Neoplasm, UreterPhase 2NCT02438865
Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial Between Single Postoperative Dose Versus Maintenance Therapy.
A Phase 2 study testing Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- in people with Neoplasm, Ureter and Neoplasm, Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasm, Ureter, Neoplasm, Bladder
- What is being tested?
- Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2015to 30 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with UTUC without history of bladder tumor
- Patients with UTUC without synchronous bladder tumor
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of bladder tumor
- Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
- Patients with advanced stage (T4)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION Upper tact urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) arises from the urothelial lining of the urinary tract from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifice. It comprises 10 % of all renal tumors and 5% of all urothelial malignancies (Jemal et al., 2007). A common feature of UTUC is multiple anatomic locations in the urinary tract either synchronous or metachronous. While synchronous bladder tumor can be identified at time of evaluation of UTUC, recurrent bladder tumor remains a major concern.
Incidence of bladder recurrence after management of UTUC varies considerably from 20% - 50% (Kirkali and Tuzel., 2003; Hall et al., 1998). Although the risk factors for development of bladder tumor post surgical management of UTUC were previously studied, considerable variations were observed in the literature. In a recent meta-analysis, Seisen et al., in 2014 have identified male gender, previous bladder cancer, and preoperative chronic kidney disease as patient-specific predictors. While tumor-specific predictors were as follows: positive preoperative urinary cytology, ureteral location, multifocality, invasive stage, and necrosis. Lastly, treatment-specific predictors were a laparoscopic approach, extravesical bladder cuff removal, and positive surgical margins.
To date, two theories have been proposed for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy including intraluminal seeding of a single transformed cell (Habuchi et al., 1993) and pan-urothelial field defect e.g. carcinogenic exposure of the entire urothelial tract can lead to independent multifocal development (Takahashi et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2005). Therefore, it has been suggested that administration of a single dose of intravesical chemotherapy in the early postoperative period might prevent seeding of transitional cancer cells and therefore might help reduce the incidence of urothelial tumor recurrence in the first year post surgery (O'Brien et al., 2011). To the best of our knowledge, only two randomized controlled trials have investigated this hypothesis (O'Brien et al., 2011; Ito et al., 2013 ). O' Brien et al., 2011, have reported 16% of patients in the mitomycin C arm and 27% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first year postoperative. Ito et al., 2013, reported 16.9% of patients in the pirarubicin arm and 31.8% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first postoperative year. Based on these findings, it has been recommended in the last European association of urology guidelines that postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to avoid bladder cancer recurrence "grade B recommendation" (Roupret et al., 2013).
In 2001 Sakamoto et al., examined the significance of intravesical instillation of Mitomycin C and cytosine arabinoside over 2 years period. They showed that instillation would reduce the recurrence rate in the bladder after surgery for upper urinary tract tumors. However, this study was underpowered to detect the desired difference. The investigators hypothesized that the 16% incidence of bladder tumor recurrence after single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy after surgery for UTUC might be attributed to the influence of pan-urothelial field defect theory. Therefore, the investigators assume that maintenance intravesical chemotherapy would significantly reduce this percentage of tumor recurrence.
AIM OF THE WORK This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients:
Type of the study A randomized controlled trial (RCT), phase II.
Study locality Urology Nephrology Center (UNC)
Study design
Patients with UTUC will be prospectively randomized into two groups using excel software by random table function:
- Group 1: will receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision.
- Group 2: will receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with history of bladder tumor
- Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
- Patients with advanced stage (T4)
Power calculation and Statistical analysis All statistical analysis will be performed using IBM v. 20 statistical software and the statistical tests will be used appropriately whenever indicated. The calculation of sample size is conducted using G*power statistical software (Faul F et al., 2007). The recurrence rate in the control arm of the study was reported to be 16% after single intravesical dose of chemotherapy. If the expected treatment effect of maintenance chemotherapy was similar to that observed in bladder tumor, there would be a reduction in recurrence rate by 38% )Huncharek M et al., 2001). Therefore, to detect this level of difference at a power of 80% and 5% level of significance, 35 patients will be required to detect the difference between groups (1) and (2) and accounting for 15% losses in each arm, 40 patients will be randomized in each arm.
Methods:
Intervention Patients will be randomly allocated into one of the two groups using excel software by random table function at the day of surgery. Radical nephroureterectomy will be done through the open or laparoscopic approach while bladder cuff excision will be performed through the open approach. All data will be prospectively maintained and include patients' demographics, preoperative laboratory parameters, operative details and postoperative complications
Follow up The scheduled follow up will be according to the EUA guidelines (Roupret M et al., 2013) by scheduling a urine cytology and cystoscopy at 3 months then at one year while CT urography at one year for non-invasive tumors and at 6 months and one year for invasive tumors. All chemotherapy-related complications will be reported.
Outcome and end-point The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery. The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with UTUC.
- Conditions
- Neoplasm, Ureter, Neoplasm, Bladder
- Being tested
- Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-, Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-
- Keywords
- Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Intravesical Chemotherapy, Epirubicin, Urothelial Carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Ureteral Neoplasms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-Drug
Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single instillation group | Active comparator | will receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision. Receives: Drug: Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- |
| Maintainance therapy group | Active comparator | will receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year. Receives: Drug: Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
bladder recurrence
The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery.
Measured: 1 year after surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
adverse events
The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with UTUC.
