AzTrials
AzTrials

MorbidityPhase 4BCGSTRAINNCT02447536

Trial of Two Strains of BCG

A Phase 4 study testing BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute) and BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India) in people with Morbidity and Bacille Calmette-Guérin, run by Bandim Health Project at 1 site in Guinea-Bissau.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial comparing two Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) strains currently used in Guinea-Bissau, the Danish and the Russian, in terms of prevention of neonatal and early life morbidity and mortality, immune responses and adverse events related to BCG vaccination. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Morbidity, Bacille Calmette-Guérin
What is being tested?
BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute) and BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12,006 participants
Where
1 siteGuinea-Bissau
Study dates
8 Dec 2014to 1 May 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Newborn infants at the HNSM maternity ward.

Who cannot join

  • Infants included in another randomized trial of BCG. Infants with a severe congenital abnormality.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Guinea-Bissau1 site
  • Bandim Health Project, Apartado 861

    Bissau

Other trials in Guinea-Bissau

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Effect of Different BCG Strains on Early Life Hospital Admissions in Guinea-Bissau: A Randomised Trial

The investigators aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial comparing two Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) strains currently used in Guinea-Bissau, the Danish and the Russian, in terms of prevention of neonatal and early life morbidity and mortality, immune responses and adverse events related to BCG vaccination. The primary outcome will be hospital admissions within 6 weeks of age.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND At the Bandim Health Project (www.bandim.org) in Guinea-Bissau, we observed that Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination at birth is associated with survival benefits which cannot be explained by prevention of tuberculosis (TB), which is rare during the first year of life. There is mounting evidence that the beneficial effects of BCG on neonatal mortality stems from non-specific beneficial immune training, also termed heterologous immunity. This way, BCG immunisation possibly confers enhanced protection against a broad range of severe infections such as pneumonia and septicemia.

In addition, observational studies from Guinea-Bissau suggest that BCG-vaccinated children who produced a scar upon immunisation have significantly better survival than BCG-vaccinated children who did not produce a scar. The pattern is the same with regard to PPD (tuberculin) skin test. While correct BCG-vaccination technique is undoubtedly important for scarring, several studies have shown that the strain of BCG might be important as well.

Globally, BCG coverage exceeds 90%, making BCG the most widely used vaccine in the world. According to UNICEF, the annual demand for the BCG vaccine was 130 million doses in 2013. Several different vaccine strains are being used, yet few studies have compared the different strains. However, several animal and human studies have shown that these genetically diverse vaccine strains induce different protective efficacy against TB, risk of adverse events and susceptibility to anti-TB drugs. Recently, a large observational study based in Uganda showed that there were significant differences between BCG strains concerning the response to specific mycobacteria and non-specific immune responses. In particular, BCG-Denmark was associated with a much higher rate of scarring (93%) than BCG-Russia (52%), but also a higher rate of adverse events in terms of ulcers and abscesses (1.8% versus 0.3%).

OBJECTIVE We aim to compare the effect of two strains of BCG (BCG-Denmark, BCG-Russia) provided at birth to children born at the National Hospital Simão Mendes (HNSM) on subsequent hospitalisations. Furthermore, mortality in the first 6 weeks and adverse events at 2 and 6 months of age will be reported for all children, and BCG scar frequency (2 and 6 months) and PPD response (6 months) will be reported for a proportion of the infants.

METHODS The study will be conducted by the Bandim Health Project (BHP). The BHP maintains a health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) in 6 districts of the capital in Guinea-Bissau covering approximately 102,000 inhabitants. All houses in the HDSS are visited monthly and all pregnancies and births are registered.

Study participants will be enrolled at the National Hospital and followed up through the HDSS and by telephone interviews as well as through hospital records. The study will be individually randomised, with 1:1 randomisation between the two strains (BCG-Denmark, BCG-Russia). During a two year inclusion period, we expect to be able to include at least 12,000 children, i.e. 6,000 in each BCG strain group. Of these, around 25% will reside within the HDSS.

Being tested
BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute), BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India)
Keywords
Immunization, Morbidity, Mortality, BCG

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute)Biological

    See above

  • BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India)Biological

    See above

Study groups in NCT02447536
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BCG-DENMARKActive comparatorInfants randomised to receive BCG-DENMARK at dismissal from the Maternity Ward will receive one 0.05 ml dose of Mycobacterium bovis BCG live attenuated vaccine BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute) by intradermal injection in the left deltoid region. Dependent on national supply, infants will receive oral polio vaccine (OPV) at the time of BCG-vaccination. NOTE: By 1st of July 2016, infants in this arm has received BCG-Japan due to a worldwide shortage of BCG-Denmark because of a halt in production of this vaccine at the Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen.
Receives: Biological: BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute)
BCG-RUSSIAActive comparatorInfants randomised to receive BCG-RUSSIA at dismissal from the Maternity Ward will receive one 0.05 ml dose Mycobacterium bovis BCG live attenuated vaccine BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India) by intradermal injection in the left deltoid region. Dependent on national supply, infants will receive oral polio vaccine (OPV) at the time of BCG-vaccination.
Receives: Biological: BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital admission

