Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3TORCHNCT02435953
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing TACE and RFA in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, run by Ming Zhao at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone. The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Ablation Techniques, RFA
- What is being tested?
- TACE and RFA
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 241 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- May 2015to Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
- No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0
- Child-Pugh Stage A or B7
- Screening laboratory values must meet the following criteria and should be obtained within 14 days prior to procedure:
- I.Adequate hematologic function:
Show all 19Show fewer
- WBC ≥ 4.0 x 109/L (stable, off any growth factor within 4 weeks of study drug administration)
- Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L (stable, off any growth factor within 4 weeks of study drug administration)
- Platelets ≥ 60 x 109/L (transfusion to achieve this level is not permitted)
- Hemoglobin ≥ 100 g/L (may be transfused to meet this requirement)
- II.Adequate hepatic function:
- Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 5×ULN
- Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 5×ULN
- Serum total bilirubin ≤ 51.3 μmol/L
- Serum albumin ≥ 2.8 g/dL
- III.Adequate coagulation function:
- a)prothrombin activity ≥ 40%
- IV.Adequate renal function:
- a)Serum creatinine < 110 μmol/L
Who cannot join
- Previous local therapy completed less than 4 weeks prior to the dosing and, if present any related acute toxicity > grade 1
- Any contraindications for TACE/RFA procedure:
- I.Impaired clotting test (platelet count < 60000/mm3, prothrombin activity < 40%) II.Renal failure / insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. III.Known severe atheromatosis IV.Known uncontrolled blood hypertension (> 160/100 mmHg) V.Patients with known active bleeding (e.g. from GI ulcers, esophageal varices) within 2 months prior to baseline/screening visit or with history or evidence of inherited bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy VI.Clinically significant third space fluid accumulation (i.e., ascites requiring tapping despite use of diuretic or pleural effusion that either required tapping or is associated with shortness of breath)
- Evidence of hepatic discompensation (i.e., refractory ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalophathy)
- Patients with any other malignancies within the last 3 years before study start
- History of HCC tumor rupture
Show all 10Show fewer
- Clinically significant (CTC grade 3 or 4) venous or arterial thrombotic disease within past 6 months
- History of abdominal fistula, GI perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within past 6 months prior to study treatment
- Pregnant women or lactating women
- Be allergic to pirarubicin, lobaplatin and iodized oil
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 500060
About this study
Official title: Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone. The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Some prospective studies have shown that TACE combined with RFA have better efficacy than any of them alone for early stage HCC (single tumor ≤5 cm). However, to the investigators' knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than TACE alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. Intermediate-stage HCC in this study was defined as 2-3 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size 3-7 cm or 4-10 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size ≤7 cm; ECOG-PS 0; Child-pugh A or B7; no tumor thrombus or extrahepatic metastases.
- Being tested
- TACE, RFA
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TACEProcedure or surgery
A catheter (or a microcatheter for cases where small vessels and branches cannot be accessed with a standard angiographic catheter) will be advanced selectively or superselectively into the right or left hepatic artery or the feeding arteries directly supplying the tumor. Depending on tumor size, location, blood supply, and liver function, the interventional radiologist administers a cytotoxic agent and lipiodol emulsion (30 mg lobaplatin, 30 mg pirarubicin, and < 15 mL lipiodol) through the catheter. Following drug infusion, embolization of the tumor vessels will be routinely performed using gelatin sponge particles.
RFAProcedure or surgery
Commercial electrode systems are used and the ablation therapy is to be performed according to manufacturer's standard recommendations. All lesions are targeted with CT images during the RFA procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TACE-RFA | Experimental | RFA follows TACE when achieving ablation eligibility criteria defined in this study, with no more than four sessions of TACE. Receives: Procedure: TACE; Procedure: RFA |
| TACE alone | Active comparator | On-demand TACE. Receives: Procedure: TACE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 (PFS-R)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of radiologic disease progression as determined according to the RECIST v1.1, or death (by any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall survival (OS)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of death (due to any cause), assessed up to 10 years.
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to HCC modified RECIST (PFS-m)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of radiologic disease progression as determined according to the HCC modified RECIST, or death (by any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years.
unAblation-TACEable or unTACEable progression-free survival (uAT-PFS)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of the following untreatable progression or death by any cause, assessed up to 10 years.
Objective response rate (ORR) according to mRECIST (ORR-m)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of study completion, an average of 8 months.
Disease control rate (DCR) according to mRECIST (DCR-m)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of study completion, an average of 8 months.
