OsteoporosisNCT02435147
Longitudinal Effects of Denosumab on Trabecular Bone Score and Femur Strength Index
An observational study of Osteoporosis and Bone Fracture, run by HealthEast Care System at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to validate the long-term benefit of denosumab for osteoporosis treatment in a real-world clinical practice setting. We hypothesize that continued therapy (36+months) with denosumab will increase both trabecular bone score (TBS) and femur strength index (FSI) and reduce fracture and other… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis, Bone Fracture
- What is being tested?
- denosumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study will enroll postmenopausal women between the ages of 40 and 90 years who have completed a minimum of 36 months of denosumab therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for study entry:
- Post-menopausal female with diagnosed osteoporosis
- Age 40-90 years
- Completed 36 months of denosumab therapy (SQ; 60mg every 6 months) but not yet received the 42 month injection
- Availability of DXA scans at the study-required time points, including the willingness of subjects to undergo a DXA evaluation at 36 months, if required
- Provided written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded from this study for any of the following reasons:
- Received denosumab injections for less than 36 months
- Patients who have missed more than 1 dose of denosumab in a 36 month period
- Contra-indicated for treatment with denosumab
- History of rheumatoid arthritis
- Current diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism; hyperthyroidism; osteomalacia, or other known diseases that can affect bone
- In the opinion of the investigator, have any kind of disorder that may compromise the ability of the subject to provide written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to validate the long-term benefit of denosumab for osteoporosis treatment in a real-world clinical practice setting. We hypothesize that continued therapy (36+months) with denosumab will increase both trabecular bone score (TBS) and femur strength index (FSI) and reduce fracture and other bone health risks among post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.
Read the detailed description
Bone fractures are a major cause of morbidity and health care expense among patients with osteoporosis.The goal of osteoporosis therapy is to reduce fracture risk. The administration of denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously (SC) every six months has been shown to limit bone turnover, increase bone mineral density (BMD), and reduce the risk for new vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip fractures among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (Cummings, 2009). Although BMD is an important factor for fracture risk, it does not describe bone microarchitecture, which is related to bone quality and mechanical bone strength. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an index for bone microarchitecture extracted from anterior-posterior spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Previous research has shown TBS to differentiate between women with and without fractures as well as predict future fracture even after adjustment for BMD (Simonelli, Leib, Winzenrieth, \& Hans, 2012). In a study of 29,407 Canadian women age 50 years and older at the time of baseline hip and spine DXA, health service records were assessed to determine the incidence of non-traumatic osteoporotic fractures subsequent to BMD testing. Lumbar spine TBS was derived for each DXA examination and blinded to clinical parameters and outcomes. Osteoporotic fractures were identified in 1668 (5.7%) women, including 439 (1.5%) spine and 293 (1.0%) hip fractures. Significantly lower spine TBS and BMD were found in women with major osteoporotic, spine, and hip fractures (p<0.0001). The results of this study suggest that spine TBS is predictive of osteoporotic fractures and provides additional clinical information independent of spine and hip BMD; therefore, combining TBS trabecular texture index with BMD incrementally improves fracture prediction in postmenopausal women (Hans, Goertzen, Krieg, \& Leslie, 2011).
Clinical research has demonstrated the positive effect of denosumab on TBS over time. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 215 postmenopausal women with low BMD at the spine or total hip, denosumab (60mg SC every 6 months) was found to increase lumbar spine QCT, DXA, and TBS at 12 months compared to placebo or alendronate (Thomas, 2013). In another study conducted by McClung et al, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who received denosumab were found to have significant increases in TBS, independent of BMD, at 36 months compared to baseline and placebo (McClung, Lippuner, Brandi, Kaufman, Zanchetta, \& Krieg, 2012).
Femur strength index (FSI), which is a measure of femoral bone density, structure, and strength, has also been shown to predict hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. In a study which compared FSI in a group of women age 50 years and older with and without hip fracture (365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls), FSI was found to be significantly lower in the fracture group, after adjusting for T score and hip axis length (Faulkner, et al., 2006). Like TBS, FSI can be obtained from femur DXA measurements using modern software.
