AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT02439281

Ropivacaine With Clonidine For Pediatric Rectus Sheath Blocks- The Magic Combination

A study testing Clonidine and Ropivacaine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Mihaela Visoiu at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Millions of pediatric patients undergo laparoscopic surgeries every year and many of them suffer significant pain and anxiety. Patient's anxiety correlates with the severity of pain and effective postoperative analgesia is necessary for optimal recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
Clonidine and Ropivacaine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2015to 1 May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • age 10-17 years
  • scheduled for elective laparoscopic appendectomy
  • weight >/=34kg
  • complete postoperative questionnaires.

Who cannot join

  • patients younger than 10 years and 18 years or older
  • weight < 34 kg
  • weight >/=100 kg
  • patient and family refusal
  • non-English-speaking patients and families
  • cognitive impairment
Show all 17Show fewer
  • developmental delay
  • allergies to medications used in the study (hydromorphone, oxycodone, acetaminophen, ketorolac, ropivacaine, and clonidine)
  • need for opioids via patient controlled analgesia device
  • patients with a positive pregnancy test
  • local infection at planned injection sites
  • patients with failed rectus sheath blocks
  • patients that require opioids via patient controlled analgesia device
  • patients with laparoscopic procedure converted to open
  • patients that will not be able to place the time of return to normal sensation within 1 hour of its occurrence
  • patients with no follow up possible
  • the patients that will be discharged home before the resolution on paresthesia will be excluded from analysis of the first aim.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE FOR PEDIATRIC RECTUS SHEATH BLOCKS- THE MAGIC COMBINATION? - A Double Blinded Prospective Study

Background: Millions of pediatric patients undergo laparoscopic surgeries every year and many of them suffer significant pain and anxiety. Patient's anxiety correlates with the severity of pain and effective postoperative analgesia is necessary for optimal recovery. Single injections ultrasound guided rectus sheath blocks provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy, however they are short lived. Searching for a blocking agent that last long enough to outlast pain and has minimal side effects is a difficult task. Using a combination of drugs yielded mixed results. Few pediatric studies showed at best a weak trend in favor of clonidine prolonging analgesia after some blocks, but anxiolytic properties of clonidine were not investigated. This study will compare rectus sheath ropivacaine blocks with ropivacaine and clonidine blocks.

Methods: One hundred pediatric patients (10-17 years old) scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy will be double blinded and randomized to the two treatment groups: the Ropivacaine Group will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) injected bilaterally in the posterior rectus sheath, at the umbilicus location, and Ropivacaine Clonidine Group will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) and clonidine (2mcg/kg). Post-operative analgesia will be provided with ketorolac and acetaminophen around the clock, and morphine, or/and oxycodone as needed. The primary aim is to determine if ropivacaine combined with clonidine prolongs duration of paresthesia. The secondary aims are to determine if the use of clonidine decreases anxiety level, prolongs duration of analgesia, and decreases pain severity at umbilicus laparoscopic site, reduces the need for analgesics, improves satisfaction with pain control, and is associated with complications such as oversedation, hypotension, and bradycardia.

Conclusions: Every hour of excellent analgesia count and a prolongation of block duration by at least 50% is clinical relevant. The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine and clonidine offer improved pain management compared to ropivacaine alone.

Read the detailed description

Objective: The primary aim is to determine if ropivacaine combined with clonidine prolongs duration of paresthesia at the umbilicus. The secondary aims are to determine if the use of clonidine decreases anxiety level, prolongs duration of analgesia, decreases pain severity at the umbilicus laparoscopic site, reduces the need for pain medication, improves satisfaction with pain control, and is associated with complications such as oversedation, hypotension, and bradycardia.

Specific Aims: Aim 1 will determine if the duration of sensory block (paresthesia) after ultrasound guided single injections rectus sheath blocks performed with ropivacaine/ clonidine is longer than duration of paresthesia after rectus sheath blocks performed with ropivacaine alone. The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine and clonidine result in longer duration of sensory block (paresthesia) compared to ropivacaine alone.

Aim 2 will determine if the use of clonidine decreases postoperative anxiety scores and if postoperative pain scores correlate with anxiety scores. The investigators hypothesize that patient postoperative anxiety scores are lower in the Ropivacaine/Clonidine group and postoperative anxiety scores decrease more in Ropivacaine /Clonidine Group, than in the Ropivacaine Group. The investigators expect that preoperative and postoperative Numeric Rating Scale(NRS) scores reported by the patient will correlate moderately (0.3-0.49) to high (equal /or >0.5) with preoperative and postoperative anxiety level.

