Denture HygieneNCT02454413
Microbial Evaluation of Denture Cleaning and Overnight Storage
A study testing denture brushing with water and soap, ultrasonic denture cleaning and cleansing tablet in people with Denture Hygiene, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.
Trial summary
Clinical guidelines for denture care are available, but evidence for optimal nocturnal storage is missing. The investigators (Duyck J., Vandamme K., Teughels W.) therefore performed a study (submitted for publication) to evaluate the effect of different overnight storage protocols on denture biofilm formation and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Denture Hygiene
- What is being tested?
- denture brushing with water and soap, ultrasonic denture cleaning and cleansing tablet
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Institutionalised frail elder
- Fully edentulous in lower and upper jaw
- Removable denture wearer in lower and upper jaw
- Good oral health
Who cannot join
- Current or history of corticosteroid treatment within the 3 months prior to the study
- Current or history of antimicrobial treatment within the 3 months prior to the study
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Inability to comply with the study requirements
About this study
Official title: ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF CLEANING METHODS AND OVERNIGHT DENTURE STORAGE ON BIOFILM FORMATION ON REMOVABLE ACRYLIC DENTURES.
Clinical guidelines for denture care are available, but evidence for optimal nocturnal storage is missing. The investigators (Duyck J., Vandamme K., Teughels W.) therefore performed a study (submitted for publication) to evaluate the effect of different overnight storage protocols on denture biofilm formation and maturation. The results of this study showed that the use of cleansing tablets (Corega Tabs Anti-bacteria®, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium) for acrylic removable denture overnight storage reduces denture biofilm mass and pathogenicity compared to dry and water preservation. As no mechanical denture cleaning was performed in the aforementioned study, the aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and overnight storage condition on the microbial composition and Candida albicans colonization of denture biofilm formation. This information is required to develop a clinical guideline on acrylic denture cleaning and overnight storage aiming to reduce the risk posed by pathogenic microorganisms, particularly in bedridden and immunocompromised patients.
It is hypothetised that mechanical denture cleaning will decrease the impact of overnight denture storage condition on biofilm formation on acrylic removable dentures.
Read the detailed description
Aim of the study
The presence of a biofilm - i.e. structured microbial communities that are attached to a surface and encased in an exopolymer matrix - on acrylic removable dentures has been associated with serious systemic conditions, especially in the dependent elderly [1]. Oral bacteria have been implicated in bacterial endocarditis [2], aspiration pneumonia [3, 4], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [5, 6], amongst other diseases [1, 7]. Ample evidence is provided regarding the relationship between proper oral hygiene and overall systemic health.
Plaque on dentures is a complex aggregate containing more than 108 organisms per milligram, and involving more than 600 prokaryote species [8]. The different species collaborate to form a symbiotic biofilm. The biofilms in dentate patients have been studied extensively, but there have been few studies on the biofilm microbiota of complete acrylic dentures [10-18]. It appears that distinct biofilms, with associated pathogenic risks, are present in 'healthy' versus denture stomatitis affected participants [15, 16, 18]. Not only poor denture cleaning but also inappropriate habits, such as wearing dentures overnight have proved to be associated with the prevalence of Candida-associated stomatitis [19, 20]. Therefore, the overnight removal of the acrylic removable dentures is advised in clinical settings. Although evidence-based guidelines for denture care and maintenance are available [21], guidelines for nocturnal storage conditions of dentures are missing. The investigators therefore performed a study (submitted for publication) to evaluate the effect of different overnight storage protocols on denture biofilm formation and maturation. The results of this study showed that the use of cleansing tablets (Corega Tabs Anti-bacteria®, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium) for acrylic removable denture overnight storage reduces denture biofilm mass and pathogenicity compared to dry and water preservation.
As no mechanical denture cleaning was performed in the aforementioned study, the aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and overnight storage condition on the microbial composition and Candida albicans colonization of denture biofilm formation. This information is required to develop a clinical guideline on acrylic denture cleaning and overnight storage aiming to reduce the risk posed by pathogenic microorganisms, particularly in bedridden and immunocompromised patients.
