GERDRESTORENCT02441400
EndoStim Patient Registry
An observational study of GERD, run by EndoStim Inc. at 30 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
To provide a research tool enabling physicians to monitor long term clinical outcomes for patients undergoing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment with EndoStim LES Stimulation System. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- GERD
- What is being tested?
- EndoStim LES Stimulation System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- May 2013to 12 Jul 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects with a diagnosis of GERD who are undergoing or have already undergone EndoStim LES stimulation system implantation.
Who may be able to join
- Subject meets therapy indications
- Subject signs informed consent
- Subject has a planned EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant (prospective) OR subject has already had EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant (retrospective)
Who cannot join
- 1. Subject meets therapy contraindications
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 7 countries.
30 sites in 7 countries
Germany23 sites
SANA Klinikum Lichtenberg
Berlin
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Castrop-Rauxel
Castrop-Rauxel
Heilig Geist-Krankenhaus Köln
Cologne
St. Marienstift Krankenhaus Friesoythe
Friesoythe
Hospital zum Heiligen Geist Fritzlar
Fritzlar
Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen
Garmisch-Partenkirchen
Wolfartklinik Graefelfing
Gräfelfing
Martha Maria Krankenhaus Halle-Dölau
Halle
Asklepios Klinik Altona
Hamburg
KRH Klinikum Siloah Hannover Oststadt
Hanover
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne
Herne
Klinikum Konstanz
Konstanz
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
Magdeburg
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim
Klinikum Memmingen
Memmingen
Klinikum Minden Johannes Wesling
Minden
Klinikum Muenchen Bogenhausen
München
Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus Neumünster
Neumünster
Asklepios Schwalm-Eder Kliniken GmbH
Schwalmstadt
Jung Stilling - Siegen
Siegen
St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen
Siegen
Klinikum Stuttgart, Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt
Stuttgart
Ev. Krankenhaus Wesel GmbH
Wesel
United Kingdom2 sites
Spire Leicester Hospital
Leicester
University Hospital Southampton
Southampton
About this study
Official title: EndoStim Patient Registry-LES Stimulation System for the Treatment of GERD
To provide a research tool enabling physicians to monitor long term clinical outcomes for patients undergoing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment with EndoStim LES Stimulation System.
Read the detailed description
The EndoStim Patient Registry provides a framework for data collection on patients with GERD treated with the EndoStim LES Stimulation System. The primary objective is to provide a tool for participating physician investigators to collect and analyze outcomes data related to the use of the EndoStim LES Stimulation System.
This is a prospective, multi-center patient Registry. Sites may choose to also retrospectively enroll previously treated patients (after obtaining informed consent) and enter retrospective data into case report forms paper or on-line.
- Conditions
- GERD
- Being tested
- EndoStim LES Stimulation System
- Keywords
- GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EndoStim LES Stimulation SystemDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant. | Registry subjects whom have been implanted commercially with the EndoStim LES Stimulation System device. Receives: Device: EndoStim LES Stimulation System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 5 years of follow-up
Measured: 5 years post-implant
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in GERD-HRQL
Change from baseline GERD-HRQL
Measured: Change in GERD-HRQL questionnaire score will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Comparison of pH values
Change from baseline in the following (while off PPI): % 24-hour esophageal pH<4.0, and number of reflux events >1 minute and > 5 minutes
Measured: The pH values of % 24-hour esophageal pH < 4.0, and the number of reflux events > 1 minute and > 5 minutes will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Comparison of symptoms and quality of life
Change from baseline in symptoms (measured by patient diary) and in quality of life (measured by SF-12)
Measured: Symptoms will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in antisecretory medication use
Change from baseline in antisecretory medication use
Measured: The use of antisecretory medication will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in Structured GI Questionnaire responses (vs. baseline)
Change from baseline on Structured GI Questionnaire responses
Measured: Symptoms will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in sleep related quality of life
Change from baseline in sleep related quality of life (measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
Measured: Sleep related quality of life will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in work productivity impairment
Change from baseline in work productivity impairment (measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire)
Measured: Work productivity will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) scores
Change from baseline in RDQ scores
Measured: RDQ questionnaire score will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completion12 Jul 2022
- Study completion12 Jul 2022
Why it stopped: Company no longer operational
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GERDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- EndoStim Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Virender K Sharma, MD, Study director, EndoStim Inc.Joachim Labenz, MD, Principal investigator, Diakonie Klinikum
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02441400
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS500
- Acronym
- RESTORE
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 1 May 2015
- Last updated
- 11 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Neto MG, Ayala JC, Saba J, Berel D, Conklin J, Soffer E. Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 May;24(5):446-50, e213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01878.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PubMed 22292889Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Gomez B, Ayala JC, Saba J, Perez-Castilla A, Galvao Neto M, Crowell MD. Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in treating GERD: final results of open-label prospective trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1083-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2561-4. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PubMed 23073680
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EndoStim Patient Registry-LES Stimulation System for the Treatment of GERD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02441400
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESTORE / CS500
- Conditions
- GERD
- Keywords
- GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Company no longer operational
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EndoStim Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2013
- Primary completion
- 12 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To provide a research tool enabling physicians to monitor long term clinical outcomes for patients undergoing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment with EndoStim LES Stimulation System.
