Advanced CancerNCT02430467
Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training in Palliative Care
A study testing Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT) and Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) in people with Advanced Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to develop more effective ways to help patients and their caregivers cope with cancer pain. The investigators are looking at the usefulness of a Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training Intervention versus Pain Education. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT) and Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 452 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to 4 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- clinical diagnosis Stage 4 solid or hematologic malignancy and nonresectable Stage 3 gastrointestinal (GI) cancer
- life expectancy of < 1 month
- worst pain in the past 2 weeks greater than or equal to 4 on the 0-10 pain scale,
- have an identified caregiver who is also willing to participate,
- at least 18 years old, 6) fluent in English.
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:
- at least 18 years old
- fluent in English
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Palliative Performance Scale rating <40,
- current external radiation therapy for reduction of pain
- unable to provide informed consent or complete study procedures as determined by clinical or study staff.
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to provide informed consent or complete study procedures as determined by clinical or study staff.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
About this study
The purpose of this study is to develop more effective ways to help patients and their caregivers cope with cancer pain. The investigators are looking at the usefulness of a Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training Intervention versus Pain Education.
Read the detailed description
The primary aim of this study is to test the efficacy for the Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training intervention to improve the caregiver's self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain. Secondary aims include testing the effectiveness of the CG-PMT intervention to improve patient pain severity, patient self-efficacy for pain management and patient psychological distress, as well as short-term caregiver adjustment and caregiver adjustment following the patient's death.
In this multi-site study, 236 dyads (patients with cancer pain and their family caregivers) will be randomized to either a Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training protocol or to an Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual control condition. Dyads in the Caregiver-Guided Pain Management condition will receive three one-hour sessions conducted via videoconference. Dyads in the Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual condition will receive educational material about cancer pain and its management but will not receive any study-related treatment sessions. Assessments will be conducted with patients and caregivers before and after treatment, and with caregivers 3 months and 6 months following the patient's death. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that caregivers who receive the intervention will report significantly higher levels of self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain than caregivers in the control condition. Secondary aims will focus on (a) improvements in short-term caregiver adjustment as well as caregiver adjustment following the patient's death, and (b) patient pain severity, self-efficacy for pain management, and psychological distress.
- Conditions
- Advanced Cancer
- Being tested
- Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT), Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT)Behavioural
Patient-caregiver dyads in the CG-PM arm of the study will receive 3 50-minute sessions via Skype with a masters-level therapist over a 3-week period. The intervention integrates educational information about cancer pain and its management with a behavioral training program to teach patients and caregivers pain coping skills including relaxation, imagery, and activity pacing, and to teach caregivers how to guide and coach the patient in the practice and application of these pain control techniques.
Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU)Behavioural
Patient-caregiver dyads in the Enhanced TAU condition will receive the same educational video and booklet on cancer pain and its management that is used as part of the CG-PMT intervention. They will also receive iPads with icons linked to reputable websites that provide educational information on cancer including cancer pain (e.g., ACS, NCI) and will be encouraged to utilize them for information and support. However, they will not meet with a study interventionist nor receive any training in behavioral pain coping skills.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver-guided pain management training protocol (CG-PMT) | Active comparator | Patient-caregiver dyads in the CG-PM arm of the study will receive 3 50-minute sessions via Skype with a masters-level therapist over a 3-week period. The intervention integrates educational information about cancer pain and its management with a behavioral training program to teach patients and caregivers pain coping skills including relaxation, imagery, and activity pacing, and to teach caregivers how to guide and coach the patient in the practice and application of these pain control techniques Receives: Behavioral: Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT) |
| Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) | Active comparator | Patient-caregiver dyads in the Enhanced TAU condition will receive the same educational video and booklet on cancer pain and its management that is used as part of the CG-PMT intervention. They will also receive iPads with icons linked to reputable websites that provide educational information on cancer including cancer pain (e.g., ACS, NCI) and will be encouraged to utilize them for information and support. However, they will not meet with a study interventionist nor receive any training in behavioral pain coping skills. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in caregiver self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain
Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
Measured: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in caregiver strain
Caregiver Strain Index
Measured: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver satisfaction
Caregiving Satisfaction Scale
Measured: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver psychological distress
Center for Epidemiology Studies Short Depression Scale
Measured: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver psychological distress
Trait Anxiety Scale
Measured: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in caregiver health behaviors
Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire
Measured: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in caregiver global health rating
Global health rating
Measured: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in patient pain
Brief Pain Inventory
Measured: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Change in patient self-efficacy
Patient Self-Efficacy Scale
Measured: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Change in patient psychological distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Measured: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018
- Study completion4 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laura Porter, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02430467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00057512
- Other IDs
- 1R01NR015348-01
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Porter LS, Steel JL, Fairclough DL, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Hanson LC, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):952-961. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004216. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
PubMed 33775175Porter LS, Samsa G, Steel JL, Hanson LC, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Background, design, and challenges for the CaringPals study. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):263-272. doi: 10.1177/1740774519829695. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
PubMed 30782014
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training in Palliative Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02430467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00057512
- Conditions
- Advanced Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to develop more effective ways to help patients and their caregivers cope with cancer pain. The investigators are looking at the usefulness of a Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training Intervention versus Pain Education.
