Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 3NCT02437162
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNFα Naive Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 57 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), who are naive to anti-TNF alpha agents, as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 347 participants
- Where
- 57 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2015to 6 Sep 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as defined by the modified 1984 New York criteria. The radiographic criterion must be confirmed by a central xray reader and at least 1 clinical criterion must be met
- Participants must have symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline, as evidenced by both a BASDAI score of greater than or equal to (>=4) and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for total back pain of >=4, each on a scale of 0 to 10
- Participants with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of >=0.300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at Screening
- If using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics for AS, must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. If currently not using NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS, must not have received NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of the study agent
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [beta-hCG]) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 before randomization
Who cannot join
- Participants who have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the ustekinumab therapy, including but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 5 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
- Participants who have received any prior biologic therapy, including but not limited to anti-TNF alpha agents, tocilizumab, alefacept, efalizumab, natalizumab, abatacept, anakinra, ustekinumab, tidrakizumab or other anti-interleukin (IL) 23 biologics, brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and B-cell depleting therapies
- Participants who have received any systemic immunosuppressives or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within 4 weeks prior to first administration of study agent. Medications in these categories include, but are not limited to chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, gold, and penicillamine
- Participant who have received leflunomide within 3 months prior to the first administration of study agent (irrespective of undergoing a drug elimination procedure), or have received leflunomide within 12 months prior to the first administration of study agent and have not undergone a drug elimination procedure
Trial locations and contacts
57 sites in 7 countries.
57 sites in 7 countries
Russia16 sites
Study site
Chelyabinsk
Study site
Chita
Study site
Ivanovo
Study site
Kemerovo
Study site
Kirov
Study site
Kursk
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Novosibirsk
Study site
Orenburg
Study site
Petrozavodsk
Study site
Pyatigorsk
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Saratov
Study site
Stavropol
Study site
Ufa
Study site
Ulyanovsk
United States11 sites
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Eagan, Minnesota
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee
Study site
Mesquite, Texas
Study site
Peoria, Arizona
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania
Czechia8 sites
Study site
Brno
Study site
Bruntál
Study site
Kladno
Study site
Ostrava
Study site
Pardubice
Study site
Prague
Study site
Uherské Hradiště
Study site
Zlín
Ukraine7 sites
Study site
Ivano-Frankivsk
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Lviv
Study site
Odesa
Study site
Ternopil
Study site
Vinnytsia
Study site
Zaporizhzhya
Poland5 sites
Study site
Bydgoszcz
Study site
Szczecin
Study site
Torun
Study site
Warsaw
Study site
Wroclaw
South Korea5 sites
Study site
Daegu
Study site
Daejeon
Study site
Gwangju
Study site
Seoul
Study site
Suwon
Taiwan5 sites
Study site
Kaohsiung City
Study site
Taichung
Study site
Tainan
Study site
Taipei
Study site
Taoyuan
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF Alpha Naive Subjects With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), who are naive to anti-TNF alpha agents, as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study. The study consists of 3 phases; Screening (up to 8 weeks), Treatment phase: placebo-controlled (Week 0 to 24) and active treatment (Week 24 to Week 100), and Safety Follow-up (12 weeks after last dose). Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, ustekinumab 45 mg and ustekinumab 90 mg. The total duration of study will be up to 112 weeks. Participants will be primarily assessed for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the trial.
- Conditions
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- Being tested
- Placebo, Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg, Golimumab 50 mg
- Keywords
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Ustekinumab, Golimumab, Stelara
- Medical subject headings
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1 and at Week 24 in Group 2 and Group 3.
Ustekinumab 45 mgDrug
Participants will receive Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 2.
Ustekinumab 90 mgDrug
Participants will receive Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 3.