Adverse Events
Measured: From enrollment to until 30 days following discontinuation of study treatment or until the initiation of the first subsequent therapy following discontinuation of study treatment (whichever occurs first).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionOct 2025
- Study completionOct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ming Zhao
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ming Zhao, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Ming Zhao, doctor, Principal investigator, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-FXY-089
- Acronym
- TORCH
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 3 May 2015
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Lyu N, Yi JZ, Wu XT, Zhang YM, Pan T, Mu LW, Chen S, Wang JL, Xu J, Tan GJ, Zhang YN, Gao ZQ, Ou-Yang ZX, Wu WJ, Song YJ, Deng HJ, He M, Jiang YQ, Chen QF, Li JB, Shi M, Chen MS, Zhao M. Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Thermal Ablation in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Phase 3 TORCH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2026 Jul 30:e262366. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.2366. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42530948
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TORCH / 2014-FXY-089
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ming ZhaoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone. The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Some prospective studies have shown that TACE combined with RFA have better efficacy than any of them alone for early stage HCC (single tumor ≤5 cm). However, to the investigators' knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than TACE alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. Intermediate-stage HCC in this study was defined as 2-3 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size 3-7 cm or 4-10 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size ≤7 cm; ECOG-PS 0; Child-pugh A or B7; no tumor thrombus or extrahepatic metastases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TACE-RFA | Experimental | Procedure: TACE, Procedure: RFARFA follows TACE when achieving ablation eligibility criteria defined in this study, with no more than four sessions of TACE. |
| TACE alone | Active comparator | Procedure: TACEOn-demand TACE. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
- No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0
- Child-Pugh Stage A or B7
- Screening laboratory values must meet the following criteria and should be obtained within 14 days prior to procedure:
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Previous local therapy completed less than 4 weeks prior to the dosing and, if present any related acute toxicity > grade 1
- Any contraindications for TACE/RFA procedure:
- I.Impaired clotting test (platelet count < 60000/mm3, prothrombin activity < 40%) II.Renal failure / insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. III.Known severe atheromatosis IV.Known uncontrolled blood hypertension (> 160/100 mmHg) V.Patients with known active bleeding (e.g. from GI ulcers, esophageal varices) within 2 months prior to baseline/screening visit or with history or evidence of inherited bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy VI.Clinically significant third space fluid accumulation (i.e., ascites requiring tapping despite use of diuretic or pleural effusion that either required tapping or is associated with shortness of breath)
- Evidence of hepatic discompensation (i.e., refractory ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalophathy)
- Patients with any other malignancies within the last 3 years before study start
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TACEA catheter (or a microcatheter for cases where small vessels and branches cannot be accessed with a standard angiographic catheter) will be advanced selectively or superselectively into the right or left hepatic artery or the feeding arteries directly supplying the tumor. Depending on tumor size, location, blood supply, and liver function, the interventional radiologist administers a cytotoxic agent and lipiodol emulsion (30 mg lobaplatin, 30 mg pirarubicin, and < 15 mL lipiodol) through the catheter. Following drug infusion, embolization of the tumor vessels will be routinely performed using gelatin sponge particles. | Procedure or surgery | TACE alone, TACE-RFA |
| RFACommercial electrode systems are used and the ablation therapy is to be performed according to manufacturer's standard recommendations. All lesions are targeted with CT images during the RFA procedure. | Procedure or surgery | TACE-RFA |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 (PFS-R)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of radiologic disease progression as determined according to the RECIST v1.1, or death (by any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years.
6 secondary outcomes
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (due to any cause), assessed up to 10 years.
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to HCC modified RECIST (PFS-m)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of radiologic disease progression as determined according to the HCC modified RECIST, or death (by any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years.
unAblation-TACEable or unTACEable progression-free survival (uAT-PFS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the following untreatable progression or death by any cause, assessed up to 10 years.
Objective response rate (ORR) according to mRECIST (ORR-m)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of study completion, an average of 8 months.
Disease control rate (DCR) according to mRECIST (DCR-m)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of study completion, an average of 8 months.
Adverse Events
Time frame: From enrollment to until 30 days following discontinuation of study treatment or until the initiation of the first subsequent therapy following discontinuation of study treatment (whichever occurs first).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42530948Lyu N, Yi JZ, Wu XT, Zhang YM, Pan T, Mu LW, Chen S, Wang JL, Xu J, Tan GJ, Zhang YN, Gao ZQ, Ou-Yang ZX, Wu WJ, Song YJ, Deng HJ, He M, Jiang YQ, Chen QF, Li JB, Shi M, Chen MS, Zhao M. Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Thermal Ablation in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Phase 3 TORCH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2026 Jul 30:e262366. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.2366. Online ahead of print.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
NIVO+IPI Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Resectable HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Liver Cancer Registry Platform
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Cholangiocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Characterizing Tumor Hypoxia With BOLD-MRI to Predict Y-90 Treatment Response
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Detect and Expunge Concealed Tumors of the Liver
Liver Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ming Zhao, doctor principal investigator
Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing TACE and RFA in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, run by Ming Zhao at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 (PFS-R) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of radiologic disease progression as determined according to the RECIST v1.1, or death (by any cause), whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02435953, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2026.