AzTrials
AzTrials

AspirationNCT02437513

NewBreez for Airway Protection in Head and Neck Cancer Patients With Chronic Aspiration

An observational study of Aspiration and Laryngeal Cancer, run by ProTiP Medical.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Laryngeal dysfunction is a problem that affects many patients after laryngeal cancer therapy (surgery or radio/chemotherapy). Laryngeal dysfunction is associated with higher incidences of aspiration and respiratory tract complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aspiration, Laryngeal Cancer
What is being tested?
NewBreez
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
2 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2016to Nov 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Recruitment of patients will primarily be from the department of Ear, Nose and Throat at the hospitals participating in the study. Secondary recruitment could also include associated clinics that treat patients with laryngeal dysfunction and aspiration, such as swallowing therapy clinics, speech language therapy clinics, and linguistics clinics.

Who may be able to join

  • History of head and neck cancer
  • Chronic aspiration
  • Currently has a tracheostomy
  • Patient is able to independently maintain their tracheostomy and cannula apparatus
  • Patient meets the CE Mark indications and are not contraindicated for a NewBreez procedure.
  • Anatomically compatible with the available sizes of NewBreez®
Show all 9Show fewer
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Sufficient cognitive function to comply with the study and follow-up requirements
  • Patient gives voluntary signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Recurrent or present cancer in the previous 12 months
  • Absent cough reflex
  • Severely disrupted swallowing function e.g. severe neurological deficit, absent swallowing reflex, severe fixation of the larynx due to scarring with absent elevation of the larynx
  • Upper esophageal sphincter not functional e.g. remains closed
  • Cor Pulmonale / Pulmonary Heart Disease, or current lung infection
  • Mouth opening less than 3.5cm
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Neck extension severely restricted hindering implantation of the device
  • Contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Severe hyperostosis (spondylophytes) of the cervical vertebrae causing dysphagia
  • Severe (radiogenic) edema or damage of the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract

About this study

Laryngeal dysfunction is a problem that affects many patients after laryngeal cancer therapy (surgery or radio/chemotherapy). Laryngeal dysfunction is associated with higher incidences of aspiration and respiratory tract complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Current standard of care treatment to reduce the consequences of aspiration is often a tracheostomy which has its own risks and complications. The proposed study aims to describe the performance of a new CE marked medical implant, the NewBreez, in protecting the patient's airways from aspiration.

Read the detailed description

Aspiration is associated with respiratory tract infections, reduced quality of life and increased mortality in patients. For chronic or unresolved aspiration, patients are often given a tracheostomy for safer breathing and greater protection of the airways from aspirated material. However tracheostomies are associated with risks and complications and do not give a 100% guarantee of aspiration protection to the patient. They also impact the quality of life in a negative way for many patients. The current study will evaluate the performance of a new intralaryngeal device for airway protection in a small group of patients who have chronic aspiration. The study will look at the overall performance of this device in preventing aspiration in this specific group of patients as well as determine any unforeseen risks of using this device in the identified group of patients. The outcomes will form the basis of future studies with larger groups of patients.

Being tested
NewBreez
Keywords
Dysphagia, Aspiration, Laryngeal cancer
Medical subject headings
Laryngeal Neoplasms, Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NewBreezDevice

    Also called Intralaryngeal Prosthesis

    Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways

Study groups in NCT02437513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NewBreezThe study group is composed only of patients who have already opted to receive the NewBreez device as part of their routine care from their physician. Patients who have the device implanted, and consent to be part of the 12 week observational study, will be enrolled and have standard clinical parameters measured over the 12 week period as well as complete quality of life assessments in the form of patient questionnaires.
Receives: Device: NewBreez

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline Per Patient of Number and Severity of Aspiration Events

    In patient change from baseline measurement of aspiration severity and frequency of events at weeks 1,4,8,and 12

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Reported Adverse Events

    Analysis of the reported system or procedure related adverse events using standard AE reporting form

    Measured: at device implantation

  2. Number of Reported Adverse Events

    Analysis of the the rate and severity of reported system or procedure related adverse events as a measure of safety of the device in this patient population over a 12 week period

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. Number of Participants With an Increase of Greater Than 1 on the Heyse-Moore Score

    In patient change from baseline score of dyspnea using Heyse-Moore (Dyspnea)score:

    0 = None

    1. = Mild, some difficulty
    2. = Moderate Difficulty but can continue
    3. = Severe difficulty, cannot continue

    Measured: 1 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Why it stopped: Recruitment rates too low to continue with the study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02437513
Sponsor's protocol ID
NB for HNC
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
23 Apr 2015
Last updated
24 Aug 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aspiration and Laryngeal Cancer, run by ProTiP Medical.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline Per Patient of Number and Severity of Aspiration Events (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in