Research questions
•What is the effect of mechanical cleaning on biofilm formation on removable acrylic dentures?
- Is ultrasonic cleaning more efficient compared to denture brushing with respect to prevention of biofilm formation on removable acrylic dentures?
- What is the effect of overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet on biofilm formation on mechanically cleaned removable acrylic dentures?
Materials \& Methods
- Participants -number: 30 -Inclusion criteria: Institutionalised frail elder Fully edentulous in lower and upper jaw Removable denture wearer in lower and upper jaw Good oral health -Exclusion criteria: Current or history of corticosteroid treatment within the 3 months prior to the study Current or history of antimicrobial treatment within the 3 months prior to the study Inability to provide informed consent Inability to comply with the study requirements
- Test conditions Denture cleaning method Denture overnight storage condition 1Brushing with water and soap Immersion in water with a cleansing tablet 2Brushing with water and soap Immersion in water without a cleansing tablet (= neg control) 3Ultrasonic cleaning Immersion in water with a cleansing tablet 4Ultrasonic cleaning Immersion in water without a cleansing tablet
- This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (S54968, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium) and registered in the Belgian Clinical Trials database (Identifier: B322201316863).
- Study design -Cross-over study with randomized sequence of the 4 test conditions This implies that all 4 test conditions will be executed within each of the 30 study participants.
- The sequence of the test conditions for the individual participants will be randomized.
- Double blind (both the participants as well as the investigators do not know the test conditions)
- All test conditions will be applied for 5 days. This means that all patients will undergo 4 test periods of 5 days.
- Each test period will be preceded by a wash-out period of 2 days in which the standard of care will be applied. This standard of care is denture cleaning through brushing with water and soap and overnight storage in water.
- All dentures will be decalcified using vinegar prior to the start of the study.
- At the start of the study, all dentures will be mechanically cleaned by means of denture brushing and additional ultrasonic cleaning. After mechanical cleaning, the dentures will also be desinfected using a 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel (Corsodyl gel, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium).
- After mechanical denture cleaning and desinfection at the start of each test period, control samples (n=4) will be taken to evaluate the effectiveness of the cleaning and desinfection procedures.
- After each test period, test samples (n=4) will be taken
- The participants will be asked not to clean their dentures themselves. 2 care takers involved in the study will do the denture cleaning and will apply the appropriate overnight storage condition.
- Outcome measures:
Clinical health of the denture bearing mucosa Method: clinical evaluation Microbial analyses Method: qualitative and quantitative PCR analyses for 20 selected oral bacteria (Aa, Pg, Tf, Td, Pi, Fn, Pm, Pn, Cg, Cr, En, Ec, Cs, Cc, Sm, Sg, Sc, Ao, Av, Vp) and for Candida Albicans.
Biofilm sampling will be performed in a 5-mm diameter circular region of interest, situated bucco-distally to the lower second premolars (Figure 1). In order to standardize the position and dimensions of this region and to ensure optimal reproducibility of the microbial sampling, a custom-made mold of each lower prosthesis with placeholder rings will be made (Optosil®, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Hanau, Germany) (Figure 1). The placeholder rings will be placed in such a way that the transition between artificial teeth and gums is situated centrally. These molds will fabricated following denture disinfection at the start of the study, and will be re-used throughout the study because of the absence of dimensional changes over time when preserved properly (i.e. dry and in plastic bag). The molds and rings will be desinfected after each microbial sampling.
