show fewer
  • Hypertriglyceridemia > 4.5 g/L
  • Lipase > 1.5 × ULN, amylase > 1.5 x ULN not related to leukemia
  • QTc > 470 ms (Bazett formula, see Appendix 1)
  • Patients at high or very high risk of cardiovascular disease with any of the following f) Established cardiovascular disease
  • Cardiac disease:
  • Congestive heart failure greater than class II NYHA or
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% or
  • Unstable angina (anginal symptoms at rest) or
  • New onset angina (began within the last 3 months) or
  • Myocardial infarction, coronary/peripheral artery disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months or
  • History of thrombolic or embolic events
  • Arrhythmias
  • Any history of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy.
  • Diabetes Mellitus untreated or not equilibrated with therapy h) Arterial Hypertension,
  • - Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure greater than 90 mmHg, despite optimal medical management and optimal measurement (http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/display.jsp?id=c_272459)
  • - Any history of hypertension with
  • Hypertensive encephalopathy
  • Posterior leucoencephalopathy
  • Aortic or artery dissection i) Familial dysplipidemia. j) Taking medications that are known to be associated with Torsades de Pointes (see Appendix 11)

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 1 country.

37 sites in 1 country

France37 sites
  • Dr Abdelaziz CHAIB

    Aix-en-Provence, 13600

  • Chu Amiens

    Amiens, 80054

  • CHU d'Angers

    Angers, 49033

  • Hôpital VICTOR DUPOUY

    Argenteuil, 95107

  • Dr Edouard RANDIAMALALA

    Bayonne, 64100

  • CHU de Besançon

    Besançon, 25030

  • Dr Thorsten BRAUN

    Bobigny, 93000

  • CHU Boulogne Sur Mer

    Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62321

  • Chr Clemenceau

    Caen, 14033

  • Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées PERCY

    Clamart, 92141

  • Dr Stéphanie HAÏAT

    Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100

  • Hôpital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, 94010

  • CHU de Dijon

    Dijon, 21079

  • Centre hospitalier de Versailles

    Le Chesnay, 78157

  • Hôpital Claude Huriez

    Lille, 59037

  • CHRU Dupuytren

    Limoges, 87042

  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot

    Lyon, 69437

  • Dr Regis COSTELLO

    Marseille, 13000

  • Centre Hospitalier de Meaux

    Meaux, 77104

  • Dr Mario OJEDA-URIBE

    Mulhouse, 68000

  • Dr Jacques DELAUNAY

    Nantes, 44000

  • CHU Nice, Hôpital Archet 1

    Nice, 06202

  • CHU de Nîmes

    Nîmes, 30029

  • Hôpital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75010

  • Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière

    Paris, 75013

  • Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades

    Paris, 75743

  • Hôpital Saint Antoine

    Paris, 75751

  • Dr Laurence SANHES

    Perpignan, 66000

  • Dr Arnaud PIGNEUX

    Pessac, 33604

  • Centre Hospitalier René Dubos

    Pontoise, 95303

  • Marc BERNARD

    Rennes, 35000

  • Dr Emilie LEMASLE

    Rouen, 76000

  • Centre Hospitalier René Huguenin

    Saint-Cloud, 92210

  • Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270

  • Dr Réda GARIDI

    Saint-Quentin, 02100

  • Dr Christian RECHER

    Toulouse, 31000

  • Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes

    Valenciennes, 59322

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase I - II Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Ponatinib With High or Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Cytogenetic FLT3-ITD AML iIn First Complete Remission

This project is part of a joint ALFA and GOELAM strategy aiming to improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) aged 18-70 years. The basis of this strategy is to evaluate intensified conventional chemotherapy and targeted drugs in selected disease-risk subgroups of adult patients with non promyelocytic AML. Participation will be proposed to almost all adult patients in France aged 18-70 years and diagnosed with AML.

FLT3 genetic alterations include FLT3 somatic point mutations within the second tyrosine kinase domain and internal duplications of the juxta-membrane domain. This alteration is refered to as FLT3-ITD. The FLT3-ITD mutation is found in around 30% of patients with cytogenetically normal AML. Patients with the FLT3-ITD genotype have been reported to have a poor outcome when treated with conventional chemotherapy with an estimated 4-year relapse-free survival of 25% (Schlenk et al. N Engl J Med 2008). More recently, the prognostic relevance of FLT3-ITD has been studied in the context of integrated genetic profiling. This confirmed the genetic complexity of AML and also that FLT3-ITD was associated with reduced overall survival in intermediate-risk AML. A multivariate analysis of several genetic alterations revealed that FLT3-ITD was the primary predictor of patient outcome. FLT3-ITD mutations were classified in 3 categories: 1) FLT3-ITD with +8, TET2, DNMT3A or MLL-PTD mutations (3-year OS 14.5%); 2) FLT3-ITD with wild type CEBPA, TET2, DNMT3 and MLL-PTD (3-year OS 35.2%) and 3) FLT3-ITD with CEBPA mutations (3-year OS 42%) (Patel JP et al. N Engl J Med 2012). However, FLT3-ITD was not a predictor of response to induction therapy, allowing the introduction of targeted therapies after the induction course.

