Relapsed Multiple MyelomaIFM-2015-03NCT02439476
Non-interventional Study on Salvage Auto in Relapsed Myeloma
An observational study of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, run by Association for Training, Education, and Research in Hematology, Immunology, and Transplantation at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease that is characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. While MM patients with relapsed disease may achieve responses to subsequent antimyeloma therapies, the duration of response decreases with successive relapses until resistant disease… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 8 Aug 2016to 8 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Relapsed multiple myeloma patients will be recruited in sites from the French collaborative IFM group in France
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years,
- Relapsed myeloma according to standard criteria and eligible for a second salvage autologous transplantation. Eligibility to autologous transplantation is based on local guidelines and standard practice
- Written patient's agreement
Who cannot join
- Age > 75,
- Contraindication to autologous stem cell transplantation
- Contraindications to the use of plerixafor
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Non-interventional Study Evaluating Plerixafor-based Mobilization for Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Myeloma
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease that is characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. While MM patients with relapsed disease may achieve responses to subsequent antimyeloma therapies, the duration of response decreases with successive relapses until resistant disease develops. Until recently, the median survival following relapse after induction therapy was approximately one year. The relatively recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of bortezomib (2003) and combination lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (2006) therapies for the treatment of previously treated MM has provided effective therapeutic options that give patients with relapsed or refractory MM the prospect for a prolongation of overall and progression-free survival times. However, MM remains an incurable disease. A clear unmet medical need still exists for additional novel therapeutic options for the treatment of previously treated MM.
Plerixafor reversibly inhibits CXCR4 binding to stromal cell derived factor (SDF)-1alpha and was recently discovered to be an effective agent to mobilize CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood. In normal volunteers, administering Plerixafor after 4-5 days of G-CSF resulted in a 3-3.5 fold increase in circulating CD34+ cells. Two phases 3 studies demonstrated that the combination of G-CSF and Plerixafor is superior to G-CSF alone for mobilizing hematopoietic progenitor cells in front-line or as salvage therapy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Read more
Nevertheless, almost all patients ultimately relapse, and no plateau is observed in the survival curves. At the time of disease recurrence, there is not one standard salvage approach, but instead, various therapeutic options are available, including novel agents-based therapy, administered for a fixed duration of time or until progression. In the pivotal trial for the approval of bortezomib as monotherapy in relapsed and refractory MM, the median PFS was 7 months, whereas in the pivotal trials for the approval of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone in the same group of patients, the median time to progression was approximately 11 months. A more recent prospective, randomized, phase 3 study has shown that a triplet combination of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) achieved superior results compared to thalidomide dexamethasone (TD) alone in patients relapsing following ASCT, with a median time to progression of 19.5 versus 13.8 months, respectively. This study suggests that combinations consisting of both an IMiD and a proteasome inhibitor are a valuable option at the time of relapse.
However, when a frozen graft is available, it is also possible to repeat high-dose therapy in patients who previously responded to the frontline application of high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Over time, several reports have demonstrated the feasibility of this salvage strategy. The majority of data are available from retrospective studies and are based on single-centre experiences with small numbers of selected patients. In this setting, PFS has been shown to range from 7 to 22 months, and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) was acceptable, ranging from 0 to 8%. Various prognostic factors for prolonged PFS have been described, such as the duration of response to the first high-dose therapy, or the number of lines of therapy prior to salvage ASCT.
With this background, this prospective non-interventional multicentre study will aim to collect data on the feasibility of salvage ASCT using a Plerixafor-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed MM, according to Plerixafor label in France.
This is a non-interventional study; visit will be performed as usual, according to each center practices. No additional visits will be requested for the study purpose. The date for each visit and any data generated must be recorded on the appropriate eCRF.
The study will consist of 3 periods:
- An early screening period
- Autologous stem cell mobilization period
- High dose melphalan therapy and autologous graft infusion and follow-up for12 months after salvage ASCT Inclusion visit
This visit may occur up to 28 days before Mozobil® administration. This visit will be performed during the visit of pre-transplant assessment. For the pre-transplant assessment, the procedures are performed routinely before ASCT even if the patient is not included in the study:
Stem cell mobilization phase The stem cell mobilization phase is performed according to standard practice of each participating centre.
Follow-up visits High dose melphalan administration and autologous graft infusion will be performed according to each centre standard practice. Patients will be followed according to each center practices. The follow-up of this non-interventional study will end 12 months after ASCT.