Denture plaque score Method: Denture plaque will be scored independently by 2 investigators using 4% erythrosine disclosing solution according to Augsburger and Elahi [22] (score range 0-4)
•Study protocol Time point Action Microbial sampling Day 0 (morning) calculus removal using vinegar mechanical denture cleaning ° Day 0-2 standard of carei Day 3 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control sample 1* Day 3-7 test period 1 Day 7 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 1 Day 8-9 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 10 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control sample 2* Day 10-14 test period 2 Day 14 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 2 Day 15-16 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 17 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control 3* Day 17-21 test period 3 Day 21 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 3 Day 22-23 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 24 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control 4* Day 24-28 test period 4 Day 28 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii END OF THE STUDY test sample 4
°mechanical denture cleaning: brushing with water and soap + additional ultrasonic cleaning i standard of care: denture brushing with water and soap and overnight storage in tab water iidesinfection with 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel (Corsodyl gel, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium)
*control sampling: after mechanical cleaning and desinfection
**test sampling: before mechanical cleaning desinfection
- Conditions
- Denture Hygiene
- Being tested
- denture brushing with water and soap, ultrasonic denture cleaning, cleansing tablet
- Keywords
- dentures hygiene, biofilm formation, oral health
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
denture brushing with water and soapOther
denture brushing with water and soap
ultrasonic denture cleaningOther
ultrasonic denture cleaning
cleansing tabletOther
addition of a cleansing tablet to the water in which the dentures are stored overnight
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| brush + water | Sham comparator | denture brushing with water and soap + overnight storage in water Receives: Other: denture brushing with water and soap |
| brush + cleansing tablet | Active comparator | denture brushing with water and soap + overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet Receives: Other: denture brushing with water and soap; Other: cleansing tablet |
| ultrasonic cleaning + water | Sham comparator | ultrasonic denture cleaning + overnight storage in water Receives: Other: ultrasonic denture cleaning |
| ultrasonic cleaning + cleansing tablet | Active comparator | ultrasonic denture cleaning + overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet Receives: Other: ultrasonic denture cleaning; Other: cleansing tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biofilm (quantity and quality) on the removable acrylic denture
Measured: sample taken at day 5 of the test period
Secondary outcomes (1)
Oral health status
Measured: oral health control at day 5 of the test period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Denture HygieneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joke Duyck, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Investigators
- Joke JA Duyck, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02454413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 27 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci. 2007;64(4):180-9. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2007.11732784.
PubMed 18236742Que YA, Moreillon P. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jun;8(6):322-36. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.43. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PubMed 21487430Raghavendran K, Mylotte JM, Scannapieco FA. Nursing home-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: the contribution of dental biofilms and periodontal inflammation. Periodontol 2000. 2007;44:164-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00206.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 17474932El-Solh AA. Association between pneumonia and oral care in nursing home residents. Lung. 2011 Jun;189(3):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9297-0. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
PubMed 21533635Scannapieco FA. Pneumonia in nonambulatory patients. The role of oral bacteria and oral hygiene. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Oct;137 Suppl:21S-25S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0400.
PubMed 17012732Pace CC, McCullough GH. The association between oral microorgansims and aspiration pneumonia in the institutionalized elderly: review and recommendations. Dysphagia. 2010 Dec;25(4):307-22. doi: 10.1007/s00455-010-9298-9. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
PubMed 20824288Senpuku H, Sogame A, Inoshita E, Tsuha Y, Miyazaki H, Hanada N. Systemic diseases in association with microbial species in oral biofilm from elderly requiring care. Gerontology. 2003 Sep-Oct;49(5):301-9. doi: 10.1159/000071711.
PubMed 12920350Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, Lakshmanan A, Wade WG. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5002-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-10. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
PubMed 20656903Mager DL, Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Distribution of selected bacterial species on intraoral surfaces. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jul;30(7):644-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00376.x.
PubMed 12834503Theilade E, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Theilade J. Predominant cultivable microflora of plaque on removable dentures in patients with healthy oral mucosa. Arch Oral Biol. 1983;28(8):675-80. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(83)90101-2.
PubMed 6579900Moore TC, Smith DE, Kenny GE. Sanitization of dentures by several denture hygiene methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Aug;52(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90087-8.
PubMed 6381698Koopmans AS, Kippuw N, de Graaff J. Bacterial involvement in denture-induced stomatitis. J Dent Res. 1988 Sep;67(9):1246-50. doi: 10.1177/00220345880670091901.
PubMed 3166009Chan EC, Iugovaz I, Siboo R, Bilyk M, Barolet R, Amsel R, Wooley C, Klitorinos A. Comparison of two popular methods for removal and killing of bacteria from dentures. J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Dec;57(12):937-9.
