AzTrials
AzTrials

Human Herpes VirusNCT02452229

Review of Human Herpes Viruses in Burns

An observational study of Human Herpes Virus and Herpes Simplex Virus, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus infection are purported to play a pivotal role in morbidity and mortality in burns. Thus far, there is no existing systematic review (Level of Evidence III or higher) describing the unique role as well as concurrent infections of these viruses in burns. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Review of the Literature for Human Herpes Virus infections
How many people
10,267 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2015to May 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Every year, about 500,000 citizens of the United States of America were burned; 50,000 of them were admitted to Burn Center. Bacterial and viral infections including cellulitis, pneumonia, wound infections and septicemia are among the top ten complications of burn injuries. Severe burn injury causes an increased inflammatory response and an overall immunosuppression. As a result severely burned patients are more prone to infections and septicemia. Early treatment of sepsis and prevention of infections are key to reducing morbidity and improving the long-term outcome of burn victims.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who presented with at least 1% TBSA burned
  • Patients who presented with a viral infections during their hospitalization

Who cannot join

  • Patients who had no burns
  • Patients who had no viral infections during their hospitalization

About this study

Official title: Human Herpes Viruses in Burn Victims: A Systematic Review

Herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus infection are purported to play a pivotal role in morbidity and mortality in burns. Thus far, there is no existing systematic review (Level of Evidence III or higher) describing the unique role as well as concurrent infections of these viruses in burns. The aim of this review is to point out the clinical differences between these human herpes virus subtypes, to outline established therapy approaches, and to provide evidence for virus related morbidity and mortality in burns.

Read the detailed description

This systematic review was created according the PRIMSA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines and checklist.

We performed an review of the medical literature to identify all studies that contain HSV, CMV and VZV infections in burns.Therefore, systematic review of the Medline database by using PubMed and Ovid interface was conducted. Also the Web of Science interface was used for systematic literature search.

On the PubMed interface, we used the following search terms: ("HSV"[All Fields] OR "herpes"[All Fields] OR "CMV"[All Fields] OR "cytomegalovirus"[All Fields] OR "VZV"[All Fields] OR "varicella-zoster"[All Fields]) AND ("burns"[MeSH Terms] OR "burns"[All Fields] OR "burn"[All Fields] OR "thermal trauma"[All Fields]). For Ovid we used: exp Burns/ AND (exp Herpes Zoster/ or exp Encephalitis, Herpes Simplex/ or exp Herpes Simplex/ or exp Herpes Simples Virus Vaccines/), exp Burns/ AND (exp Cytomegalovirus/ or exp Cytomegalovirus Infections/), exp Burns/ AND (exp Chickenpox/ or Herpesvirus 3. Human/ or exp Herpes Zoster/). And for Web of Science we used: (TS=(HSV OR herpes OR CMV OR cytomegalovirus OR VZV OR varicella-zoster) AND TS=(burn OR burns OR thermal trauma)) AND LANGUAGE: (English) AND DOCUMENT TYPES: (Article); Timespan: All years; Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A\&HCI, CPCI-S.

Being tested
Review of the Literature for Human Herpes Virus infections
Medical subject headings
Herpes Simplex, Chickenpox, Burns

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Review of the Literature for Human Herpes Virus infectionsOther

    Review of the Medline database (PubMed and Ovid interface) for human herpes virus infections in burns as well as Web of Science interface.

    PRIMSA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines and checklist were used.

Study groups in NCT02452229
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Burn patientsThe included patient are burn victims who sustained a burn of at least 1 % total body surface are (TBSA); with no restriction on age.
Receives: Other: Review of the Literature for Human Herpes Virus infections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of Human Herpes Virus (HHV) Infections

    HHV include the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr viruses (EBV) and human herpes virus 6 to 8

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment of Human Herpes Virus (HHV) Infections

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
10,267 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02452229
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHC-G-SR-HHV
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
14 May 2015
Last updated
22 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 18. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20171303

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Human Herpes Virus and Herpes Simplex Virus, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of Human Herpes Virus (HHV) Infections (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02452229, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in