Subjects will be enrolled over a 2 years period. The total duration of the study will be 36 months
- Conditions
- Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple myeloma, ASCT, plerixafor, stem cell mobilization, Salvage ASCT using plerixafor-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Relapsed multiple myeloma patients who are considered eligible | Patients mobilized using G-CSF+Plerixafor according to Plerixafor label in France will be included. Apheresis will be performed according to standard practice and local guidelines. Once the autologous stem cell product becomes available, patients will undergo ASCT conditioned by high dose Melphalan according to standard practice in each centre |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility to collect at least 2x10e6/kg CD34+ peripheral blood cell stem cells
Percentage of patients achieving CD34+ ≥ 2x10e6/kg recipient body weight in one apheresis session after stem cell mobilization
Measured: from date of Plerixafor based mobilization until the date of stem cells transplantation, an expected average of 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Engraftment after ASCT (neutrophil and platelets recovery)
Measured: Time to achieve neutrophil (>500/µl) and platelets (first of three days with>20G/l without transfusion), an expected average of 20 days
Time to disease progression
Measured: from the date of ASCT to the date of the first observation of disease progression, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Duration of response
Measured: the time from partial response or complete response to the first documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Progression free survival (PFS)
Measured: time from the start of treatment to the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause during study, whichever occurs earlier, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Overall Survival
Measured: from the date of ASCT to the date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive whichever occurs first, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Clinical Safety as measured by the type, the frequency and the severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
incidence of treatment emergent Adverse event (TEAE), serious adverse event (SAE) and laboratory abnormalities using NCI common toxicity criteria
Measured: 12 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start8 Aug 2016
- Primary completion8 Aug 2020
- Study completion8 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsed Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Training, Education, and Research in Hematology, Immunology, and Transplantation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02439476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IFM-2015-03
- Acronym
- IFM-2015-03
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
van de Wyngaert Z, Malard F, Hulin C, Caillot D, Mariette C, Facon T, Touzeau C, Perrot A, Moreau P, Hebraud B, Kanouni T, Heshmati F, Lebon D, Mohty M, Chabannon C. Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Mobilization of Stem Cells by Plerixafor Before Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (IFM-2015-03). Clin Hematol Int. 2023 Mar;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1007/s44228-023-00030-0. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
PubMed 36781774
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-interventional Study Evaluating Plerixafor-based Mobilization for Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02439476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IFM-2015-03 / IFM-2015-03
- Conditions
- Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple myeloma, ASCT, plerixafor, stem cell mobilization, Salvage ASCT using plerixafor-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Training, Education, and Research in Hematology, Immunology, and TransplantationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease that is characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. While MM patients with relapsed disease may achieve responses to subsequent antimyeloma therapies, the duration of response decreases with successive relapses until resistant disease develops. Until recently, the median survival following relapse after induction therapy was approximately one year. The relatively recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of bortezomib (2003) and combination lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (2006) therapies for the treatment of previously treated MM has provided effective therapeutic options that give patients with relapsed or refractory MM the prospect for a prolongation of overall and progression-free survival times. However, MM remains an incurable disease. A clear unmet medical need still exists for additional novel therapeutic options for the treatment of previously treated MM.
Plerixafor reversibly inhibits CXCR4 binding to stromal cell derived factor (SDF)-1alpha and was recently discovered to be an effective agent to mobilize CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood. In normal volunteers, administering Plerixafor after 4-5 days of G-CSF resulted in a 3-3.5 fold increase in circulating CD34+ cells. Two phases 3 studies demonstrated that the combination of G-CSF and Plerixafor is superior to G-CSF alone for mobilizing hematopoietic progenitor cells in front-line or as salvage therapy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Nevertheless, almost all patients ultimately relapse, and no plateau is observed in the survival curves. At the time of disease recurrence, there is not one standard salvage approach, but instead, various therapeutic options are available, including novel agents-based therapy, administered for a fixed duration of time or until progression. In the pivotal trial for the approval of bortezomib as monotherapy in relapsed and refractory MM, the median PFS was 7 months, whereas in the pivotal trials for the approval of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone in the same group of patients, the median time to progression was approximately 11 months. A more recent prospective, randomized, phase 3 study has shown that a triplet combination of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) achieved superior results compared to thalidomide dexamethasone (TD) alone in patients relapsing following ASCT, with a median time to progression of 19.5 versus 13.8 months, respectively. This study suggests that combinations consisting of both an IMiD and a proteasome inhibitor are a valuable option at the time of relapse.
