AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone FracturesNCT02435498

Web-based Education Module for Pain Management

A study testing Interactive website and Video in people with Bone Fractures, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study's objectives are as follows: 1. To evaluate the utility of a website to provide information and guidance about pain management in children 2. To educate parents about the pathophysiology of pain, proper use of analgesic medications and signs of pain in children 3. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bone Fractures
What is being tested?
Interactive website and Video
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
311 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
4 Sep 2015to 1 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All caregivers who are in attendance with their child (any age) for a primary complaint of a non-operative fracture managed by the paediatric emergency physician AND will be the primary caregiver for the child at home.

Who cannot join

  • Poor parental English fluency
  • Lack of a home computer with Internet access
  • Child with a history of renal disease, liver disease, bleeding diathesis, chronic pain issues, or pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A5W9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Web-based Education Module Versus Standard of Care for Pain Management Following a Fracture in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study's objectives are as follows:

  1. To evaluate the utility of a website to provide information and guidance about pain management in children 2. To educate parents about the pathophysiology of pain, proper use of analgesic medications and signs of pain in children 3. To reduce the functional impact of pain in children following treatment for fracture 4. To endow parents with confidence to manage their child's pain at home 5. To dispel misconceptions about the use and safety of analgesics in children 6. To increase awareness of complications of fractures such as compartment syndrome
Read the detailed description

This study will compare the effectiveness of three mediums of parental education among parents of children treated for non-operative fractures in the emergency department (ED): 1) A novel website entitled, "Online User-Centered Home Pain Management for Fractures" (OUCH PMF) 2) An online educational video (OV) and 3) standard discharge instructions (SOC). The investigators primary goal is to see which modality results in a greater improvement in scores on a on a knowledge questionnaire. The investigators secondary goals are to see which modality results in better parental satisfaction, confidence in managing pain, and lower impact of injury on the child and family. As participants will receive the standard-of-care that includes a pamphlet on how to take care of the cast. During their stay in the ED, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three aforementioned groups. Participants will then be given the pre-intervention knowledge questionnaire, followed by the intervention and then the post-intervention knowledge questionnaire, prior to being discharged. At 120 hours post-discharge, participants will be asked to access an online survey to obtain information about the functional impact of the injury on their child. The investigators goal is to compare online and video education tools in their ability to improve parental knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction regarding the treatment of fracture pain.

Conditions
Bone Fractures
Being tested
Interactive website, Video, Standard of care
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interactive websiteOther

    The interactive website called Online User Centered Home Pain Management for Fractures (OUCH PMF) will cover 4 domains of knowledge: 1. Fracture-related pain 2. Analgesic dosing regimens 3. Indications, risks and safety of analgesia in children 4. Signs and symptoms of pain in children

  • VideoOther

    The online video will contain the same information within the website.

  • Standard of careOther

    Standard of care includes a pamphlet with cast care instructions and verbal instructions on caring for the child at home.

Study groups in NCT02435498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interactive websiteExperimentalThe interactive website called Online User Centered Home Pain Management for Fractures (OUCH PMF) will cover 4 domains of knowledge: 1. Fracture-related pain 2. Analgesic dosing regimens 3. Indications, risks and safety of analgesia in children 4. Signs and symptoms of pain in children
Receives: Other: Interactive website
VideoActive comparatorThe online video will contain the same information within the website.
Receives: Other: Video
Standard of careActive comparatorStandard of care includes a pamphlet with cast care instructions and verbal instructions on caring for the child at home.
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in 21-item knowledge questionnaire total score between groups

    Measured: 120 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of days of work missed for parent

    Measured: 120 hours

  2. Parental confidence in recognizing pain and providing analgesia using a 5-point Likert scale

    Measured: 120 hours

  3. Number of sleep-interrupted nights for child

    Measured: 120 hours

  4. Number of days of school missed for child

    Measured: 120 hours

  5. Number of days before resumption of normal diet for child

    Measured: 120 hours

  6. Other educational resources used

    Measured: 120 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
311 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02435498
Sponsor's protocol ID
106402
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
29 Apr 2015
Last updated
21 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interactive website and Video in people with Bone Fractures, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in 21-item knowledge questionnaire total score between groups (time frame: 120 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in