AzTrials
AzTrials

SeizuresNERDSNCT02451618

Novel Epidermal Recording and Detection of Seizures

An observational study of Seizures and Encephalopathy, run by Sharp HealthCare at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

For any newborn that exhibits possible seizure activity or has altered mental status of unknown etiology, continuous bedside EEG recording is the standard of care to detect subclinical seizure activity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day and older
Conditions the study is for
Seizures, Encephalopathy, Asphyxiated Newborn
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jan 2015to 3 Nov 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Any newborn admitted to the NICU that requires an EEG for clinical care. Must be less than or equal to 44 weeks corrected gestational age.

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized neonates who already require continuous EEG recording for clinical care
  • Parents signed informed consent
  • CGA 44 weeks or less

Who cannot join

  • Patient is moribund

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns

    San Diego, California, 92123

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study of Seizure Detection in Neonates Using Multimodal Temporary Epidermal Electronics

For any newborn that exhibits possible seizure activity or has altered mental status of unknown etiology, continuous bedside EEG recording is the standard of care to detect subclinical seizure activity. The experimental aspect of this study will be the application of test electrodes (EES or EKG) to evaluate if the electrodes can be used to produce a continuous bedside recording of brain activity in the same manner as an EEG recording, while ideally producing less irritation of newborn skin than conventional EEG electrodes.

Read the detailed description

Infants admitted to our NICU that require a standard EEG for clinical diagnosis will be approached for consent to test one of two new methods of EEG recording. Patients will be randomized to the new epidermal electronic system (EES) or the a hydrogel EKG electrode. All patients will continue to receive the standard of care EEG monitoring.

EES is slim new temporary tattoo technology that can easily be applied to the skin without requiring a technician or scrubbing and preparation as with standard EEG lead. The hydrogel EKG are FDA approved leads normally used to detect cardiac rhythm.

Specific Aims:

  1. To compare the rate of detection of neonatal seizures between a new method of recording electrical brain rhythms (EES or EKG) and the current standard of care (EEG, or electroencephalography.)
  2. To compare characterization of electrical brain activity between EES or EKG and EEG in the neonate.
Keywords
Perinatal Depression
Medical subject headings
Seizures, Brain Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02451618
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epidermal Electronic SystemEES, wireless tattoo electrode
Hydrogel electrodeEKG electrode, looking at hairline placement of electrodes.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Seizure detection

    Seizures detected by study electrodes will be compared to seizures detected on conventional EEG recording.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. EEG characterization

    Compare quality of brain activity with study leads vs standard leads

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Skin integrity from standard EEG vs study electrodes

    Photographs will be taken to compare skin integrity after each electrode use.

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Hair removal from standard EEG vs study electrodes

    If hair removal is necessary for study electrode placement.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion3 Nov 2017

Why it stopped: Trial was discontinued due to inadequate signal from study eeg leads.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02451618
Sponsor's protocol ID
Epidermal Electronics
Acronym
NERDS
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
31 Mar 2015
Last updated
7 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tharp BR. Neonatal seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2002;43 Suppl 3:2-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.43.s.3.11.x.

    PubMed 12060001
  • Lawrence R, Inder T. Neonatal status epilepticus. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2010 Sep;17(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2010.06.010.

    PubMed 20727485
  • Isaeva E, Isaev D, Savrasova A, Khazipov R, Holmes GL. Recurrent neonatal seizures result in long-term increases in neuronal network excitability in the rat neocortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Apr;31(8):1446-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07179.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

    PubMed 20384780
  • van Rooij LG, Toet MC, van Huffelen AC, Groenendaal F, Laan W, Zecic A, de Haan TR, van Straaten IL, Vrancken S, van Wezel G, van der Sluijs J, Ter Horst H, Gavilanes D, Laroche S, Naulaers G, de Vries LS. Effect of treatment of subclinical neonatal seizures detected with aEEG: randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e358-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0136. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

    PubMed 20100767
  • Nagarajan L, Ghosh S, Palumbo L. Ictal electroencephalograms in neonatal seizures: characteristics and associations. Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Jul;45(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2011.01.009.

    PubMed 21723453
  • Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;112(3):536-44. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00533-2.

    PubMed 11222977
  • Young GB, Campbell VC. EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: pitfalls and caveats. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;16(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199901000-00003.

    PubMed 10082090
  • Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, Kim YS, Kim RH, Wang S, Wu J, Won SM, Tao H, Islam A, Yu KJ, Kim TI, Chowdhury R, Ying M, Xu L, Li M, Chung HJ, Keum H, McCormick M, Liu P, Zhang YW, Omenetto FG, Huang Y, Coleman T, Rogers JA. Epidermal electronics. Science. 2011 Aug 12;333(6044):838-43. doi: 10.1126/science.1206157.

    PubMed 21836009
  • Volpe JJ. Neonatal Seizures in Neurology of the Newborn, 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Sanders, 2001: 178-214.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Seizures and Encephalopathy, run by Sharp HealthCare at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Trial was discontinued due to inadequate signal from study eeg leads.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Seizure detection (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02451618, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in