Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 2NCT02437890
A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0061 in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 118 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
Primary objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- What is being tested?
- ALX-0061
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 312 participants
- Where
- 118 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Man or woman ≥ 18 years and < 65 years of age
- Have a diagnosis of SLE for at least 6 months prior to screening and fulfill the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria
- Have moderate to severe active SLE
- Have seropositive disease at screening
- Subject must be at least on one or more of the treatments for SLE as listed in the protocol
- Others as defined in the protocol
Who cannot join
- Have an A score on the revised BILAG-2004 other than in the mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal system at screening and at baseline for the organ systems that can be clinically assessed
- Have a systemic inflammatory disease other than SLE
- Clinically significant infection treated or needing treatment
- Any active or recurrent viral infection that based on the Investigator´s clinical assessment makes the subject unsuitable for the study
- Have received prior therapy blocking the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway
- Others as defined in the protocol
Trial locations and contacts
118 sites in 17 countries.
118 sites in 17 countries
United States28 sites
Investigator Site
Artesia, California, 90701
Investigator Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Investigator Site
Austin, Texas, 78745
Investigator Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Investigator Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Investigator Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Investigator Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Investigator Site
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Investigator Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Investigator Site
Houston, Texas, 77034
Investigator Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Investigator Site
La Jolla, California, 92093
Investigator Site
La Palma, California, 90623
Investigator Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Investigator Site
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Investigator Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Investigator Site
New York, New York, 10016
Investigator Site
New York, New York, 10032
Investigator Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Investigator Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Investigator Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781
Investigator Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Investigator Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617
Investigator Site
Smithtown, New York, 11787
Investigator Site
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Investigator Site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Investigator Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Investigator Site
Upland, California, 91786
Ukraine11 sites
Investigator Site
Ivano-Frankivsk
Investigator Site
Kharkiv
Investigator Site
Kryvyi Rih
Investigator Site 1
Kyiv
Investigator Site 2
Kyiv
Investigator Site 3
Kyiv
Investigator Site
Lviv
Investigator Site 1
Poltava
Investigator Site 2
Poltava
Investigator Site 1
Vinnytsia
Investigator Site 2
Vinnytsia
Russia9 sites
Investigator Site
Kazan'
Investigator Site
Kemerovo
Investigator Site
Orenburg
Investigator Site
Ryazan
Investigator Site 1
Saint Petersburg
Investigator Site 2
Saint Petersburg
Investigator Site
Smolensk
Investigator Site
Vladimir
Investigator Site
Voronezh
Spain8 sites
Investigator Site
A Coruña
Investigator Site 1
Barcelona
Investigator Site 2
Barcelona
Investigator Site 3
Barcelona
Investigator Site
Bilbao
Investigator Site 1
Madrid
Investigator Site 2
Madrid
Investigator Site
Sant Joan Despí
Mexico7 sites
Investigator Site 1
Guadalajara
Investigator Site 2
Guadalajara
Investigator Site 3
Guadalajara
Investigator Site
Mérida
Investigator Site
Mexicali
Investigator Site
Mexico City
Investigator Site
San Luis Potosí City
Poland7 sites
Investigator Site
Bydgoszcz
Investigator Site
Katowice
Investigator Site 1
Lodz
Investigator Site 2
Lodz
Investigator Site 1
Poznan
Investigator Site 2
Poznan
Investigator Site
Szczecin
Argentina6 sites
Investigator Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, 1431
Investigator Site
Caba
Investigator Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aire
Investigator Site
Córdoba
Investigator Site
San Juan, 5400
Investigator Site
San Miguel de Tucumán
Philippines6 sites
Investigator Site 1
Cebu City
Investigator Site 2
Cebu City
Investigator Site
Lipa City
Investigator Site
Makati City
Investigator Site
Manila
Investigator Site
Quezon City
Serbia6 sites
Investigator Site 1
Belgrade
Investigator Site 2
Belgrade
Investigator Site 3
Belgrade
Investigator Site 4
Belgrade
Investigator Site 5
Belgrade
Investigator Site
Niška Banja
Hungary5 sites
Investigator Site 1
Budapest
Investigator Site 2
Budapest
Investigator Site
Debrecen
Investigator Site
Gyula
Investigator Site
Zalaegerszeg
Portugal5 sites
Investigator Site
Almada
Investigator Site
Amadora
Investigator Site
Lisbon
Investigator Site
Ponte de Lima
Investigator Site
Porto
Taiwan5 sites
Investigator Site
Kaohsiung City
Investigator Site 1
Taichung
Investigator Site 2
Taichung
Investigator Site
Taipei
Investigator Site
Taoyuan
Germany4 sites
Investigator Site
Berlin
Investigator Site
Dresden
Investigator Site
Mainz
Investigator Site
Mannheim
Peru4 sites
Investigator Site 1
Lima
Investigator Site 2
Lima
Investigator Site 3
Lima
Investigator Site 4
Lima
South Korea4 sites
Investigator Site
Daegu
Investigator Site
Gwangju
Investigator Site 1
Seoul
Investigator Site 2
Seoul
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-range Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Primary objective:
To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo.