Measured: 1 year after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2015
- Primary completion1 May 2018
- Study completion30 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neoplasm, UreterStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Magdy Elshabrawy, Mansoura University
- Investigators
- Yasser M. Osman, MD, Study director, Urology And Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02438865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MElsh112015
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 6 May 2015
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial Between Single Postoperative Dose Versus Maintenance Therapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02438865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MElsh112015
- Conditions
- Neoplasm, Ureter, Neoplasm, Bladder
- Keywords
- Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Intravesical Chemotherapy, Epirubicin, Urothelial Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION Upper tact urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) arises from the urothelial lining of the urinary tract from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifice. It comprises 10 % of all renal tumors and 5% of all urothelial malignancies (Jemal et al., 2007). A common feature of UTUC is multiple anatomic locations in the urinary tract either synchronous or metachronous. While synchronous bladder tumor can be identified at time of evaluation of UTUC, recurrent bladder tumor remains a major concern.
Incidence of bladder recurrence after management of UTUC varies considerably from 20% - 50% (Kirkali and Tuzel., 2003; Hall et al., 1998). Although the risk factors for development of bladder tumor post surgical management of UTUC were previously studied, considerable variations were observed in the literature. In a recent meta-analysis, Seisen et al., in 2014 have identified male gender, previous bladder cancer, and preoperative chronic kidney disease as patient-specific predictors. While tumor-specific predictors were as follows: positive preoperative urinary cytology, ureteral location, multifocality, invasive stage, and necrosis. Lastly, treatment-specific predictors were a laparoscopic approach, extravesical bladder cuff removal, and positive surgical margins.
To date, two theories have been proposed for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy including intraluminal seeding of a single transformed cell (Habuchi et al., 1993) and pan-urothelial field defect e.g. carcinogenic exposure of the entire urothelial tract can lead to independent multifocal development (Takahashi et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2005). Therefore, it has been suggested that administration of a single dose of intravesical chemotherapy in the early postoperative period might prevent seeding of transitional cancer cells and therefore might help reduce the incidence of urothelial tumor recurrence in the first year post surgery (O'Brien et al., 2011). To the best of our knowledge, only two randomized controlled trials have investigated this hypothesis (O'Brien et al., 2011; Ito et al., 2013 ). O' Brien et al., 2011, have reported 16% of patients in the mitomycin C arm and 27% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first year postoperative. Ito et al., 2013, reported 16.9% of patients in the pirarubicin arm and 31.8% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first postoperative year. Based on these findings, it has been recommended in the last European association of urology guidelines that postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to avoid bladder cancer recurrence "grade B recommendation" (Roupret et al., 2013).
In 2001 Sakamoto et al., examined the significance of intravesical instillation of Mitomycin C and cytosine arabinoside over 2 years period. They showed that instillation would reduce the recurrence rate in the bladder after surgery for upper urinary tract tumors. However, this study was underpowered to detect the desired difference. The investigators hypothesized that the 16% incidence of bladder tumor recurrence after single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy after surgery for UTUC might be attributed to the influence of pan-urothelial field defect theory. Therefore, the investigators assume that maintenance intravesical chemotherapy would significantly reduce this percentage of tumor recurrence.
AIM OF THE WORK This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients:
Type of the study A randomized controlled trial (RCT), phase II.
Study locality Urology Nephrology Center (UNC)
Study design
Patients with UTUC will be prospectively randomized into two groups using excel software by random table function:
- Group 1: will receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision.
- Group 2: will receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with history of bladder tumor
- Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
- Patients with advanced stage (T4)
Power calculation and Statistical analysis All statistical analysis will be performed using IBM v. 20 statistical software and the statistical tests will be used appropriately whenever indicated. The calculation of sample size is conducted using G*power statistical software (Faul F et al., 2007). The recurrence rate in the control arm of the study was reported to be 16% after single intravesical dose of chemotherapy. If the expected treatment effect of maintenance chemotherapy was similar to that observed in bladder tumor, there would be a reduction in recurrence rate by 38% )Huncharek M et al., 2001). Therefore, to detect this level of difference at a power of 80% and 5% level of significance, 35 patients will be required to detect the difference between groups (1) and (2) and accounting for 15% losses in each arm, 40 patients will be randomized in each arm.
Methods:
Intervention Patients will be randomly allocated into one of the two groups using excel software by random table function at the day of surgery. Radical nephroureterectomy will be done through the open or laparoscopic approach while bladder cuff excision will be performed through the open approach. All data will be prospectively maintained and include patients' demographics, preoperative laboratory parameters, operative details and postoperative complications
Follow up The scheduled follow up will be according to the EUA guidelines (Roupret M et al., 2013) by scheduling a urine cytology and cystoscopy at 3 months then at one year while CT urography at one year for non-invasive tumors and at 6 months and one year for invasive tumors. All chemotherapy-related complications will be reported.
Outcome and end-point The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery. The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with UTUC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single instillation group | Active comparator | Drug: Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-will receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision. |
| Maintainance therapy group | Active comparator | Drug: Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-will receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with UTUC without history of bladder tumor
- Patients with UTUC without synchronous bladder tumor
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with history of bladder tumor
- Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
- Patients with advanced stage (T4)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- | Drug | Single instillation group |
| Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- | Drug | Maintainance therapy group |
Primary outcome
bladder recurrence
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery.
1 secondary outcome
adverse events
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2018.
Related trials for Neoplasm, Ureter
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Addition of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) to Chemotherapy Before Surgery for Patients With High-Grade Upper Urinary Tract Cancer
Renal Pelvis and Ureter Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
FORAGER-1: A Study of Vepugratinib (LY3866288; LOXO-435) in Participants With Cancer With a Change in a Gene Called FGFR3
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LY4052031 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumor, Recurrent Solid Tumor
Recruiting
Feasibility of the "One-Finger Technique" for Identifying the Upper Left Ureter During Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy
Ovary Cancer, Cervical Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yasser M. Osman, MD study director
Urology And Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- in people with Neoplasm, Ureter and Neoplasm, Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
bladder recurrence (time frame: 1 year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2018.