BalanceAKSNCT02436837
Applicability of Kinect Sensor® in the Rehabilitation of Balance in the Elderly
A study testing sessions with virtual reality in people with Balance and Elderly, run by Federal University of Juiz de Fora at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Background: Taking into consideration the ongoing inversion of the population pyramid and the limitations and medical conditions, which predispose to episodes of falling among elderly people, the implementation of exercises and physical treatments capable of promoting postural balance in the group studied is made… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- sessions with virtual reality
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- individuals have to be elderly (60 to 70 years old) or young (20 to 30 years old).
Who cannot join
- anamnesis questionnaire: cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions.
- cores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Background:
Taking into consideration the ongoing inversion of the population pyramid and the limitations and medical conditions, which predispose to episodes of falling among elderly people, the implementation of exercises and physical treatments capable of promoting postural balance in the group studied is made necessary.
Read more
Objectives:
Assess the influence of the electronic platform Kinect Sensor® (KS) as a tool in the treatment of postural balance in elderly individuals. Method: The study included 10 elderly (60 to 70 years old) and 10 young (20 to 30 years old) individuals. Treatment protocol composed of five weeks with sessions performed twice a week with application of KS. Initial and final evaluation included static and dynamic balance instruments: Berg Balance scale and Timed up and Go and Romberg Tandem tests.
Read the detailed description
Sample Each volunteer has agreed to participate of this research after signing a informed consent. The present work has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Research of the School of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora, SUPREMA University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil, under the statement 0015/12.
Each subject filled adequately an anamnesis questionnaire composed of items which referred to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those considered incapable of performing activities involving maintenance of balance or belonging to the health risk group were excluded. Health risk was defined by criteria such as, cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions. Besides those factors, scores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion.
In order to collect data, 26 individuals from the Hospital and Maternity Ward Therezinha de Jesus (School of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora, SUPREMA University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil) were evaluated. Among them, six have been excluded for distinct reasons, such as, abandoning the proposed sessions or presenting risk factors inserted in the exclusion criteria of the study. The experimental group was composed by 10 subjects (eight females) with mean age of 64.5 years old and the control group had other 10 participants (five females) with mean age 23 years.
The sampled individuals were subject to a sequence of tests specifically devised for static and dynamic balance, which could be used as a comparison parameter for postural balance among the individuals. The tests applied were: a) Timed Up and Go test (TUG); b) Romberg Tandem test; c) Berg Balance scale.
Protocol Treatment protocol consisted of 10 sessions with maximal length of 6 minutes for performing activities using the KS. The interval between the evaluations was of five weeks and the sessions took place twice times a week, according to the participant availability. Before the first session and one day preceding the last, the individuals were evaluated in what concerns static and dynamic balance. Arterial pressure (AP) measurement and stretching activity were performed prior to the KS session. Afterwards, AP was again measured.
Berg Balance Scale Berg Balance scale was the main instrument in the assessment of the postural balance, which was also used as exclusion criterion. It is used in the clinical practice, mainly for the elderly population or neurologic disturbed patients, who have been referred to rehabilitation. The test is constituted of 14 ordinary static and dynamic balance tasks, which are related to quotidian life activities, such as getting up, transfer oneself, standing up, reaching for an object and turning. Each task generates a score between zero and four points, so that the total may be of 56 points. Points are subtracted from the total of a task, if the subject needs aid or external support device to accomplish the particular task. According to Berg et al., patient scoring less or equal to 45 are at high risk of falling during ambulation, what justify the exclusion of volunteers to whom was attributed an inferior score aforementioned.
Timed Up and Go Test In order to perform the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the subject would rise from a chair, walk three meters and return to the chair. The speed of task execution was established by the participant, with no stimulation by use of verbal commands. The time of execution was measured on the initial evaluation and one day past the tenth session.