PubMed 1760779Kononen E, Asikainen S, Alaluusua S, Kononen M, Summanen P, Kanervo A, Jousimies-Somer H. Are certain oral pathogens part of normal oral flora in denture-wearing edentulous subjects? Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1991 Apr;6(2):119-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1991.tb00463.x.
PubMed 1945487Campos MS, Marchini L, Bernardes LA, Paulino LC, Nobrega FG. Biofilm microbial communities of denture stomatitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008 Oct;23(5):419-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00445.x.
PubMed 18793366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF CLEANING METHODS AND OVERNIGHT DENTURE STORAGE ON BIOFILM FORMATION ON REMOVABLE ACRYLIC DENTURES.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02454413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2
- Conditions
- Denture Hygiene
- Keywords
- dentures hygiene, biofilm formation, oral health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical guidelines for denture care are available, but evidence for optimal nocturnal storage is missing. The investigators (Duyck J., Vandamme K., Teughels W.) therefore performed a study (submitted for publication) to evaluate the effect of different overnight storage protocols on denture biofilm formation and maturation. The results of this study showed that the use of cleansing tablets (Corega Tabs Anti-bacteria®, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium) for acrylic removable denture overnight storage reduces denture biofilm mass and pathogenicity compared to dry and water preservation. As no mechanical denture cleaning was performed in the aforementioned study, the aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and overnight storage condition on the microbial composition and Candida albicans colonization of denture biofilm formation. This information is required to develop a clinical guideline on acrylic denture cleaning and overnight storage aiming to reduce the risk posed by pathogenic microorganisms, particularly in bedridden and immunocompromised patients.
It is hypothetised that mechanical denture cleaning will decrease the impact of overnight denture storage condition on biofilm formation on acrylic removable dentures.
Detailed description
Aim of the study
The presence of a biofilm - i.e. structured microbial communities that are attached to a surface and encased in an exopolymer matrix - on acrylic removable dentures has been associated with serious systemic conditions, especially in the dependent elderly [1]. Oral bacteria have been implicated in bacterial endocarditis [2], aspiration pneumonia [3, 4], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [5, 6], amongst other diseases [1, 7]. Ample evidence is provided regarding the relationship between proper oral hygiene and overall systemic health.
Plaque on dentures is a complex aggregate containing more than 108 organisms per milligram, and involving more than 600 prokaryote species [8]. The different species collaborate to form a symbiotic biofilm. The biofilms in dentate patients have been studied extensively, but there have been few studies on the biofilm microbiota of complete acrylic dentures [10-18]. It appears that distinct biofilms, with associated pathogenic risks, are present in 'healthy' versus denture stomatitis affected participants [15, 16, 18]. Not only poor denture cleaning but also inappropriate habits, such as wearing dentures overnight have proved to be associated with the prevalence of Candida-associated stomatitis [19, 20]. Therefore, the overnight removal of the acrylic removable dentures is advised in clinical settings. Although evidence-based guidelines for denture care and maintenance are available [21], guidelines for nocturnal storage conditions of dentures are missing. The investigators therefore performed a study (submitted for publication) to evaluate the effect of different overnight storage protocols on denture biofilm formation and maturation. The results of this study showed that the use of cleansing tablets (Corega Tabs Anti-bacteria®, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium) for acrylic removable denture overnight storage reduces denture biofilm mass and pathogenicity compared to dry and water preservation.
As no mechanical denture cleaning was performed in the aforementioned study, the aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and overnight storage condition on the microbial composition and Candida albicans colonization of denture biofilm formation. This information is required to develop a clinical guideline on acrylic denture cleaning and overnight storage aiming to reduce the risk posed by pathogenic microorganisms, particularly in bedridden and immunocompromised patients.
Research questions
•What is the effect of mechanical cleaning on biofilm formation on removable acrylic dentures?
- Is ultrasonic cleaning more efficient compared to denture brushing with respect to prevention of biofilm formation on removable acrylic dentures?
- What is the effect of overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet on biofilm formation on mechanically cleaned removable acrylic dentures?