This is a single-site, open-label, non-randomized, observational study designed to assess the change in TBS and FSI at 36 months. among post-menopausal women with osteoporosis taking denosumab. All patients included in this study are under the medical care of the principal investigator. Subjects will enter the study once they have completed 36 months of treatment with denosumab and have evaluable DXA scans. Medical records will be retrospectively reviewed and percent change in TBS and FSI scores will be calculated.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Bone Fracture
- Being tested
- denosumab
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
denosumabDrug
Also called Prolia
Patients will receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every six months as part of their standard osteoporosis treatment.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Change in Mean Trabecular Bone Score
Proportion of change in mean trabecular bone score at 36 months following denosumab initiation
Measured: Baseline and 36 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of Change in Mean Femur Strength Index Score
Proportion of change in mean Femur Strength Index Score at 36 months following denosumab initiation
Measured: Baseline and 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- HealthEast Care System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beth Jorgenson, HealthEast Care System
- Investigators
- Christine Simonelli, MD, Principal investigator, HealthEast Care System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HE 15 03 003
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 1 May 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Longitudinal Effects of Denosumab on Trabecular Bone Score and Femur Strength Index
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HE 15 03 003
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Bone Fracture
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- HealthEast Care SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to validate the long-term benefit of denosumab for osteoporosis treatment in a real-world clinical practice setting. We hypothesize that continued therapy (36+months) with denosumab will increase both trabecular bone score (TBS) and femur strength index (FSI) and reduce fracture and other bone health risks among post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.
Detailed description
Bone fractures are a major cause of morbidity and health care expense among patients with osteoporosis.The goal of osteoporosis therapy is to reduce fracture risk. The administration of denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously (SC) every six months has been shown to limit bone turnover, increase bone mineral density (BMD), and reduce the risk for new vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip fractures among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (Cummings, 2009). Although BMD is an important factor for fracture risk, it does not describe bone microarchitecture, which is related to bone quality and mechanical bone strength. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an index for bone microarchitecture extracted from anterior-posterior spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Previous research has shown TBS to differentiate between women with and without fractures as well as predict future fracture even after adjustment for BMD (Simonelli, Leib, Winzenrieth, \& Hans, 2012). In a study of 29,407 Canadian women age 50 years and older at the time of baseline hip and spine DXA, health service records were assessed to determine the incidence of non-traumatic osteoporotic fractures subsequent to BMD testing. Lumbar spine TBS was derived for each DXA examination and blinded to clinical parameters and outcomes. Osteoporotic fractures were identified in 1668 (5.7%) women, including 439 (1.5%) spine and 293 (1.0%) hip fractures. Significantly lower spine TBS and BMD were found in women with major osteoporotic, spine, and hip fractures (p<0.0001). The results of this study suggest that spine TBS is predictive of osteoporotic fractures and provides additional clinical information independent of spine and hip BMD; therefore, combining TBS trabecular texture index with BMD incrementally improves fracture prediction in postmenopausal women (Hans, Goertzen, Krieg, \& Leslie, 2011).
Clinical research has demonstrated the positive effect of denosumab on TBS over time. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 215 postmenopausal women with low BMD at the spine or total hip, denosumab (60mg SC every 6 months) was found to increase lumbar spine QCT, DXA, and TBS at 12 months compared to placebo or alendronate (Thomas, 2013). In another study conducted by McClung et al, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who received denosumab were found to have significant increases in TBS, independent of BMD, at 36 months compared to baseline and placebo (McClung, Lippuner, Brandi, Kaufman, Zanchetta, \& Krieg, 2012).
Femur strength index (FSI), which is a measure of femoral bone density, structure, and strength, has also been shown to predict hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. In a study which compared FSI in a group of women age 50 years and older with and without hip fracture (365 with prior hip fracture and 2,141 controls), FSI was found to be significantly lower in the fracture group, after adjusting for T score and hip axis length (Faulkner, et al., 2006). Like TBS, FSI can be obtained from femur DXA measurements using modern software.
This is a single-site, open-label, non-randomized, observational study designed to assess the change in TBS and FSI at 36 months. among post-menopausal women with osteoporosis taking denosumab. All patients included in this study are under the medical care of the principal investigator. Subjects will enter the study once they have completed 36 months of treatment with denosumab and have evaluable DXA scans. Medical records will be retrospectively reviewed and percent change in TBS and FSI scores will be calculated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study will enroll postmenopausal women between the ages of 40 and 90 years who have completed a minimum of 36 months of denosumab therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for study entry:
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients will be excluded from this study for any of the following reasons:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| denosumabAlso: ProliaPatients will receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every six months as part of their standard osteoporosis treatment. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Change in Mean Trabecular Bone Score
Time frame: Baseline and 36 months
Proportion of change in mean trabecular bone score at 36 months following denosumab initiation
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of Change in Mean Femur Strength Index Score
Time frame: Baseline and 36 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christine Simonelli, MD principal investigator
HealthEast Care System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Osteoporosis and Bone Fracture, run by HealthEast Care System at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Change in Mean Trabecular Bone Score (time frame: Baseline and 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2018.