Golimumab 50 mgDrug
Participants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Groups 1, 2 and 3.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. At Week 24 all participants (with the exception of participants who qualified for early escape [EE]) will be re-randomized to receive either ustekinumab 45 or 90 milligram (mg) SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. Participants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg; Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg |
| Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg) | Experimental | Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by every 12 week dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg |
| Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg) | Experimental | Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24
ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 40 percent (%) and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation(0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (35)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response at Week 24
ASAS 20 defined as improvement from baseline of >= 20% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of 1 on a 0 to 10cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains:Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain(0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain),Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) (self-assessment represented as mean(0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions,8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life, Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe);absence of deterioration from baseline(>= 20% and worsening of at least 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale) in the potential remaining domain. ASAS 20 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24
BASDAI used to measure ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease severity. Consists of 6 questions: fatigue,spinal pain,arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons, ligaments),morning stiffness(MS) (2 questions:duration, severity). Each question is easy to answer 10cm VAS, 0(none),10(very severe) and for the last question related to morning stiffness duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). In order to give each 5 symptoms equal weight, mean of 2 questions about MS added to total of remaining 4 scores,final BASDAI score(ranging 0-10) is average of overall total score. Higher BASDAI indicates more severe AS symptom. 50% improvement from baseline based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rule(consider non-responder at W20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Total Score at Week 24
The BASFI is composed with 10 questions (each question is answered with a visual analogue scale 0-10 cm) to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Each question is a 10cm VAS with a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible). The final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 scores. The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10. Higher BASFI score indicates more severe functional limitations of the participant due to AS. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 24
ASDAS includes CRP milligram per liter(mg/L); four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment(PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*TBP) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058* DMS) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 [normal] to 10 [very severe]) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Inactive disease is defined as an ASDAS score <1.3. ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels Through Week 24
Change from baseline in hsCRP levels were reported. hsCRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. Early escape rule was applied(measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) Total Score at Week 16 and 24
Assessment of enthesitis was performed in the following 7 domains: 1) 1st costochondral joint left and right, 2) 7th costochondral joint left and right, 3) posterior superior iliac spine left and right, 4) anterior superior iliac spine left and right, 5) iliac crest left and right, 6) 5th lumbar spinous process and 7) proximal insertion of Achilles tendon left and right. Entheses were scored as either 0 (nontender) or 1 (tender) yielding total MASES ranging from 0 (no tenderness) to 13 (worst possible score; severe tenderness). Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16 and 24
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index linear function is a combined index of 5 clinical measurements (performed by the Joint Assessor) which reflect axial mobility in the AS patient. The measurements to assess mobility are: 1)Tragus-to-wall; 2)Modified Schober (lumbar flexion); 3)Cervical rotation angle; 4)Lateral spinal flexion; 5)Intermalleolar distance. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL) Score at Week 16 and 24
The ASQoL is a self-administered health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument. It consists of 18 items requesting a Yes or No response to questions related to the impact of the disease/condition (including pain) on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. A score of 1 is given to a response of "yes" on each item and all item scores are summed to a total score with a range of 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 16 and 24
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-(SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at Week 16 and 24
The Medical Outcome Study health measure SF-36 questionnaire is a well-validated and widely used quality-of-life instrument. It is a self-administered survey that consists of 8 multi-item scales: The 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the PCS score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and the 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the MCS score(vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). PCS and MCS are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health (worst value is 0 and best value is 100), which are scored using a norm-based system where linear transformations are performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Inflammation Score Through Week 24
The BASDAI is used to measure the ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease severity. It consists of 6 questions: fatigue, spinal pain, arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons and ligaments), and morning stiffness (2 questions: duration, severity). Each question is an easy to answer 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 being none, and 10 being very severe and for the last question relating to morning stiffness duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). Change from baseline in inflammation was assessed by calculating the average of the Last 2 Questions of the BASDAI Concerning Morning Stiffness. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Composite and Domain Scores of Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 16 and 24
