Radiation ToxicityPhase 3NCT02440191
3DCRT vs. IMRT in Early Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing 3DCRT in people with Radiation Toxicity, run by Jong Hoon Lee at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
It has been not clinically determined whether TomoDirect was dosimetrically better than 3D-CRT for Asian patients with early breast cancer. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of TomoDirect and 3D-CRT in early breast cancer patients of an Asian cohort. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Radiation Toxicity
- What is being tested?
- 3DCRT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 690 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- May 2015to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- histologically confirmed breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery
- pT1-2N0
- no evidence of distant metastasis
- no previous malignancy
- patient age, 20 - 80 years
- Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70
- adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function (leucocytes > 4,000/mm3, hemoglobin > 10 g/dL, platelets > 100,000/mm3; serum bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL, serum transaminase < 2.5 times the upper normal limit; serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL).
- completion of scheduled chemotherapy
Who cannot join
- carcinoma in situ of breast
- distant metastasis
- mastectomy
- male
- both breast cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Vincent Hospital
Suwon
Jong Hoon Lee, MD, koppul@catholic.ac.kr
About this study
Official title: Postoperative Radiotherapy With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus 3-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in Early Breast Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
It has been not clinically determined whether TomoDirect was dosimetrically better than 3D-CRT for Asian patients with early breast cancer. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of TomoDirect and 3D-CRT in early breast cancer patients of an Asian cohort.
Read the detailed description
In breast cancer patients, helical TomoTherapy is not a suitable option since the gantry continuously rotates around the patient, and this technique can deliver low dose radiation to lungs that is associated with an occurrence of radiation pneumonitis. To avoid this inefficiency of beam usage, a TomoDirect option using static gantry positions combined with simultaneous couch translation and dynamic collimator modulation has been developed. In a pilot study, TomoDirect seemed particularly well suited for postoperative irradiation in breast cancer patients. TomoDirect achieved an optimal target volume coverage and coincident adequate normal tissue sparing in a dosimetric study. Clinical studies of TomoDirect in breast cancer patients are scarce and have been assessed only in small and retrospective series. Thus, we undertook a prospective study on the technical feasibility and toxicity of TomoDirect in breast cancer patients who received postoperative radiotherapy.
- Conditions
- Radiation Toxicity
- Being tested
- 3DCRT
- Medical subject headings
- Radiation Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3DCRTRadiation
conventional radiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3DCRT | Active comparator | conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on the breast, 50.4 Gy/28 fx and tumor bed boost, 9 Gy/5 fx will be irradiated for 6.5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: 3DCRT |
| IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) | Experimental | Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on the whole breast, 50.4 Gy/28 fx and tumor bed, 57.4 Gy/28 fx will be irradiated for 5.5 weeks.
Unlike 3DCRT, concomittant boost technique is used in the IMRT arm. Receives: Radiation: 3DCRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free survival
Measured: 3-year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Toxicity
Acute toxicity within 3 months after radiotherpy and late toxicity thereafter up to 3 years will be followed up by physicians. Adverse effects of radiotherapy were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Incidence of toxicity grade ≥ 2 was recorded.
Measured: acute (time frame: with 3 months after radiation) and late (time frame: up to 3 years after radiation), Participants will be followed for an expected average of 3 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Radiation ToxicityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 690 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jong Hoon Lee
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jong Hoon Lee, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
- Investigators
- Jong Hoon Lee, MD, Principal investigator, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02440191
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KROG 15-03
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Capelle L, Warkentin H, Mackenzie M, Joseph K, Gabos Z, Pervez N, Tankel K, Chafe S, Amanie J, Ghosh S, Parliament M, Abdulkarim B. Skin-sparing helical tomotherapy vs 3D-conformal radiotherapy for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: in vivo skin dosimetry study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.086. Epub 2012 May 12.
PubMed 22580119Choi KH, Ahn SJ, Jeong JU, Yu M, Kim JH, Jeong BK, Lee JH, Kim SH, Lee JH. Postoperative radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in early breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial of KROG 15-03. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jan;154:179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
PubMed 32980384
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Postoperative Radiotherapy With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus 3-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in Early Breast Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02440191
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KROG 15-03
- Conditions
- Radiation Toxicity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 690 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Jong Hoon LeeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It has been not clinically determined whether TomoDirect was dosimetrically better than 3D-CRT for Asian patients with early breast cancer. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of TomoDirect and 3D-CRT in early breast cancer patients of an Asian cohort.
Detailed description
In breast cancer patients, helical TomoTherapy is not a suitable option since the gantry continuously rotates around the patient, and this technique can deliver low dose radiation to lungs that is associated with an occurrence of radiation pneumonitis. To avoid this inefficiency of beam usage, a TomoDirect option using static gantry positions combined with simultaneous couch translation and dynamic collimator modulation has been developed. In a pilot study, TomoDirect seemed particularly well suited for postoperative irradiation in breast cancer patients. TomoDirect achieved an optimal target volume coverage and coincident adequate normal tissue sparing in a dosimetric study. Clinical studies of TomoDirect in breast cancer patients are scarce and have been assessed only in small and retrospective series. Thus, we undertook a prospective study on the technical feasibility and toxicity of TomoDirect in breast cancer patients who received postoperative radiotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3DCRT | Active comparator | Radiation: 3DCRTconventional 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on the breast, 50.4 Gy/28 fx and tumor bed boost, 9 Gy/5 fx will be irradiated for 6.5 weeks. |
| IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) | Experimental | Radiation: 3DCRTIntensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on the whole breast, 50.4 Gy/28 fx and tumor bed, 57.4 Gy/28 fx will be irradiated for 5.5 weeks. Unlike 3DCRT, concomittant boost technique is used in the IMRT arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- histologically confirmed breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery
- pT1-2N0
- no evidence of distant metastasis
- no previous malignancy
- patient age, 20 - 80 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- carcinoma in situ of breast
- distant metastasis
- mastectomy
- male
- both breast cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3DCRTconventional radiotherapy | Radiation | 3DCRT, IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) |
Primary outcome
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 3-year
1 secondary outcome
Toxicity
Time frame: acute (time frame: with 3 months after radiation) and late (time frame: up to 3 years after radiation), Participants will be followed for an expected average of 3 years.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 22580119Capelle L, Warkentin H, Mackenzie M, Joseph K, Gabos Z, Pervez N, Tankel K, Chafe S, Amanie J, Ghosh S, Parliament M, Abdulkarim B. Skin-sparing helical tomotherapy vs 3D-conformal radiotherapy for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: in vivo skin dosimetry study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.086. Epub 2012 May 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32980384Choi KH, Ahn SJ, Jeong JU, Yu M, Kim JH, Jeong BK, Lee JH, Kim SH, Lee JH. Postoperative radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in early breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial of KROG 15-03. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jan;154:179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Radiation Toxicity
RecruitingObservational study
3D Versus 2D Strain Echocardiography for Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity During Cancer Therapy
Cancer Related Cardiovascular Toxicity, Anthracycline Related Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Sequential Chemotherapy Followed by Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer, TURBT
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Whole Versus Partial Gland Boost During Prostate SBRT
Prostate Cancer, Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PAtient Similarity for Decision-Making in Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): A Feasibility Study
Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Risk-Adapted Segmental Esophagus-Sparing Radiotherapy for Definitive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jong Hoon Lee, MD principal investigator
St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing 3DCRT in people with Radiation Toxicity, run by Jong Hoon Lee at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jong Hoon Lee, MD (010-8607-1269 ext. 001, koppul@catholic.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free survival (time frame: 3-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02440191, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017.