Gastric CancerNCT02454673
Therapeutic Individualization for Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancer
An observational study of Gastric Cancer and Effects of Chemotherapy, run by Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the R0 rate, pathological response degree, patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes may be initially predicted in patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer treated with a neoadjuvant approach and salvage surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer, Effects of Chemotherapy, Surgery
- How many people
- 121 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma gastric cancer for a neoadjuvant protocol consisting of preoperative chemotherapy or induction chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery. Patients must have a medically fit condition to complete the protocol. Initial staging comprises a thoracic and abdominal computerised tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound endoscopy (EUS), biopsy and blood test including blood cell count, hepatic and renal function. Radiological and endoscopic evaluations are performed at baseline and at the completion of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Blood tests are acquired at baseline, before each chemotherapy course and concurrently with evaluations. Blood tests are also obtained during follow-up and at the time progression.
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal cancer
- Age ≥18 years old
- Performance Status- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1
- Body mass index ≥ 18
- No prior chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
- TNM stage of T3-T4 and/or positive regional lymph nodes (N+) by endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography (CT)
- No evidence of metastasis (M0)
- Adequate hematological, liver and renal functions (ALT and AST≤2.5 UNL, total bilirubin ≤1.5 UNL, and serum creatinine ≤1.5 UNL)
Who cannot join
- Patients with previous (less than 10 years) or current history of malignant neoplasms, except for curatively treated
- Patients with evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
- Medically unfit for chemotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Approximation to the Therapeutic Individualization in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancer Through Modelling and Generation of Predictive Gene Signatures
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the R0 rate, pathological response degree, patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes may be initially predicted in patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer treated with a neoadjuvant approach and salvage surgery.
Read the detailed description
Patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer with T3-4 and/or N+ are included. Initially, patients are diagnosed by computerized tomography scan and endoscopic ultrasound. The neoadjuvant strategy consisted of 3-4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (group A) or 3-4 courses of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group B). Chemoradiotherapy comprised weekly chemotherapy concurrently with daily external beam radiotherapy up to 45 Gy). Surgery is scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after the end of CRT. Pathological response is graded according to the Becker criteria. Statistical analysis is performed IBM SPSS v20. Nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) modelling is applied to evaluate the impact of dynamic changes in tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the clinical outcome of these patients.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Effects of Chemotherapy, Surgery
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, Neoadjuvant therapy, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Nonlinear Dynamics
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | * 3-4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy * Surgery | |
| Group B | * 3-4 cycles of induction chemotherapy * Radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for 5 weeks * Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the period from diagnosis until death (from any cause). Nonlinear mixed effects population modelling to evaluate the impact in clinical outcome of dynamic markers as tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR).
Measured: From date of diagnosis until death, assessed up to 10 years
Disease Free Survival
DFS was defined as the time from diagnosis to the first date of local or distant cancer. Nonlinear mixed effects population modelling to evaluate the impact in clinical outcome of dynamic markers as tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR).
Measured: From date of diagnosis until treatment failure, assessed up to 10 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Pathological Response at the Time of Surgery
Specimen analysis according to TNM classification. Pathological complete response is defined as no invasive cancer cells in the surgical specimen.
Measured: Weeks 10 to 28
R0 Resection rate at the Time of Surgery
The R0 resection rate after the neoadjuvant protocol. R0 is defined as a microscopically margin-negative resection, in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the primary tumor bed.
Measured: Weeks 10 to 28
Tumor Regression Grade at the Time of Surgery
Estimate of tumor regression grade at the time of surgery according to Becker Criteria: Grade 1a, No residual tumor; Grade 1b, <10% residual tumor; Grade 2, 10-50% residual tumor; Grade 3, >50% residual tumor.
Measured: Weeks 10 to 28
Lymph nodes response at the Time of Surgery
Participants were assessed for node-negative lymph nodes at the time of surgery according to TNM classification. Node-negative (pN0) participants had no regional lymph node metastasis.
Measured: Weeks 10 to 28
Estimate of TN Change From Baseline to Surgery
Estimate of TN change due to neoadjuvant treatment is defined as the estimate of the evidence of downstaging between baseline and surgery
Measured: Weeks 10 to 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionMar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Javier Rodriguez Rodriguez, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Clinica Universidad de Navarra
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02454673
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CUN-GCNMEM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 22 May 2015
- Last updated
- 27 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531.
PubMed 16822992Xiong BH, Cheng Y, Ma L, Zhang CQ. An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Invest. 2014 Jul;32(6):272-84. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2014.911877. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24800782Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Langer P, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Bitzer M, Konigsrainer A, Budach W, Wilke H. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0506. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
PubMed 19139439Carton E, Caldwell MT, McDonald G, Rama D, Tanner WA, Reynolds JV. Specialized intestinal metaplasia in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2000 Jan;87(1):116-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01322.x.