Secondary objectives:
To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, flare rate, steroid reduction and health-related quality of life, with different dose regimens of ALX-0061.
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Being tested
- ALX-0061, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ALX-0061Biological
PlaceboBiological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Two s.c. injections with placebo every 2 weeks (q2w).
***
Placebo was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to the placebo group received 2 s.c. injections q2w:
Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Receives: Biological: Placebo |
| ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | Experimental | ALX-0061 75 mg every 4 weeks (q4w).
***
Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 75 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w:
Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46. Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo |
| ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | Experimental | ALX-0061 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4w).
***
Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w:
Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46.
Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo |
| ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | Experimental | ALX-0061 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w).
***
Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w:
Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Receives: Biological: ALX-0061; Biological: Placebo |
| ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | Experimental | ALX-0061 225 mg every 2 weeks (q2w).
***
Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 225 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w:
Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46.
Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Receives: Biological: ALX-0061 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score
The primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses.
mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria:
- BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D.
- No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B.
- No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline.
- No significant deterioration (< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA.
- No treatment failure (including the premature
Measured: At Week 24 visit
Secondary outcomes (40)
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Number and percentage of mBICLA responders at Week 24 and Week 48
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48
The composite index mSRI-4 enables quantification of decrease and increase in disease activity in a broad spectrum of manifestations thereby offering a comprehensive assessment of SLE disease status. mSRI combines advantages from 3 validated measurement tools. The mSRI-4 criteria for response are:
- modified SLE disease activity index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K): ≥ 4 point reduction (covers global disease improvement),
- British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004): no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B (covers organ-specific disease improvement),
- Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (is used as validity and safety net for items that were not addressed by the other two indices): < 10% increase from Baseline (no worsening) When all 3 criteria are met, the subject is a mSRI-4 responder at that time point.
Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
The mSRI-5 criteria for response are:
- mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 5 point reduction
- BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
- PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 5 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.
Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
The mSRI-6 criteria for response are:
- mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 6 point reduction
- BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
- PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.
Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
The mSRI-7 criteria for response are:
- mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 7 point reduction
- BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
- PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 7 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.
Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.
The mSRI-8 criteria for response are:
- mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 8 point reduction
- BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score
- PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 8 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.
Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 is a 1-page weighted score for 24 items (seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, visual disturbance, cranial nerve disorder, lupus headache, cerebrovascular accident, vasculitis, arthritis, myositis, urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers, pleurisy, pericarditis, low complement, etc). The manifestations felt to be most commonly contributing to disease activity are included and scored based on the presence (= 1 multiplied by weight) or absence (= 0) within 30 days prior to the evaluation. The total score ranges from 0-105 (= sum of individual scores), with 105 being higher disease activity. mSLEDAI-2K derives from the standard index by omitting low complement. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline mSLEDAI-2K Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48
Normal Improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D.
Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48
Enhanced improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D and no worsening between consecutive visits from baseline up to the considered visit Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
BILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been developed based on the principle of a physician's intention to treat using a nominal consensus approach. In the index, the nine systems (not organs) considered are: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, ophthalmic and hematological. Disease activity in each of the nine systems is categorized into five levels: grades A (= severe disease activity requiring systemic high dose oral corticosteroids, i.v. pulse corticosteroids, etc.) to E (= system never involved).
BILAG total score is derived by assigning the following value to each grade and summing the sores over all organ systems:
A = 12, B = 8, C = 1, D/E = 0. The total score ranges from 0-108, with 108 representing high disease activity in all 9 systems requiring high doses of corticosteroids, starting/increasing immunosuppressive drugs, etc.
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48
An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.
Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48
An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.
Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48
The physician makes a mark between 0 ("no disease") and 100 mm ("severe disease") on the visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate disease activity (independent of the subject's self-assessment).
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline PGA score and geographic region as covariates.
A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
The subject makes a mark between 0 ("very good") and 100 mm ("very bad") on the VAS to indicate how the subject is doing, while considering all the ways SLE affects him/her.
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline Patient's Global Assessment and geographic region as covariates.
A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline proteinuria and geographic region as covariates
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48
Efficacy Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis) - Active Urine Sediment Number of subjects who were urine sediment negative at Baseline, but positive at Week 24 and Week 48, respectively.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline serum creatinine and geographic region as covariates
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline eGFR and geographic region as covariates
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Defined as non-protocol allowed increase in steroid dose, start i.v. or i.m. steroids, or start or increase of immunosuppressant
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline prednisone equivalent total daily dose and geographic region as covariates
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48
Number and percentage of subjects whose prednisone equivalent dose was >7.5 mg/day at baseline and reduced to ≤7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40-48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare after the first prednisone equivalent dose decrease.
Measured: Between Week 40 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe Flare
Number and percentage of subjects who discontinued Prednisone (or equivalent) by Week 48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare
Measured: Up to and including Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Twenty-eight joints are assessed for swollenness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of swollenness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are swollen). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes an improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Twenty-eight joints are assessed for tenderness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of tenderness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are tender). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline TJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes and improvement.
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
CLASI Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and nonscarring alopecia. Evaluation of erythema and scale/hyperkeratosis is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (erythema: 0=absent, 1=pink, 2=red, 3=dark red; scale: 0=absent, 1=scale, 2=verrucous/hypertrophic). Mucous membrane involvement and acute hair loss are scored based on the presence (=1) or absence (=0).
Nonscarring alopecia is scored as 0=absent, 1=diffuse/non-inflammatory, 2=focal or patchy in 1 quadrant, 3=focal or patchy in >1 quadrant. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Activity Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement
Measured: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
CLASI Damage is scored based on dyspigmentation and scarring. Evaluation of dyspigmentation and scarring is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (dyspigmentation: 0=absent, 1=present; scarring: 0=absent, 1=scarring, 2=severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis). Subjects are also asked whether dyspigmentation due to SLE lesions usually remains visible for >12 months, which is considered permanent and results in doubling of the dyspigmentation score. Scarring alopecia is scored as follows: 0=absent, 3=1 quadrant, 4=2 quadrants, 5=3 quadrants, 6=affects the whole skull. Total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more damaged skin.
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Damage Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement.
Measured: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
ALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48
Measured: At Week 24 and Week 48
Actual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Measured: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive
Measured: From first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionJan 2018
- Study completionJan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 312 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ablynx, a Sanofi company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Lead, Study director, Ablynx NV
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437890
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALX0061-C204
- Other IDs
- 2015-000372-95, 2015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
PubMed 33687069
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-range Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437890
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALX0061-C204
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 312 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ablynx, a Sanofi companyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary objective:
To assess the efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of ALX-0061 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to subjects with moderate to severe active, seropositive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to placebo.