Materials \& Methods
- Participants -number: 30 -Inclusion criteria: Institutionalised frail elder Fully edentulous in lower and upper jaw Removable denture wearer in lower and upper jaw Good oral health -Exclusion criteria: Current or history of corticosteroid treatment within the 3 months prior to the study Current or history of antimicrobial treatment within the 3 months prior to the study Inability to provide informed consent Inability to comply with the study requirements
- Test conditions Denture cleaning method Denture overnight storage condition 1Brushing with water and soap Immersion in water with a cleansing tablet 2Brushing with water and soap Immersion in water without a cleansing tablet (= neg control) 3Ultrasonic cleaning Immersion in water with a cleansing tablet 4Ultrasonic cleaning Immersion in water without a cleansing tablet
- This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (S54968, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium) and registered in the Belgian Clinical Trials database (Identifier: B322201316863).
- Study design -Cross-over study with randomized sequence of the 4 test conditions This implies that all 4 test conditions will be executed within each of the 30 study participants.
- The sequence of the test conditions for the individual participants will be randomized.
- Double blind (both the participants as well as the investigators do not know the test conditions)
- All test conditions will be applied for 5 days. This means that all patients will undergo 4 test periods of 5 days.
- Each test period will be preceded by a wash-out period of 2 days in which the standard of care will be applied. This standard of care is denture cleaning through brushing with water and soap and overnight storage in water.
- All dentures will be decalcified using vinegar prior to the start of the study.
- At the start of the study, all dentures will be mechanically cleaned by means of denture brushing and additional ultrasonic cleaning. After mechanical cleaning, the dentures will also be desinfected using a 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel (Corsodyl gel, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium).
- After mechanical denture cleaning and desinfection at the start of each test period, control samples (n=4) will be taken to evaluate the effectiveness of the cleaning and desinfection procedures.
- After each test period, test samples (n=4) will be taken
- The participants will be asked not to clean their dentures themselves. 2 care takers involved in the study will do the denture cleaning and will apply the appropriate overnight storage condition.
- Outcome measures:
Clinical health of the denture bearing mucosa Method: clinical evaluation Microbial analyses Method: qualitative and quantitative PCR analyses for 20 selected oral bacteria (Aa, Pg, Tf, Td, Pi, Fn, Pm, Pn, Cg, Cr, En, Ec, Cs, Cc, Sm, Sg, Sc, Ao, Av, Vp) and for Candida Albicans.
Biofilm sampling will be performed in a 5-mm diameter circular region of interest, situated bucco-distally to the lower second premolars (Figure 1). In order to standardize the position and dimensions of this region and to ensure optimal reproducibility of the microbial sampling, a custom-made mold of each lower prosthesis with placeholder rings will be made (Optosil®, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Hanau, Germany) (Figure 1). The placeholder rings will be placed in such a way that the transition between artificial teeth and gums is situated centrally. These molds will fabricated following denture disinfection at the start of the study, and will be re-used throughout the study because of the absence of dimensional changes over time when preserved properly (i.e. dry and in plastic bag). The molds and rings will be desinfected after each microbial sampling.