Sleep problems were assessed using the 12-item MOS-SS, a generic instrument designed to assess six dimensions of sleep: Sleep disturbance, Somnolence, Sleep adequacy, Snoring, Awaken short of breath or headache, and Quantity of sleep(QS)/optimal sleep(OS) during the past 4 weeks. The six dimensions were also used to generate the composite Sleep Problems Index (SPI). An increase in score from baseline represents improvement. Sleep disturbance, snoring, somnolence, awaken short of breath, sleep problems index have score ranges from 0(no sleep problems) to 100 (greater sleep problems), negative change indicates improvement. Sleep adequacy scored 0 (least sleep adequacy) to 100 (better sleep adequacy), positive change indicates improvement. Quantity of sleep is scored 0 (less quantity of sleep) to 24 (greater quantity of sleep), positive change indicates improvement. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week (W) 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Composite and Domain Scores of Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)-Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep at Week 16 and 24
Sleep problems were assessed using the 12-item MOS-SS, a generic instrument designed to assess six dimensions of sleep: Sleep disturbance, Somnolence, Sleep adequacy, Snoring, Awaken short of breath or headache, QS/OS during past W4. 6 dimensions used to generate composite SPI. Increase in score from baseline represents improvement. Sleep adequacy scored 0 (least sleep adequacy[SA]) to 100 (better SA), positive change indicates improvement. QS is scored 0 (less QS) to 24 (greater QS), positive change indicates improvement. Single-item QS asks participants to estimate average number of hours they slept each night during past 4W (0-24 hours) and transformed into dichotomous OS Score, reported 7 (or 8) hours of sleep considered Optimal. OS is scored Yes if average hours of sleep is in range of 7-8 hours. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week (W) 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 40% Improvement From Baseline in ASAS 40 Components at Week 24
ASAS 40 components included Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe). Percentage of Participants With at least a 40% improvement from baseline in each of the ASAS components was calculated.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 20%, 50%, 70% and 90% Improvement From Baseline in BASDAI Through Week 24
BASDAI used to measure the AS disease severity. It consists of 6 questions: fatigue, spinal pain, arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons and ligaments), and morning stiffness (2 questions: duration and severity). Each question is an easy to answer cm VAS with 0 being none, and 10 being very severe and for the last question relating to morning stiffness duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). In order to give each of the 5 symptoms equal weight, mean of 2 questions about morning stiffness will be added to total of remaining 4 scores, final BASDAI score (ranging 0-10) is average of overall total score. Higher BASDAI score indicates more severe AS symptom. 20 %,50%, 70%,90% improvement from baseline in BASDAI based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responders).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Total Score Through Week 24
The BASDAI is used to measure the ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease severity. It consists of 6 questions: fatigue, spinal pain, arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons and ligaments), and morning stiffness (2 questions: duration and severity). Each question is an easy to answer 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 being none, and 10 being very severe and for the last question relating to morning stiffness duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). In order to give each of the 5 symptoms equal weight, the mean of the 2 questions about morning stiffness will be added to the total of the remaining 4 scores, and the final BASDAI score (ranging 0-10) is the average of the overall total score. Higher BASDAI score indicates more severe AS symptom. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 40 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 40% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to10cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 20 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
ASAS 20 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 20% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); absence of deterioration (>= 20% and worsening of at least 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale) from baseline in the potential remaining domain. ASAS20 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission Through Week 24
Low level of disease activity was measured by criteria for ASAS partial remission, defined as a value below 2 on a scale of 0 to 10 cm in each of the 4 ASAS domains: patient's global assessment of disease activity, total back pain, function (BASFI), inflammation. ASAS partial remission response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 5/6 Response at Week 16 and 24
ASAS 5/6 is defined as a >=20% improvement in any 5 of the 6 domains of pain (VAS 0 to 10), patient global (VAS 0 to 10), function (BASFI score), morning stiffness (from BASDAI), hsCRP, and spine mobility (lumbar side flexion). ASAS 5/6 response is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
Measured: Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ASDAS (CRP) Total Score Through Week 24
ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; 4 additional self-reported items (rated 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*TBP)+(0.110*PGA) + (0.073*peripheral pain(PP)/swelling)+(0.058* duration of morning stiffness)+(0.579*Ln(CRP+1)). The disease activity, TBP, and PP/swelling on a NRS(0[normal]-10[very severe]and DMS on NRS(0 to 10, 0 being none and 10 representing a duration=>2 hours). The scores were categorized as: inactive disease (< 1.3), moderate (1.3 - < 2.1), high (2.1 - 3.5) and very high disease activity (> 3.5). The calculated score can be from 0 to no defined upper limit. A negative number indicates a reduction in the score which indicates decrease in disease activity. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12 ,16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*total back pain) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058* duration of morning stiffness) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1)). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Inactive disease is defined as an ASDAS score <1.3. ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non- responders).
Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS (CRP) Major Improvement (Decrease >=2.0) Through Week 24
ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*TBP) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058* DMS) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1)). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Major improvement in ASDAS is defined as a decrease from baseline >=2.0. ASDAS (CRP) major improvement (decrease >=2.0) is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non- responders).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASDAS (CRP) Clinically Important Improvement (Decrease >=1.1) Through Week 24
ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 NRS) included are TBP, duration of DMS, peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*TBP) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058*DMS) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1)). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Clinically important improvement in ASDAS is defined as a decrease from baseline >=1.1. ASDAS (CRP) clinical important improvement (decrease >=1.1) is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non- responders).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASFI at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
The BASFI is composed with 10 questions (each question is answered with a visual analogue scale 0-10 cm) to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Each question is a 10cm VAS with a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible). The final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 scores. The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10. Higher BASFI score indicates more severe functional limitations of the participant due to AS. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Week 16 and 24
Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. It is measured at the level of the fourth intercostal space in males, and just below the breasts in females. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain (TBP) and Night Back Pain (NBP) Through Week 24
The total back pain and nighttime back pain was measured on a VAS (0 to 10 cm; 0 = no pain, 10 = most severe pain). Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity Through Week 24
Participants assessed their disease activity using a 10 cm visual analog scale, with responses ranging from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor). Early escape rule was applied (The measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16 and 24
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a brief, generic health-related quality of life assessment (HRQOL) that can also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assesses HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). Lower scores indicate worsening. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Index Score at Week 16 and 24
The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing death. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Berlin Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Spine Score at Week 24
The study used MRI with fat-saturating techniques such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) to look for the presence of bone marrow edema. The Berlin modification of Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score for activity (ASspiMRI-a) scoring technique assesses inflammation in each of the 23 disc vertebral units (DVU), capturing edema and erosion. Scores for each DVU range from 0-3 (0=normal; 1=minor bone marrow edema [less than or equal to 25% of DVU; 3=severe bone marrow edema (more that 50% of DVU)]. The composite score ranges from 0 to 69, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Due to AS (Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Specific Health Problem [WPAI-SHP]) Through Week 24
The WPAI-SHP is a 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem (here "AS") affected work attendance, work productivity and productivity in non-work regular activities. Patients are asked to consider the past 7 days prior to each questionnaire day. The questionnaire asks: current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work for any reason other than AS, hours missed from work due to AS, degree to which AS affected work productivity, and degree to a which AS affected non-work regular activities. Four component scores were then calculated: percent work time missed due to AS; percent impairment while working due to AS, percent overall work impairment due to AS, and percent non-work activity impairment due to AS. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. change from baseline in percent work time missed due to AS for each study arm are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
WPAI-SHP is 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem ("AS") affected work attendance, work productivity and productivity in non-work regular activities. Patients are asked to consider the past 7 days prior to each questionnaire day. The questionnaire asks: current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work for any reason other than AS, hours missed from work due to AS, degree to which AS affected work productivity, and degree to a which AS affected non-work regular activities. Four component scores were then calculated: percent work time missed due to AS; percent impairment while working due to AS, percent overall work impairment due to AS, and percent non-work activity impairment due to AS. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. change from baseline in percent impairment while working due to AS for each study arm are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
WPAI-SHP is 6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem (AS) affected work attendance, work productivity and productivity in non-work regular activities. Patients are asked to consider the past 7 days prior to each questionnaire day. Questionnaire asks: current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work for any reason other than AS, hours missed from work due to AS, degree to which AS affected work productivity, and degree to a which AS affected non-work regular activities. Four component scores were then calculated: percent work time missed due to AS; percent impairment while working due to AS, percent overall work impairment due to AS, percent non-work activity impairment due to AS. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. change from baseline in percent overall work impairment due to AS for each study arm are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Non-work Activity Impairment Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
WPAI-SHP is6-item questionnaire used to assess the degree to which a specified health problem (AS) affected work attendance, work productivity and productivity in non-work regular activities. Patients are asked to consider the past 7 days prior to each questionnaire day. The questionnaire asks: current employment status, hours worked, hours missed from work for any reason other than AS, hours missed from work due to AS, degree to which AS affected work productivity, and degree to a which AS affected non-work regular activities. Four component scores were then calculated: percent work time missed due to AS; percent impairment while working due to AS, percent overall work impairment due to AS, and percent non-work activity impairment due to AS. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. change from baseline in percent non-work activity impairment due to AS for each study arm are reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start3 Sep 2015
- Primary completion22 Mar 2017
- Study completion6 Sep 2017
Why it stopped: Neither dose achieved the study's primary or major secondary endpoints. The safety profile was consistent with previous ustekinumab studies.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Axial SpondyloarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 347 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437162
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR107098
- Other IDs
- CNTO1275AKS3001, 2014-003679-48, 2014
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 5 May 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kavanaugh A, Baraliakos X, Gao S, Chen W, Sweet K, Chakravarty SD, Song Q, Shawi M, Rahman P. Genetic and Molecular Distinctions Between Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Post Hoc Analyses from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2439-2456. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02475-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
PubMed 36995469Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, Clark M, Calderon C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Leu JH, Campbell K, Sweet K, Harrison DD, Hsia EC, van der Heijde D. Three Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):258-270. doi: 10.1002/art.40728. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
PubMed 30225992
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF Alpha Naive Subjects With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437162
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR107098
- Conditions
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- Keywords
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Ustekinumab, Golimumab, Stelara
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Neither dose achieved the study's primary or major secondary endpoints. The safety profile was consistent with previous ustekinumab studies.