Read more

Several FLT3 inhibitors have been evaluated or are currently being tested in the setting of relapsing AML. In most trials to date, patients were only eligible if the FLT3-ITD mutation was present. Disappointing results were reported with the first generation of FLT3 inhibitors, including lestaurtinib (CEP-701), midostaurin (PKC-412) and sorafenib. Second generation FLT3 inhibitors such as quizartinib (AC220) are currently under investigation with promising results. However, the hematologic toxicity of AC220 will likely present a major limitation in evaluating AC220 combined with standard or high-dose chemotherapy.

Ponatinib (AP24534) is a third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain. Ponatinib was rationally designed with an extensive network of optimized molecular contacts and triple bonds to accommodate the T315I mutation, a major cause of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic and advanced phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Ponatinib also inhibits SRC (IC50: 5.4 nM) and members of the VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR families of receptor tyrosine kinases (O'Hare T, Cancer Cell 2009). Despite low activity against FLT3 based on the IC50 value (FLT3 IC50: 12.6 nM compared to BCR IC50: 0.37 nM), ponatinib has recently been reported to have significant cellular activity against the MV4-11 cell line which harbors an FLT3-ITD activating mutation. Ponatinib-induced apoptosis was maximal at 10 nM in vitro and a single dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg had a strong inhibitory effect in vivo in mice bearing MV4-11 xenografts. Primary blast cells from 4 FLT3-ITD AML patients were also tested and ponatinib reduced their viability (IC50: 4 nM) whereas no activity was shown on FLT3-ITD-negative blast cells (Gozgit JM et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2011).

Preliminary data from the phase I clinical trial showed that 15 mg ponatinib was associated with a Cmax of 51.1 nM. Cmax was increased to 111 nM and 149 nM in the 30 mg and 45 mg cohorts respectively. The trough concentrations were 55.3 nM and 61.9 nM for the 30 mg and 45 mg doses respectively (Ariad clinical investigator's brochure, version 3). Results from the ongoing phase II trial in CML patients suggest that the hematological toxicity profile of ponatinib is comparable with that of nilotinib or dasatinib, both of which have been successfully combined with conventional chemotherapy.

Investigators thus aim to combine ponatinib with cytarabine in FLT3-ITD AML patients in first complete remission.

Being tested
Ponatinib and Cytarabine
Keywords
FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ponatinib and CytarabineDrug

    Prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation phase I-II trial; an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression dose-escalation model incorporating escalation with overdose control will be used (Babb 1998, Tighiouart 2005). Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients

Study groups in NCT02428543
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ponatinib armExperimentaldose-escalation Arm _ 15, 30, 45mg Ponatinib per day. Each cohort will consist of 3 evaluable patients
Receives: Drug: Ponatinib and Cytarabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ponatinib during consolidation 1 with HDAC or IDAC

    assess the safety of increased doses of ponatinib in combination with high or intermediate -dose cytarabine in AML FLT3-ITD patients in first complete remission

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Overall survival

    To determine disease-free survival from achievement of first complete remission

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Relapse-free survival

    To determine overall survival from achievement of first complete remission

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Event-free survival

    To determine overall survival from diagnosis

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Minimal residual disease based on FLT3-ITD quantification, WT1 expression and/or NPM1 mutation quantification

    To study minimal residual disease after induction and consolidation courses based on the quantification of the FLT3-ITD signal and /or WT1, NPM if available

    Measured: 18 months

  5. relationship between minimal residual disease and outcome

    To study the relationship between minimal residual disease and outcome

    Measured: 18 months

  6. To study ponatinib resistance mechanisms

    To assess FLT3-ITD mutant before and after ponatinib treatment

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2021
  4. Study completion3 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02428543
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-000268-27
Acronym
PONATINIB-AML
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
2 Aug 2013
Last updated
6 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ponatinib and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Lukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 37 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ponatinib during consolidation 1 with HDAC or IDAC (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in