Septic ShockPhase 1/2ACIdoSISNCT02442440
Anisodamine Critically Ill SeptIc Shock
A Phase 1/2 study testing anisodamine in people with Septic Shock, run by Jinhua Central Hospital at 15 sites in China.
Trial summary
Anisodamine has been widely used in China for its pharmacological effect on improving microcirculation during shock. It has been reported that anisodamine is effective in reducing mortality rate in children with meningitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock
- What is being tested?
- anisodamine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 355 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to 1 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with septic shock
- Inclusion criteria included patients with sepsis plus use of vasopressors. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is defined as meeting at least one of the following 3 criteria for a systemic inflammatory response. One of the SIRS criteria must be either the WBC criteria (a) or the body temperature criteria (b):
- White blood cell count >12,000 or <4,000 or >10% band forms
- Body temperature >38oC (any route) or <36oC (accepting core temperatures only; indwelling catheter, esophageal, rectal)
- Heart rate (> 90 beats/min) or receiving medications that slow heart rate or paced rhythm.
- Suspected or documented infection included the following sites: thorax, urinary tract, abdomen, skin, sinuses, central venous catheters, and bacterial meningitis.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Septic shock was defined as sustained arterial hypotension with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mm Hg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 70 mm Hg, or an SBP decrease > 40 mm Hg, despite adequate fluid resuscitation. To ease clinical screening process, we defined septic shock as the requirement of vasopressors despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Vasopressors include norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine and dopamine>5mcg/kg/min.
- Patients with following conditions will be excluded:
- Age<15 years old
- Moribund (expected to die within 24 hours)
- Stay in ICU for more than 24 hours
- Contraindications to anisodamine: elevated intracranial pressure, acute phase of intracranial hemorrhage, glaucoma, untreated bowel obstruction (surgically treated obstruction is not contraindicated), enlargement of prostate without urinary catheterization.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
China15 sites
Binzhou People's hospital of Shandong province
Binzhou, Shandong
Peace hospital of Changzhi medical college
Changzhi, Shanxi
The first People's hospital of Yongkang
Guli, Zhejiang
Zhejiang Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000
Sir Run Run Shaw hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 321000
Sir Run Run Shaw hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Huizhou first hospital
Huizhou, Guangdong, 516000
Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000
Department of critical care medicine, The central hospital of Lishui City
Lishui, Zhejiang, 323000
the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Beilun People's hospital; The first affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university (Beilun Branch)
Ningbo, Zhejiang
department of critical care medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200001
Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang province
Taizhou, Zhejiang, 317000
Union Hospital, Tongji medical collegue, Huazhong university of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei
affiliated hospital, Jiangsu University
Zhenjiang, Jiangsu
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Anisodamine for the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Anisodamine has been widely used in China for its pharmacological effect on improving microcirculation during shock. It has been reported that anisodamine is effective in reducing mortality rate in children with meningitis. however, its effectiveness in patients with septic shock has not been systematically investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of anisodamine in the treatment of patients with septic shock.
Read the detailed description
Septic shock is an important contributor of mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). The crude mortality is reported to be from 30% to 65% (1-5). Although there are significant advances in the management of septic shock in recent decades, the mortality rate was only marginally reduced. For example, the CUB-Réa Network study reported that the mortality rate of septic shock declined from 62.1% in 1993 to 55.9% in 2000 (6). The well-known Surviving Sepsis Campaign has also made every effort to reduce mortality rate of severe sepsis and septic shock. The organization recommended bundled strategies including early goal directed therapy (EGDT) for the management of septic shock (7,8). Although EGDT was once the mainstay therapy of septic shock, its efficacy has been questioned by recent several large randomized controlled trials (9,10). Therefore, the treatment of septic shock is still a global challenge and there is no well-established intervention that can reduce its mortality.
Anisodamine is an active agent isolated from a Chinese herb medicine. Both experimental and clinical studies have shown some potential beneficial effects of anisodamine in improving outcomes of shock (11-13). It was reported that anisodamine could reduce the mortality rate of fulminant epidemic meningitis from 66.9% to 12.4% (14). The efficacy of anisodamine might be mediated via the inhibition of thromboxane synthesis, granulocyte and platelet aggregation (15). Although anisodamine has been widely used in the treatment of septic shock in mainland China, there is no solid evidence from well designed clinical trials to support its efficacy. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of anisodamine in the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock
- Being tested
- anisodamine
- Keywords
- anisodamine, septic shock
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
anisodamineDrug
Also called 654-2
Anisodamine will be given first as bolus of 10 mg, followed by 0.1-0.5mg/kg/hr. The adjustment of pump infusion rate is largely at the discretion of treating physician, with the aim of improving microcirculation and limit the side effect to a minimum. For example, if serum lactate continues to elevate, the infusion rate can be increased. Discontinuation on severe side effect or recovery of shock (normalized lactate, weaned from vasopressor) or death.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| anisodamine group | Experimental | administration of the drug Receives: Drug: anisodamine |
| control group | No intervention | these arm do not use anisodamine, other resuscitation protocol is as usual. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
hospital mortality
the outcome will be assessed by using proportion of patients died, and relative risk will be reported.
Measured: from ICU admission to hospital discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days)
Secondary outcomes (1)
lactate levels
the value was measured in mmol/l, and they will be compared between both arms.
