AzTrials
AzTrials

Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 3NCT02438787

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF(Alpha) Refractory Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 148 sites in 19 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult anti-TNF(alpha) refractory participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Axial Spondyloarthritis
What is being tested?
Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
315 participants
Where
148 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
31 Jul 2015to 31 Aug 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must have a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS), as defined by the modified 1984 New York criteria. The radiographic criterion must be confirmed by a central xray reader and at least 1 clinical criterion must be met
  • Participants must have symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline, as evidenced by both a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of greater than or equal to (>=4) and a visual analog scale (VAS) score for total back pain of >=4, each on a scale of 0 to 10
  • Participants with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of >=0.300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening
  • Refractory by either lack of benefit or documented intolerance to 1 and no more than 1 anti-TNF(alpha) agent
  • Inadequate response to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over a 4-week period in total with maximal doses of NSAID(s), or is unable to receive a full 4 weeks of maximal NSAID therapy because of intolerance, toxicity, or contraindications to NSAIDs.
  • Participants with complete ankylosis of the spine are permitted to be included in the study, but will be limited to approximately 10 percent (%) of the study population

Who cannot join

  • Participants who have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the ustekinumab therapy, including but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
  • Participants who have received infliximab or infliximab biosimilar, within 12 weeks of the first study agent administration; have received adalimumab, adalimumab biosimilar, or certolizumab pegol within 6 weeks of the first study agent administration; have received etanercept or etanercept biosimilar within 6 weeks of the first study agent administration
  • Participants who have ever received golimumab
  • Participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child while enrolled in the study or within 5 months after receiving the last administration of study agent
  • Participants who have received any systemic immunosuppressives or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) within 4 weeks prior to first administration of study agent. Medications in these categories include, but are not limited to leflunomide, chloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, gold, and penicillamine

Trial locations and contacts

148 sites in 19 countries.

148 sites in 19 countries

United States19 sites
  • Study site

    Arlington, Virginia

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Boise, Idaho

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Eagan, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Fremont, California

  • Study site

    Glendale, Arizona

  • Study site

    Jackson, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Mesquite, Texas

  • Study site

    Monroe, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Orchard Park, New York

  • Study site

    Peoria, Arizona

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    St. Petersburg, Florida

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania

Other trials in United States

Russia17 sites
  • Study site

    Belgorod

  • Study site

    Chelyabinsk

  • Study site

    Chita

  • Study site

    Kazan'

  • Study site

    Kemerovo

  • Study site

    Khanty-Mansiysk

  • Study site

    Kursk

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Nizhny Novgorod

  • Study site

    Omsk

  • Study site

    Orenburg

  • Study site

    Petrozavodsk

  • Study site

    Pyatigorsk

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Study site

    Saratov

  • Study site

    Ufa

  • Study site

    Zelenograd

Other trials in Russia

Spain11 sites
  • Study site

    A Coruña

  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Bilbao

  • Study site

    Córdoba

  • Study site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Málaga

  • Study site

    Sabadell

  • Study site

    Santiago de Compostela

  • Study site

    Seville

  • Study site

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

Ukraine11 sites
  • Study site

    Cherkasy

  • Study site

    Ivano-Frankivsk

  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Kyiv

  • Study site

    Lviv

  • Study site

    Odesa

  • Study site

    Poltava

  • Study site

    Ternopil

  • Study site

    Uzhhorod

  • Study site

    Vinnytsia

  • Study site

    Zaporizhzhya

Other trials in Ukraine

Brazil8 sites
  • Study site

    Campinas

  • Study site

    Curitiba

  • Study site

    Goiânia

  • Study site

    Juiz de Fora

  • Study site

    Porto Alegre

  • Study site

    Rio de Janeiro

  • Study site

    Santo André

  • Study site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

France8 sites
  • Study site

    Boulogne-Billancourt

  • Study site

    Chambray-lès-Tours

  • Study site

    Échirolles

  • Study site

    Montpellier

  • Study site

    Orléans

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Rouen

  • Study site

    Toulouse

Other trials in France

Germany8 sites
  • Study site

    Bad Neuheim

  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Cologne

  • Study site

    Gommern

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Herne

  • Study site

    Olsberg

  • Study site

    Ratingen

Other trials in Germany

Hungary8 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest

  • Study site

    Debrecen

  • Study site

    Eger

  • Study site

    Kistarcsa

  • Study site

    Nyíregyháza

  • Study site

    Székesfehérvár

  • Study site

    Szolnok

  • Study site

    Veszprém

Other trials in Hungary

Poland7 sites
  • Study site

    Bialystok

  • Study site

    Bydgoszcz

  • Study site

    Elblag

  • Study site

    Nadarzyn

  • Study site

    Szczecin

  • Study site

    Torun

  • Study site

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Taiwan7 sites
  • Study site