    Measured: 6 weeks after birth

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mortality

    Reported exclusively for a subgroup of infants with regular house visits

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. BCG scar frequency

    Reported exclusively for a subgroup of infants with regular house visits

    Measured: 6 months

  3. PPD (tuberculin response)

    Reported exclusively for a subgroup of infants with regular house visits

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Adverse events (abscesses/ulcers)

    Adverse events to the vaccines will be evaluated for a subgroup of infants with regular house visits

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Hospital admission during neonatal period

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion24 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12,006 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02447536
Sponsor's protocol ID
BCGSTRAIN
Acronym
BCGSTRAIN
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
20 Apr 2015
Last updated
16 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Wardlaw T, You D, Newby H, Anthony D, Chopra M. Child survival: a message of hope but a call for renewed commitment in UNICEF report. Reprod Health. 2013 Dec 11;10:64. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-64.

    PubMed 24325885
  • Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.

    PubMed 15752534
  • Penfold S, Willey BA, Schellenberg J. Newborn care behaviours and neonatal survival: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Nov;18(11):1294-316. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12193. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

    PubMed 24112377
  • Aaby P, Roth A, Ravn H, Napirna BM, Rodrigues A, Lisse IM, Stensballe L, Diness BR, Lausch KR, Lund N, Biering-Sorensen S, Whittle H, Benn CS. Randomized trial of BCG vaccination at birth to low-birth-weight children: beneficial nonspecific effects in the neonatal period? J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul 15;204(2):245-52. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir240.

    PubMed 21673035
  • Biering-Sorensen S, Aaby P, Napirna BM, Roth A, Ravn H, Rodrigues A, Whittle H, Benn CS. Small randomized trial among low-birth-weight children receiving bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination at first health center contact. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Mar;31(3):306-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182458289.

    PubMed 22189537
  • Roth A, Gustafson P, Nhaga A, Djana Q, Poulsen A, Garly ML, Jensen H, Sodemann M, Rodriques A, Aaby P. BCG vaccination scar associated with better childhood survival in Guinea-Bissau. Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;34(3):540-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh392. Epub 2005 Jan 19.

    PubMed 15659474
  • Garly ML, Martins CL, Bale C, Balde MA, Hedegaard KL, Gustafson P, Lisse IM, Whittle HC, Aaby P. BCG scar and positive tuberculin reaction associated with reduced child mortality in West Africa. A non-specific beneficial effect of BCG? Vaccine. 2003 Jun 20;21(21-22):2782-90. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00181-6.

    PubMed 12798618
  • Roth A, Sodemann M, Jensen H, Poulsen A, Gustafson P, Weise C, Gomes J, Djana Q, Jakobsen M, Garly ML, Rodrigues A, Aaby P. Tuberculin reaction, BCG scar, and lower female mortality. Epidemiology. 2006 Sep;17(5):562-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000231546.14749.ab.

    PubMed 16878042
  • Behr MA. BCG--different strains, different vaccines? Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 Feb;2(2):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00182-2.

    PubMed 11901655
  • Ritz N, Curtis N. Mapping the global use of different BCG vaccine strains. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009 Jul;89(4):248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

    PubMed 19540166
  • Behr MA. Correlation between BCG genomics and protective efficacy. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33(4):249-52. doi: 10.1080/003655401300077180.

    PubMed 11345214
  • Ritz N, Hanekom WA, Robins-Browne R, Britton WJ, Curtis N. Influence of BCG vaccine strain on the immune response and protection against tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Aug;32(5):821-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00118.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

    PubMed 18616602
  • Anderson EJ, Webb EL, Mawa PA, Kizza M, Lyadda N, Nampijja M, Elliott AM. The influence of BCG vaccine strain on mycobacteria-specific and non-specific immune responses in a prospective cohort of infants in Uganda. Vaccine. 2012 Mar 9;30(12):2083-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.053. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

    PubMed 22300718
  • Biai S, Rodrigues A, Nielsen J, Sodemann M, Aaby P. Vaccination status and sequence of vaccinations as risk factors for hospitalisation among outpatients in a high mortality country. Vaccine. 2011 May 9;29(20):3662-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PubMed 21440640
  • Aaby P, Whittle H, Benn CS. Vaccine programmes must consider their effect on general resistance. BMJ. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3769. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3769. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22700785

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing BCG-Denmark 1331 (Statens Serum Institute) and BCG-Russia-I (Serum Institute of India) in people with Morbidity and Bacille Calmette-Guérin, run by Bandim Health Project at 1 site in Guinea-Bissau.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Guinea-Bissau. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital admission (time frame: 6 weeks after birth). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02447536, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in