Secondary objectives:
To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, flare rate, steroid reduction and health-related quality of life, with different dose regimens of ALX-0061.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: PlaceboTwo s.c. injections with placebo every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Placebo was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to the placebo group received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. |
| ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | Experimental | Biological: ALX-0061, Biological: PlaceboALX-0061 75 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 75 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46. |
| ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | Experimental | Biological: ALX-0061, Biological: PlaceboALX-0061 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q4w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q4w at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, and 44, and syringe A with placebo (1 mL) q4w at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. |
| ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | Experimental | Biological: ALX-0061, Biological: PlaceboALX-0061 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) and placebo were supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 150 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with placebo (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. |
| ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | Experimental | Biological: ALX-0061ALX-0061 225 mg every 2 weeks (q2w). *** Vobarilizumab (ALX-0061) was supplied as a sterile liquid for s.c. injection at a volume of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL in pre-filled single-use syringes. To maintain the blind, subjects randomly assigned to ALX-0061 225 mg q2w received 2 s.c. injections q2w: Syringe A with ALX-0061 (1 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. Syringe B with ALX-0061 (0.5 mL) q2w starting at Day 1, up to and including Week 46. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Man or woman ≥ 18 years and < 65 years of age
- Have a diagnosis of SLE for at least 6 months prior to screening and fulfill the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria
- Have moderate to severe active SLE
- Have seropositive disease at screening
- Subject must be at least on one or more of the treatments for SLE as listed in the protocol
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Have an A score on the revised BILAG-2004 other than in the mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal system at screening and at baseline for the organ systems that can be clinically assessed
- Have a systemic inflammatory disease other than SLE
- Clinically significant infection treated or needing treatment
- Any active or recurrent viral infection that based on the Investigator´s clinical assessment makes the subject unsuitable for the study
- Have received prior therapy blocking the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ALX-0061 | Biological | ALX-0061 150 mg q2w, ALX-0061 150 mg q4w, ALX-0061 225 mg q2w, ALX-0061 75 mg q4w |
| Placebo | Biological | ALX-0061 150 mg q2w, ALX-0061 150 mg q4w, ALX-0061 75 mg q4w, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score
Time frame: At Week 24 visit
The primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses. mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria: 1. BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D. 2. No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B. 3. No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline. 4. No significant deterioration (< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA. 5. No treatment failure (including the premature
40 secondary outcomes
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mBICLA Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (mSRI-4) Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-5 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-6 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-7 Response at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With mSRI-8 Response at Week 24 and Week 48.
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Enhanced Improvement at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
BILAG-2004 Total Score at Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Mucocutaneous System at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With BILAG-2004 Normal Improvement in Musculoskeletal System at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Persistent Minimal or no Activity in 9 Organ Systems According to BILAG-2004 Systems Tally at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent Urine Sediment Positive at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Creatinine Clearance Estimation (eGFR) at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number of and Percentage Treatment Failures From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to BILAG-2004 Flare Index From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Severe Flares According to mSLEDAI-2K Flare Index (mSFI) From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Daily Dose of Steroids at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Whose Daily Dose of Steroids Was Reduced Without Severe Flares During Weeks 40-48
Time frame: Between Week 40 and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Discontinued Prednisone (or Equivalent) by Week 48 Without Experiencing a Severe Flare
Time frame: Up to and including Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores of Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Scores of SF-36 at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Swollenness (SJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Count Tenderness (TJC28) Score at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CLASI Damage Score at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
ALX-0061 Serum Concentrations at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48
Actual Values of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Fibrinogen Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C3 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values of Complement C4 Concentrations at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Actual Values for Hemolytic Complement Component 50 (CH50) at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Time frame: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Were Treatment-emergent (TE) Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive
Time frame: From first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687069Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
Related trials for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Study of Afimetoran in Adults With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE), Systematic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pakistan Arthritis and Connective Tissue Disease Network - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLE - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
CD19-Directed CAR-T Cell Therapy in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Lead study director
Ablynx NV
118 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ALX-0061 in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Ablynx, a Sanofi company at 118 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 118 sites in United States, Ukraine, Russia, Spain, Mexico and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number and Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Response at Week 24 According to the Modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (mBICLA) Score (time frame: At Week 24 visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02437890, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2019.