Aim 3 will determine if rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine prolongs duration of analgesia at umbilicus instrument site, decreases analgesic consumption, improves satisfaction with pain control, and has minimal complications such as oversedation, bradycardia, and hypotension. The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine would result in longer duration of analgesia compared to ropivacaine alone, lower pain scores at umbilicus, less need for pain medication consumption for pain at umbilicus and for the first 18 hours, better satisfaction with pain control from patient, parent and nurse. The investigators expect no difference in incidence of oversedation, hypotension, and bradycardia episodes.

Background: Millions of pediatric patients undergo laparoscopic surgeries every year and many of them suffer significant pain on the day of surgery and the subsequent days. Pain is a sensory and emotional experience, modified by multiple factors, including anxiety. Patient's anxiety correlates with the severity of pain. Children that are very anxious before surgery have been found to have more postoperative pain, delayed hospital discharge, higher incidence of emergence delirium, sleep disturbances, and other maladaptive behavior changes that can last up to a few weeks following surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy can cause significant pain and anxiety despite the minimally invasive approach. The investigators' recent completed prospective study showed that on the day after surgery, pain after laparoscopic appendectomy correlated very well with postoperative anxiety scores (Pearson coefficient =0.539; pending publication results from 133 subjects, 11-17 years old, that underwent laparoscopic appendectomy).

Effective postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy is necessary for optimal recovery. A multimodal approach includes regional analgesia techniques, improves analgesia, and reduces side-effects from opioids use. Unfortunately, pain associated with this procedure extends after the day of surgery. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks can be effective, but are deemed excessively invasive in the context of this minimally invasive surgery. Single injection nerve blocks are appropriate, but the duration with a long acting local anesthetic is only around 12 hours, and do not match the most painful part of postoperative period, the first 24 hours. Over the last years, the challenge of developing a blocking agent that lasts long enough to outlast pain and has minimal side effects has been addressed by combining different drugs (epinephrine, clonidine, dexamethasone, tramadol, buprenorphine, midazolam, magnesium, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine) and yielded mixed results. Among these, clonidine, an alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist has been shown to prolong the duration of analgesia when administered in epidural space in children. Clonidine has also been added to local anesthetic for peripheral nerve blocks but its perineural use is controversial and the exact mechanism is unclear. Its action is not entirely attributed to an alpha -adrenergic effect at the nerve; rather, it is possibly secondary to the blockade of the current through hyperpolarization- activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, resulting in the enhancement of activity-dependent hyperpolarization.

From the limited available data, perineurally administered clonidine appears to be safe, but the results remain controversial. Adult metaanalysis have found that clonidine from 30-300 mcg prolongs the time to the first analgesic request by only 2-2.5 hrs. Furthermore, clonidine prolonged sensory and motor blockade with all local anesthetic except mepivacaine.

The pediatric literature regarding the use of clonidine for peripheral nerve blocks lags behind adult literature and is conflicting. Few small and under-powered studies showed at best a weak trend in favor of clonidine. A retrospective review of 215 patients showed that the use of clonidine prolongs the duration of infraclavicular, lumbar plexus, femoral, fascia iliaca and sciatic nerve blocks by 20-50%. However, the prolongation is block location dependent, and increased the incidence of motor block. This effect was only seen with diluted concentrations of bupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.2%. No pediatric or adult studies were performed involving trunk blocks such as rectus sheath, transversus abdominis plane, or paravertebral nerve blocks.

Side effects reported after clonidine was administered neuraxially or perineurally are hypotension, sedation, fainting, and prolonged motor blockade. Hypotension and sedation appear to be limited up to doses of 150 mcg. However, Petroheilou et al. reported intraoperatively hemodynamic stability after administration of clonidine at 3 mcg/kg. Clonidine 1-2 mcg/kg is suggested for use with local anesthetic for single injections peripheral nerve blocks.

Clonidine can help to relieve postoperative anxiety, and subsequently improve pain control. Minimal sedation after clonidine administration can be desired for some pediatric patients. Clonidine at 2 mcg/kg prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation and can be used as premedication in children. No studies have investigated its role as an anxiolytic when added to local anesthetic for a nerve block.

The Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (CHP of UPMC) has a dedicated service to provide regional anesthesia techniques and performs peripheral nerve blocks on a regular basis. Over the last academic year, 190 patients that underwent laparoscopic appendectomy had peripheral nerve blocks (rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane) performed for pain control. Children localized the majority of their pain to the umbilicus instrument site. This pain interferes with patients' activities such as ambulation, eating, and bedside activities. The principal investigator performed a retrospective chart review to compare postoperative analgesia from rectus sheath blocks and a combination of transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks. The postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were similar. Since then, the primary investigator performs only ultrasound guided rectus sheath blocks for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy. A recent pediatric study showed that the rectus sheath blocks in combination with multimodal analgesia are effective for postoperative pain control after mentioned procedure. Unfortunately the duration of these blocks performed with maximum 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline did not outlast the most painful period. The investigators believe that rectus sheath blocks with ropivacaine 0.5% and clonidine (2 mcg/kg) will prolong the duration of blocks, can reduce postoperative pain and anxiety, facilitate discharge, and decrease unplanned hospital admission secondary to pain, and can contribute to an increased patient and family satisfaction, and decrease costs for the hospital, insurer, and the patient.

Significance: To the investigators' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate whether ropivacaine /clonidine rectus sheath blockade is a better and more complete therapeutic regimen for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. While the patients that underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy are treated as inpatient for at least one day, CHP wants to implement early discharge strategies. Unfortunately, the pain after day of surgery can be significant and some parents can be reluctant to have their children discharged. The analgesia advices can be poorly retained. The parents can feel overwhelmed about home pain management. Some parents believe that using pain medication in childhood may lead to later drug abuse. This is concerning as parents often undermedicate their child's pain, with up to 60% of parents administering less than the prescribed analgesia on the following day after surgery discharge. A child with long lasting pain control and less anxiety from ropivacaine/clonidine rectus sheath blockade will help the parent cope with the surgical event, and can facilitate early discharge.

Additionally, patient's satisfaction with pain control is becoming an increasingly important aspect of health care reimbursements reported via the Hospital Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. The ropivacaine/ clonidine rectus sheath blockade in combination with multimodal therapy can be better therapeutic regimen that standard of care, and can improve quality of care, increase satisfaction and save health care costs.

Being tested
Clonidine, Ropivacaine
Keywords
Ropivacaine, Anesthesia adjuncts, clonidine, laparoscopic appendectomy, rectus sheath block
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ClonidineDrug

    Also called kapvay, Catapres, Duraclon, Nexiclon

    Only the Ropivacaine /clonidine group will receive clonidine (2mcg/kg) injected with ropivacaine.

  • RopivacaineDrug

    Also called Naropin

    One hundred pediatric patients (10-17 years old) scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy will be randomized to the two treatment groups: the Ropivacaine Group will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) injected bilateral in Both groups will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) injected bilaterally for the rectus sheath block

Study groups in NCT02439281
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ropivacaine GroupActive comparatorRopivacaine Group will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) injected bilaterally in the posterior rectus sheath, at the umbilicus location.
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine GroupExperimentalRopivacaine/ Clonidine Group will receive ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) and clonidine (2mcg/kg) injected bilaterally in the posterior rectus sheath, at the umbilicus location.
Receives: Drug: Clonidine; Drug: Ropivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Duration of Sensory Block (Paresthesia)

    The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine and clonidine result in longer duration of sensory block (paresthesia) compared to ropivacaine alone.

    Measured: Indicated by return of normal sensation (expected average of 12 hours after block placement).

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Satisfaction With Pain Control From Patient

    The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine would result in better satisfaction with pain control.

    Measured: Prior to hospital discharge (up to 24 hours after surgery)

  2. Complications Rate

    The investigators expect no difference in incidence of complications (e.g. oversedation, hypotension, bradycardia episodes, etc.).

    Measured: until study completion

  3. Change in Anxiety Scores

    The investigators hypothesize that patient postoperative anxiety scores are lower in the Ropivacaine/Clonidine group and postoperative anxiety scores decrease more in Ropivacaine /Clonidine Group, than in Ropivacaine Group.

