AzTrials
AzTrials

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 2NCT02437890

A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0061 in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 118 sites in 17 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What is being tested?
ALX-0061
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
312 participants
Where
118 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
Jul 2015to Jan 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Man or woman ≥ 18 years and < 65 years of age
  • Have a diagnosis of SLE for at least 6 months prior to screening and fulfill the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria
  • Have moderate to severe active SLE
  • Have seropositive disease at screening
  • Subject must be at least on one or more of the treatments for SLE as listed in the protocol
  • Others as defined in the protocol

Who cannot join

  • Have an A score on the revised BILAG-2004 other than in the mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal system at screening and at baseline for the organ systems that can be clinically assessed
  • Have a systemic inflammatory disease other than SLE
  • Clinically significant infection treated or needing treatment
  • Any active or recurrent viral infection that based on the Investigator´s clinical assessment makes the subject unsuitable for the study
  • Have received prior therapy blocking the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway
  • Others as defined in the protocol

Trial locations and contacts

118 sites in 17 countries.

118 sites in 17 countries

United States28 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Artesia, California, 90701

  • Investigator Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Investigator Site

    Austin, Texas, 78745

  • Investigator Site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Investigator Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Investigator Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Investigator Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Investigator Site

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Investigator Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Investigator Site

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Investigator Site

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Investigator Site

    La Jolla, California, 92093

  • Investigator Site

    La Palma, California, 90623

  • Investigator Site

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • Investigator Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Investigator Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Investigator Site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Investigator Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Investigator Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Investigator Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Investigator Site

    Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781

  • Investigator Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Investigator Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617

  • Investigator Site

    Smithtown, New York, 11787

  • Investigator Site

    Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281

  • Investigator Site

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Investigator Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • Investigator Site

    Upland, California, 91786

Other trials in United States

Ukraine11 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Ivano-Frankivsk

  • Investigator Site

    Kharkiv

  • Investigator Site

    Kryvyi Rih

  • Investigator Site 1

    Kyiv

  • Investigator Site 2

    Kyiv

  • Investigator Site 3

    Kyiv

  • Investigator Site

    Lviv

  • Investigator Site 1

    Poltava

  • Investigator Site 2

    Poltava

  • Investigator Site 1

    Vinnytsia

  • Investigator Site 2

    Vinnytsia

Other trials in Ukraine

Russia9 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Kazan'

  • Investigator Site

    Kemerovo

  • Investigator Site

    Orenburg

  • Investigator Site

    Ryazan

  • Investigator Site 1

    Saint Petersburg

  • Investigator Site 2

    Saint Petersburg

  • Investigator Site

    Smolensk

  • Investigator Site

    Vladimir

  • Investigator Site

    Voronezh

Other trials in Russia

Spain8 sites
  • Investigator Site

    A Coruña

  • Investigator Site 1

    Barcelona

  • Investigator Site 2

    Barcelona

  • Investigator Site 3

    Barcelona

  • Investigator Site

    Bilbao

  • Investigator Site 1

    Madrid

  • Investigator Site 2

    Madrid

  • Investigator Site

    Sant Joan Despí

Other trials in Spain

Mexico7 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Guadalajara

  • Investigator Site 2

    Guadalajara

  • Investigator Site 3

    Guadalajara

  • Investigator Site

    Mérida

  • Investigator Site

    Mexicali

  • Investigator Site

    Mexico City

  • Investigator Site

    San Luis Potosí City

Other trials in Mexico

Poland7 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Bydgoszcz

  • Investigator Site

    Katowice

  • Investigator Site 1

    Lodz

  • Investigator Site 2

    Lodz

  • Investigator Site 1

    Poznan

  • Investigator Site 2

    Poznan

  • Investigator Site

    Szczecin

Other trials in Poland

Argentina6 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Caba, Buenos Aires, 1431

