AzTrials
AzTrials

PresbyopiaNCT02444130

Presbyopia Compensation: Looking for Electrophysiological Predictors

An observational study of Presbyopia, run by University Hospital, Tours at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study was to identify electrophysiological predictive markers of post-correction visual comfort for presbyopic patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Presbyopia
What is being tested?
contact lenses
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Feb 2015to Feb 2016
How long will I take part?
8 Weeks
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Adults with presbyopia

Who may be able to join

  • normal acuity

Who cannot join

  • stereoacuity disorder
  • neurological disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University hospital Tours

    Tours, 37000

Other trials in France

About this study

The main purpose of this study was to identify electrophysiological predictive markers of post-correction visual comfort for presbyopic patients.

Read the detailed description

For each participant, presbyopia was compensated with contact lenses by monovision during three weeks and multifocality (three weeks again). A break of two weeks without any presbyopia compensation came in between the two phases of the test that were randomized.

All subjects were tested three times: before any compensation, after three weeks with monovsion and after three weeks with multifocality.

Each testing session was strictly the same including visual examinations and VEPs (visual evoked potentials).

Conditions
Presbyopia
Being tested
contact lenses
Keywords
multifocality, monovision
Medical subject headings
Presbyopia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • contact lensesDevice

    Presbyopia was compensated with contact lenses by monovision and multifocality.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual acuity at baseline

    near and distance visual acuity (Monoyer and Parinaud scales)

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. electrophysiological recordings at baseline

    monocular and binocular pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in response to a checkerboard pattern N75 and P100 components : amplitude, latency and topography

    Measured: baseline

  2. electrophysiological recordings change with monovision

    monocular and binocular pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in response to a checkerboard pattern N75 and P100 components : amplitude, latency and topography

    Measured: after 3 weeks with monovision contact lenses

  3. electrophysiological recordings with multifocality

    monocular and binocular pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in response to a checkerboard pattern N75 and P100 components : amplitude, latency and topography

    Measured: after 3 weeks with multifocality contact lenses

  4. quantitative measurement of stereopsis at baseline

    TNO plates

    Measured: baseline

  5. quantitative measurement of stereopsis with monovision

    TNO plates

    Measured: after 3 weeks with monovision contact lenses

  6. quantitative measurement of stereopsis with multifocality

    TNO plates

    Measured: after 3 weeks with multifocality contact lenses

  7. Visual acuity change with monovision

    near and distance visual acuity (Monoyer and Parinaud scales)

    Measured: after 3 weeks with monovision contact lenses

  8. Visual acuity change with multifocality

    near and distance visual acuity (Monoyer and Parinaud scales)

    Measured: after 3 weeks with multifocality contact lenses

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
Target duration
8 Weeks
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02444130
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-A01677-38
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
18 Feb 2015
Last updated
3 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Imbeau L, Majzoub S, Thillay A, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Pisella PJ, Batty M. Presbyopia compensation: looking for cortical predictors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;101(2):223-226. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307581. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

    PubMed 27107029

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Presbyopia, run by University Hospital, Tours at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual acuity at baseline (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02444130, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in