However, when a frozen graft is available, it is also possible to repeat high-dose therapy in patients who previously responded to the frontline application of high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Over time, several reports have demonstrated the feasibility of this salvage strategy. The majority of data are available from retrospective studies and are based on single-centre experiences with small numbers of selected patients. In this setting, PFS has been shown to range from 7 to 22 months, and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) was acceptable, ranging from 0 to 8%. Various prognostic factors for prolonged PFS have been described, such as the duration of response to the first high-dose therapy, or the number of lines of therapy prior to salvage ASCT.
With this background, this prospective non-interventional multicentre study will aim to collect data on the feasibility of salvage ASCT using a Plerixafor-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed MM, according to Plerixafor label in France.
This is a non-interventional study; visit will be performed as usual, according to each center practices. No additional visits will be requested for the study purpose. The date for each visit and any data generated must be recorded on the appropriate eCRF.
The study will consist of 3 periods:
- An early screening period
- Autologous stem cell mobilization period
- High dose melphalan therapy and autologous graft infusion and follow-up for12 months after salvage ASCT Inclusion visit
This visit may occur up to 28 days before Mozobil® administration. This visit will be performed during the visit of pre-transplant assessment. For the pre-transplant assessment, the procedures are performed routinely before ASCT even if the patient is not included in the study:
Stem cell mobilization phase The stem cell mobilization phase is performed according to standard practice of each participating centre.
Follow-up visits High dose melphalan administration and autologous graft infusion will be performed according to each centre standard practice. Patients will be followed according to each center practices. The follow-up of this non-interventional study will end 12 months after ASCT.
Subjects will be enrolled over a 2 years period. The total duration of the study will be 36 months
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Relapsed multiple myeloma patients who are considered eligible | – | –Patients mobilized using G-CSF+Plerixafor according to Plerixafor label in France will be included. Apheresis will be performed according to standard practice and local guidelines. Once the autologous stem cell product becomes available, patients will undergo ASCT conditioned by high dose Melphalan according to standard practice in each centre |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Relapsed multiple myeloma patients will be recruited in sites from the French collaborative IFM group in France
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years,
- Relapsed myeloma according to standard criteria and eligible for a second salvage autologous transplantation. Eligibility to autologous transplantation is based on local guidelines and standard practice
- Written patient's agreement
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 75,
- Contraindication to autologous stem cell transplantation
- Contraindications to the use of plerixafor
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Feasibility to collect at least 2x10e6/kg CD34+ peripheral blood cell stem cells
Time frame: from date of Plerixafor based mobilization until the date of stem cells transplantation, an expected average of 24 hours
Percentage of patients achieving CD34+ ≥ 2x10e6/kg recipient body weight in one apheresis session after stem cell mobilization
6 secondary outcomes
Engraftment after ASCT (neutrophil and platelets recovery)
Time frame: Time to achieve neutrophil (>500/µl) and platelets (first of three days with>20G/l without transfusion), an expected average of 20 days
Time to disease progression
Time frame: from the date of ASCT to the date of the first observation of disease progression, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Duration of response
Time frame: the time from partial response or complete response to the first documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time frame: time from the start of treatment to the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause during study, whichever occurs earlier, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Overall Survival
Time frame: from the date of ASCT to the date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive whichever occurs first, assessed up to 12 months follow-up
Clinical Safety as measured by the type, the frequency and the severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
Time frame: 12 months follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36781774van de Wyngaert Z, Malard F, Hulin C, Caillot D, Mariette C, Facon T, Touzeau C, Perrot A, Moreau P, Hebraud B, Kanouni T, Heshmati F, Lebon D, Mohty M, Chabannon C. Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Mobilization of Stem Cells by Plerixafor Before Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (IFM-2015-03). Clin Hematol Int. 2023 Mar;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1007/s44228-023-00030-0. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
Related trials for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of OPN-6602 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Cemsidomide in Combination With Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Mezigdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Radioimmunotherapy (111Indium/225Actinium-DOTA-daratumumab) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma, Refractory Plasma Cell Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, run by Association for Training, Education, and Research in Hematology, Immunology, and Transplantation at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility to collect at least 2x10e6/kg CD34+ peripheral blood cell stem cells (time frame: from date of Plerixafor based mobilization until the date of stem cells transplantation, an expected average of 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02439476, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2021.