    Measured: 6 hours after block placement

  4. Duration of Analgesia at Umbilicus Instrument Site-How Many Minutes Passed From the Time When the Blocks Where Performed Until Patient Reported Pain at Umbilicus

    The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine would result in longer duration of analgesia and decreased pain scores compared to ropivacaine alone.

    Measured: indicated by the first request for pain medication at umbilicus site

  5. Average Pain Severity at the Umbilicus Laparoscopic Site

    Numeric Rating Pain Scores ( 0-10), will be obtained every 2 hours after PACU discharge up to 18 hours or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs first. The pain score of 0, means no pain, is a good outcome , and a pain score of 10 is excruciating pain, a very bad outcome. The average of these scores will be evaluated.The pain scores will not longer be documented after the numbness went away.

    Measured: Logistic regression of the 4 th pain score assessment

  6. Medication Consumption

    Total intravenous morphine equivalents mg/kg

    Measured: 18 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Why it stopped: The patients were discharged on the day of the surgery.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02439281
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO14100075
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
16 Apr 2015
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Groenewald CB, Rabbitts JA, Schroeder DR, Harrison TE. Prevalence of moderate-severe pain in hospitalized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Jul;22(7):661-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03807.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

    PubMed 22332912
  • Hegarty M, Calder A, Davies K, Shave M, Christiansen E, Meyer T, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Does take-home analgesia improve postoperative pain after elective day case surgery? A comparison of hospital vs parent-supplied analgesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 May;23(5):385-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12077. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

    PubMed 23167309
  • Tsao JC, Lu Q, Myers CD, Kim SC, Turk N, Zeltzer LK. Parent and child anxiety sensitivity: relationship to children's experimental pain responsivity. J Pain. 2006 May;7(5):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.12.004.

    PubMed 16632321
  • Tsao JC, Meldrum M, Kim SC, Zeltzer LK. Anxiety sensitivity and health-related quality of life in children with chronic pain. J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

    PubMed 17613277
  • Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, McClain B, Gaal D, Mayes LC, Feng R, Zhang H. Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors. Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1648-1654. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136471.36680.97.

    PubMed 15562048
  • Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Karas DE, McClain BC. Preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and behavioral recovery in young children undergoing surgery. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):651-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2920.

    PubMed 16882820
  • Liu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

    PubMed 24112856
  • Abdallah FW, Johnson J, Chan V, Murgatroyd H, Ghafari M, Ami N, Jin R, Brull R. Intravenous dexamethasone and perineural dexamethasone similarly prolong the duration of analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized, triple-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):125-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000210.

    PubMed 25629321
  • Bailard NS, Ortiz J, Flores RA. Additives to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: Evidence, limitations, and recommendations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Mar 1;71(5):373-85. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130336.

    PubMed 24534592
  • Akin A, Ocalan S, Esmaoglu A, Boyaci A. The effects of caudal or intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Apr;20(4):350-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03259.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

    PubMed 20158620
  • Rochette A, Troncin R, Raux O, Dadure C, Lubrano JF, Barbotte E, Capdevila X. Clonidine added to bupivacaine in neonatal spinal anesthesia: a prospective comparison in 124 preterm and term infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Dec;15(12):1072-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01664.x.

    PubMed 16324026
  • Kroin JS, Buvanendran A, Beck DR, Topic JE, Watts DE, Tuman KJ. Clonidine prolongation of lidocaine analgesia after sciatic nerve block in rats Is mediated via the hyperpolarization-activated cation current, not by alpha-adrenoreceptors. Anesthesiology. 2004 Aug;101(2):488-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00031.

    PubMed 15277933
  • McCartney CJ, Duggan E, Apatu E. Should we add clonidine to local anesthetic for peripheral nerve blockade? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.02.010.

    PubMed 17720118
  • Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Wenk M, Tramer MR. Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve and plexus blocks: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):406-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae897.

    PubMed 19602964
  • Petroheilou K, Livanios S, Zavras N, Hager J, Fassoulaki A. Sciatic lateral popliteal block with clonidine alone or clonidine plus 0.2% ropivacaine: effect on the intra-and postoperative analgesia for lower extremity surgery in children: a randomized prospective controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb 1;12:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-2.

    PubMed 22297020

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clonidine and Ropivacaine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Mihaela Visoiu at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Duration of Sensory Block (Paresthesia) (time frame: Indicated by return of normal sensation (expected average of 12 hours after block placement).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02439281, which also lists 32 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in