Detailed description
The EndoStim Patient Registry provides a framework for data collection on patients with GERD treated with the EndoStim LES Stimulation System. The primary objective is to provide a tool for participating physician investigators to collect and analyze outcomes data related to the use of the EndoStim LES Stimulation System.
This is a prospective, multi-center patient Registry. Sites may choose to also retrospectively enroll previously treated patients (after obtaining informed consent) and enter retrospective data into case report forms paper or on-line.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant. | – | Device: EndoStim LES Stimulation SystemRegistry subjects whom have been implanted commercially with the EndoStim LES Stimulation System device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects with a diagnosis of GERD who are undergoing or have already undergone EndoStim LES stimulation system implantation.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject meets therapy indications
- Subject signs informed consent
- Subject has a planned EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant (prospective) OR subject has already had EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant (retrospective)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Subject meets therapy contraindications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EndoStim LES Stimulation System | Device | EndoStim LES Stimulation System implant. |
Primary outcome
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Time frame: 5 years post-implant
Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 5 years of follow-up
8 secondary outcomes
Change in GERD-HRQL
Time frame: Change in GERD-HRQL questionnaire score will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Comparison of pH values
Time frame: The pH values of % 24-hour esophageal pH < 4.0, and the number of reflux events > 1 minute and > 5 minutes will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Comparison of symptoms and quality of life
Time frame: Symptoms will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in antisecretory medication use
Time frame: The use of antisecretory medication will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in Structured GI Questionnaire responses (vs. baseline)
Time frame: Symptoms will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in sleep related quality of life
Time frame: Sleep related quality of life will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in work productivity impairment
Time frame: Work productivity will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Change in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) scores
Time frame: RDQ questionnaire score will be assessed at baseline, 3-6 months post implant, and then annually until 5 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Company no longer operational). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22292889Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Neto MG, Ayala JC, Saba J, Berel D, Conklin J, Soffer E. Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 May;24(5):446-50, e213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01878.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 23073680Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Gomez B, Ayala JC, Saba J, Perez-Castilla A, Galvao Neto M, Crowell MD. Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in treating GERD: final results of open-label prospective trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1083-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2561-4. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Registry sponsor's websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for GERD
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Not yet recruiting
PROPER-GERD: A Prospective Crossover Study to Evaluate Probe Placement Optimization for Reflux Testing in Women and Lower-BMI Patients
GERD
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
A Study to Evaluate Tegoprazan as a Diagnostic Tool for GERD
GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Band Ligation for Treating Reflux Disease
GERD
Recruiting
Neuroregulators for the Treatment of Diseases Associated With Esophageal-brain-gut Axis Communication Abnormalities.
Gut-Brain Disorders, GERD Without Erosive Esophagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Virender K Sharma, MD study director
EndoStim Inc.
Joachim Labenz, MD principal investigator
Diakonie Klinikum
30 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of GERD, run by EndoStim Inc. at 30 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in Germany, United Kingdom, Argentina, Austria, Denmark and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Company no longer operational). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence and severity of adverse events (time frame: 5 years post-implant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02441400, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.