  • Investigator Site

    Caba

  • Investigator Site

    Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aire

  • Investigator Site

    Córdoba

  • Investigator Site

    San Juan, 5400

  • Investigator Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán

Other trials in Argentina

Philippines6 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Cebu City

  • Investigator Site 2

    Cebu City

  • Investigator Site

    Lipa City

  • Investigator Site

    Makati City

  • Investigator Site

    Manila

  • Investigator Site

    Quezon City

Other trials in Philippines

Serbia6 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Belgrade

  • Investigator Site 2

    Belgrade

  • Investigator Site 3

    Belgrade

  • Investigator Site 4

    Belgrade

  • Investigator Site 5

    Belgrade

  • Investigator Site

    Niška Banja

Other trials in Serbia

Hungary5 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Budapest

  • Investigator Site 2

    Budapest

  • Investigator Site

    Debrecen

  • Investigator Site

    Gyula

  • Investigator Site

    Zalaegerszeg

Other trials in Hungary

Portugal5 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Almada

  • Investigator Site

    Amadora

  • Investigator Site

    Lisbon

  • Investigator Site

    Ponte de Lima

  • Investigator Site

    Porto

Other trials in Portugal

Taiwan5 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Investigator Site 1

    Taichung

  • Investigator Site 2

    Taichung

  • Investigator Site

    Taipei

  • Investigator Site

    Taoyuan

Other trials in Taiwan

Germany4 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Berlin

  • Investigator Site

    Dresden

  • Investigator Site

    Mainz

  • Investigator Site

    Mannheim

Other trials in Germany

Peru4 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Lima

  • Investigator Site 2

    Lima

  • Investigator Site 3

    Lima

  • Investigator Site 4

    Lima

Other trials in Peru

South Korea4 sites
  • Investigator Site

    Daegu

  • Investigator Site

    Gwangju

  • Investigator Site 1

    Seoul

  • Investigator Site 2

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Chile2 sites
  • Investigator Site 1

    Santiago

  • Investigator Site 2

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Czechia1 site
  • Investigator Site

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-range Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Primary objective:

To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo.

Secondary objectives:

To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, flare rate, steroid reduction and health-related quality of life, with different dose regimens of ALX-0061.

Being tested
ALX-0061, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ALX-0061Biological

  • PlaceboBiological

Study groups in NCT02437890
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorTwo s.c. injections with placebo every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Placebo was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to the placebo group received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Receives: Biological: Placebo
ALX-0061 75 mg q4wExperimentalALX-0061 75 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 75 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46.
Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo
ALX-0061 150 mg q4wExperimentalALX-0061 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo
ALX-0061 150 mg q2wExperimentalALX-0061 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo
ALX-0061 225 mg q2wExperimentalALX-0061 225 mg every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 225 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Receives: Biological: ALX-0061

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score

    The primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses.

    mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria:

    1. BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D.
    2. No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B.
    3. No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline.
    4. No significant deterioration (< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA.
    5. No treatment failure (including the premature

    Measured: At Week 24 visit

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Number and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    Number and percentage of mBICLA responders at Week 24 and Week 48

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  2. Number and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    The composite index mSRI-4 enables quantification of decrease and increase in disease activity in a broad spectrum of manifestations thereby offering a comprehensive assessment of SLE disease status. mSRI combines advantages from 3 validated measurement tools. The mSRI-4 criteria for response are:

    1. modified SLE disease activity index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K): ≥ 4 point reduction (covers global disease improvement),
    2. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004): no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B (covers organ-specific disease improvement),
    3. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (is used as validity and safety net for items that were not addressed by the other two indices): < 10% increase from Baseline (no worsening) When all 3 criteria are met, the subject is a mSRI-4 responder at that time point.

    Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  3. Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    The mSRI-5 criteria for response are:

    1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 5 point reduction
    2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
    3. PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 5 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.

    Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  4. Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    The mSRI-6 criteria for response are:

    1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 6 point reduction
    2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
    3. PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.

    Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  5. Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    The mSRI-7 criteria for response are:

    1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 7 point reduction
    2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
    3. PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 7 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.

    Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  6. Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.

    The mSRI-8 criteria for response are:

    1. mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 8 point reduction
    2. BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
    3. PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 8 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.

    Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

    The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 is a 1-page weighted score for 24 items (seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, visual disturbance, cranial nerve disorder, lupus headache, cerebrovascular accident, vasculitis, arthritis, myositis, urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers, pleurisy, pericarditis, low complement, etc). The manifestations felt to be most commonly contributing to disease activity are included and scored based on the presence (= 1 multiplied by weight) or absence (= 0) within 30 days prior to the evaluation. The total score ranges from 0-105 (= sum of individual scores), with 105 being higher disease activity. mSLEDAI-2K derives from the standard index by omitting low complement. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline mSLEDAI-2K Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  8. Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48

    Normal Improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D.

    Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  9. Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48

    Enhanced improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D and no worsening between consecutive visits from baseline up to the considered visit Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  10. BILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48

    The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been developed based on the principle of a physician's intention to treat using a nominal consensus approach. In the index, the nine systems (not organs) considered are: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, ophthalmic and hematological. Disease activity in each of the nine systems is categorized into five levels: grades A (= severe disease activity requiring systemic high dose oral corticosteroids, i.v. pulse corticosteroids, etc.) to E (= system never involved).

    BILAG total score is derived by assigning the following value to each grade and summing the sores over all organ systems:

    A = 12, B = 8, C = 1, D/E = 0. The total score ranges from 0-108, with 108 representing high disease activity in all 9 systems requiring high doses of corticosteroids, starting/increasing immunosuppressive drugs, etc.

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48

  11. Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48

    An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.

    Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  12. Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48

    An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.

    Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  13. Number and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  14. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48

    The physician makes a mark between 0 ("no disease") and 100 mm ("severe disease") on the visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate disease activity (independent of the subject's self-assessment).

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline PGA score and geographic region as covariates.

    A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  15. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48

    The subject makes a mark between 0 ("very good") and 100 mm ("very bad") on the VAS to indicate how the subject is doing, while considering all the ways SLE affects him/her.

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline Patient's Global Assessment and geographic region as covariates.

    A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  16. Change From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline proteinuria and geographic region as covariates

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  17. Number of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48

    Efficacy Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis) - Active Urine Sediment Number of subjects who were urine sediment negative at Baseline, but positive at Week 24 and Week 48, respectively.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  18. Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline serum creatinine and geographic region as covariates

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  19. Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline eGFR and geographic region as covariates

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  20. Number of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

    Defined as non-protocol allowed increase in steroid dose, start i.v. or i.m. steroids, or start or increase of immunosuppressant

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

  21. Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

  22. Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48

  23. Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline prednisone equivalent total daily dose and geographic region as covariates

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  24. Number and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48

    Number and percentage of subjects whose prednisone equivalent dose was >7.5 mg/day at baseline and reduced to ≤7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40-48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare after the first prednisone equivalent dose decrease.

    Measured: Between Week 40 and Week 48

  25. Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe Flare

    Number and percentage of subjects who discontinued Prednisone (or equivalent) by Week 48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare

    Measured: Up to and including Week 48

  26. Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  27. Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  28. Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

    Twenty-eight joints are assessed for swollenness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of swollenness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are swollen). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes an improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  29. Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48

    Twenty-eight joints are assessed for tenderness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of tenderness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are tender). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline TJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes and improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  30. Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    CLASI Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and nonscarring alopecia. Evaluation of erythema and scale/hyperkeratosis is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (erythema: 0=absent, 1=pink, 2=red, 3=dark red; scale: 0=absent, 1=scale, 2=verrucous/hypertrophic). Mucous membrane involvement and acute hair loss are scored based on the presence (=1) or absence (=0).

    Nonscarring alopecia is scored as 0=absent, 1=diffuse/non-inflammatory, 2=focal or patchy in 1 quadrant, 3=focal or patchy in >1 quadrant. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Activity Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement

    Measured: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  31. Change From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    CLASI Damage is scored based on dyspigmentation and scarring. Evaluation of dyspigmentation and scarring is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (dyspigmentation: 0=absent, 1=present; scarring: 0=absent, 1=scarring, 2=severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis). Subjects are also asked whether dyspigmentation due to SLE lesions usually remains visible for >12 months, which is considered permanent and results in doubling of the dyspigmentation score. Scarring alopecia is scored as follows: 0=absent, 3=1 quadrant, 4=2 quadrants, 5=3 quadrants, 6=affects the whole skull. Total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more damaged skin.

    Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Damage Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement.

    Measured: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

  32. ALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48

    Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48

  33. Actual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  34. Actual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  35. Actual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  36. Actual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  37. Actual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  38. Actual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  39. Actual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

    Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48

  40. Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive

    Measured: From first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionJan 2018
  4. Study completionJan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
312 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02437890
Sponsor's protocol ID
ALX0061-C204
Other IDs
2015-000372-95, 2015
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
29 Apr 2015
Last updated
26 Feb 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0061 in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 118 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 118 sites in United States, Ukraine, Russia, Spain, Mexico and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score (time frame: At Week 24 visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02437890, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in