Romberg TandemTest According to the protocol established by the Romberg Tandem test, the participants remained with the eyes closed in orthostatic position, with the calcaneus bone of the non-dominant foot placed ahead of the toes of the dominant foot, until the loose balance or reach 60 seconds, maximal time.
Arterial Pressure Arterial pressure (AP) was measured before and after each session. Individuals presenting hypertension stage 3 (≥ 180 systolic and ≥ 110 diastolic), which poses a threat to their practicing of physical activity, were withdrawn of the treatment.
Stretching After AP measurement, all subjects were instructed to perform muscular stretching exercises. The activities were performed in an active and assisted fashion, bilaterally, such as lateral cervical flexion, anterior and posterior inclination of the cervical column, orthostatic torso flexion, torso lateral inclination and rotation on the transverse plane. With the upper limbs, the motions proposed were flexion of shoulder and elbow, horizontal adduction of shoulders and flexion and extension of fingers and wrists. The participants also performed global exercises, cross walks, touching the knees with the hands alternately.
Kinect Sensor All the individuals, including the ones placed in the control group, were instructed on the execution of the activities and accompanied through verbal commands. They were positioned in front of the KS with the highest level of Stack em Up mode (available under the title Yourshape: Fitness Evolved®), and should keep static position with upper limbs raised, simulating sustain a platform. Colored boxes fall upon the simulated platform and must be deposited with the lateral inclination of the torso towards left or right, according to visual stimulus from the television, where virtual apertures are opened on alternate sides at the bottom of the screen. Eventually, fiery boxes fall, and it is necessary to raise the inferior limb of the side where the box is falling towards the platform in order to extinguish the fire, thus flexing knee and pelvic region at 90º.
Statistic Analysis D'agostino \& Pearson test was applied to verify the normality of the data. The mean analysis was done by paired Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon test for non-parametric for the data of each group; unpaired Student's t-test was performed for parametric data and Mann Whitney test for non-parametric data between the evaluated groups.
- Being tested
- sessions with virtual reality
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sessions with virtual realityOther
sessions with virtual reality to improve the balance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| young | Active comparator | 20 to 30 years old individuals used as a comparator for elderly group Receives: Other: sessions with virtual reality |
| elderly | Experimental | target of treatment to improve the balance. Receives: Other: sessions with virtual reality |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
anamnesis questionnaire for physical health condition
Those considered incapable of performing activities involving maintenance of balance or belonging to the health risk group were excluded. Health risk was defined by criteria such as, cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions.
Measured: one day
Berg Balance Scale for equilibrium condition
Scores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion
Measured: one day
Secondary outcomes (3)
Berg Balance Scale for equilibrium condition
Berg Balance scale was the main instrument in the assessment of the postural balance
Measured: five weeks
Timed Up and Go Test for the performance of physical agility
In order to perform the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the subject would rise from a chair, walk three meters and return to the chair. The speed of task execution was established by the participant, with no stimulation by use of verbal commands. The time of execution was measured on the initial evaluation and one day past the tenth session.
Measured: five weeks
Romberg TandemTest for equilibrium performance
According to the protocol established by the Romberg Tandem test, the participants remained with the eyes closed in orthostatic position, with the calcaneus bone of the non-dominant foot placed ahead of the toes of the dominant foot, until the loose balance or reach 60 seconds, maximal time
Measured: five weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BalanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Juiz de Fora
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fernando de Sá Silva, Federal University of Juiz de Fora
- Investigators
- Andre GF Oliveira, PhD, Principal investigator, Federal University of Juiz de Fora
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02436837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UFJFGV0001
- Acronym
- AKS
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 7 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;83 Suppl 2:S7-11.
PubMed 1468055Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Nov;73(11):1073-80.
PubMed 1444775Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PubMed 1991946Diamantopoulos II, Clifford E, Birchall JP. Short-term learning effects of practice during the performance of the tandem Romberg test. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Aug;28(4):308-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00710.x.