    Changhua

  • Study site

    Hualien City

  • Study site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Study site

    Taichung

  • Study site

    Tainan

  • Study site

    Taipei

  • Study site

    Taoyuan

Other trials in Taiwan

Belgium6 sites
  • Study site

    Brussels

  • Study site

    Genk

  • Study site

    Ghent

  • Study site

    Leuven

  • Study site

    Liège

  • Study site

    Merksem (Antwerp)

Other trials in Belgium

South Korea6 sites
  • Study site

    Daegu

  • Study site

    Daejeon

  • Study site

    Gwangju

  • Study site

    Jeonju

  • Study site

    Seoul

  • Study site

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Study site

    Bath

  • Study site

    Leytonstone

  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    Peterborough

  • Study site

    Stoke-on-Trent

  • Study site

    Upton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Argentina5 sites
  • Study site

    Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Ciudad de Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Ciudad de La Plata

  • Study site

    Ciudad de San Miguel de Tucuman

  • Study site

    Córdoba

Other trials in Argentina

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Study site

    Burgas

  • Study site

    Pleven

  • Study site

    Plovdiv

  • Study site

    Rousse

  • Study site

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada5 sites
  • Study site

    Québec, Quebec

  • Study site

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Windsor, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

Czechia5 sites
  • Study site

    Bruntál

  • Study site

    Pardubice

  • Study site

    Prague

  • Study site

    Uherské Hradiště

  • Study site

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Mexico3 sites
  • Study site

    Culiacán

  • Study site

    Guadalajara

  • Study site

    Mexico City

Other trials in Mexico

Portugal3 sites
  • Study site

    Almada

  • Study site

    Lisbon

  • Study site

    Porto

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNF(Alpha) Refractory Subjects With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab, in adult anti-TNF(alpha) refractory participants with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), as measured by the reduction in signs and symptoms of radiographic AxSpA.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study. The study consists of 3 phases; Screening (up to 8 weeks), Treatment phase: placebo-controlled (Week 0 to 24) and active treatment (Week 24 to Week 52), and Safety Follow-up (up to 12 weeks). Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: placebo, ustekinumab 45 mg and ustekinumab 90 mg. The total duration of study will be up to 64 weeks. Participants will be primarily assessed for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the trial.

Being tested
Placebo, Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg, Golimumab 50 mg
Keywords
Ankylosing Spondylitis, Ustekinumab, Golimumab, STELARA
Medical subject headings
Axial Spondyloarthritis, Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16 in Group 1.

  • Ustekinumab 45 mgDrug

    Ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 2.

  • Ustekinumab 90 mgDrug

    Ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 1. Participants will start with ustekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52 in Group 3.

  • Golimumab 50 mgDrug

    Participants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52 in Group 1, 2 and 3.

Study groups in NCT02438787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 (placebo)Placebo comparatorPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. At Week 24 all participants (with the exception of participants who qualified for early escape [EE]) will be re-randomized to receive either ustekinumab 45 or 90 milligram (mg) SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28 followed by every 12 weeks (q12w) dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. Participants who meet EE criteria (less than [<] 10 percent [%] improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg; Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg
Group 2 (ustekinumab 45 mg)ExperimentalUstekinumab 45 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab 45 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg
Group 3 (ustekinumab 90 mg)ExperimentalUstekinumab 90 mg SC injection at Weeks 0 and 4, followed by q12w dosing, with the last administration of study agent at Week 52. At Week 24, participants will receive placebo SC injection to maintain the blind. Participants who meet EE criteria (<10% improvement from baseline in both total back pain and morning stiffness measures at both Week 12 and Week 16) will be administered open-label golimumab 50 mg SC administrations at Week 16 and q4w thereafter through Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg; Drug: Golimumab 50 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24

    ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 40% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to10cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI(self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI(non responder imputation)] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week(W) 24

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ASAS 20 Response at Week 24

    ASAS 20 defined as improvement from baseline of >= 20% from baseline and with an absolute improvement from baseline of 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); absence of deterioration (>= 20% and worsening of at least 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale) from baseline in the potential remaining domain. ASAS20 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24

    BASDAI is used to measure the ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease severity. It consists of 6 questions: fatigue, spinal pain, arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons and ligaments), morning stiffness(MS) (2 questions: duration and severity). Each question is an easy to answer 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 being none, and 10 being very severe and for the last question related to MS duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). In order to give each of 5 symptoms equal weight, mean of 2 questions about MS will be added to total of remaining 4 scores, final BASDAI score (ranging 0-10) is average of overall total score. Higher BASDAI score indicates more severe AS symptom. 50% improvement in response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Total Score at Week 24