Detailed description
The primary aim of this study is to test the efficacy for the Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training intervention to improve the caregiver's self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain. Secondary aims include testing the effectiveness of the CG-PMT intervention to improve patient pain severity, patient self-efficacy for pain management and patient psychological distress, as well as short-term caregiver adjustment and caregiver adjustment following the patient's death.
In this multi-site study, 236 dyads (patients with cancer pain and their family caregivers) will be randomized to either a Caregiver-Guided Pain Management Training protocol or to an Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual control condition. Dyads in the Caregiver-Guided Pain Management condition will receive three one-hour sessions conducted via videoconference. Dyads in the Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual condition will receive educational material about cancer pain and its management but will not receive any study-related treatment sessions. Assessments will be conducted with patients and caregivers before and after treatment, and with caregivers 3 months and 6 months following the patient's death. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that caregivers who receive the intervention will report significantly higher levels of self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain than caregivers in the control condition. Secondary aims will focus on (a) improvements in short-term caregiver adjustment as well as caregiver adjustment following the patient's death, and (b) patient pain severity, self-efficacy for pain management, and psychological distress.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver-guided pain management training protocol (CG-PMT) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT)Patient-caregiver dyads in the CG-PM arm of the study will receive 3 50-minute sessions via Skype with a masters-level therapist over a 3-week period. The intervention integrates educational information about cancer pain and its management with a behavioral training program to teach patients and caregivers pain coping skills including relaxation, imagery, and activity pacing, and to teach caregivers how to guide and coach the patient in the practice and application of these pain control techniques |
| Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU)Patient-caregiver dyads in the Enhanced TAU condition will receive the same educational video and booklet on cancer pain and its management that is used as part of the CG-PMT intervention. They will also receive iPads with icons linked to reputable websites that provide educational information on cancer including cancer pain (e.g., ACS, NCI) and will be encouraged to utilize them for information and support. However, they will not meet with a study interventionist nor receive any training in behavioral pain coping skills. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT)Patient-caregiver dyads in the CG-PM arm of the study will receive 3 50-minute sessions via Skype with a masters-level therapist over a 3-week period. The intervention integrates educational information about cancer pain and its management with a behavioral training program to teach patients and caregivers pain coping skills including relaxation, imagery, and activity pacing, and to teach caregivers how to guide and coach the patient in the practice and application of these pain control techniques. | Behavioural | Caregiver-guided pain management training protocol (CG-PMT) |
| Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU)Patient-caregiver dyads in the Enhanced TAU condition will receive the same educational video and booklet on cancer pain and its management that is used as part of the CG-PMT intervention. They will also receive iPads with icons linked to reputable websites that provide educational information on cancer including cancer pain (e.g., ACS, NCI) and will be encouraged to utilize them for information and support. However, they will not meet with a study interventionist nor receive any training in behavioral pain coping skills. | Behavioural | Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) |
Primary outcome
Change in caregiver self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain
Time frame: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
9 secondary outcomes
Change in caregiver strain
Time frame: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver satisfaction
Time frame: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver psychological distress
Time frame: baseline, following intervention (3 weeks)
Change in caregiver psychological distress
Time frame: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in caregiver health behaviors
Time frame: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in caregiver global health rating
Time frame: following death of patient (3 mos & 6 mos)
Change in patient pain
Time frame: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Change in patient self-efficacy
Time frame: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Change in patient psychological distress
Time frame: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33775175Porter LS, Steel JL, Fairclough DL, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Hanson LC, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):952-961. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004216. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30782014Porter LS, Samsa G, Steel JL, Hanson LC, LeBlanc TW, Bull J, Fischer S, Keefe FJ. Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Background, design, and challenges for the CaringPals study. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):263-272. doi: 10.1177/1740774519829695. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
Related trials for Advanced Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Porter, Ph.D. principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Caregiver-guided pain management training (CG-PMT) and Enhanced treatment-as-usual (TAU) in people with Advanced Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in caregiver self-efficacy for helping the patient manage pain (time frame: baseline, post-intervention (3 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02430467, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2023.