PubMed 12871243Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Hoffman HJ, Sklare DA, Schubert MC. The modified Romberg Balance Test: normative data in U.S. adults. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1309-11. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e5bee.
PubMed 21892121
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Applicability of Kinect Sensor® in the Rehabilitation of Balance in the Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02436837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AKS / UFJFGV0001
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Juiz de ForaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Taking into consideration the ongoing inversion of the population pyramid and the limitations and medical conditions, which predispose to episodes of falling among elderly people, the implementation of exercises and physical treatments capable of promoting postural balance in the group studied is made necessary.
Objectives:
Assess the influence of the electronic platform Kinect Sensor® (KS) as a tool in the treatment of postural balance in elderly individuals. Method: The study included 10 elderly (60 to 70 years old) and 10 young (20 to 30 years old) individuals. Treatment protocol composed of five weeks with sessions performed twice a week with application of KS. Initial and final evaluation included static and dynamic balance instruments: Berg Balance scale and Timed up and Go and Romberg Tandem tests.
Detailed description
Sample Each volunteer has agreed to participate of this research after signing a informed consent. The present work has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Research of the School of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora, SUPREMA University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil, under the statement 0015/12.
Each subject filled adequately an anamnesis questionnaire composed of items which referred to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those considered incapable of performing activities involving maintenance of balance or belonging to the health risk group were excluded. Health risk was defined by criteria such as, cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions. Besides those factors, scores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion.
In order to collect data, 26 individuals from the Hospital and Maternity Ward Therezinha de Jesus (School of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora, SUPREMA University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil) were evaluated. Among them, six have been excluded for distinct reasons, such as, abandoning the proposed sessions or presenting risk factors inserted in the exclusion criteria of the study. The experimental group was composed by 10 subjects (eight females) with mean age of 64.5 years old and the control group had other 10 participants (five females) with mean age 23 years.
The sampled individuals were subject to a sequence of tests specifically devised for static and dynamic balance, which could be used as a comparison parameter for postural balance among the individuals. The tests applied were: a) Timed Up and Go test (TUG); b) Romberg Tandem test; c) Berg Balance scale.
Protocol Treatment protocol consisted of 10 sessions with maximal length of 6 minutes for performing activities using the KS. The interval between the evaluations was of five weeks and the sessions took place twice times a week, according to the participant availability. Before the first session and one day preceding the last, the individuals were evaluated in what concerns static and dynamic balance. Arterial pressure (AP) measurement and stretching activity were performed prior to the KS session. Afterwards, AP was again measured.
Berg Balance Scale Berg Balance scale was the main instrument in the assessment of the postural balance, which was also used as exclusion criterion. It is used in the clinical practice, mainly for the elderly population or neurologic disturbed patients, who have been referred to rehabilitation. The test is constituted of 14 ordinary static and dynamic balance tasks, which are related to quotidian life activities, such as getting up, transfer oneself, standing up, reaching for an object and turning. Each task generates a score between zero and four points, so that the total may be of 56 points. Points are subtracted from the total of a task, if the subject needs aid or external support device to accomplish the particular task. According to Berg et al., patient scoring less or equal to 45 are at high risk of falling during ambulation, what justify the exclusion of volunteers to whom was attributed an inferior score aforementioned.
Timed Up and Go Test In order to perform the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the subject would rise from a chair, walk three meters and return to the chair. The speed of task execution was established by the participant, with no stimulation by use of verbal commands. The time of execution was measured on the initial evaluation and one day past the tenth session.
Romberg TandemTest According to the protocol established by the Romberg Tandem test, the participants remained with the eyes closed in orthostatic position, with the calcaneus bone of the non-dominant foot placed ahead of the toes of the dominant foot, until the loose balance or reach 60 seconds, maximal time.
Arterial Pressure Arterial pressure (AP) was measured before and after each session. Individuals presenting hypertension stage 3 (≥ 180 systolic and ≥ 110 diastolic), which poses a threat to their practicing of physical activity, were withdrawn of the treatment.