PubMed 10606922Moehler M, Baltin CT, Ebert M, Fischbach W, Gockel I, Grenacher L, Holscher AH, Lordick F, Malfertheiner P, Messmann H, Meyer HJ, Palmqvist A, Rocken C, Schuhmacher C, Stahl M, Stuschke M, Vieth M, Wittekind C, Wagner D, Monig SP. International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):550-63. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
PubMed 25192931Lee S, Oh SY, Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim MC, Kim KH, Kim HJ. Prognostic significance of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 22;13:350. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-350.
PubMed 23876227
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Approximation to the Therapeutic Individualization in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancer Through Modelling and Generation of Predictive Gene Signatures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02454673
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CUN-GCNMEM
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Effects of Chemotherapy, Surgery
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, Neoadjuvant therapy, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Nonlinear Dynamics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the R0 rate, pathological response degree, patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes may be initially predicted in patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer treated with a neoadjuvant approach and salvage surgery.
Detailed description
Patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer with T3-4 and/or N+ are included. Initially, patients are diagnosed by computerized tomography scan and endoscopic ultrasound. The neoadjuvant strategy consisted of 3-4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (group A) or 3-4 courses of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group B). Chemoradiotherapy comprised weekly chemotherapy concurrently with daily external beam radiotherapy up to 45 Gy). Surgery is scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after the end of CRT. Pathological response is graded according to the Becker criteria. Statistical analysis is performed IBM SPSS v20. Nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) modelling is applied to evaluate the impact of dynamic changes in tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the clinical outcome of these patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | – | –* 3-4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy * Surgery |
| Group B | – | –* 3-4 cycles of induction chemotherapy * Radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for 5 weeks * Surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma gastric cancer for a neoadjuvant protocol consisting of preoperative chemotherapy or induction chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery. Patients must have a medically fit condition to complete the protocol. Initial staging comprises a thoracic and abdominal computerised tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound endoscopy (EUS), biopsy and blood test including blood cell count, hepatic and renal function. Radiological and endoscopic evaluations are performed at baseline and at the completion of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Blood tests are acquired at baseline, before each chemotherapy course and concurrently with evaluations. Blood tests are also obtained during follow-up and at the time progression.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal cancer
- Age ≥18 years old
- Performance Status- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1
- Body mass index ≥ 18
- No prior chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with previous (less than 10 years) or current history of malignant neoplasms, except for curatively treated
- Patients with evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
- Medically unfit for chemotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of diagnosis until death, assessed up to 10 years
Overall survival was defined as the period from diagnosis until death (from any cause). Nonlinear mixed effects population modelling to evaluate the impact in clinical outcome of dynamic markers as tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR).
Disease Free Survival
Time frame: From date of diagnosis until treatment failure, assessed up to 10 years
DFS was defined as the time from diagnosis to the first date of local or distant cancer. Nonlinear mixed effects population modelling to evaluate the impact in clinical outcome of dynamic markers as tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR).
5 secondary outcomes
Pathological Response at the Time of Surgery
Time frame: Weeks 10 to 28
R0 Resection rate at the Time of Surgery
Time frame: Weeks 10 to 28
Tumor Regression Grade at the Time of Surgery
Time frame: Weeks 10 to 28
Lymph nodes response at the Time of Surgery
Time frame: Weeks 10 to 28
Estimate of TN Change From Baseline to Surgery
Time frame: Weeks 10 to 28
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 16822992Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531.
- Background: PubMed 24800782Xiong BH, Cheng Y, Ma L, Zhang CQ. An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Invest. 2014 Jul;32(6):272-84. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2014.911877. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 19139439Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Langer P, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Bitzer M, Konigsrainer A, Budach W, Wilke H. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0506. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 10606922Carton E, Caldwell MT, McDonald G, Rama D, Tanner WA, Reynolds JV. Specialized intestinal metaplasia in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2000 Jan;87(1):116-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01322.x.
- Background: PubMed 25192931Moehler M, Baltin CT, Ebert M, Fischbach W, Gockel I, Grenacher L, Holscher AH, Lordick F, Malfertheiner P, Messmann H, Meyer HJ, Palmqvist A, Rocken C, Schuhmacher C, Stahl M, Stuschke M, Vieth M, Wittekind C, Wagner D, Monig SP. International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):550-63. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 23876227Lee S, Oh SY, Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim MC, Kim KH, Kim HJ. Prognostic significance of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 22;13:350. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-350.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Javier Rodriguez Rodriguez, MD, PhD principal investigator
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastric Cancer and Effects of Chemotherapy, run by Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: From date of diagnosis until death, assessed up to 10 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02454673, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2015.