Measured: from ICU admission to hospital discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionOct 2020
- Study completion1 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 355 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jinhua Central Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhongheng Zhang, Jinhua Central Hospital
- Investigators
- kun chen, MSc, Study director, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02442440
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015-013
- Acronym
- ACIdoSIS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yu Y, Zhu C, Hong Y, Chen L, Huang Z, Zhou J, Tian X, Liu D, Ren B, Zhang C, Hu C, Wang X, Yin R, Gao Y, Zhang Z. Effectiveness of anisodamine for the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2021 Sep 27;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03774-4.
PubMed 34579741Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang R, Wang Z, Sun H, Liu S. A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus surgery alone for stage IIA-IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jan;9(1):200-204. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.01.44.
PubMed 28203424Zhang Z, Zhou J, Shang Y, Wang X, Yin R, Zhu Z, Chen W, Tian X, Yu Y, Zuo X, Chen K, Ji X, Ni H; Anisodamine Critically Ill SeptIc Shock (ACIdoSIS) study group. Effectiveness of anisodamine for the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock (ACIdoSIS study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Oct;3(17):246. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.03.
PubMed 26605292
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Anisodamine for the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02442440
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACIdoSIS / 2015-013
- Conditions
- Septic Shock
- Keywords
- anisodamine, septic shock
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 355 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jinhua Central HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Anisodamine has been widely used in China for its pharmacological effect on improving microcirculation during shock. It has been reported that anisodamine is effective in reducing mortality rate in children with meningitis. however, its effectiveness in patients with septic shock has not been systematically investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of anisodamine in the treatment of patients with septic shock.
Detailed description
Septic shock is an important contributor of mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). The crude mortality is reported to be from 30% to 65% (1-5). Although there are significant advances in the management of septic shock in recent decades, the mortality rate was only marginally reduced. For example, the CUB-Réa Network study reported that the mortality rate of septic shock declined from 62.1% in 1993 to 55.9% in 2000 (6). The well-known Surviving Sepsis Campaign has also made every effort to reduce mortality rate of severe sepsis and septic shock. The organization recommended bundled strategies including early goal directed therapy (EGDT) for the management of septic shock (7,8). Although EGDT was once the mainstay therapy of septic shock, its efficacy has been questioned by recent several large randomized controlled trials (9,10). Therefore, the treatment of septic shock is still a global challenge and there is no well-established intervention that can reduce its mortality.
Anisodamine is an active agent isolated from a Chinese herb medicine. Both experimental and clinical studies have shown some potential beneficial effects of anisodamine in improving outcomes of shock (11-13). It was reported that anisodamine could reduce the mortality rate of fulminant epidemic meningitis from 66.9% to 12.4% (14). The efficacy of anisodamine might be mediated via the inhibition of thromboxane synthesis, granulocyte and platelet aggregation (15). Although anisodamine has been widely used in the treatment of septic shock in mainland China, there is no solid evidence from well designed clinical trials to support its efficacy. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of anisodamine in the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| anisodamine group | Experimental | Drug: anisodamineadministration of the drug |
| control group | No intervention | –these arm do not use anisodamine, other resuscitation protocol is as usual. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- patients with septic shock
- Inclusion criteria included patients with sepsis plus use of vasopressors. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is defined as meeting at least one of the following 3 criteria for a systemic inflammatory response. One of the SIRS criteria must be either the WBC criteria (a) or the body temperature criteria (b):
- White blood cell count >12,000 or <4,000 or >10% band forms
- Body temperature >38oC (any route) or <36oC (accepting core temperatures only; indwelling catheter, esophageal, rectal)
- Heart rate (> 90 beats/min) or receiving medications that slow heart rate or paced rhythm.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| anisodamineAlso: 654-2Anisodamine will be given first as bolus of 10 mg, followed by 0.1-0.5mg/kg/hr. The adjustment of pump infusion rate is largely at the discretion of treating physician, with the aim of improving microcirculation and limit the side effect to a minimum. For example, if serum lactate continues to elevate, the infusion rate can be increased. Discontinuation on severe side effect or recovery of shock (normalized lactate, weaned from vasopressor) or death. | Drug | anisodamine group |
Primary outcome
hospital mortality
Time frame: from ICU admission to hospital discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days)
the outcome will be assessed by using proportion of patients died, and relative risk will be reported.
1 secondary outcome
lactate levels
Time frame: from ICU admission to hospital discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34579741Yu Y, Zhu C, Hong Y, Chen L, Huang Z, Zhou J, Tian X, Liu D, Ren B, Zhang C, Hu C, Wang X, Yin R, Gao Y, Zhang Z. Effectiveness of anisodamine for the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2021 Sep 27;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03774-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28203424Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang R, Wang Z, Sun H, Liu S. A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus surgery alone for stage IIA-IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jan;9(1):200-204. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.01.44.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26605292Zhang Z, Zhou J, Shang Y, Wang X, Yin R, Zhu Z, Chen W, Tian X, Yu Y, Zuo X, Chen K, Ji X, Ni H; Anisodamine Critically Ill SeptIc Shock (ACIdoSIS) study group. Effectiveness of anisodamine for the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock (ACIdoSIS study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Oct;3(17):246. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.03.
Related trials for Septic Shock
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response
Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Cardiac Index Measurement Using Right Ventricular Pressure Curve Analysis and Thermodilution Via a Swan-Ganz IQ™ Catheter.
Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Value of EMR3 in Sepsis Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 3
Systematic Adjunction of Vasopressine in Septic Shock
Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Neutrophil Activation and NETosis in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
kun chen, MSc study director
Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing anisodamine in people with Septic Shock, run by Jinhua Central Hospital at 15 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
hospital mortality (time frame: from ICU admission to hospital discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02442440, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2021.