Stretching After AP measurement, all subjects were instructed to perform muscular stretching exercises. The activities were performed in an active and assisted fashion, bilaterally, such as lateral cervical flexion, anterior and posterior inclination of the cervical column, orthostatic torso flexion, torso lateral inclination and rotation on the transverse plane. With the upper limbs, the motions proposed were flexion of shoulder and elbow, horizontal adduction of shoulders and flexion and extension of fingers and wrists. The participants also performed global exercises, cross walks, touching the knees with the hands alternately.
Kinect Sensor All the individuals, including the ones placed in the control group, were instructed on the execution of the activities and accompanied through verbal commands. They were positioned in front of the KS with the highest level of Stack em Up mode (available under the title Yourshape: Fitness Evolved®), and should keep static position with upper limbs raised, simulating sustain a platform. Colored boxes fall upon the simulated platform and must be deposited with the lateral inclination of the torso towards left or right, according to visual stimulus from the television, where virtual apertures are opened on alternate sides at the bottom of the screen. Eventually, fiery boxes fall, and it is necessary to raise the inferior limb of the side where the box is falling towards the platform in order to extinguish the fire, thus flexing knee and pelvic region at 90º.
Statistic Analysis D'agostino \& Pearson test was applied to verify the normality of the data. The mean analysis was done by paired Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon test for non-parametric for the data of each group; unpaired Student's t-test was performed for parametric data and Mann Whitney test for non-parametric data between the evaluated groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| young | Active comparator | Other: sessions with virtual reality20 to 30 years old individuals used as a comparator for elderly group |
| elderly | Experimental | Other: sessions with virtual realitytarget of treatment to improve the balance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- individuals have to be elderly (60 to 70 years old) or young (20 to 30 years old).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- anamnesis questionnaire: cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions.
- cores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sessions with virtual realitysessions with virtual reality to improve the balance | Other | elderly, young |
Primary outcome
anamnesis questionnaire for physical health condition
Time frame: one day
Those considered incapable of performing activities involving maintenance of balance or belonging to the health risk group were excluded. Health risk was defined by criteria such as, cardiopathies, uncontrolled hypertension, auditory and visual impairment, neurological disturbances and severe muscle-skeletal conditions.
Berg Balance Scale for equilibrium condition
Time frame: one day
Scores inferior to 45 points in the Berg Balance Scale also resulted in exclusion
3 secondary outcomes
Berg Balance Scale for equilibrium condition
Time frame: five weeks
Timed Up and Go Test for the performance of physical agility
Time frame: five weeks
Romberg TandemTest for equilibrium performance
Time frame: five weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 1468055Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;83 Suppl 2:S7-11.
- Background: PubMed 1444775Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Nov;73(11):1073-80.
- Background: PubMed 1991946Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
- Background: PubMed 12871243Diamantopoulos II, Clifford E, Birchall JP. Short-term learning effects of practice during the performance of the tandem Romberg test. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Aug;28(4):308-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00710.x.
- Background: PubMed 21892121Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Hoffman HJ, Sklare DA, Schubert MC. The modified Romberg Balance Test: normative data in U.S. adults. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1309-11. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e5bee.
Related trials for Balance
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Metabolism, the Routes and Extent of Elimination, and Drug Levels of [14C]Navlimetostat (BMS-986504) in Healthy Female Participants
Healthy Female Participants
Not yet recruiting
Sensory-integration Therapy Verses Augumented Reality-based Training in ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Isokinetic Knee Strength, Bilateral Muscle Balance, and Anaerobic Performance in Adolescent Athletes
Isokinetic Knee Strength, Hamstring-to-Quadriceps Strength Ratio
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andre GF Oliveira, PhD principal investigator
Federal University of Juiz de Fora
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing sessions with virtual reality in people with Balance and Elderly, run by Federal University of Juiz de Fora at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
anamnesis questionnaire for physical health condition (time frame: one day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02436837, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2015.