    The BASFI is composed with 10 questions (each question is answered with a visual analogue scale 0-10 cm) to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Each question is a 10cm VAS with a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible). The final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 scores. The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10. Higher BASFI score indicates more severe functional limitations of the participant due to AS. Missing data were imputed using early escape rule (consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 24

    ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*total back pain) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058* duration of morning stiffness) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Inactive disease is defined as an ASDAS score <1.3. ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels Through Week 24

    Change from baseline in hsCRP was reported. hsCRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. Early escape rule was applied (measurement value at Week 20 and Week 24 was set as missing).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease (<1.3) at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    ASDAS includes CRP mg/L; four additional self-reported items (rated on 0-10cm VAS or 0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]) included are total back pain (TBP), duration of morning stiffness (DMS), peripheral pain/swelling and patient global assessment (PGA). ASDAS scores calculated as: ASDAS(CRP) = (0.121*total back pain) + (0.110*participant global) + (0.073*peripheral pain/swelling) + (0.058* duration of morning stiffness) + (0.579*Ln(CRP+1)). The disease activity, TBP, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe) and DMS on a numeric rating scale (0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of =>2 hours). Inactive disease is defined as an ASDAS score <1.3. ASDAS (CRP) Inactive Disease is based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24), NRI(missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non- responders).

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 40 Responses at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    ASAS 40 defined as improvement from baseline >= 40% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of at least 2 on 0 to10cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); no worsening at all from baseline in remaining domain. ASAS40 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ASAS 20 Responses at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    ASAS 20 defined as improvement from baseline of >= 20% and with an absolute improvement from baseline of 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale in at least 3 of following 4 domains: Patient's global assessment (0 to 10cm; 0=very well,10=very poor),total back pain (0 to 10cm; 0=no pain,10=most severe pain), BASFI (self-assessment represented as mean (0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible) of 10 questions, 8 of which relate to participant's functional anatomy and 2 relate to participant's ability to cope with everyday life), Inflammation (0 to 10cm;0=none,10=very severe); absence of deterioration (>= 20% and worsening of at least 1 on a 0 to 10 cm scale) from baseline in the potential remaining domain. ASAS20 response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Improvement From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    BASDAI is used to measure the ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease severity. It consists of 6 questions: fatigue, spinal pain, arthralgia (joint pain) or swelling, enthesitis (inflammation of tendons and ligaments), morning stiffness(MS) (2 questions: duration and severity). Each question is an easy to answer 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 being none, and 10 being very severe and for the last question related to MS duration: 0(0 hours), 10(2 or more hours). In order to give each of 5 symptoms equal weight, mean of 2 questions about MS will be added to total of remaining 4 scores, final BASDAI score (ranging 0-10) is average of overall total score. Higher BASDAI score indicates more severe AS symptom. 50% improvement in response based on imputed data using treatment failure(consider non-responders at and after treatment failure),early escape rules(consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24),non-responder[NRI] (missing responses at post baseline visit imputed as non-responder).

    Measured: Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

  10. Change From Baseline in BASFI Total Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

    The BASFI is composed with 10 questions (each question is answered with a visual analogue scale 0-10 cm) to assess the disease severity, including the first 8 questions regarding to functional anatomy related activities and the remaining 2 questions related to daily activities of AS participants. Each question is a 10cm VAS with a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible). The final BASFI score is the mean of the 10 scores. The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 10. Higher BASFI score indicates more severe functional limitations of the participant due to AS. Missing data were imputed using early escape rule (consider non-responder at Week 20 and 24).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2017

Why it stopped: This study was stopped because ustekinumab did not achieve key endpoints in a related study. The safety profile was consistent with past ustekinumab studies.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
315 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02438787
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR107099
Other IDs
CNTO1275AKS3002, 2015-000288-16, 2015
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
6 May 2015
Last updated
29 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kavanaugh A, Baraliakos X, Gao S, Chen W, Sweet K, Chakravarty SD, Song Q, Shawi M, Rahman P. Genetic and Molecular Distinctions Between Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Post Hoc Analyses from Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2439-2456. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02475-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

    PubMed 36995469
  • Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Sieper J, Clark M, Calderon C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Leu JH, Campbell K, Sweet K, Harrison DD, Hsia EC, van der Heijde D. Three Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;71(2):258-270. doi: 10.1002/art.40728. Epub 2018 Dec 29.

    PubMed 30225992

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab 45 mg, Ustekinumab 90 mg and Golimumab 50 mg in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 148 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 148 sites in United States, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, Brazil and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week(W) 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02438787, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in