Denture plaque score Method: Denture plaque will be scored independently by 2 investigators using 4% erythrosine disclosing solution according to Augsburger and Elahi [22] (score range 0-4)
•Study protocol Time point Action Microbial sampling Day 0 (morning) calculus removal using vinegar mechanical denture cleaning ° Day 0-2 standard of carei Day 3 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control sample 1* Day 3-7 test period 1 Day 7 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 1 Day 8-9 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 10 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control sample 2* Day 10-14 test period 2 Day 14 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 2 Day 15-16 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 17 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control 3* Day 17-21 test period 3 Day 21 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii test sample 3 Day 22-23 standard of carei (wash-out period) Day 24 (morning) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii control 4* Day 24-28 test period 4 Day 28 (evening) Mechanical denture cleaning° and desinfectionii END OF THE STUDY test sample 4
°mechanical denture cleaning: brushing with water and soap + additional ultrasonic cleaning i standard of care: denture brushing with water and soap and overnight storage in tab water iidesinfection with 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel (Corsodyl gel, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare SA, Genval, Belgium)
*control sampling: after mechanical cleaning and desinfection
**test sampling: before mechanical cleaning desinfection
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| brush + water | Sham comparator | Other: denture brushing with water and soapdenture brushing with water and soap + overnight storage in water |
| brush + cleansing tablet | Active comparator | Other: denture brushing with water and soap, Other: cleansing tabletdenture brushing with water and soap + overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet |
| ultrasonic cleaning + water | Sham comparator | Other: ultrasonic denture cleaningultrasonic denture cleaning + overnight storage in water |
| ultrasonic cleaning + cleansing tablet | Active comparator | Other: ultrasonic denture cleaning, Other: cleansing tabletultrasonic denture cleaning + overnight storage in water with a cleansing tablet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Institutionalised frail elder
- Fully edentulous in lower and upper jaw
- Removable denture wearer in lower and upper jaw
- Good oral health
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Current or history of corticosteroid treatment within the 3 months prior to the study
- Current or history of antimicrobial treatment within the 3 months prior to the study
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Inability to comply with the study requirements
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| denture brushing with water and soapdenture brushing with water and soap | Other | brush + cleansing tablet, brush + water |
| ultrasonic denture cleaningultrasonic denture cleaning | Other | ultrasonic cleaning + cleansing tablet, ultrasonic cleaning + water |
| cleansing tabletaddition of a cleansing tablet to the water in which the dentures are stored overnight | Other | brush + cleansing tablet, ultrasonic cleaning + cleansing tablet |
Primary outcome
Biofilm (quantity and quality) on the removable acrylic denture
Time frame: sample taken at day 5 of the test period
1 secondary outcome
Oral health status
Time frame: oral health control at day 5 of the test period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 18236742Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci. 2007;64(4):180-9. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2007.11732784.
- Background: PubMed 21487430Que YA, Moreillon P. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jun;8(6):322-36. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.43. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 17474932Raghavendran K, Mylotte JM, Scannapieco FA. Nursing home-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: the contribution of dental biofilms and periodontal inflammation. Periodontol 2000. 2007;44:164-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00206.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21533635El-Solh AA. Association between pneumonia and oral care in nursing home residents. Lung. 2011 Jun;189(3):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9297-0. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 17012732Scannapieco FA. Pneumonia in nonambulatory patients. The role of oral bacteria and oral hygiene. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Oct;137 Suppl:21S-25S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0400.
- Background: PubMed 20824288Pace CC, McCullough GH. The association between oral microorgansims and aspiration pneumonia in the institutionalized elderly: review and recommendations. Dysphagia. 2010 Dec;25(4):307-22. doi: 10.1007/s00455-010-9298-9. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 12920350Senpuku H, Sogame A, Inoshita E, Tsuha Y, Miyazaki H, Hanada N. Systemic diseases in association with microbial species in oral biofilm from elderly requiring care. Gerontology. 2003 Sep-Oct;49(5):301-9. doi: 10.1159/000071711.
- Background: PubMed 20656903Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, Lakshmanan A, Wade WG. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):5002-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-10. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 12834503Mager DL, Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Distribution of selected bacterial species on intraoral surfaces. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jul;30(7):644-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00376.x.
- Background: PubMed 6579900Theilade E, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Theilade J. Predominant cultivable microflora of plaque on removable dentures in patients with healthy oral mucosa. Arch Oral Biol. 1983;28(8):675-80. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(83)90101-2.
- Background: PubMed 6381698Moore TC, Smith DE, Kenny GE. Sanitization of dentures by several denture hygiene methods. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Aug;52(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90087-8.
- Background: PubMed 3166009Koopmans AS, Kippuw N, de Graaff J. Bacterial involvement in denture-induced stomatitis. J Dent Res. 1988 Sep;67(9):1246-50. doi: 10.1177/00220345880670091901.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joke JA Duyck, PhD principal investigator
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing denture brushing with water and soap, ultrasonic denture cleaning and cleansing tablet in people with Denture Hygiene, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biofilm (quantity and quality) on the removable acrylic denture (time frame: sample taken at day 5 of the test period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02454413, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2015.