- Enrolment
- 347 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), who are naive to anti-TNF alpha agents, as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study. The study consists of 3 phases; Screening (up to 8 weeks), Treatment phase: placebo-controlled (Week 0 to 24) and active treatment (Week 24 to Week 100), and Safety Follow-up (12 weeks after last dose). Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, ustekinumab 45 mg and ustekinumab 90 mg. The total duration of study will be up to 112 weeks. Participants will be primarily assessed for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg, Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg, Drug: Golimumab 50 mgPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. At Week 24 all participants (with the exception of participants who qualified for early escape [EE]) will be re-randomized to receive either ustekinumab 45 or 90 milligram (mg) SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. Participants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52. |
| Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg) | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg, Drug: Golimumab 50 mgUstekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by every 12 week dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52. |
| Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg) | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg, Drug: Golimumab 50 mgUstekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants must have a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as defined by the modified 1984 New York criteria. The radiographic criterion must be confirmed by a central xray reader and at least 1 clinical criterion must be met
- Participants must have symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline, as evidenced by both a BASDAI score of greater than or equal to (>=4) and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for total back pain of >=4, each on a scale of 0 to 10
- Participants with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of >=0.300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at Screening
- If using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics for AS, must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. If currently not using NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS, must not have received NSAIDs or other analgesics for AS for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of the study agent
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [beta-hCG]) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 before randomization
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants who have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the ustekinumab therapy, including but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 5 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
- Participants who have received any prior biologic therapy, including but not limited to anti-TNF alpha agents, tocilizumab, alefacept, efalizumab, natalizumab, abatacept, anakinra, ustekinumab, tidrakizumab or other anti-interleukin (IL) 23 biologics, brodalumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and B-cell depleting therapies
- Participants who have received any systemic immunosuppressives or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within 4 weeks prior to first administration of study agent. Medications in these categories include, but are not limited to chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, gold, and penicillamine
- Participant who have received leflunomide within 3 months prior to the first administration of study agent (irrespective of undergoing a drug elimination procedure), or have received leflunomide within 12 months prior to the first administration of study agent and have not undergone a drug elimination procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboParticipants will receive Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1 and at Week 24 in Group 2 and Group 3. | Drug | Group 1 (Placebo), Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg), Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg) |
| Ustekinumab 45 mgParticipants will receive Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 2. | Drug | Group 1 (Placebo), Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg) |
| Ustekinumab 90 mgParticipants will receive Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 100 in Group 3. | Drug | Group 1 (Placebo), Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg) |
| Golimumab 50 mgParticipants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Groups 1, 2 and 3. | Drug | Group 1 (Placebo), Group 2 (Ustekinumab 45 mg), Group 3 (Ustekinumab 90 mg) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 40 percent (%) and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation(0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).
35 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Total Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) Total Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL) Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-(SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Inflammation Score Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Composite and Domain Scores of Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week (W) 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Composite and Domain Scores of Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)-Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week (W) 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 40% Improvement From Baseline in ASAS 40 Components at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 20%, 50%, 70% and 90% Improvement From Baseline in BASDAI Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASDAI Total Score Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 40 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 20 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 5/6 Response at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ASDAS (CRP) Total Score Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12 ,16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS (CRP) Major Improvement (Decrease >=2.0) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASDAS (CRP) Clinically Important Improvement (Decrease >=1.1) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in BASFI at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain (TBP) and Night Back Pain (NBP) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Index Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Berlin Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Spine Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Due to AS (Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - Specific Health Problem [WPAI-SHP]) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Change From Baseline in Percent Non-work Activity Impairment Due to AS (Assessed by WPAI-SHP) Through Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36995469Kavanaugh A, Baraliakos X, Gao S, Chen W, Sweet K, Chakravarty SD, Song Q, Shawi M, Rahman P. Genetic and Molecular Distinctions Between Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Post Hoc Analyses from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2439-2456. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02475-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30225992Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, Clark M, Calderon C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Leu JH, Campbell K, Sweet K, Harrison DD, Hsia EC, van der Heijde D. Three Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):258-270. doi: 10.1002/art.40728. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
Related trials for Axial Spondyloarthritis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Resistance Exercise on Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis
Spondyloarthritis (SpA), Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
57 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 57 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 57 sites in Russia, United States, Czechia, Ukraine, Poland and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02437162, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.